Connect with us

News

NELFUND, South-East, The Hypocrisy And Nonchalance

Published

on

Spread the love

By Samson Ezea

The Nigeria Education Loan Fund (NELFUND), the Federal Government of Nigeria’s institutional framework for providing interest-free student loans to Nigerians who need financial support to access higher education and skills training, is a welcome development, no matter how one views or interprets it, particularly as it concerns the South-East region and the manner in which the scheme has fared in the region.

It is an axiomatic fact that, for many years, the cost of tertiary education in Nigeria has created significant financial barriers for students, particularly those from low-income families. The idea behind a national student-loan system was to ensure that lack of money would not prevent a qualified Nigerian from pursuing higher education.
Before NELFUND, Nigeria had the Nigerian Education Bank framework, but the Federal Government eventually moved towards a dedicated student-loan system.

The major objective was to create a sustainable mechanism through which students could obtain financial support for their education and repay the loans later when they become economically productive.

The major breakthrough came under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in June 2023, when the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) Act, 2023 was enacted to provide interest-free loans to Nigerians seeking higher education. President Tinubu signed the original Student Loan Bill into law on June 12, 2023, amidst commendations, mixed feelings and scepticism, all of which were expected whenever governments introduce new laws, programmes and policies.

Maduka College Advert

The policy initiative was presented as a means of ensuring that no Nigerian student would be forced to abandon tertiary education simply because of an inability to pay school fees.
However, the 2023 law was not immediately operationalised in its original form. Several issues were identified concerning governance, eligibility, administration, application procedures, funding and repayment. This eventually led to the 2024 repeal and re-enactment of the law, giving birth to NELFUND as we know it today.

The Federal Government and the National Assembly subsequently reviewed the 2023 legislation, and President Tinubu signed the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) (Repeal and Re-enactment) Act, 2024, on April 3, 2024. This is the legislation that established NELFUND in its current institutional form.

The 2024 Act introduced several significant changes, including:
Establishing NELFUND as a body corporate capable of entering contracts and legally administering and recovering student loans.
Giving NELFUND responsibility for providing loans for tuition, institutional charges and upkeep.
Extending support beyond conventional university education to vocational and skills-acquisition programmes.
Removing the previous family-income threshold.
Removing the requirement for a guarantor.
Creating a Board of Directors and a professional management structure headed by a Managing Director.
Establishing a funding mechanism that includes 1% of taxes, levies and duties collected by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) accruing to the Federal Government.

From Legislation to Actual Student Loans

Following the 2024 Act, NELFUND moved from being primarily a legislative framework to an operational institution. The NELFUND student-loan portal was launched on May 24, 2024, and applications subsequently commenced for students in tertiary institutions across Nigeria. Loan disbursement commenced in February 2025, according to NELFUND’s official timeline.

The fundamental philosophy behind the scheme is simple: access to education first, repayment later. Rather than requiring students to have the money before entering or remaining in school, NELFUND provides financial support to enable eligible students to continue their education. The loans are interest-free, with repayment generally commencing when beneficiaries become gainfully employed and begin earning an income.
As beneficial, helpful and laudable as this policy programme is, particularly considering its potential to promote human capital development and unhindered access to higher education, it appears not to have received the level of awareness, campaigns, sensitisation and enlightenment it deserves across the country, especially in the South-East region.

This raises serious questions about the role of political leaders, clergymen, academics, parents, state governors, heads of tertiary institutions and National Assembly members in ensuring that their people take advantage of opportunities provided by the Federal Government.

Whether this situation is intentional, conspiratorial, hypocritical, political or simply an act of negligence is, to me, immaterial. What matters is that the money available under the scheme is Nigerian money. It is our collective patrimony. It does not belong to any particular geopolitical zone, political party, religion or ethnic group. It is our national cake, and every qualified Nigerian student has a legitimate right to benefit from it.

Why, therefore, is access to NELFUND apparently so low among students in South-East tertiary institutions?
Why are some South-East leaders, heads of tertiary institutions, lecturers, parents, clergymen and even students not talking sufficiently about the scheme or encouraging their children, wards and relatives to take advantage of it?
I know many people may wonder why I am writing in this manner. I am doing so out of genuine shock, disappointment and concern over what I witnessed recently.

I was privileged to accompany my boss, Senator Ikeje Asogwa, and other members of the National Assembly Joint Senate Committee on Tertiary Institutions and TETFund and the House of Representatives Committee on Student Loans, Scholarships and Higher Education Financing to the South-East National Sensitisation Programme on the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) at the Moot Auditorium, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus (UNEC).
The event brought together heads and leaders of tertiary institutions in the South-East, undergraduates, NELFUND officials and other stakeholders.

It was an incisive, interactive, expository, informative and revealing engagement.
What shocked me most was the revelation by one of the South-East senators, Senator Tony Nwoye, representing Anambra North Senatorial District, that the South-East region reportedly ranks lowest among Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones in the number of students accessing the NELFUND student loan.

According to the figures presented by Senator Nwoye and attributed to NELFUND, the reported figures were:
North-West — 450,000 beneficiaries
North-East — 378,103
South-West — 360,000
North-Central — 324,908
South-South — 198,000
South-East — 108,000

If these figures are accurate, then the situation is not only disappointing, but also calls for urgent intervention.
Senator Nwoye, visibly concerned by the development, challenged heads of tertiary institutions, clergymen, parents and students to embrace the policy. He reminded stakeholders that the fund belongs to Nigerians and is not the property of any political party, religion or ethnic group.His frustration was palpable.

Also speaking, the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Tertiary Institutions and NELFUND, Senator Dandutse Muntari Mohammed, appealed to stakeholders and students to embrace the scheme. He also disclosed that, as part of efforts to ensure adequate funding for NELFUND, l that proceeds from recovered assets and unclaimed dividends, among other sources, be channelled towards funding student loans.

I was deeply shocked by these revelations.
What is even more troubling is that I have yet to see any compelling reason why the South-East, despite its reputation for educational advancement and high literacy levels, should be at the bottom of the table in accessing an educational opportunity of this nature.

Since that event, I have been trying to understand why awareness and access to NELFUND appear to be relatively poor in the South-East, despite the potential relief the scheme can provide to students, parents and guardians.
I recently spoke with a cousin of mine studying at a federal university in the North-West. I asked him if he knew about NELFUND.
He said yes.
I asked whether he had ever benefited from it.
He told me that he had applied once and received upkeep support, while his institution’s charges were also covered, amounting to about ₦490,000 in total.
I then asked him why he had stopped accessing the scheme.
His response surprised me.
He said he was afraid that having a student loan could somehow affect his ability to travel overseas after graduation or create an obligation that could “hang over” him.

I had to educate him that such a fear, without evidence, should not prevent him from accessing a legitimate educational support programme. I asked him whether he believed that all the thousands of Nigerian students benefiting from NELFUND would automatically be prevented from travelling abroad after graduation.

The fundamental point is that a loan is a financial obligation, not a criminal record.
Students should, however, understand the terms and conditions of any loan they accept and comply with the applicable repayment requirements after graduation and employment.

I reminded him that the fund is Nigerian money, not APC money, not President Tinubu’s personal money, and certainly not Hausa, Igbo or Yoruba money.

It is a national student-loan programme established to support eligible Nigerian students.
There are undoubtedly many students across the South-East who may harbour similar misconceptions or simply lack adequate information about the scheme.

That is why our parents, political leaders, traditional and religious leaders, academics, university administrators, media practitioners and other stakeholders must urgently take the message of NELFUND to every corner of the region.

The politics and hypocrisy surrounding the avoidance or discouragement of our students from accessing NELFUND cannot benefit anyone.
It is time for the South-East to wake up from this apparent slumber and face reality.
We must stop viewing every policy of the Federal Government through the prism of partisan politics.
If a policy is good for our people, we should embrace it. If it has shortcomings, we should demand improvements. If there are legitimate concerns, we should raise them constructively.

But rejecting an opportunity simply because it was introduced by a government or political party we do not support is not leadership; it is self-inflicted deprivation.
NELFUND should not be regarded as an APC programme or a Bola Tinubu programme. It is a national policy designed to address a national problem.
The South-East cannot, on the one hand, complain about marginalisation and lack of opportunities while, on the other hand, failing to take advantage of opportunities that are already available to its students.
There is nothing wrong with scrutinising government policies. There is everything wrong with allowing political resentment, misinformation or indifference to prevent our children from accessing legitimate opportunities.
NELFUND is also, in many respects, more accessible than traditional scholarship programmes, which often have limited slots and stringent eligibility requirements.

A student-loan programme can potentially reach a much larger number of students who may otherwise struggle to finance their education.
And let us be honest: even in many developed countries, students take educational loans to finance their studies and repay them after graduation when they secure employment. What should matter is whether the terms are fair, transparent and sustainable.
South-East governors, members of the National Assembly, commissioners, local government leaders, university administrators, lecturers, religious leaders, traditional rulers, media organisations, student unions, parents and community organisations must intensify sensitisation about NELFUND.

Our universities and other eligible institutions should not merely wait for students to stumble upon information about the scheme. They should actively educate them about the application process, eligibility requirements, benefits and repayment obligations.
Our political leaders should put politics aside, when the welfare and future of our children are involved.
Our parents should ask questions.
Our students should seek information.
Our media should report the opportunities and also interrogate the challenges.
And our religious and community leaders should use their enormous platforms to educate young Nigerians.

The objective should not be to promote President Tinubu or any political party. The objective should be to ensure that no qualified South-East student misses an educational opportunity, because of ignorance, misinformation or unnecessary political sentiment.
The South-East has historically distinguished itself through education, enterprise, intellectual capacity and an extraordinary determination to succeed. It would therefore be a painful contradiction for a region celebrated for valuing education to rank last in accessing a national student-loan programme designed to make education more accessible.

We cannot continue to complain that our people are being excluded, while simultaneously failing to take advantage of opportunities available to them.
Education is too important to become a casualty of politics.
If NELFUND has weaknesses, let us expose them and demand reforms. If there are legitimate concerns about repayment, let us seek clarification and better safeguards. If students are inadequately informed, let us educate them. But let us not reject the opportunity itself because of who introduced it.
The question should no longer be “Who introduced NELFUND?”
The question should be:
“How can our children benefit from it?”
The fund belongs to Nigeria. The opportunity belongs to Nigerian students. The future belongs to our children.

Let us therefore put aside hypocrisy, misinformation, partisan sentiments and nonchalance.
Let the South-East wake up. Let our leaders speak. Let our institutions sensitise. Let our parents encourage. Let our students apply.
Because when politics ends, it is our children who will have to live with the consequences of the opportunities we either embraced or rejected today.
NELFUND is not about APC. It is not about PDP. It is not about North or South. It is about Nigerian students, Nigerian education and the future of Nigeria.

Our children must not be allowed to lose tomorrow because their parents and leaders failed to recognise the opportunity available to them today.

Ezea, Director, Media To Senator Ikeje Asogwa writes from Independence Layout, Enugu State

News

Fake agency sagas: Ministers, DGs face fresh hurdles over foreign trips

Published

on

Spread the love

The Federal Government has barred ministers, heads of ministries, departments and agencies and other government appointees from embarking on official foreign trips without prior approval from the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation.

The government also directed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to make evidence of valid approval from the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation a mandatory requirement for processing official travel documents, including official, diplomatic and service visas for government appointees.

The directive was contained in a circular signed by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, and addressed to top government officials and heads of major Federal Government institutions.

The move comes amid heightened scrutiny of government agencies and individuals claiming to represent the Federal Government, following the controversy surrounding the self-styled Director-General of the purported Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi.

The controversy has raised questions about how individuals claiming official status can undertake engagements in the name of Nigeria, including foreign engagements, without clear evidence of government authorisation.

Maduka College Advert

However, the latest directive is broader and applies to Federal Government appointees generally.

The circular, titled “Non-Compliance by Government Appointees with the Requirement for OSGF Approval for Official Foreign Trips and the Mandatory Inclusion of OSGF Approval in the Processing of Official Visas,” said the government had observed that some officials continued to embark on official foreign trips without obtaining the required clearance.

It stated, “It has been observed with concern that some Federal Government Appointees continue to embark on official foreign trips without obtaining prior approval from the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), contrary to extant government directives and established administrative procedures regulating official travels outside the country.”

The SGF recalled that the government had issued several circulars over the years to regulate official foreign travel by ministers, heads of ministries, departments and agencies, boards, committees and other public officials.

According to the circular, these directives were issued “with a view to promoting accountability, fiscal discipline and effective coordination of Government business.”

The circular listed a September 18, 2023, circular on “Guidelines for Official Travels by Cabinet Members, Heads of Agencies and Public Officials”, a March 31, 2015, circular on “Guidelines for Official Trips by Chairmen of Federal Government Committees, Boards of Corporations and Government-Owned Companies” and a September 27, 2017, circular on “Additional Cost Control Measures to Guide Foreign Trips by Ministers and Senior Government Officials.”

It also referenced a March 8, 2018, circular on “Observed Indifferent Adherence to Extant Regulations Guiding the Conduct of Foreign Trips by Public Officials” and a November 20, 2012, circular on “Further Cost-Cutting Measures and Fiscal Prudence on Travel by Cabinet Members.”

Despite the previous directives, the SGF said cases of non-compliance had persisted.

The circular stated, “Despite these directives, instances of non-compliance continue to be recorded.”

It warned that the development had broader implications for government administration, stating, “This trend undermines Government’s efforts to ensure proper coordination, accountability, transparency, prudent management of public resources and effective monitoring of official foreign engagements undertaken on behalf of the Federal Government of Nigeria.”

The government consequently reaffirmed the requirement for prior clearance.

The circular stated, “Accordingly, all official foreign trips undertaken by Federal Government appointees shall continue to require prior approval from the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation before such trips are undertaken, except where otherwise expressly provided by law or by specific Presidential directive.”

It added, “This requirement is consistent with the principles of due process, centralised coordination of government business and prudent management of public resources, as reflected in the Public Service Rules, 2021 Edition, the Financial Regulations (Revised Edition, January 2009) and other extant Government directives.”

As part of the immediate measures to strengthen compliance, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been directed to ensure that evidence of OSGF approval forms part of the documentation required for official foreign travel.

The circular directed that “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs shall include evidence of valid OSGF approval, where applicable, as a mandatory requirement in the processing of requests for official Notes Verbales, diplomatic facilitation and all applications relating to official foreign travel by Government Appointees.”

The ministry was further directed to communicate the requirement to foreign missions and embassies operating in Nigeria.

It stated, “The ministry is further requested to formally communicate this requirement to all Foreign Missions and Embassies accredited to the Federal Republic of Nigeria, advising that applications for Official, Diplomatic or Service Visas by Government Appointees should, where applicable, be accompanied by duly issued OSGF travel approval as part of the mandatory supporting documentation.”

The new measure therefore gives foreign missions an additional means of verifying whether a Nigerian government official travelling on official business has received the required authorisation.

The Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation was also assigned responsibility for checking compliance with the directive during audit exercises.

According to the circular, “The Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation shall require every government appointee who undertook an official foreign trip at public expense to produce evidence of the requisite OSGF approval during audit exercises.”

The government further warned that public funds spent on unauthorised foreign trips would be subject to scrutiny.

It stated, “Any expenditure incurred in respect of official foreign travel undertaken without the required approval shall be reported appropriately in accordance with extant Financial Regulations and applicable audit procedures.”

The directive also places a direct responsibility on accounting officers and heads of Federal Government institutions to prevent the processing of public funds for unauthorised trips.

It stated, “Accounting Officers, Permanent Secretaries, Chief Executive Officers and Heads of Federal Government Agencies shall ensure that no expenditure relating to official foreign travel by government appointees is processed unless the requisite OSGF approval has first been obtained.”

The SGF consequently directed all ministers, permanent secretaries, accounting officers and heads of ministries, departments and agencies to ensure compliance.

The circular stated, “All Honourable Ministers, Permanent Secretaries, Accounting Officers and Heads of Ministries, Departments and Agencies are hereby directed to ensure strict compliance with the provisions of this Circular.”

It further stated that the directive was effective immediately, declaring, “This circular takes immediate effect and supersedes any administrative practice inconsistent with its provisions, without prejudice to existing extant regulations governing official foreign travel.”

The circular was addressed to the Chief of Staff to the President; Deputy Chief of Staff to the Vice President; all Honourable Ministers and Ministers of State; Head of the Civil Service of the Federation; National Security Adviser; Economic Adviser to the President; Special Advisers and Senior Special Assistants.

It was also addressed to the Chief of Defence Staff, Service Chiefs and Inspector-General of Police; Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria; Chairman, Federal Civil Service Commission; Chairman, Police Service Commission; Chairman, Code of Conduct Bureau; Chairman, Code of Conduct Tribunal; Chairman, Federal Character Commission; Chairman, Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission; Chairman, Federal Inland Revenue Service; Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission; Chairman, National Population Commission; Chairman, Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission; Chairman, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and Chairman, National Drug Law Enforcement Agency.

Other recipients listed in the circular were all permanent secretaries and Heads of Extra-Ministerial Departments; Clerk of the National Assembly; Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court of Nigeria; Accountant-General of the Federation; Auditor-General for the Federation; and Directors-General and Chief Executives of Parastatals, Agencies and Government-Owned Companies.

The breadth of the recipients means the directive covers ministers, senior political appointees, permanent secretaries, security chiefs, heads of regulatory and anti-corruption bodies, electoral institutions, financial institutions, government agencies and government-owned companies.

The development is coming against the backdrop of the controversy over the purported PFIPC, which has drawn attention to the need for stronger verification of individuals and organisations claiming to represent the Federal Government.

The purported PFIPC and its self-styled Director-General, Adeyemi, have been at the centre of investigations into alleged impersonation and the use of questionable government documents.

The matter has also raised concerns about how purported government officials could engage public institutions and foreign entities while claiming to represent Nigeria.

The latest directive, however, does not single out the purported PFIPC or Adeyemi.

Instead, it establishes a general requirement that government appointees must obtain central approval before undertaking official foreign engagements.

By directing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to demand evidence of OSGF approval, the government is also creating a formal verification mechanism for foreign missions processing travel documents for Nigerian officials.

The financial provisions of the circular further link official travel approval to accountability for public expenditure, as accounting officers have been directed not to process expenses relating to foreign trips unless the required approval has been obtained.

The measures are expected to strengthen the Federal Government’s control over official foreign engagements, reduce unauthorised travel and ensure that persons travelling abroad in the name of the government have the necessary approval to represent Nigeria. (PUNCH)

Continue Reading

News

NOUN bursar shot dead in Zamfara

Published

on

Nasiru Marafa
Spread the love

Nasiru Marafa, the bursar of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), is dead.

Oladipo Ajayi, NOUN registrar and secretary to council, announced Marafa’s death in a statement on Sunday, saying he was reportedly shot while returning from Gusau, Zamfara state capital.

“The Vice-Chancellor, on behalf of the Governing Council, Management, Senate, Staff and Students of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), regrets to announce the sudden and untimely passing of the University Bursar, Mallam Nasiru Gusau Marafa, which occurred today, Sunday, 6th September 2026,” the statement reads.

“According to information available to the University, Mallam Nasiru Gusau Marafa was reportedly shot while returning from Gusau.”

Marafa was appointed bursar of the university on September 17, 2022, for a five-year tenure scheduled to end in September 2027.

Maduka College Advert

Ajayi described the deceased as a dedicated and committed staff member of the university, who served the institution meritoriously and occupied various positions of responsibility during his career.

He said Marafa’s demise is a profound loss to the university community, describing him as “a distinguished colleague, dedicated administrator and valued member of the NOUN family.”

The registrar extended the university’s condolences to Marafa’s immediate family, relatives, friends, colleagues and others mourning his death.

He also said further information on the burial arrangements would be communicated once details are released by the family.

“May the Almighty Allah forgive his shortcomings, grant him Al-Jannah Firdaus, and grant his family, friends, colleagues and the entire University community the strength to bear this painful loss,” the statement added.

Continue Reading

News

Enugu CP receives Best Crime Bursting police chief award , SP Ndukwe best PRO

Published

on

CP Giwa receiving the Best Crime Bursting Police Chief in West Africa award
Spread the love

The Commissioner of Police, Enugu State Command, CP Mamman Bitrus Giwa, has received the 2025 Best Crime Busting Police Chief in West Africa award, just as the Command’s Police Public Relations Officer (PPRO), SP Daniel Ndukwe, bags the Best Police Public Relations Officer in Nigeria award.

 Both awards were presented to them weekend by the Security Watch Africa Initiative.

Presenting the awards at the State Command Headquarters, GRA, Enugu, the International Coordinator and Chief Executive Officer of the Initiative, Patrick Agbambu, said the recipients were selected following a review of their respective policing antecedents and professional contributions in Enugu State.

He urged CP Giwa to sustain his proactive approach to crime prevention and combating, while encouraging the PPRO to maintain his strategic and effective police-public relations activities.

Responding, CP Giwa expressed appreciation to the organizers for the recognition, attributing his achievements in Enugu State to Almighty God and the support of the State Government, law-abiding citizens and other stakeholders. SP Ndukwe also appreciated the organizers and dedicated the award to Almighty God, CP Giwa and the people of Enugu State for their continued support.

Maduka College Advert

The awards were presented as part of the 19th Africa Security Watch Awards, following the 19th Africa Security Watch Conference held in July 2026 at the Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara International Conference Centre, Banjul, The Gambia.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert