Connect with us

News

PDP Governors drag Tinubu, National Assembly before Supreme Court over Fubara’s suspension

Published

on

Pro-Fubara lawmakers to challenge appeal court verdict on Amaewhule faction
Fubara
Spread the love

Governors of states governed by the Peoples Democratic Party have instituted a suit before the Supreme Court, challenging the six-month suspension of the Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara.

Fubara, his deputy Ngozi Odu, and the Rivers House of Assembly members were suspended for six months by President Bola Tinubu after he declared a state of emergency in the state on March 18 and appointed a sole administrator for the state.

Meanwhile, the legislatures, on their part, supported the president’s decision to implement the suspension.

However, the governors of Bauchi, Adamawa, Bayelsa, Enugu, Osun, Plateau, and Zamfara states questioned the powers the president has to carry out such action (suspension).

Mentioned as respondents in the suit are Tinubu and the National Assembly.

Maduka College Advert

The seven state governors who termed the suspension as unconstitutional, through their Attorney-Generals, urged the Supreme Court to declare that “the President has no powers whatsoever or authority to suspend a democratically elected governor and deputy governor of a state in the Federation of Nigeria under the guise of or pursuant to the proclamation of a state of emergency in any state of the federation, including the states represented by the plaintiffs,” based on the provisions of Sections 1(2), 5(2), and 305 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

The governors also urged the apex court to declare that the President has no powers to suspend a democratically elected House of Assembly of a state pursuant to Sections 192 (4) (6) and 305 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

The appellants (seven state governors) sought a declaration that “the suspension of Governor Siminalaye Fubara, his deputy, and members of the Rivers State House of Assembly was unconstitutional, unlawful, and in gross violation of the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).”

The governors argued that Tinubu lacks the statutory powers to suspend a serving governor and appoint a sole administrator in their stead.

The governors urged the Supreme Court to nullify the appointment of the sole administrator appointed to govern the state.

They challenged the constitutionality of the voice votes used by the National Assembly to ratify Tinubu’s actions.

They argued that the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by the defendants did not comply with the constitutional requirements set out in Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

Furthermore, the litigants contended that the proclamation by the President failed to meet the stipulated conditions and procedures for such a declaration, stating that it was made for reasons beyond those specified in the Constitution.

They also argued that the National Assembly’s approval of the state of emergency via a voice vote was invalid, stressing that the Constitution mandates a two-thirds majority vote of members of each legislative chamber.

They prayed the Supreme Court for the following relief, “An order nullifying the proclamation of a state of emergency in Rivers State made by the first defendant and wrongfully approved by the second defendant.

“An order restraining the defendant, by himself, his servants, agents, and privies, from implementing the unlawful suspension of the governor and deputy governor of Rivers State.

“An order restraining the defendant, by himself, his servants, agents, and privies, from interfering in any manner whatsoever with the execution by the governor and deputy governor of Rivers State of their constitutional and statutory duties, as well as their electoral mandate.

“An order restraining the defendant from attempting the suspension of any other governor of any state in Nigeria, particularly the plaintiffs, or from interfering with or undermining their constitutional and statutory duties.”

News

Five family members mysteriously found dead in their Abia home

Published

on

Five members of the Nnabugwu family were found dead in Umuimo Village. Photo credit: ALEXANDER JOE Source: Getty Images
Spread the love

• All seen seated together in living room

Five members of a single family have been found dead inside their home in Umuimo Village, Osisioma Local Government Area of Abia State.

Neighbours reportedly made the discovery after forcing their way into the apartment following days of concern over the family’s absence.

Worried community members broke into the residence on Monday, July 22, 2026, after the family had not been seen since Saturday, July 19.

The bodies were already in an advanced state of decomposition when neighbours entered the house.

Those who arrived early at the scene reported that the five bodies were found in the sitting room, positioned in a manner that suggested the family may have been eating when they died.

Maduka College Advert

Partly consumed food, including cooked chicken and groundnuts that had not been finished, was found in the same room.

This led to early speculation that the family may have died from food poisoning or generator fumes, though no official cause of death has been established.

Following local tradition, community members performed customary rites before the bodies were removed and taken to a morgue.

Police confirm incident

The Abia State Police Command confirmed the death of the five members of the same family, which has
thrown the Umuimo community into mourning

Confirming the incident, the Police Public Relations Officer, Abia State Command, DSP Maureen Chinaka, said the matter was reported by the deceased’s brother after he was unable to reach one of the victims.

She said police officers accompanied the complainant to the family’s residence at Umuimo Village, Osisioma Ngwa.

According to Chinaka, “Upon arrival, repeated knocks yielded no response. They subsequently forced entry into the house, where they discovered the lifeless and decomposing bodies of their brother and his family.

“The crime scene has been visited. A preliminary visual inspection of the bodies was conducted, and photographs taken. The corpses have been deposited at the morgue for preservation and autopsy. Investigation is ongoing.”

The police said investigations are ongoing to determine the circumstances surrounding the deaths.

Continue Reading

News

Soludo threatens to arrest, prosecute fake Traditional Rulers in Anambra

Published

on

Anambra Gov Chukwuma Soludo
Spread the love
The Governor Chukwuma Soludo-led Government of Anambra State has warned persons allegedly parading themselves as traditional rulers without official recognition to immediately desist from the act or risk arrest and prosecution under the state’s Traditional Rulers Law.

The government also directed residents and Presidents-General of town unions across the state to report individuals who unlawfully assume traditional ruler titles or perform functions reserved for duly recognised traditional rulers.

The warning was contained in a letter dated July 22, 2026, signed by the Commissioner for Local Government and Community Affairs, Mr. Ifeanyi Ezeaka, Esq., and addressed to Presidents-General of town unions in the state.

According to the commissioner, the directive followed reports received by the state government concerning individuals who allegedly parade themselves, allow themselves to be addressed or portrayed as traditional rulers, or perform functions legally reserved for recognised traditional rulers despite not having been formally recognised by the Anambra State Government.

The government stressed that under the Traditional Rulers Law of Anambra State, 2007, only a person duly selected, appointed and formally recognised by the state government in accordance with the law is entitled to function as, or present himself as the recognised traditional ruler of a town or community.

According to the government, the law makes it a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment for any person who has not been recognised by the Governor as a traditional ruler to parade himself as one, permit himself to be portrayed or addressed as a traditional ruler, or perform any function or ceremony reserved for a recognised traditional ruler.

Maduka College Advert

The state government consequently announced its decision to prosecute individuals found to be unlawfully parading themselves as traditional rulers, assuming reserved traditional titles or performing functions legally designated for recognised traditional rulers.

The Commissioner therefore directed Presidents-General of town unions to submit complaints to the Ministry of Local Government and Community Affairs and the Ministry of Justice against persons within their communities who are allegedly violating the provisions of the law.

The letter:

Continue Reading

News

40 abducted as bandits raid 11 communities in Zamfara

Published

on

Spread the love

No fewer than 40 residents from 11 communities in the Mayanchi District of Maru Local Government Area of Zamfara State have been abducted by armed bandits.

It was gathered that the attackers are loyalists of a notorious bandit kingpin, Kachalla Sa’idu, with most of the abducted victims reportedly women and children.

Sources said Kachalla Sa’idu has long terrorised communities in Maru, Maradun and Talata Mafara local government areas of the state.

A visit to some of the affected communities revealed scores of women and children hurriedly packing their belongings and fleeing for fear of further attacks and abductions.

A resident, Alhaji Lauwali Abdullahi, said that about a week ago, gunmen loyal to Kachalla Sa’idu invaded Garagi village in an attempt to abduct residents.

Maduka College Advert

According to him, villagers resisted the attack, killing one of the bandits and seizing his rifle.

He said the bandit leader subsequently threatened to attack all neighbouring communities up to Mayanchi town unless the rifle was returned.

Another source disclosed that Kachalla Sa’idu sent a message to community leaders threatening to kill all those currently being held captive if his seized rifle was not returned or replaced with another firearm.

Chairman of Maru Local Government Area, Hon. Bello Jabaka, confirmed the incident, saying the council was aware of the security situation in the Mayanchi District.

He said the local government, in collaboration with security agencies, was taking steps to restore peace and address the worsening insecurity in the area.

Jabaka acknowledged that bandits had continued to terrorise communities across the local government, stressing that urgent measures were needed to tackle the menace.

Mayanchi District is a strategic area linking Sokoto State with the Niger Republic, as well as Zuru Local Government Area of Kebbi State and parts of Niger State. (The Guardian)

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert