
News
Land tussle: Ideani PG accused of sending armed men against family, forces workers out of construction site
…keeps blind eye on 43 years unpaid N215m accumulated debt
By Chuks Collins, Awka,
The fragile peace in Ideani community, Idemili North Council area of Anambra State is now under serious threat by the actions of the President General, Chief Paul Okoye.
Okoye, according to eye witnesses had sent thugs and armed vigilantes to chase away and stop the land owners from access to the land known as Ana Ezi Orji(aka offia Iyiogu)located at Nsokwe village, overlooking the Abatete-Ideani Highway, which they are currently fencing before Okoye’s men struck.
The visibly angry land owners in their reaction vide a press statement backed by series of letters between them and the Ideani Development Union (IDU)/Eze-in-Council that traversed forty-three(43) years period in an attempt to get a valid formal agreement between the two parties expressed their dismay at Okoye.
According to the statement, the Nwankwo Okpala/Nwolisa family of Nsokwe village noted that “regarding the open, unnecessary challenge by some hired thugs and village urchins who claimed to have been sent the PG over our Family land (Ana Ezi Orji) situate at Nsokwe village, Ideani overlooking the Ideani-Abatete Highway, we have been pressed to the wall. This has given rise to huge misinformation, youthful exuberance and intimidation of our family by the President General of Ideani Community, Chief Paul Okoye, his sponsors/godfathers and other faceless individuals.

“With due respect, we need to raise some very germaine issues staring Ideani in the face that have apparently not caught the attention of the PG and his puppeteers.
It’s on record that he has never made any conscious attempt to reach us(the family, our consultants and or representatives)in relation to the Ana Ezi Orji where a failed attempt by the Ideani community was made in the past to lease to build a Post Office more than four decades ago. The project, we believe failed due to lack of funds, and political will on the part of the Community. So after so many years of inaction we foreclosed any further foot dragging, discussion or negotiation on the matter. We communicated all these in writing years ago to them. It’s our view that what could not happen in the past forty-three years would not likely happen now.
Consequently, Ideani community which held unto our land since 1981(43 years) having displayed clear lack of interest/will, as well as the financial muscle to see the project through, cannot in any stretched of imagination suddenly wake up from her prolonged slumber to lay claim to the land where no contract ever existed.
We are in good conscience making this matter public to enable all real and imagined interested persons, real or imagined friends and foes to come out open, or forever keep quiet in the interest of peace and good neighborliness.
“We will no longer tolerate any further interference, trespass or distractions by anyone or group of persons on the said land, as we have chosen to develop same, beginning with erecting walls round it.
We hereby alert all citizens to stay away from the land and to stop disturbing, threatening or harassing our workers in any way. Also, those currently sent to plant charms, fetish objects, omu, signposts, etc by anyone should in their own interest stop such forthwith and keep off.
“We caution that Security agencies have been duly briefed accordingly as we have resolved to proceed with the development of the entire land area. And any unauthorized person/s seen in or loitering around that parcel of land will surely be arrested forthwith.
“The President General and his puppeteers should note that the aborted post office project was conceived to be sited in only a marked portion of about 10% area of the land. So, assuming without conceding that there was a claim, was that enough reason to prevent us access to the entire land area? Right from when we moved back into the land and started farming on it why hasn’t the PG and or his goons said anything, until we begin to effect its walling.
“Again has the community leadership under the headship of the PG approached the Nwankwo Okpala/Nwolisa family over the land formally or informally other than these intimidation antics?
“Was the PG properly briefed on the land/project?
Is the PG operating on mere hearsays and or beer palour gossips?
Is he acting on impulse, or out to achieve a lasting peace, show the world his bulging muscles and chest or to satisfy his godfathers.
“It’s wise and advisably so to disabuse the minds of those seeing our dear PG as a mere puppet.
“In conclusion, the Nwankwo Okpala/Nwolisa family is very peaceful and is ready to cooperate with you and the Ideani Community to bring development, progress to Ideani, especially whenever you are on the right track.
“That was the reason we considered about four decades ago to give out a portion of one of our choicest property for the public cause so far the agreement was beneficial, in the first place.
“It is true that most of those flexing muscles today were just toddlers or we’re not born when we started delving into issues of public good. It is therefore early in the day; let’s sheath our swords and retrace our steps and allow all sleeping dogs lie.
“The land in question, or the contentious portion belongs to us, and no written or oral agreement or any binding contract was ever perfected or entered into between us and anyone over it.
Those who contacted the Federal agency (NIPOST) were seen and treated as mere meddlesome interlopers. Because no such ceding of land ever existed or took place when there was no title documents to do so. As none was ever signed by anyone because negotiation had continued seemingly ad infinitum for more than forty years, consequent upon which we ordered the community out of the land, in writing!
“It was an incontrovertible fact that no response or reaction was received from the community for our letters of Aug 24,1988; February 22,1990; March 8,2003; August 3,2007 or March 5,2018.
How can anyone reasonably describe this bodylanguage other than nonchalant and irresponsible. So how can such organization suddenly wake up now and expect to be taken serious.
Investigation by journalists revealed that none out of more than six topical letters including copy of the drafted agreement which encapsulated and articulated the points agreed to between them was ratified or returned to the Family.
But according to the land owners, they are requesting for a total sum of Two hundred and five million Naira (N205m) from the PG/Ideani community, being accumulated cost of the proposed annual ground rent for the forty-three years they held unto the land and denied us access or use. There were other items including- training of members of the family up to university levels; giving of employment to all willing and qualified members of the family.
The community had in one letter to the family copiously expressed her sadness in keeping the land for more than forty years without perfecting the handover/transfer of ownership process due to lack of matching funds and administrative will.
Chief Charles Nwolisa who jointly signed the statement along with Godfrey Nwankwo Okpala on behalf of the family led by their lawyer and other Consultants showed copies of letters written to the community these past years.
From the tone of a letter from the community, it was in response to one of the letters from the family which made them set up a Lands Committee. It was this committee, according to its chairman that recommended handing off the land and returning it back to the family, especially where the proposed Post Office project had gone out of fashion, in view of the emergence of information communication technology (ICT).
More so when the community failed to live up to any of the proposed terms and obligation, even if just in principle.
So, notwithstanding the unfortunate crass display of lack of information and arrogance of power by those who sponsored the PG to power, “.. we have in summary tried to educate the public, the PG and his pupetteers on the raw truth they intensionally chose to ignore.
“We also urge those indulging in this unfolding infantile busybody concerning the judgement on the land to approach the High Court of Justice at Ogidi for a copy to avoid any unpleasant consequences.
“We may not have the luxury of going into all these details again.. “, the family added.
Opinions from the community’s eight villages were in favor of the family, to do whatever pleases them with their land.
One of the elder statesman and leaders in the community, Chief Eugene Agwubilo in an interaction with journalists at his Nsokwe village country home, Ideani, disclosed that “the parcel of land in question belongs to the Nwolisa family.
“I will volunteer on oath that as a kid, we often go hunting in that place. It was then called ‘ofia Iyiogu’ and was inhabited by one of Nwolisah’s son called Iyiogu. He died a leper, without a wife or child.
“The late Iyiogu’s property was consequently inherited by other Nwolisah offsprings today. It’s their land”.
Chief Agwubilo, a very strong, articulate and agile nonagenarian added that, “I also learnt that someone at a time was laying claim to the land. That is not possible! Except the issue was about the correct boundary demarcation, else it’s incontestable that the piece of land duly belong to Nwolisa family. I am willing and ready to testify to this anywhere”, Chief Agwubilo noted.
In addition, he pointed out that he had personally in the past urged the family to move back into the land since efforts by the community leadership to use a portion of it for the proposed post office, if they enter into an agreement with them to use it. That he was therefore surprised to hear about the ongoing rumpus currently arising from moves by the family to sell or enter into a joint commercial venture with an investor on the land.
But Okoye, (PG) alongside his Secretary reacted with a written two-page letter claiming “the land is Ideani Community Post Office land”
They warned those encroaching on the land or vandalizing property on it to desist.
At the last weekend executive meeting when journalists besieged the civic center to hear from him or what the community would say about the matter, Okoye said it will wait till next meeting.
Another elderstatesman from Uruechem village, Ideani who appealed for anonymity, who was among the leadership of Ideani in the hey days of the late Igwe Humphrey Okoye noted that, “any person claiming or assuming that the community was given the land in any way should ask himself how? There was no formal or informal agreement executed between the community and the family. Anything seen that went on then on the land was manipulatively done in order to railroad the family into succumbing willy nilly. But they were vehement that no further development should take place until the proposed agreement was perfected and executed. Little wonder no signpost was planted on the land to announce “Site for proposed Ideani Post Office”.
“No such signpost was made or mounted because no such site was acquired by anyone. They know the consequences of placing same, the Nwolisah family would have readily removed it.”
News
Court Orders Interior Minister Tunji-Ojo to Respond to Suit Seeking Release of His NYSC Records
The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday ordered the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, to respond to a suit seeking to compel the release of records of his National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) scheme.
Justice Salim Ibrahim gave the order when the matter came up for hearing.
The Incorporated Trustees of Pathway to Equity and Charity Foundation had filed the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1812/2026.
The group prayed the court to compel the NYSC to disclose documents supporting the minister’s claim that he completed the mandatory one-year national service.
The foundation also sought an order of mandamus directing the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA), the 2nd respondent, to produce records showing that the minister did his primary assignment at the FCTA.

When the case was called, counsel to the applicant, Chief Solomon Akuma, SAN, told the court he was ready to proceed with the hearing.
However, Abiola Olaniji, who appeared for the minister, said he had filed an application for Tunji-Ojo to be joined as the 3rd respondent.
Olaniji said the applicant (foundation) had responded with a counter affidavit raising serious issues, to which he needed time to reply.
The lawyer stated that the minister was ready to take part in the proceedings as an interested party.
But Akuma opposed the application, arguing that the minister was not a proper party.
