Connect with us

News

Alleged Terrorism: Kanu declines to enter defence, insists no case against him

Published

on

We're working underground to free Nnamdi Kanu – Deputy Speaker
Nnamdi Kanu, IPOB Leader
Spread the love

The detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has abandoned his earlier plan to call witnesses in his defence in his ongoing trial for alleged terrorism offences.

Kanu told a Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday that he has realised that there was no valid charge against him and that evidence led so far have not established any case against him to require the he enter a defence.

The court had on October 24 adjourned till October 27 for Kanu to open his defence. Kanu had written the court, indicating his intention to call witnesses and applied for witness summons.

At the day’s hearing, Counsel for the Prosecution, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) announced appearance, along with some other lawyers.

Kanu also announced his name and said he was representing himself, following which Awomolo reminded the court that the business of the day was for the defendant to open his defence.

Maduka College Advert

Responding, Kanu stood up in the dock and said he had gone through the case files and found that there was actually no charge against him.

He argued that there is no extant law in the country on which the prosecution could premise its case, adding: “There is no case against me. If there is no case against me, it will be futile for me to enter any defence.”

At that point Justice James Omotosho intervened and took time to explain to the defendant that in a criminal trial, the defendant only has three options after the prosecution has closed its case.

Justice Omotosho said the first option was for the defendant to make a no-case submission and when overruled, the defendant is then required to enter a defence.

He said where a defendant chose not to open his/her defence or conduct any defence at all, such a defendant can decide to rest on the prosecution’s case, and then file a written address, to which the prosecution will be required to reply and the court delivers judgment.

After listening to the judge’s explanation, Kanu said: “my position is that there is no charge against me. There is no need for me to enter a defence. What I’m saying is that there is no case against me.”

The judge then reminded him that he had earlier ruled on Kanu’s no-case submission and held that he has a case to answer. The judge said that ruling still subsists.

Kanu then applied to the court for a week adjournment to enable him file a written address to support why he insisted that no valid charge was pending against him, arguing that he was subjective to needless trial and determination.

Responding, Awomolo said from what the defendant has said and the option he has taken, the court should adjourn for judgment.

Awomolo said: “I take it that the defendant said he is not putting in any defence, because there is no valid charge against him.

“I want to submit that this position is conclusive of the defendant’s defence. I know that he took a plea to counts against him and he pleaded not guilty.
We led evidence and he cross-examined our witnesses.

“Now that he said he has no defence, the case has been brought to a close,” Awomolo said and urged the court to adjourn for judgment right away.

Awomolo noted that at this stage, there is only one option for the defendant, adding that if he (Kanu) takes his objection as his defence, the prosecution will respond and the court will give its judgment subsequently.

The prosecuting lawyer said the option chosen by Kanu implies that he has opted to address the court on pont of law as his defence in the case.

In his intervention, Justice Omotosho noted that the defendant is not outrightly saying he has no defence, but that the charge against him cannot be.

He added: “That is also a defence. In that case, he will have to put that down in a written submission that will be served on the prosecution, who will also respond.”

The judge then proceeded to advise Kanu to consult experts before he decides on how to proceed henceforth.

Justice Omotosho said: “There is need for you (Kanu) to consult people, who are knowledgeable in criminal prosecution to advise you on how to proceed.

“I am begging you in the name of God Almighty, to consult properly. I am inclined to grant you the adjournment you seek.
I am inclined to give him the opportunity to consult those, who are knowledgeable in criminal law.

“I know you are educated, but you are not a lawyer, you need to consult experts in the field. Please make adequate consultation. This is not economics. This is criminal prosecution.

“Please, my brother, make adequate consultation. Criminal cases are not like every other cases. I took the opportunity to explain to the defendant because he is not a lawyer,” he said.

The judge added that he has a duty to explain to the defendant the consequences of his decision not to enter a defence.

Justice Omotosho said after Kanu sacked his lawyers, he had wanted to refer the case to the Legal Aid Council or any lawyer, who was willing to take the case pro bono, but the defendant refused and said he was going to defend himself.

“Even at that, I still have a duty to explain the consequences of his option to him because he is not a lawyer. Please, make consultation,” the judge said.

The judge then gave Kanu four days from Monday within which he should file his written address and serve on the prosecution to enable the prosecution file it’s reply.

He adjourned till November 4, 5 and 6 for either the adoption of the written addresses or for Kanu to open his defence should he chose to change his mind.

News

Anambra Police Arrest Suspect Over Murder of 23-Year-Old Woman in Uga

Published

on

Anambra PPRO, SP Tochukwu Ikenga
Spread the love

The Anambra State Police Command has arrested a man, identified as Chima Ofoeke, over the suspected murder of 23-year-old Mmesoma Umeorini in Uga, Aguata Local Government Area of the state.

The arrest followed a report by the deceased’s mother to the Divisional Police Officer (DPO) of Umuchu Division that her daughter had been missing since October 16, 2026, despite efforts to locate her.

According to the police, operatives, working with members of the Agunechemba security outfit in Uga, apprehended the suspect following intelligence-led information.

The suspect was identified as the deceased’s alleged former boyfriend.

Maduka College Advert

During preliminary interrogation, Ofoeke allegedly confessed to killing the young woman following the breakdown of their relationship. He reportedly led detectives to the location where her remains were discovered and recovered.

Following the development, the Commissioner of Police in Anambra State, CP Nnanna Oji Ama, has directed that the case be transferred to the State Criminal Investigation Department (SCID), Awka, for a thorough investigation.

The police said the investigation would establish the full circumstances surrounding the incident and ensure that justice was served.

The command reiterated its commitment to protecting lives and property, urging residents to promptly report missing persons and suspicious activities to the appropriate authorities.

It added that further information would be made available as the investigation progresses.

Continue Reading

News

Mbah: Why We Built 268 Smart Green Schools Across Enugu State

Published

on

Governor Peter Mbah at the Townhall meeting in Enugu
Spread the love

…Assures defects will be addressed

…Threatens to blacklist contractors over defects

Enugu State Governor, Dr Peter Mbah, has defended the construction of 268 smart green schools across the state, assuring residents that structural defects and other challenges identified in some facilities will be addressed.

Mbah gave the assurance during a town hall meeting, where he explained that the state government deliberately adopted an accelerated approach to the construction of the schools to ensure that every child in Enugu had access to quality education.

According to the governor, the scale of the projects delivered within three years would ordinarily take between 10 and 20 years to accomplish under conventional implementation timelines.

He acknowledged that the speed of execution had resulted in some teething problems, including defects in certain buildings and roofing challenges, but maintained that the government was committed to ensuring that all the facilities were fit for purpose.

“When you have fast-tracked projects at that scale, you are bound to have teething problems, and we are not oblivious of it,” he said, adding that the government was resolved to address the identified shortcomings.

Maduka College Advert

Mbah explained that the decision to build 268 smart green schools was driven by the administration’s determination to expand access to quality education rather than concentrate resources on a few model institutions.

Participants at the Town Hall meeting

He said the government could have opted to construct only three smart schools, one in each senatorial zone, or 17 schools across the state, but chose a broader approach to reach more children.

“We said every child in this state must have access to quality learning, and we did 268 smart green schools,” the governor stated.

He stressed that the administration would not abandon the projects because of the defects identified, adding that corrective measures were already part of the government’s response.

The governor’s remarks come amid concerns over defects reported in some of the newly constructed school facilities.

He maintained that the administration remained committed to ensuring that the projects delivered their intended educational benefits to pupils across Enugu State.

Mbah Threatens to Blacklist Contractors Over Defective School Projects

Governor Mbah also  warned contractors handling the state’s smart green school projects that they will face consequences for failing to address defects in their work.

Mbah gave the warning while responding to questions about structural defects and other problems reported in some of the 268 smart green schools constructed by his administration.

The governor said the government had records of the contractors responsible for the projects and would require those whose work was found defective to return to their sites and carry out necessary repairs.

He, however, warned that contractors who refused to comply with the government’s directives would be blacklisted.

“For those that have been recalcitrant, we blacklist. And there are consequences for that,” he said.

Mbah explained that although the projects were executed on an accelerated timeline to expand access to quality education, the fast-tracked approach did not absolve contractors of responsibility for the quality of their work.

He also disclosed that the government obtained advance payment guarantees from the contractors, providing an additional mechanism for enforcing compliance where necessary.

“We do have an option to call those up if it becomes necessary,” the governor said, referring to the guarantees.

The administration has come under scrutiny over reported defects in some of the newly constructed school buildings, including roofing and other structural concerns.

Mbah acknowledged the existence of such challenges but described them as issues the government was determined to resolve.

He said the overriding objective was to ensure that all the smart green schools were fit for purpose and capable of providing the learning environment intended by the state government.

The governor’s comments signal the administration’s intention to hold contractors accountable while continuing its investment in education infrastructure across Enugu State.

Continue Reading

News

UBA Commences Contempt Proceedings Against WEMPCO Directors over Alleged Disobidence of Court Order

Published

on

Mr. Lewis Tung and his brother Robert Tung
Spread the love

The Federal High Court, presided over by Honourable Justice Aluko, has granted an application by United Bank for Africa (UBA) Plc for substituted service of Form 49 on directors of Wempco named as alleged contemnors in the case of UBA v. Wempco.

The application forms part of proceedings seeking to determine whether the named individuals disobeyed an order of the court and whether they should be committed to prison for contempt.

The directors named as alleged contemnors are Lewis Shui Ngor Tung, Phillip Shui Chei Tung, M.A. Ola Yusuf, Tung Lawrence Blake, Aali Aare Hadji Tokunbo, Paul Shui Po Tung, Tung Robert, C.L. Ip and Taiwo Alli.

In advancing the application, counsel to UBA argued that service of Form 49 on the alleged contemnors was necessary to enable them to appear before the court and show cause why an order of committal should not be made against them.

He also argued that the Directors of Wempco and some members of staff took illegal steps in an attempt to disobey the Order of Court.

Maduka College Advert

The court’s decision to grant substituted service provides a procedural step towards bringing the notice to the attention of the individuals concerned in accordance with the court’s directions.

Form 49 is a notice requiring an alleged contemnor to show cause why an order of committal to prison should not be made against them for alleged disobedience of a court order.

The Federal High Court had earlier made an Order of Mareva Injunction and appointed a Receiver/Manager over some of the Assets of Wempco following the indebtedness of Wempco to UBA in the sum of N61,445,695,993.76 (Sixty One Billion FourHundred and Forty-Five Million Six Hundred and Ninety Five Thousand, Nine Hundred and Ninety Three Naira, Seventy Six Kobo).

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert