Connect with us

News

Five Years After #EndSARS: Aisha Yesufu says Nigerian govt behaved like terrorist regime

Published

on

Aisha Yesufu
Spread the love
Political and civil rights activist Aisha Yesufu has described the Nigerian government’s handling of the October 20, 2020 #EndSARS protest as an act of state terrorism, saying the movement was “not a protest that died down, but one that was killed off with guns and bullets.”

Speaking on ARISE News on Monday, to mark five years since security forces opened fire on peaceful demonstrators at the Lekki Toll Gate in Lagos, Yesufu said the events of that night remain one of the darkest moments in Nigeria’s democratic history.

“It was killed off,” Yesufu said. “Guns were brought in, and military officers who should be protecting Nigerians and the territorial integrity of this nation decided to turn their guns on citizens — Nigerian youths who were merely reciting the national anthem and waving the Nigerian flag. It is heartbreaking that Nigeria could do this to its young ones.”

She said the #EndSARS shootings confirmed long-held fears among citizens that law enforcement officers could kill and face no consequences.

“On October 20th, 2020, we saw clearly that indeed, they can kill Nigerians and nothing would happen,” she said. “It’s so sad that the Nigerian government decided to behave like a terrorist government by killing its own citizens.”

Reflecting on her decision to join the protests, Yesufu explained that her participation was not driven by excitement but by a duty to protect young Nigerians facing police brutality.

“I came out because Nigerian youths were being attacked by the police,” she said. “I was there to give them moral support, to say, ‘If you’re going to shoot them, then you’ll have to put a bullet through me first.’ These were young people who were thriving despite the odds, being harassed simply because they had dreadlocks, laptops, or nice cars. That’s not a crime.”

Maduka College Advert

She recalled that the 2020 protests were not the first of their kind, noting that she had also joined similar demonstrations in 2017.

“When the 2020 protest began, I joined from the first day in Abuja,” she said. “The protesters owned it. They were organised. It was their protest, not anyone’s to control.”

Yesufu described the #EndSARS movement as “a protest of survivors” — distinct from earlier protests that were often born of empathy.

“It wasn’t people fighting on behalf of others,” she explained. “These were victims of police brutality, or people who had lost loved ones. They came out to fight for their own survival in their own country.”

According to her, the movement also revealed the government’s brutality to a younger generation that had never experienced military rule.

“Those of us who grew up during the military era were used to this kind of repression,” she said. “But many of the #EndSARS protesters were born after democracy returned. For the first time, they saw what government could do to its own citizens.”

Asked whether the protest achieved any lasting change, Yesufu said the movement transformed civic consciousness and political participation, even if immediate reforms were not achieved.

“Nation-building is a marathon, not a sprint,” she said. “Before #EndSARS, only a few of us spoke up. Today, many more voices are challenging injustice, especially from the younger generation. There’s more political awareness now than ever before.”

She credited the protests with sparking the political awakening that led to the 2023 “Obidient” movement.

“After #EndSARS, when politicians mocked the youths and said, ‘If you don’t like what we did, remove us,’ young people took up the challenge,” she said. “That spirit birthed the Obidient movement. Yes, the election was rigged, but the awareness remains — and that’s a win.”

Yesufu, however, said she has refused to join public demonstrations under the current administration, which she described as “illegitimate.”

“I’ve said since they came in, I won’t protest to a government I don’t believe should be there,” she said. “That would be legitimising illegitimacy.”

She condemned the continued use of force against peaceful protesters and the government’s misplaced priorities.

“You see helicopters hovering over innocent citizens exercising their constitutional right to protest,” she said. “Yet these same forces cannot go after terrorists and kidnappers who are terrorising Nigerians. It’s an anomaly.”

Responding to criticisms that the #EndSARS movement lacked leadership, Yesufu argued that its horizontal structure was strategic and effective.

“There was leadership — just not the traditional kind,” she said. “People were organising, crowdfunding, managing health and security. They learned from Occupy Nigeria, where identifying leaders made it easy for government to negotiate or neutralise them. With #EndSARS, if you took one person out, the protest went on.”

She urged Nigerians to understand that protests extend beyond the streets to the ballot box.

“Citizens must realise that protest is also political,” she said. “If you vote and don’t protect your vote, you didn’t really vote. We need to elect leaders with competence, character, capacity, and patriotism — people who respect the rule of law.”

Yesufu said the persistence of state repression stems from institutional capture and citizens’ failure to hold leaders accountable.

“Institutions have been captured,” she said. “Even when the judiciary gives orders, they’re ignored. Until citizens start demanding accountability — both in the streets and at the polls — we’ll keep having criminals in office who destroy the country just to stay in power.”

Despite the painful memories of October 2020, Yesufu said she remains hopeful that the resilience of Nigeria’s youth will eventually force change.

“Yes, it’s slow,” she said, “but the young generation has been emboldened. They’re taking on issues, speaking out, and pushing back. That’s how nations are built — one act of courage at a time.” (AriseTv)

News

ICPC: Why we detained ex-minister uche Nnaji

Published

on

Ex-Minister Uche Nnaji
Spread the love

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has disclosed that there are two main reasons a former Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Uche Nnaji, is being detained by the commission.

It also revealed that legal action was taken against the Enugu-born politician after he failed to honour several invitations extended to him through a letter referenced ICPC/HC/CSTF/GUN/GBT/T.1/VOLV16, and dated 15 May 2026.

John Odey, the spokesman of the commission in a statement on Wednesday explained that the commission later approached Federal High Court, Abuja Division, with the suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1160/2026) in order to effect Nnaji’s arrest after his failure to honour invitation.

Nnaji was arrested at the Akanu Ibiam International Airport, Enugu, when he boarded a private jet to Abuja.

Corroborating the development, the ICPC spokesman said Nnaji’s arrest was effected at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, upon his arrival where he was led to the commission’s custody immediately.

According to him, Nnaji is being probed on forgery of academic credentials, specifically concerning a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) and False National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) Discharge Certificate, which was submitted during his ministerial screening process in 2023.

Maduka College Advert

The statement read, “The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has arrested the immediate past Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Hon. Geoffrey Uchechukwu Nnaji (M), following the execution of a bench warrant issued by the Federal High Court of Nigeria.

“The arrest was effected on Wednesday, 1st July 2026 at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, upon Mr. Nnaji’s arrival.

“He was apprehended with the assistance of the Department of State Services (DSS) and subsequently handed over to the ICPC for further investigation.

“The Commission had earlier extended formal invitations to the former minister through a letter referenced ICPC/HC/CSTF/GUN/GBT/T.1/VOLV16, dated 15 May 2026.

“The invitation notices were duly served to his known addresses in Abuja and Enugu, as well as via his electronic mail address.

“Despite service through multiple channels, Mr. Nnaji failed to appear for investigative interviews on the scheduled dates, necessitating further legal action.

“The legal action followed a court order granted by the Federal High Court in the Abuja Judicial Division (Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1160/2026).

“The order, issued on 11 June 2026, directed the ICPC to arrest the former minister to enable investigation into allegations bordering on:

“Forgery of academic credentials, specifically concerning a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN); and “False National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) Discharge Certificate, which was submitted during his ministerial screening process in 2023.

“Following the arrest, Mr. Nnaji has been taken into custody at the ICPC headquarters in Abuja, where investigations are expected to continue. The Commission assures the public that the matter will be pursued diligently in accordance with the law.”

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: Ex-Minister Uche Nnaji arrested over alleged certificate forgery probe

Published

on

Uche Nnaji
Spread the love

The immediate past Minister of Science and Technology, Uche Nnaji, was arrested on Wednesday at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on arrival from Enugu via a chartered flight.

Authoritative sources at the airport confirmed the arrest to PREMIUM TIMES, saying Mr Nnaji would be handed over to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) for interrogation.

The reported arrest comes weeks after the Federal High Court reportedly granted the ICPC permission to arrest and investigate Nnaji over the allegations.

The court also authorised the anti-graft agency to declare him wanted through newspapers, social media platforms and other media channels after the commission alleged that he repeatedly failed to honour invitations for questioning.

According to the ICPC, its application to the court followed Nnaji’s alleged refusal to appear before investigators despite several invitations relating to the forgery allegations.

The case stems from a two-year investigation published by Premium Times in October last year, which alleged that Nnaji submitted forged University of Nigeria degree and National Youth Service Corps certificates during his ministerial screening and confirmation process in 2023.

Maduka College Advert

The report alleged that the documents were presented to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the Nigerian Senate, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and the State Security Service.

According to the publication, Nnaji later acknowledged that the University of Nigeria did not issue him the degree certificate in question, a development the newspaper said corroborated its investigation.Newspapers

The former minister had previously denied the existence of the court order authorising his arrest, dismissing the publication as a “media trial.”

However, on June 18, he reportedly filed an appeal before the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn the arrest order.

As of the time of filing this report, the ICPC had not issued an official statement confirming the reported arrest, while Nnaji’s legal team had yet to publicly respond to the latest development.

Continue Reading

News

Alleged Cybercrime: Court grants Sowore N200m bail, orders two sureties, passport surrender

Published

on

Omoyele Sowore
Spread the love

The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, restored the bail it had earlier granted to activist and presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore.

Sowore is facing a two-count cybercrime charge filed against him by the Department of State Services (DSS) for calling President Bola Tinubu a “criminal” in a social media post.

Trial Justice Muhammed Umar, who had earlier granted the defendant bail on self-recognisance, on June 16 revoked the bail and issued a warrant for his arrest.

The order came after Sowore failed to appear before the court for the continuation of his trial, even though he wrote a letter explaining his absence and requesting a new date.

When proceedings resumed in the case on June 22, Justice Umar ordered the remand of the defendant in Kuje prison.

Dissatisfied with the actions the court took against him, Sowore—whose legal team had initially withdrawn from the case over alleged bias by the judge—secured a new lawyer, who promptly filed a motion to restore his bail and quash the arrest warrant.

Maduka College Advert

When the case came up on Tuesday, Justice Umar held that he was minded to admit the defendant to bail.

However, the court listed some conditions that had to be met before he would be released from prison custody.

Aside from granting him bail to the tune of N200 million, the court held that the defendant must produce two sureties in like sum.

The court also ordered the defendant to surrender his international passport.

Related News
2027 Polls: Court orders INEC to register, grant access code to ADA wiithin 72 hours

NDC, Peter Obi, Sowore, Bolaji, Paul Ibe, PDP reject Lokoja court ruling
Sowore’s detention undermines fair trial, free speech — Gani Adams, Odumakin
Sowore, in the application he anchored on Sections 35(4), 36(1), and 66 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, as well as Sections 169 and 352 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, insisted that the orders the court made against him were unjust and unwarranted.

The defendant had, on December 2, 2025, pleaded not guilty to the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/484/2025, filed against him by the Department of State Services (DSS).

The charges allege offences under Sections 24(1)(b) and 24(2)(a), (b), and (c) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024.

The offending posts, made on August 25, 2025, were in response to President Tinubu’s claim, made in Brazil, that his administration had ended corruption in Nigeria.

Angered by the posts, the DSS demanded that X Inc. (formerly Twitter) and Meta Platforms Inc. ban Sowore’s accounts and remove the posts.

The security agency also wrote to Sowore, asking him to delete the posts from all platforms.

Non-compliance with the request led to the charges.

The prosecution claims the defamatory posts were intended to cause a breakdown of law and order and to tarnish the president’s reputation.

Exhibits include printouts of the posts and the DSS letters.

X Inc. and Meta were initially co-defendants but were delisted in the amended charge.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert