Connect with us

International

Real Estate firm sues Botswana lawyer, K.P. Tamocha, over alleged property scam

Published

on

Kagisano Peace Tamocha
Spread the love
…seeks President Boko, Botswana Law Society’s intervention

A popular Botswana lawyer, Kagisano Peace Tamocha has been dragged to court by a Real Estate Development company, MAART Homes (Proprietary) Limited in Botswana for allegedly defrauding it of the sum of P600,000 Pula,  about US$60,000, resulting from a fraudulent property sale scam.

The company claimed in the paper filed before the High Court of the Republic of Botswana sitting at Gaborone, copies of which were made available to The Advocate News Online, that the lawyer (Tamocha) fraudulently facilitated the sale of a plot of land identified as “Lot 57561 Gaborone” to the firm without the knowledge of the owner.

The plaintiff, MAART Homes (Proprietary) Limited represented by one of its Directors, Mrs. T. C. Tigelo said the company has also made a passionate appeal to Botswana President, Duma Gideon Boko, a renowned legal luminary and a Senior Advocate, and Law Society of Botswana for urgent intervention in order to ensure the protection of the rights.

According to the papers filed in court, Tamocha through his law firm, had advertised the land, Lot 57561 Gaborone, for sale at P750,000 which prompted MAART Homes to indicate interest and went ahead to enter into a contract with the lawyer who claimed to be representing the rightful owner, Eng Sealogane Mpotokwane (Eng).

The fake ID of the purported seller

The company said in the motion filed by its counsel, M. K. Moesi & Co of Gaborone, that on or about 6th June 2025, Tamocha drafted an agreement between it and Eng Sealogane Mpotokwane (Eng) to make a deposit of the sum of P600,000 as a condition to commence development of the said property “to the standard for which it can be transferred.”

Maduka College Advert

The plaintiff told the court that after making the payment of P600,000 as agreed, the lawyer delayed issuance of the title deed for about a week while he was busy moving the money from his trust account with the First National Bank where it was lodged.

He later released only three pages out of the 12-page title deed and withheld the remaining pages insisting that the three pages which did not include the front and back pages and other critical parts containing vital information about the property, were enough to conduct a search on the property.

Following pressure from the plaintiff’s counsel, Tamocha released what he claimed was the original title document with which the plaintiff conducted a search and managed to locate Eng who denied being involved in selling her property and in particular denied knowledge or being a party to the sale agreement purportedly produced by Tamocha.

It was at this point that the plaintiff and lawyers confirmed that the sale agreement and the title deed “were null and void and/or fraudulent because they were founded on a forged document,” adding that the person who presented herself as the owner of the property was not the real owner.

According to the plaintiff, he later obtained the “original” title deed which had the ID of the owner of the property’s face different from the person who appeared before him as the seller.

In the course of the search, the plaintiff further discovered that the same Tamocha had earlier on 29th January 2025 received into his trust account the sum of P300,000 from Welcome Enterprises (Pty) Ltd being deposit for the same Plot No. 57561, Gaborone, the same property he sold to the plaintiff with forged documents.

Following the observed discrepancies, it became clear that the agreement between the plaintiff and Eng “is null and void and unlawful”, hence his decision to approach the court to seek redress.  The plaintiff is therefore claiming from the defendant, the P600,000 he paid for the property with interest of 10 percent per annum with effect from 6th June 2025 to date of the payment in addition to P112,000 expenses incurred when he mobilized to the site to commence development.

“The defendant is therefore liable to pay to Plaintiff the said amount of P712,000 which is due and payable,” the plaintiff claimed, informing the court that despite proper and lawful demand, the defendant had refused, neglected or failed to pay the amount.

In addition to seeking redress in court, Mrs. T. C. Tigelo, a director of the defrauded company, MAART Homes (Proprietary) Limited, told The Advocate Online, that they have decided to appeal to President Boko and the Botswana Law Society to call the legal practitioner (K. P. Tamocha) to order and help to secure the refund of the money in his possession.

She said: “ We are appealing to the president of Botswana, concerned authorities including the Law Society of Botwana, Judiciary and the parliament to look into the criminal activities of the lawyer called Kaisano Peace Tamocha.

“Unfortunately, this lawyer advertised a plot for sale through an agent and other means of communicating with people when you have a property you are disposing, his agent contacted us that the plot is available for sale and the particular place he advertised the property is at a highbrow area in Gaborone Botswana called Block 10. After advertising the plot, it happened that there is a woman he used in staging the fraud.

“The woman came out to claim that she is the owner of the plot with fake ID of the original owner of the plot. She answered the same name of the original owner of the plot, used the same date of birth, place of birth and the same Identification number of the original owner on OMANG.  The difference between her and the original owner is the picture on the ID.  The picture of the original owner and her own on the ID were not the same.

