Connect with us
Maduka University Advert

News

Anger as police fire teargas to disrupt protests, deploy choppers

Published

on

Protesters running away from tear-gassed areas. Credit: The ICIR
Spread the love

Police operatives on Monday disrupted the protest organised by the Take-It-Back Movement over the proclamation of a state of emergency in Rivers State, the alleged misuse of the Cyber Crime Act and the hardships in the country.

The attack on the protesters triggered condemnation from various groups, including Amnesty International.

The Country Director, Amnesty International Nigeria, Isa Sanusi, said this showed that the government was not willing to listen to Nigerians.

He criticised the action as a serious violation of human rights, stressing that the people have the right to assemble and associate with others.

He said, ‘’People have the right to associate and the duty of the security agencies is not to tear gas them, it is not to harass them or violate them but to facilitate them and make sure they do their protest peacefully and with all the projections that would let them have their voice heard.

“But the police once again have proven to be against humanity’s right, they have proven not to be ready to change from their old ways of hostility. We condemn this act and want to call on them to change before it’s too late because Nigerians cannot continue to tolerate this kind of assault; enough is enough.

Maduka College Advert

“It happened in August and in October last year and now we are witnessing another one it was completely a lawless attack and Amnesty International condemns it and we are documenting it.’’

The Executive Director, Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, Musa Rafsanjani, also berated the security agencies over the crackdown.

He said, “I want to appeal to the Nigerian Police that disrespecting or attacking peaceful protesters is not good for their image. We have seen in many countries,s including the United States, people are doing protests and the police are guarding them, helping to make sure that the protest happens without any disruption or any people hiding under it to commit any criminal activities.

“I think it is not really good and the police should stop doing that because tomorrow they will also retire and they will start protesting against non-payment of their pension or gratuity. Who will kill them if they do that? The police are even victims.”

The demonstration, which began as early as 7am, was truncated by security operatives who fired tear gas at the participants in Abuja and Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

The protesters in Lagos similarly had a confrontation with the security personnel who blocked them from accessing the state House of Assembly.

However, the protest did not take place in Benue, Kano, Taraba, Kogi, Sokoto and others.

The event recorded a low turn-out in Plateau State.

In the FCT, roadblocks were set up along the Nyanya/Maraba axis and roads leading to the federal secretariat.

This led to significant traffic congestion in the affected areas.

In support of the police, the Nigerian Air Force scrambled two helicopters for aerial surveillance over the nation’s capital.

The choppers flew for several hours as the police went after the protesters, arresting two of them, identified as flagboy and Abosede.

Journalists, commuters and other residents were caught in the snafu, which abruptly ended the rally.

Confirming the arrests, a protest leader, Rex Elanu, said, “Our protest was violently dispersed. Bosede and Flagboy have been arrested. The flag boy is the one you saw carrying the Nigerian flag.”

Prominent activist and a former presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, also joined the protest.

In Lagos, the police prevented the protesters from reaching the Lagos State Assembly complex, where they intended to submit a letter containing their demands.

The protesters had earlier gathered at the Ikeja Under Bridge as they displayed placards with inscriptions expressing their grievances, and chanted solidarity songs.

But they met armed policemen who had mounted a roadblock some meters away from the assembly’s entrance.

The police officers were joined by men of the Nigerian Army, the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps and the Lagos Neighbourhood Safety Corps.

Irked by their presence, the protesters insisted on presenting their letter, but the operatives refused to yield.

The showdown lasted for about two hours, as no lawmaker showed up to address them.

The national coordinator of the Take-It-Back Movement, Juwon Sanyaolu, accused the security operatives of violating their rights to protest.

He said, “The policemen are preventing us from accessing the house of assembly. It is the people’s assembly, so why are they blocking it? They are impeding our constitutional rights to movement, peaceful assembly, and protest.”

Sanyaolu also demanded the release of protesters who were arrested in some parts of the country where the protest was held.

While describing the demonstration as a warning action, Sanyaolu declared that another protest would come up in August should the government fail to meet their demands.

He said, “Currently, protesters have been arrested in Abuja after they were violently dispersed. We are calling for the immediate release of the protesters arrested in Abuja, Yobe, Gombe and Rivers States.

‘’This is a warning action, and we are going back to remobilise. By the time we get back in August, we will shake the entire country and the entire world.

“We want the Federal Government to stop the Cyber Crime Act, the emergency rule in Rivers State, the demolition of houses in Oworonshoki and other parts of Lagos State and stop the trial of those who are being charged for treason after the #Endbadgovernance protest.”

Prior to the commencement of the protest, the policemen were deployed to some strategic locations across the state to prevent a breakdown of law and order.

Concerned by the demonstrators’ resort to street procession, the Lagos State Government admonished them to comply with a recent court ruling that restricts protests to two designated locations within the state.

In a statement on Monday by the Director of Public Affairs at the Lagos State Ministry of Justice, Mrs Grace Alo, the government reaffirmed its recognition of citizens’ fundamental rights to peaceful assembly and association but warned that such rights must be exercised lawfully and with respect for public safety.

Referring to a judgment by the Lagos High Court delivered on January 30, 2025, the government noted that protests within Lagos are now legally restricted to Gani Fawehinmi Freedom Park in Ojota and Peace Park in Ketu.

It said, “The state government wishes to draw the attention of the general public, especially the Take it Back Movement, the organisers of the planned protest to a judgment of the Lagos High Court delivered on Thursday January 30, 2025 which restricted protests in Lagos State to two designated locations to wit: Gani Fawehinmi Freedom Park, Ojota, Lagos State and Peace Park, Ketu, Lagos State.

“The court further held that any organiser or protester who participates in protests outside these designated areas shall be responsible and liable jointly and severally in damages for any injury, loss, or destruction of properties.”

The government advised all protest organisers and participants to strictly comply with the court ruling and to notify the Nigeria Police Force ahead of any planned protest to ensure the provision of adequate security.

In Port Harcourt, there was also a confrontation between the protest participants and the security agents comprising the army, police and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps.

The protesters waved placards with slogans such as ‘Stop the Repression’ and ‘Let Us Breathe.’

The protesters, led by the Coordinator of the Take-It-Back Movement in Rivers State, King Amanyie, arrived at Isaac Boro Park at about 9am, but the operatives cut them short, saying they did not have permission to use the facility.

An unidentified officer who addressed them, ordered them to move to the federal secretariat instead.

After some back and forth, the demonstrators marched towards the CFC junction along Aba Road, where they were again accosted by a large number of police operatives who asked them to break up their rally.

Provoked by the attitude of the protesters, the operatives fired tear gas canisters and also shot live bullets in the air, sending everyone running for safety.

A protester identified as Amanyie was hit in the leg by a canister.

The operatives were seen assaulting the Channels TV correspondent, Charles Opurum, whom they later bundled into their vehicle. They seized the camera of the AIT crew.

The journalists were later released, and their cameras returned to them.

Speaking to newsmen after the tension, a former spokesperson for the coalition of civil society organizations in Rivers State, Solomon Menu, said, “As we have always maintained, freedom is not free, and protest is the right of every citizen of Nigeria as guaranteed in the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“They have used their brute force to disperse us today, but we are going to continue. What we are going to do now is to get back to our comrades to ensure that they are all safe and well, and then we’ll reconvene again and continue to push these demands that all the right be done.’’

A legal practitioner who joined the protest, Chetam Nwala, condemned the actions of the security operatives.

He said, “They started shooting tear gas canisters at us, it was a joint team from the Army, the police, the civil defence, they were all there.

“The Army started shooting sporadically in the air, the police started shooting tear gas canisters at us, chasing us and even arrested some of the reporters who came to cover the event. They shot a protester in the leg. He’s currently hospitalized as we speak.’’

However, the Rivers police denied shooting at the protesters.

The police spokesperson, Grace Iringe-Koko, in a statement stated, “The command wishes to categorically clarify that the report is unfounded. Upon receiving intelligence regarding the protest, our officers were promptly deployed to the specified locations.

“On arrival, a group of miscreants was observed engaging in criminal acts, including the theft of mobile phones and other valuables from unsuspecting members of the public. Our operatives responded swiftly, dispersing the individuals.’’

The demonstration was peaceful in Osogbo, the Osun capital, with the protesters moving through the streets accompanied by policemen in five trucks.

One of the coordinators of the Take-It-Back Movement, Victor Lijofi, called on the Federal Government to immediately repeal the Cyber Crime Act, which he said was being used to suppress free speech.

Lijofi said, “Government has been using the Cyber Crime Act to torment us. We will use this opportunity to protest that law. We are ending the protest for today at Olaiya Junction. We don’t have the power to declare an end to the protest.

“Other youth groups can come out tomorrow to start their own protest. We are calling on the government to repeal the Cyber Crime Act so that Nigerians, bloggers can express themselves freely and allow democracy to thrive.”

“When we came out, DSS and police operatives came out, and they just followed us. They didn’t stop us. They appeared calm. They, however, stopped us on the way and advised us to turn back, but we didn’t listen to them,” he narrated.

The rally was peaceful in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital.

The protesters, the majority of whom are members of the African Action Congress, decried the poor economy.

They marched from the Iwo end of the Lagos-Ibadan expressway in the early hours of the day.

The State Coordinator of the Movement, Dimeji Salako, said the protest was to express displeasure against the Cyber Crime Act, which he said was used to gag the people.

The state Chairman of AAC, Kayode Babayomi, argued that the youths were not pleased with the Act ‘’as it is sending people to jail needlessly because they choose to express themselves online.’’

In Edo State, the protesters demanded effective action against insecurity and also demanded pro-people economic policies.

“I urge the Federal Government to channel their energy on those things that will benefit the masses rather than trying to suffocate them with the Cyber Crime Act,’’ Afiz Lawal stated.

The leader of the Talakawa Parliament, Kola Edokpayi, alleged that some Nigerians now scavenge from the dustbin.

Few people turned up for the rally held at the Old Airport Roundabout in Jos, Plateau State.

The coordinator, Jonah Onah, attributed the low turnout to government intimidation.

“People are scared, but even if I’m the only person, I will come out and protest because the situation in the country is not just right. Look at the killings in the country. In other states, the protest is massive but here in Jos, the situation is different and that is why things keep happening and nobody is taking responsibility.

“They kill people, and they are not doing anything, and the next thing they do is to start distributing palliatives. Do they think we need palliatives more than we need protection? Our leaders have really failed us, and we can’t continue like this,” he declared.

Checks by our correspondents indicate that the protest did not hold in Benue, Kano, Taraba, Kogi, Sokoto and other northern states.

PUNCH

News

Church suspends Priest over alleged fake miracles, prophecies

Published

on

Herdsmen attack Seminary in Agenebode, kidnap Rector Rev. Fr. Oyode
Spread the love

The Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) has taken disciplinary action against a member of the clergy, Reverend Ifunaya Maduka, following allegations bordering on staged miracles and questionable prophetic activities at St Paul’s Parish, Nteje, in Anambra State.

The suspension was announced by the Diocese on the Niger under the leadership of the Bishop, Rt. Rev. Owen Nwokolo, who confirmed that the priest has been removed from his duties for a period of six months without salary while further investigations continue.

According to the church authorities, the decision followed reports that the cleric allegedly conducted arranged prophetic sessions and miracle displays involving individuals said to have been coordinated or financially induced to participate. These activities were reportedly presented to worshippers as divine interventions.

The Diocese further stated that Reverend Maduka was confronted with the allegations and, based on their account, admitted involvement in the incidents after being presented with supporting information.

The suspension was formally communicated in a letter signed by Bishop Nwokolo and dated April 27, in which the Church expressed deep concern over what it described as conduct inconsistent with the expectations of ordained ministry within the Anglican Communion.

The letter outlined that the priest’s actions raised serious concerns, including false prophecy, misuse of spiritual authority, and conduct capable of misleading members of the congregation and the wider public.

Maduka College Advert

Church leadership noted that prior to the development, the cleric had been engaged on several occasions regarding his ministerial conduct and had maintained that his practices aligned with Christian doctrine and Anglican standards.

However, the Diocese said recent findings contradicted those assurances.

Describing the situation as damaging to the image of the Church, the leadership stated that the conduct had undermined trust, brought disrepute to the ministry, and created grounds for disciplinary intervention in line with ecclesiastical rules.

As part of the suspension directives, Reverend Maduka has been instructed to hand over all church property, financial records, and official documents in his possession to the appropriate parish authorities and vacate the premises within a specified timeframe.

The Church also confirmed that a disciplinary panel will be set up within the coming weeks to conduct a further review of the allegations and determine any additional measures in line with church regulations.

The Diocese concluded its communication by expressing hope for reflection and repentance, urging the suspended cleric to return to the core values of his calling and ministry.

Continue Reading

News

Attorney General asks Court to deregister ADC, Accord, three other parties

Published

on

The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN
Spread the love

The Attorney General of the Federation has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister five political parties, arguing that their continued existence violates constitutional provisions and undermines Nigeria’s electoral integrity.

In court filings, the Attorney General contended that unless the court intervenes, INEC would “continue to act in breach of its constitutional duty” by retaining parties that have failed to meet the minimum requirements prescribed by law.

The filing stressed that the right to associate as a political party is not absolute and must be exercised within constitutional limits. It further argued that it is in the interest of justice for the court to grant the reliefs sought by the plaintiffs.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026 and filed at the Abuja Judicial Division of the Federal High Court, lists the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators as the plaintiff.

The defendants include INEC as the first defendant and the Attorney General of the Federation as the second defendant, alongside five political parties: African Democratic Congress (ADC), Action Alliance (AA), Action Peoples Party (APP), Accord (A), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

At the center of the issue in the case is whether INEC has a constitutional obligation to remove parties that fail to meet electoral performance thresholds set out in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and reinforced by the Electoral Act 2022 and INEC’s own regulations.

Maduka College Advert

The plaintiffs argue that the affected parties have persistently failed to satisfy the constitutional benchmarks required to retain their registration. These include winning at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during a presidential election or securing at least one elective seat at the national, state or local government level.

They contend that the parties performed poorly in the 2023 general elections and subsequent by-elections, failing to win seats across key tiers of government, yet continue to be recognised by INEC as eligible political platforms.

The plaintiffs maintain that this continued recognition is unlawful and undermines the integrity of Nigeria’s electoral system.

In the affidavit supporting the suit, the forum’s national coordinator, Igbokwe Raphael Nnanna, states that allowing parties that have not met constitutional requirements to remain on the register “is unconstitutional, illegal and a violation” of the governing legal framework.

The suit asks the court to declare that INEC is duty-bound to deregister such parties and to compel the commission to do so before preparations for the 2027 elections advance further.

Beyond declaratory reliefs, the plaintiffs are also seeking far-reaching orders that would bar the affected parties from participating in the next general elections or engaging in political activities such as campaigns, rallies and primaries. They further request injunctions restraining INEC from recognising or dealing with the parties in any official capacity unless and until they comply strictly with constitutional provisions.

Central to the plaintiffs’ argument is their interpretation of the law as imposing a mandatory duty on INEC. They argue that the use of the word “shall” in the Constitution leaves no room for discretion once a party fails to meet the stipulated thresholds.

In their written address, they rely on statutory provisions and judicial precedents to contend that electoral performance is an objective condition that must be enforced to maintain discipline, transparency, and accountability in the political system.

Attorney General backs plaintiff
In a notice filed pursuant to Order 15 Rule 1 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2019, the Attorney General, who is a defendant in the suit, formally admitted the plaintiff’s case to the extent of his constitutional responsibilities.

He maintained that, as the chief law officer of the federation, he is duty-bound to defend and uphold the Constitution, including ensuring compliance with the Electoral Act and other laws governing elections in Nigeria.

The filing emphasised that the Attorney General’s role extends beyond litigation to preventive oversight, ensuring that laws are faithfully implemented to maintain public confidence in the electoral process. It described the case as a public interest litigation aimed at safeguarding democratic integrity and promoting constitutional observance.

According to the document, the Attorney General argued that citizens, including the plaintiff group, have the right to challenge constitutional breaches, particularly where electoral processes are concerned. He added that supporting such litigation aligns with his dual role as both a defender of the state and an advocate for citizens’ rights.

The submission also highlighted the broader implications of non-compliance by political parties. It argued that the continued existence of parties that fail to meet constitutional thresholds contributes to ballot congestion, increases the cost of election administration, and undermines the intent of Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which empowers INEC to deregister underperforming parties.

The plaintiff further contended that INEC has no residual discretion to retain parties that do not satisfy the constitutional criteria, insisting that failure to deregister them constitutes a continuing breach of constitutional duty. The suit warned that such inaction could be challenged through public interest litigation, as is the case before the court.

Additionally, the filing noted that the plaintiff, comprising former legislators, possesses the requisite standing to institute the action, having been directly involved in the enactment and oversight of Nigeria’s constitutional and electoral framework.

The Attorney General also underscored the importance of access to justice, arguing that his support for the suit would help bridge gaps faced by citizens seeking to enforce constitutional rights. He maintained that collaboration between government institutions and civic actors is essential to strengthening legal literacy, accountability, and democratic participation.

The Attorney General of the Federation is represented in the suit by a team of lawyers led by Prof. J. O. Olatoke, SAN, alongside O. J. David, U. O. Olufadi, D. O. Bamidele, V. D. Maiye, Waheed Abdulraheem and A. K. Abdulmumin, all of whom signed the court filing before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

The case, which has drawn significant attention within political and legal circles, could have far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s party system ahead of future elections, particularly if the court grants the request to compel INEC to act against the affected parties. (TRIBUNE)

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu names Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu as Minister of Foreign Affairs

Published

on

Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Spread the love

…Nominates Amb. Sola Enikanolaiye as Minister of State

President Bola Tinubu has appointed Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu as Nigeria’s new Minister of Foreign Affairs after the resignation of Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar, who is reportedly preparing for a political move ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The President also forwarded the name of Ambassador Sola Enikanolaiye for appointment as Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, pending approval by the Senate.

The appointments were disclosed in a statement released on Wednesday by presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga.

According to the statement, the reshuffle is aimed at improving Nigeria’s diplomatic strategy and ensuring that the country’s foreign policy supports the administration’s economic agenda more effectively.

“These adjustments are part of ongoing efforts to reposition Nigeria’s foreign policy architecture for greater efficiency, strategic engagement, and stronger global partnerships,” the statement read.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu, who previously served as Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and has years of diplomatic experience, is expected to oversee Nigeria’s international relations as the government intensifies focus on economic diplomacy, regional peace, and wider global partnerships.

Maduka College Advert

The presidency highlighted her long-standing involvement in global affairs, stating:

“Ambassador Odumegwu-Ojukwu brings decades of diplomatic experience and a deep understanding of Nigeria’s engagement with the global community,” the statement read.

Enikanolaiye, a seasoned career diplomat, had earlier worked as Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and International Relations.

He has represented Nigeria in several cities around the world, including Addis Ababa, London, Ottawa, Belgrade, and New Delhi.

The statement noted that his nomination is expected to strengthen institutional continuity within the foreign service.

“Ambassador Enikanolaiye’s extensive experience across multiple diplomatic missions will support Nigeria’s evolving foreign policy objectives,” the statement added.

President Tinubu congratulated the two diplomats and urged them to place national interest at the forefront while promoting economic diplomacy and improving the welfare of Nigerians living abroad.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert