
Uncategorized
Atiku reaffirms 2027 ambition after Court clears Mark-Led ADC
The Federal High Court, Abuja on Thursday affirmed David Mark’s leadership of the opposition African Democratic Congress, a ruling the party welcomed even as former Vice‑President Atiku Abubakar said he would continue his pursuit of the 2027 presidency.
Atiku described the judgment, which dismissed a suit filed by a member of the House of Representatives, Leke Abejide, as victory for constitutional democracy and a rejection of attempts to use the judiciary for political ends.
Delivering judgment on Thursday, Justice Musa Liman upheld the preliminary objections raised by the ADC, its former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu, Mark, and the party’s National Secretary, Rauf Aregbesola.
The judge held that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter because it bordered on the internal affairs of a political party, which he described as non-justiciable.
Justice Liman also ruled that Abejide lacked the legal standing to institute the suit, having failed to demonstrate how his rights were violated by the emergence of the current ADC leadership.

He further held that the lawmaker did not exhaust the party’s internal dispute resolution mechanism before approaching the court.
The judge equally resolved the issues raised in the substantive suit in favour of the defendants.
On the legality of the emergence of Mark and Aregbesola as the party’s leaders, Justice Liman held that the transfer of leadership by Nwosu did not contravene the ADC constitution.
He held that the July 2, 2025, stakeholders’ meeting, where Nwosu handed over the party’s leadership, preceded the National Executive Committee meeting of July 29, 2025, which formally produced Mark and Aregbesola as the party’s national chairman and national secretary, respectively, under the supervision of the Independent National Electoral Commission.
The court declared that the emergence of the duo complied with the ADC constitution and the Electoral Act, 2026, and subsequently awarded costs of N2m each in favour of the defendants against Abejide.
It also ordered Abejide’s counsel to pay N10m as costs pursuant to the provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026.
Abejide had, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1637/2025 and filed on February 15, sued the ADC, Nwosu, Mark, Aregbesola and INEC, seeking to nullify the July 2, 2025, handover of the party’s leadership.
Among other reliefs, he sought an order restraining Mark and Aregbesola from parading themselves as National Chairman and National Secretary respectively, and an injunction stopping INEC from recognising them as ADC leaders.
He argued that their emergence did not comply with the party’s constitution and relevant provisions of the Electoral Act.
Reacting in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku said the court deserved commendation for upholding legal principles on jurisdiction, locus standi, and internal party dispute mechanisms.
“The court could not have been clearer. It rightly held that the matter borders on the internal affairs of the ADC, that the Federal High Court lacks jurisdiction, and that the plaintiffs neither exhausted the internal remedies provided by the party’s constitution nor established the locus standi required to invoke the jurisdiction of the court.
“We commend Justice Liman for refusing to allow the judiciary to be converted into an extension of partisan political warfare,” he said.
Atiku described the judgment as a boost for the rule of law amid what he called sustained pressure on opposition parties.
“We are particularly encouraged because this judgment comes at a time when certain desperate elements operating from the corridors of power have sought, through every conceivable means, to destabilise the opposition and frustrate the growing aspirations of millions of Nigerians who desire democratic change,” he said.
He alleged attempts to weaken opposition politics through litigation and institutional manipulation, insisting that the judiciary remained the last hope of the common man.
Atiku also defended the legitimacy of the David Mark-led National Working Committee, saying it emerged through a lawful and transparent process.
“The David Mark-led National Working Committee emerged through a lawful and transparent process in accordance with the constitution of our great party.
“No amount of forum shopping or judicial adventurism can alter that fact,” he said.
He urged party members to remain united and committed to strengthening democratic institutions, adding that the ADC remained a credible alternative ahead of future elections.
The suit came amid ongoing political realignments within the opposition following the adoption of the ADC as a coalition platform ahead of the 2027 general election.
We’re vindicated — Mark
Meanwhile, the National Chairman of ADC, Senator David Mark, has described the Federal High Court judgment affirming his leadership of the party as a major victory for democracy and the rule of law.
Mark said the decision, which upheld the legitimacy of the party’s NWC and ordered the INEC to recognise its leadership, vindicated the ADC’s longstanding position on constitutional democracy and the rights of political parties to operate without interference.
In a statement issued by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Kola Ologbondiyan, the former Senate President said the judgment marked another important milestone in Nigeria’s democratic evolution.
“From the outset, we had maintained that democracy can only thrive when political parties operate without intimidation, undue interference, or attempts to undermine legitimate opposition.
“Today’s judgment has reaffirmed that no individual or institution is above the law and that the judiciary remains the ultimate guardian of our constitutional order,” Mark said.
He commended the judiciary for what he described as its courage, impartiality and commitment to justice.
“The judgment is a triumph of truth and the democratic aspirations of the Nigerian people,” he added.
He reaffirmed the ADC’s commitment to constitutionalism, the rule of law and democratic governance, pledging that the party would continue to provide credible opposition at a critical period in the country’s political development.
According to him, the significance of the judgment extends beyond the fortunes of the ADC.
“This is not just a victory for our party; it is a victory for democracy, justice, and every Nigerian who believes in a vibrant political system where ideas compete freely and the will of the people ultimately prevails,” he added.
Mark urged party members, supporters and Nigerians to remain united and committed to strengthening democratic institutions through peaceful political participation.
“As the party moves forward, I call on all members, supporters and other well-meaning Nigerians to remain united, focused and committed to building a stronger, more inclusive and prosperous nation through peaceful democratic engagement,” he added.
ADC responds
In its reaction, the ADC described the ruling as a possible indication of imminent end to judicial manipulation by elements bent on truncating the nation’s democracy.
The National Publicity Secretary of the party, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi in a statement issued on Thursday, said the judgment reinforced the party’s longstanding position that issues relating to its leadership remained internal matters and were not justiciable under the Electoral Act, 2022.
“The judgment once again, affirms our clear position that the issue of leadership remains an internal affair of the party and is therefore not justiciable, especially in the light of the Electoral Act, 2026.
“It also confirms that the emergence of the current leadership of our great party, led by Senator David Mark, was carried out in accordance with the law and the Constitution of the ADC,” he said.
The opposition party said it hoped the ruling would bring an end to what it described as repeated attempts to destabilise it through litigation.
“While we view this ruling as yet another victory for multiparty democracy in Nigeria, it is our hope that this judgment will help bring to an end all the unnecessary distractions and attempts at judicial manipulation by those who are hell-bent on destabilising the opposition and foisting a one-party rule on the country,” Abdullahi added.
The party maintained that its attention remained on providing alternatives to the policies of the ruling party rather than responding to what it termed ‘contrived legal challenges.’
“At a time when millions of Nigerians are confronted daily with worsening insecurity, an unbearable cost of living, rising unemployment and declining economic opportunities, our responsibility as a serious opposition party is to present practical solutions as alternatives to the people, not to be bogged down by contrived legal challenges,” the statement read in part.
The ADC also commended Justice Liman for what it described as his courage in upholding the law, particularly noting the sanctions imposed on the plaintiff and his legal representatives.
“We commend the courage shown by the presiding judge in standing firmly on the side of justice. We commend, especially, the judge’s decision to award fines against the plaintiff and his lawyers, hoping that this measure will serve as a deterrent to those who may want to pursue such frivolous actions in the future,” Abdullahi stated.
He thanked party members and supporters for remaining steadfast throughout the legal contest, urging them to remain united as the party pursues its political objectives.
The latest judgment is one in a series of court cases instituted to challenge the leadership of the ADC following the emergence of former Senate President David Mark as the head of the party’s National Working Committee.
The leadership transition, which followed a restructuring of the party aimed at strengthening its opposition profile ahead of future elections, has attracted a number of legal challenges from aggrieved members questioning the process that produced the current national officers.
In recent months, however, the ADC has consistently maintained that the changes in its leadership complied with the provisions of its constitution and applicable electoral laws. The party has also argued that disputes arising from the selection of its officers are matters of internal party administration, which the courts have repeatedly held to be outside judicial intervention except in circumstances specifically provided by law.
The latest judgment is one of several legal challenges instituted since the ADC unveiled Senator Mark as the leader of its new NWC following the party’s reorganisation.
The restructuring, which was accompanied by the appointment of former Osun State governor Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary and the emergence of a new leadership team, came as the party positioned itself as a major platform for opposition politicians ahead of the 2027 general election.
The development, however, triggered a wave of litigation by some party members seeking to stop the new leadership from taking control of the party.
In one of the earlier suits, a Federal High Court in Abuja declined to grant an ex parte application seeking to restrain INEC from recognising the Mark-led executive.
The court instead directed the parties to put the defendants on notice before hearing the application.
Another suit sought to invalidate the outcome of the party’s National Executive Committee meeting that ushered in the current leadership, with the plaintiffs contending that the process violated the party’s constitution. The ADC insisted throughout the proceedings that the decisions were taken in accordance with its constitution and that the courts lacked jurisdiction over matters relating to its internal administration.
The party has consistently argued that disputes over the emergence of its officers are internal affairs, adding that aggrieved members must first exhaust the dispute resolution mechanisms provided under the ADC Constitution before approaching the courts.
Justice Liman’s ruling appears to have reinforced this position.
Apart from holding that the plaintiff lacked the locus standi to institute the action, the court ruled that the dispute was not a pre-election matter, that it related to the internal affairs of the party, and that the plaintiff failed to exhaust the party’s internal remedies before filing the suit.
The ruling is expected to bolster the legal standing of the Mark-led NWC, as it not only struck out the suit for lack of jurisdiction but also directed INEC to recognise the party’s current national officers.
Uncategorized
NSCDC orders probe as 40 illegal miners die in custody
The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps has commenced an investigation into the deaths of some suspected illegal miners arrested during enforcement operations in Niger State.
The suspects were arrested during coordinated operations conducted by the Niger State Command in the M.I. Wushishi/Lukoto axis on September 15 and 16, 2026, as part of efforts to curb illegal mining activities in the state.
The development followed reports that no fewer than 33 suspected illegal miners were feared dead after being detained at an NSCDC facility in Minna.
The deaths were reportedly discovered in the early hours of Thursday, with the Niger State Commandant, Suberu Aniviye, attributing them to a suspected outbreak of disease.
However, the NSCDC National Headquarters said the cause of the deaths had yet to be established, stressing that reports linking them to any specific disease remained subject to medical and laboratory confirmation.

In a statement on Thursday, the Corps’ National Public Relations Officer, Babawale Afolabi, said the Commandant General, Ahmed Abubakar Audi, had directed the constitution of a high-powered investigative team to determine the circumstances surrounding the deaths.
Afolabi said the team, to be led by the Deputy Commandant General in charge of Intelligence and Investigation, had been mandated to conduct a comprehensive inquiry into the incident.
According to him, the investigation would cover the condition of the suspects upon arrest, their period in custody, the conditions of detention, medical attention provided to them and other circumstances surrounding the deaths.
The statement partly read, “NSCDC has confirmed the death of some suspected illegal miners who were arrested during enforcement operations conducted in parts of Niger State on September 15 and 16, 2026.
“Following the development, the Commandant General, Ahmed Abubakar Audi, has directed the constitution of a high-powered investigative team, led by the Deputy Commandant General in charge of Intelligence and Investigation, to immediately look into the circumstances surrounding the incident.
“The team has been mandated to undertake a comprehensive investigation into the circumstances leading to the deaths, including the condition of the suspects upon arrest, their period in custody, the conditions of detention, medical attention provided, and other relevant circumstances surrounding the incident.”
Afolabi also directed that the health and welfare of all persons currently in custody be prioritised, while measures were being taken to protect personnel who might have had contact with the affected persons.
The Corps expressed condolences to the families of the deceased and assured them that the circumstances surrounding the incident would be thoroughly investigated and appropriately addressed based on established facts.
Afolabi added, “The NSCDC wishes to clarify that reports attributing the deaths to any specific disease remain subject to medical and laboratory confirmation. The Corps will therefore refrain from speculation until the outcome of the medical examination is established.
“The Corps extends its condolences to the families of the deceased and assures them that the circumstances surrounding the incident will be thoroughly investigated and appropriately addressed based on established facts.”
Uncategorized
Gunmen kill popular politician
A popular Enugu State politician, Prince Ikechukwu Oloto, also known as Okanga Moo, has reportedly been killed by unknown gunmen in Nsukka Local Government Area of the state.
Oloto was allegedly attacked at his residence in the Odenigbo area of Nsukka on Thursday evening.
The attackers reportedly invaded the politician’s home and killed him during the incident.
The reports also alleged that a knife was used in the attack.
Details surrounding the killing remain unclear, as the circumstances that led to the incident have not been fully established.

The identities of the attackers and their motive were also unknown as of the time of filing the report.
The death was also reported by social media influencer, Sen. Chijinkem Ugwuanyi, in a Facebook post.
Ugwuanyi said the politician was killed at his residence in Odenigbo, Nsukka.
The reported killing comes as political activities and preparations for the 2027 general elections continue to gather momentum across the country.
However, it was not immediately clear whether the incident was connected to Oloto’s political activities.
By press time, the Enugu State Police Command had yet to issue an official statement confirming the killing or providing details of any investigation into the incident.
Uncategorized
Ibaji and the Politics of the Perpetual Road Promise
By Tony Edike
How successive governments have repeatedly promised to open up Kogi’s agricultural powerhouse — and why residents are tired of waiting
For decades, the people of Ibaji Local Government Area of Kogi State have watched politicians arrive with promises of development, particularly the construction of the roads that would finally connect their isolated communities to the rest of Nigeria.
Then the elections come.
Campaigns are held. Political leaders visit. Road projects are announced or flagged off. Contracts are mentioned. Hope rises among the people.

And, according to residents and repeated reports about abandoned projects, the construction often disappears from the political radar once the election is over.
For Ibaji, this has become more than a problem of bad roads. It has become a question of political accountability.
The most enduring symbol of this frustration is the long-promised Otuocha–Ibaji–Idah road corridor, which residents believe could fundamentally transform the local government by opening it to commerce, investment, agriculture and social development.
A food basket trapped behind bad roads
Ibaji occupies a strategically important position along the River Niger and has enormous agricultural potential.
The local government is known for farming and fishing, producing crops including rice, yam and cassava. Yet the same geographical and agricultural advantages that could make Ibaji a major economic hub have been undermined by inadequate transportation infrastructure.
The contradiction is stark: a community capable of contributing significantly to Nigeria’s food supply continues to struggle with the basic infrastructure required to move its agricultural products to markets.
Poor roads increase transportation costs, discourage investment and make it more difficult for farmers to get their produce to consumers.
During the rainy and flooding seasons, the problem becomes even more severe.
Reports have documented the extent to which flooding and damaged roads have isolated communities in Ibaji, with residents sometimes relying on bicycles, motorcycles and waterways where roads become impassable.
For a predominantly agrarian community, this is not simply an inconvenience.
It is an economic handicap.
The promise that keeps returning
The history of the Otuocha–Ibaji–Idah corridor illustrates the frustration.
In 2009, the Federal Government reportedly awarded the approximately 90-kilometre Otuocha–Ibaji–Idah road to Nigercat Nigeria Limited for about N7.2 billion, with reports putting the mobilisation payment at about N2.5 billion.
Yet the project subsequently stalled.
Years later, the road remained a subject of complaints by Ibaji residents and community groups.
The road was still being discussed when another promise came from the Kogi State Government.
Yahaya Bello’s 2017 flag-off
In April 2017, then Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello visited Ibaji and flagged off the construction of the 40-kilometre Idah–Onyedega road.
The contract was reported to be worth more than N5 billion.
At the ceremony, Bello said the road would be asphalt-overlaid and that its completion would boost the economy of the area.
The message was significant because even the then Deputy Governor, Simon Achuba, an indigene of Ibaji, acknowledged that the local government had long been neglected and that roads were its major problem.
The state’s Works Commissioner at the time described Ibaji as the state’s “Food Basket” and said the lack of roads was an impediment to its development.
The people had every reason to hope.
But according to subsequent reports, the promise did not translate into the completed road residents were expecting.
By 2021, a report on the project stated that work had still not commenced and described the road as practically impassable. The report recalled that Bello had promised that the construction would take 24 months.
In 2023, a motion before the House of Representatives also raised concerns about the condition and neglect of the road, stating that since the flag-off of its rehabilitation, no work had commenced.
The election-cycle question
This is where the political frustration in Ibaji becomes difficult to ignore.
Residents have seen one administration after another return to the same fundamental problem: the road.
The criticism from the community is not that politicians should not promise infrastructure.
It is that promises should be followed by construction.
For a community that has heard road promises repeatedly, the real measure of government commitment is not another flag-off ceremony, another speech or another campaign visit.
It is asphalt on the ground.
Then came another governor
After Yahaya Bello’s tenure, his successor, Governor Ahmed Usman Ododo, also visited Ibaji.
In July 2026, Ododo met with traditional rulers, community leaders, women, youths and other stakeholders in the local government and announced that the design for a proposed Ibaji Road Project had been completed and was available for public review before construction.
The Federal Ministry of Information described the proposed road as a strategic intervention that could improve access to markets, schools and healthcare while unlocking Ibaji’s economic and agricultural potential.
The announcement was naturally welcomed.
But it also raises an unavoidable question:
How many more times will Ibaji hear that its road is about to be constructed?
Because for residents who remember previous promises, the existence of a design is not the same thing as the existence of a completed road.
And now, the Federal Government
Just as the controversy surrounding the road continues, another major development emerged in July 2026.
Anambra State Governor Chukwuma Soludo announced that President Bola Tinubu had approved the Otuocha–Anam–Abaji road for design and procurement, alongside another major South-East highway project.
The Federal Government’s announcement describes the Otuocha–Anam–Abaji corridor as approximately 108 kilometres and says it will link Anambra with Kogi and North-Central Nigeria.
Kogi-based reports subsequently described the project as the Otuocha–Nzam–Ibaji Road and connected it to the long-standing demand for the Otuocha–Ibaji–Idah corridor.
The development has understandably generated excitement.
After all, this is precisely the type of regional infrastructure Ibaji residents have been demanding for years . This is similar to the age long clamor for the provision of electricity in the local government, which has remained in the dark since its creation. The entire people of Ibaji have not enjoyed public power supply for decades yet the area has remained a vote-hunting hub for politicians in all elections.
This has also raises a question that government officials should answer clearly:
Is this move by Ododo finally the road Ibaji has been waiting for — or will it become another announcement that disappears after the political season?
That question is not an accusation of wrongdoing against any individual.
It is a legitimate question arising from the history of abandoned and repeatedly announced road projects in the area.
The Hope Uzodinma connection
The announcement has also attracted attention in the wider South-East, including from political leaders in neighbouring states.
The involvement of Anambra and Imo in the wider regional road agenda is significant because the Otuocha corridor is not merely an Ibaji road.
It has the potential to connect agricultural communities in Anambra and Kogi and strengthen commercial links between the South-East, North-Central and South-South regions.
That is precisely why the project deserves to be treated as an economic corridor rather than merely another local political promise.
Can Ibaji afford another disappointment?
For the people of Ibaji, the issue is bigger than party politics.
The community wants a road.
A real road.
An asphalted, durable and properly engineered road capable of remaining accessible during the rainy season and capable of carrying agricultural produce, commercial vehicles and passengers.
They want the road to connect farmers to markets.
They want businesses to be able to come into Ibaji.
They want easier access to hospitals and schools.
They want young people to have opportunities beyond leaving or dumping their communities because of infrastructural isolation.
They want their agricultural wealth to become economic wealth.
And they want the government to understand that a road can change the destiny of an entire local government.
The politics of promises
The suspicion among some Ibaji residents that politicians remember the road mainly during election seasons is therefore understandable in the context of the project’s long history.
But suspicion is not proof.
If politicians want to demonstrate that the latest promise is different, the answer is straightforward: publish the documents and build the road.
Let the public know the contract sum.
Let the contractor be identified.
Let the scope of work be published.
Let the commencement date be known.
Let the completion date be known.
Let payments and milestones be transparently accounted for.
And, most importantly, let the people see continuous construction activity on the ground.
That is how another campaign promise becomes a development project.
Ibaji is asking for development, not political rhetoric
The people of Ibaji have waited long enough.
They have watched governments come and go.
They have listened to flag-off speeches.
They have heard promises of economic transformation.
They have watched projects stall.
They have endured roads that become almost impassable during the rainy season.
Yet the potential of Ibaji remains enormous.
With adequate infrastructure, the local government could become an important agricultural and commercial corridor between Kogi and the South-East.
The River Niger should be an economic advantage.
Its fertile agricultural land should be an economic advantage.
Its proximity to Anambra and other markets should be an economic advantage.
But without roads, those advantages remain severely constrained.
Enough of promises — let the road be built
The latest federal approval may provide a new opportunity.
But Ibaji residents have heard enough promises to know that approval alone is not the destination.
Design of the road is not construction.
Construction is not completion.
And a flag-off is not a road.
What the people are asking for is simple: an asphalted road that will finally open Ibaji to commerce, investment, agriculture, education, healthcare and the wider Nigerian economy.
They do not want another road project to become an election slogan.
They want to see the bulldozers arrive.
They want to see the earthworks completed.
They want to see bridges and drainage structures constructed.
They want to see asphalt laid.
And they want to drive on a completed road.
For a local government described by its own political leaders as a food basket, the continued infrastructural isolation is a contradiction that can no longer be ignored.
Ibaji does not need another promise. Ibaji needs a road.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu should please note that there is a place known as Ibaji bordered by four states of Enugu, Anambra, Delta and Edo (across the River Niger). And this local government is being administered by the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC.
Ibaji people have strongly supported his government and they deserve the attention of his government.
-
Politics22 hours agoWHEN PRIVACY BECOMES CONTENT: The Dangerous Normalisation of Leaked Private Conversations
-
Editorial3 days agoWhy Nigerian Graduates and Youths Are Jobless — and Increasingly Vulnerable to Crime and Other Vices
-
News1 day agoBREAKING: Gov Mbah appoints 101 new aides
-
News2 days agoFormer Kogi Gov, Ibrahim Idris, dies in UK at 77
-
News14 hours agoUK excludes Nigerian, Ghanaian-trained teachers from teaching qualification list
-
News2 days agoNDLEA intercepts N3.4bn drugs, arrests fake police officer
-
News3 days agoWoman allegedly kills husband over plans to marry second wife
-
Politics3 days agoNDC disowns purported OK Movement PCC, moves to sanction John Ugulu