“The ministry has confirmed that the title deed he gave to us is fake.  The law society of Botswana disciplinary committee meeting will hold this July and we are expecting them to look into the complaint formally lodged with the Department of fraud and financial crime department, which investigation is ongoing.

“The police have not arrested him hence our crying out now to the office of the president and the law society among others to ensure our rights are protected.”

Meanwhile, the legal process is ongoing at the court.

International

$300bn reconstruction aid, sanctions lift’ – US-Iran MoU details emerge

Published

on

Spread the love

The following is the text of the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding, as read out by a senior US official to reporters on Wednesday:

“The United States of America and Islamic Republic of Iran have jointly agreed in good faith on (a date yet to be determined, the official said), on the following:

“Paragraph 1 – The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran and their allies in the current war, by signing this MOU, declare an immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and other provisions of this paragraph.

“Paragraph 2 – The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.

“Paragraph 3 – The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran commit to negotiating and achieving the final deal in maximum 60 days extendable with mutual consent.

“Paragraph 4 – Immediately upon the signing of this MOU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.

Maduka College Advert

“Paragraph 5 – Upon the signing of this MOU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman, and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles, and de-mining by the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz, in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states, in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.

“Paragraph 6 – The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive mutually agreed plan with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required licenses, waivers, and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States of America.

“Paragraph 7 – The United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the United Nations Security Council resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the critical importance of the sanctions termination issue above mentioned, and express their intentions to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.

“Paragraph 8 – The Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpiled enriched material pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in Paragraph 7, with the minimum methodology to be down-blending on site under the supervision of the IAEA. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear needs, based on a satisfactory framework being agreed upon in the final deal. The final deal will confirm the provisions of this paragraph. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran acknowledge the critical importance of the nuclear issues above mentioned, and express their intention to immediately address these issues in the negotiation in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.

“Paragraph 9 – Pending the final deal, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree to maintain the status quo. The Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program, and the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions, and will not deploy additional forces in the region.

“Paragraph 10 – The United States of America undertakes that immediately upon the signing of this MOU, and until the termination of sanctions, US Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, transportation, etc.

“Paragraph 11 – The United States of America undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran upon the implementation of this MOU. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds during the negotiations. Such funds, whether retained in the original account or transferred, shall be made fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designated by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America undertakes to issue all necessary licenses and authorizations accordingly.

“Paragraph 12 – The United States of America and Islamic Republic of Iran agree that an executive mechanism will be established to monitor the successful implementation of this MOU and the future compliance of the final deal.

“Paragraph 13 – After signing this MOU and subject to the beginning of the implementation of Paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10 and 11 of this MOU, and the continuing implementation of these measures, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal exclusively on the other paragraphs.

“Paragraph 14 – The final deal will be endorsed by a binding UNSC resolution.”

Continue Reading

International

Iran threatens retaliation, says US strikes violated ceasefire

Published

on

US President Donald Trump
Spread the love

Iran’s foreign ministry on Tuesday accused the United States of violating a fragile ceasefire during the past 48 hours in the southern coastal province of Hormozgan, without specifying the incident.

The accusation comes after US Central Command said its forces had on Monday attacked missile sites and boats in southern Iran that were trying to lay mines in the Gulf, while Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said it fired at US aircraft trying to enter its airspace.

“The US terrorist army, continuing its illegal and unjustified actions since the ceasefire… has, in the past 48 hours, committed a gross violation of the ceasefire in the Hormozgan region,” the Iranian foreign ministry said in a statement.

It added that Tehran “will not leave any evil unanswered and will not hesitate to defend the Iranian nation,” without elaborating.

Tuesday’s statement came as a top Iranian delegation was in Qatar for talks as part of a “diplomatic process” aimed at ending the war with the United States, which broke out on February 28

Continue Reading

International

Dozens of lranian fighters killed, as US resumes strike in Strait of Hormuz, targets IRGC Naval Boats in the Gulf

Published

on

Spread the love

U.S. fighter jets have reportedly struck IRGC naval boats in the Gulf after Iranian forces allegedly targeted a vessel near Bandar Abbas.

U.S. Central Command confirms “self-defense strikes” were carried out against Iranian boats and missile sites near the Strait of Hormuz amid rising tensions in the region.

It was stated that the numbers of dead has increased from 9 to 15, with dozens still missing while others remain injured.

According to emerging reports, the strikes targeted IRGC maritime assets and defensive positions during what rapidly escalated into a major military confrontation in the region. Rescue and emergency operations are said to be ongoing as authorities continue searching for missing personnel.

Iranian and regional media report heavy explosions and gunfire near Bandar Abbas, while negotiations between Washington and Tehran continue in Qatar.

Maduka College Advert

The situation is still developing, and some battlefield claims remain independently unverified.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert