
News
Ex-Chief of Defence Staff Irabor calls for review of Terrorism Act
Former Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), General Lucky Irabor (Rtd), has called for a review of the 2022 Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, explaining that although comprehensive, the Act contains vague provisions that risk undermining journalistic independence.
Irabor stated that reform is needed to amend ambiguous definitions of terrorism, embed procedural safeguards for arrests, and explicitly protect journalistic confidentiality.
The former Defence Chief made this call while delivering a paper at the ongoing Guild of Editors Conference in Abuja.
He said: “Within 24 months, targeted amendments should be passed to clarify definitions and reduce arbitrary arrests by at least 50%.
These legal adjustments will balance the imperatives of security with the preservation of press freedom, ensuring that media institutions continue to serve as watchdogs rather than becoming casualties of counterterrorism policy.
Such reforms will also build public trust in both the legal system and the media, strengthening democratic resilience.

When journalists feel legally protected, they are more likely to engage in investigative reporting that exposes extremist networks and corruption that may fuel insecurity.
By addressing legislative ambiguity, Nigeria can ensure that its counterterrorism framework is not only robust but also consistent with international human rights standards.”
He also emphasised that one of the most pressing needs in Nigeria’s counter-terrorism architecture is structured cooperation between the media and security institutions.
To this end, Irabor advocated the establishment of a National Media–Security Coordination Council (NMSCC) under the Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation, to serve as a formal platform for intelligence–information exchange.
Such an institution, he said, would enable regular joint briefings, verified updates, and guided access to operational details, thereby eliminating sensational or conflicting narratives that often undermine national security communication.
“This takes into account the concept of ‘Citizenship Media’. Here, the view sees the media as builders of nations. They shape society. What you say is what you get. Therefore, as a media practitioner, whatever you do, always ask yourself: does it align with the kind of society you envision? Your actions must not lead to self-destruction,” General Irabor said.
The ex-CDS stressed that a well-supported, professionally guided, and institutionally protected media remains one of Nigeria’s strongest instruments for fostering peace, resilience, and enduring national security.
He, however, reminded the editors that, as the last men standing, they do not have the swords to protect themselves if their framing of national security matters leads to the extinction of the first, second, and third persons in the realm.
He also called for the constitution of a coordinated task force comprising editors, security agencies, and human rights organisations to develop comprehensive guidelines for terrorism reporting.
These guidelines, he said, should cover verification standards, the framing of narratives, the ethical use of imagery, and the protection of sources.
“Within 18 months, at least 80% of media houses are expected to adopt the guidelines, with periodic audits conducted to measure compliance and assess levels of public trust. Such a framework would reduce sensationalism, enhance journalists’ safety, and promote responsible reporting that resists the manipulative strategies of terrorist groups.
By embedding these practices into the professional culture of Nigerian journalism, the media can strengthen its watchdog role while avoiding the unintentional amplification of extremist propaganda.
Clear guidelines would also create a shared framework between government and media institutions, reducing friction in moments of crisis. Ultimately, national guidelines ensure that reporting protects both democratic freedoms and public safety without compromising credibility,” he said.
News
ICPC: Why we detained ex-minister uche Nnaji
The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has disclosed that there are two main reasons a former Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Uche Nnaji, is being detained by the commission.
It also revealed that legal action was taken against the Enugu-born politician after he failed to honour several invitations extended to him through a letter referenced ICPC/HC/CSTF/GUN/GBT/T.1/VOLV16, and dated 15 May 2026.
John Odey, the spokesman of the commission in a statement on Wednesday explained that the commission later approached Federal High Court, Abuja Division, with the suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1160/2026) in order to effect Nnaji’s arrest after his failure to honour invitation.
Nnaji was arrested at the Akanu Ibiam International Airport, Enugu, when he boarded a private jet to Abuja.
Corroborating the development, the ICPC spokesman said Nnaji’s arrest was effected at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, upon his arrival where he was led to the commission’s custody immediately.
According to him, Nnaji is being probed on forgery of academic credentials, specifically concerning a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) and False National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) Discharge Certificate, which was submitted during his ministerial screening process in 2023.

The statement read, “The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has arrested the immediate past Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Hon. Geoffrey Uchechukwu Nnaji (M), following the execution of a bench warrant issued by the Federal High Court of Nigeria.
“The arrest was effected on Wednesday, 1st July 2026 at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, upon Mr. Nnaji’s arrival.
“He was apprehended with the assistance of the Department of State Services (DSS) and subsequently handed over to the ICPC for further investigation.
“The Commission had earlier extended formal invitations to the former minister through a letter referenced ICPC/HC/CSTF/GUN/GBT/T.1/VOLV16, dated 15 May 2026.
“The invitation notices were duly served to his known addresses in Abuja and Enugu, as well as via his electronic mail address.
“Despite service through multiple channels, Mr. Nnaji failed to appear for investigative interviews on the scheduled dates, necessitating further legal action.
“The legal action followed a court order granted by the Federal High Court in the Abuja Judicial Division (Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1160/2026).
“The order, issued on 11 June 2026, directed the ICPC to arrest the former minister to enable investigation into allegations bordering on:
“Forgery of academic credentials, specifically concerning a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN); and “False National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) Discharge Certificate, which was submitted during his ministerial screening process in 2023.
“Following the arrest, Mr. Nnaji has been taken into custody at the ICPC headquarters in Abuja, where investigations are expected to continue. The Commission assures the public that the matter will be pursued diligently in accordance with the law.”
News
BREAKING: Ex-Minister Uche Nnaji arrested over alleged certificate forgery probe
The immediate past Minister of Science and Technology, Uche Nnaji, was arrested on Wednesday at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on arrival from Enugu via a chartered flight.
Authoritative sources at the airport confirmed the arrest to PREMIUM TIMES, saying Mr Nnaji would be handed over to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) for interrogation.
The reported arrest comes weeks after the Federal High Court reportedly granted the ICPC permission to arrest and investigate Nnaji over the allegations.
The court also authorised the anti-graft agency to declare him wanted through newspapers, social media platforms and other media channels after the commission alleged that he repeatedly failed to honour invitations for questioning.
According to the ICPC, its application to the court followed Nnaji’s alleged refusal to appear before investigators despite several invitations relating to the forgery allegations.
The case stems from a two-year investigation published by Premium Times in October last year, which alleged that Nnaji submitted forged University of Nigeria degree and National Youth Service Corps certificates during his ministerial screening and confirmation process in 2023.

The report alleged that the documents were presented to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the Nigerian Senate, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and the State Security Service.
According to the publication, Nnaji later acknowledged that the University of Nigeria did not issue him the degree certificate in question, a development the newspaper said corroborated its investigation.Newspapers
The former minister had previously denied the existence of the court order authorising his arrest, dismissing the publication as a “media trial.”
However, on June 18, he reportedly filed an appeal before the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn the arrest order.
As of the time of filing this report, the ICPC had not issued an official statement confirming the reported arrest, while Nnaji’s legal team had yet to publicly respond to the latest development.
News
Alleged Cybercrime: Court grants Sowore N200m bail, orders two sureties, passport surrender
The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, restored the bail it had earlier granted to activist and presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore.
Sowore is facing a two-count cybercrime charge filed against him by the Department of State Services (DSS) for calling President Bola Tinubu a “criminal” in a social media post.
Trial Justice Muhammed Umar, who had earlier granted the defendant bail on self-recognisance, on June 16 revoked the bail and issued a warrant for his arrest.
The order came after Sowore failed to appear before the court for the continuation of his trial, even though he wrote a letter explaining his absence and requesting a new date.
When proceedings resumed in the case on June 22, Justice Umar ordered the remand of the defendant in Kuje prison.
Dissatisfied with the actions the court took against him, Sowore—whose legal team had initially withdrawn from the case over alleged bias by the judge—secured a new lawyer, who promptly filed a motion to restore his bail and quash the arrest warrant.

When the case came up on Tuesday, Justice Umar held that he was minded to admit the defendant to bail.
However, the court listed some conditions that had to be met before he would be released from prison custody.
Aside from granting him bail to the tune of N200 million, the court held that the defendant must produce two sureties in like sum.
The court also ordered the defendant to surrender his international passport.
Related News
2027 Polls: Court orders INEC to register, grant access code to ADA wiithin 72 hours
NDC, Peter Obi, Sowore, Bolaji, Paul Ibe, PDP reject Lokoja court ruling
Sowore’s detention undermines fair trial, free speech — Gani Adams, Odumakin
Sowore, in the application he anchored on Sections 35(4), 36(1), and 66 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, as well as Sections 169 and 352 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, insisted that the orders the court made against him were unjust and unwarranted.
The defendant had, on December 2, 2025, pleaded not guilty to the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/484/2025, filed against him by the Department of State Services (DSS).
The charges allege offences under Sections 24(1)(b) and 24(2)(a), (b), and (c) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024.
The offending posts, made on August 25, 2025, were in response to President Tinubu’s claim, made in Brazil, that his administration had ended corruption in Nigeria.
Angered by the posts, the DSS demanded that X Inc. (formerly Twitter) and Meta Platforms Inc. ban Sowore’s accounts and remove the posts.
The security agency also wrote to Sowore, asking him to delete the posts from all platforms.
Non-compliance with the request led to the charges.
The prosecution claims the defamatory posts were intended to cause a breakdown of law and order and to tarnish the president’s reputation.
Exhibits include printouts of the posts and the DSS letters.
X Inc. and Meta were initially co-defendants but were delisted in the amended charge.
-
Uncategorized1 day agoUS withdraws troops deployed to Nigeria, retains intelligence partnership
-
Uncategorized18 hours agoGunmen ambush, kill ex-Benue SSG Salifu
-
Uncategorized16 hours agoThree brothers charged with murder after beating mother’s boyfriend to death
-
Uncategorized2 days agoKenneth Okonkwo eats his words, emerges as Atiku’s spokesperson
-
News2 days agoICPC: Why we detained ex-minister uche Nnaji
-
Uncategorized1 day agoAtiku reaffirms 2027 ambition after Court clears Mark-Led ADC
-
Uncategorized15 hours agoPFIPC scandal: NDC seeks Gbajabiamila’s sack, independent probe
-
Uncategorized1 day ago‘Every Naira stolen robs Enugu of development’ — Gov. Mbah charges Public Officers on Accountability