He said the suit only sought an order of mandamus compelling the respondents (NYSC and FCTA) to produce documents that are not in the minister’s custody.
Justice Ibrahim directed the minister to file and serve his reply to the applicant’s counter affidavit, which opposed his application to be joined as a party in the suit before the next hearing date.
The judge then adjourned the matter until Oct. 18 for hearing.
The applicant had sought from the NYSC the mobilisation or call-up letter issued to Tunji-Ojo in 2006 or any other year; the posting letter to the FCTA in 2006 or any other year; and his application for mobilisation.
It also sought the evidence of approval of his remobilisation by the NYSC’s Director-General; evidence of payment of allowances to him; the record of his Community Development Service and his discharge certificate.
The foundation equally sought from the FCTA, the mobilisation or call-up letter, the posting letter, his attendance record during the service year, evidence of any allowance paid to him, among others.
It said the application was brought under Section 14 of the Federal High Court Act, Order 34 Rules 1, 2 and 5 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019.
It also cited Sections 20, 21 and 25 of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, 2011.
(NAN)
News
Reject money requests from home, Obi tells UK-based Nigerians
The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, has advised Nigerians residing in the United Kingdom to stop sending money to people who seek financial help at home.
Obi also advised them to urge their relatives to vote for productive leaders.
He made the remarks at a town hall meeting with diaspora supporters in Manchester, United Kingdom, on Sunday.
He stressed that Nigeria’s prevailing economic hardship resulted from bad leadership, arguing that continuous financial assistance only cushions the effects of poor governance without addressing the root causes.
“You have people at home in Nigeria today who are begging you for money. Tell them no!” he said.

The former Anambra State governor insisted that his record in public office distinguished him from other governors, claiming none of them matched his achievements in saving public funds.
“I’m not saying I’m a saint, but I saved money. I’ve not seen one governor who has saved 10 per cent of what I saved. No governor has done it.
“Let’s start with this one that is less corrupt. That’s how other countries change.”
He maintained that his conversations with the people reinforced the need for collective responsibility, stressing that building a new Nigeria would require citizens to take an active role in addressing challenges facing the country.
Obi also urged Nigerians to take the 2027 election seriously, describing the contest as a critical moment for the nation.
News
Federal High Court Upholds ENSSAA’s N150m Political Campaign Billboard Fee, CTC Reveals
Contrary to false and misleading reports on social media that a Federal High Court (FHC) sitting in Abuja had nullified the N150 million fee prescribed by the Enugu State Structures for Signage and Advertisement Agency (ENSSAA) for political campaign billboards, findings have revealed that the court actually ruled in favour of the agency, upholding its powers to prescribe the fee.
According to a certified true copy (CTC) of a judgment of FHC sitting in Enugu, the court had on September 1, 2026, dismissed a suit by opposition parties and figures challenging ENSSAA’s authority to impose a mandatory N150 million fee on each political party seeking to erect campaign billboards or display posters ahead of the 2027 general election.
The judgment rendered by Justice Mabel Segun-Bello held that it was within the legislative competence of the Enugu State House of Assembly to make laws on outdoor advertising and for ENSSAA to exercise powers donated to it by state law.
The suit marked FHC/EN/CS/165/2026 had the Labour Party; Chairman of the Labour Party (LP) in Enugu, Hon. Kingsley Ugwu; Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC); NDC factional state Chairman, Engr. Ibuchukwu Obetta; the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and its state Chairman, Hon. Magnus Ezea, as plaintiffs, while ENSSAA; its General Manager, Mr. Francis Aninwike; the Enugu State House of Assembly; Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC); Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON); and Nigeria Police Force were the respondents or defendants.
The plaintiffs had in June 2026 approached the court seeking a declaration that, by virtue of Sections 99 (1) and (2) of the Electoral Act, 2026, and Section 153 of the 1999 Constitution, which donated exclusive powers to INEC to regulate electoral campaigns of political parties in Nigeria, it was ultra vires the powers of ENSSAA and its General Manager to make executive decisions and publications imposing a mandatory payment of N150 million by political parties and their candidates in the state as an advertisement permit fee for the placement of billboards for the council election and the 2027 election.

They equally sought a declaration by the court that it was unlawful and ultra vires the legislative powers of the Enugu State House of Assembly to make laws regulating the advertisement of political campaigns in the state.
Consequently, the plaintiffs sought an order of the court setting aside the mandatory N150 million fee, as well as an injunction restraining the agency and its GM, the Enugu State Government, its agents and representatives from enforcing ENSSAA’s executive directive.
They finally sought an order of the court mandating the Nigeria Police Force to protect political parties in Enugu State against possible harassment for the placement of billboards and posters for the council election and the 2027 elections.
However, delivering her judgment in September, after a careful consideration of the totality of the affidavit evidence, the exhibits, and submissions by both parties, the presiding judge, Justice Mabel Segun-Bello, held, among other things, that the National Assembly does not hold exclusive legislative powers over outdoor advertising.
“I accede to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants’ contention that the subject matter of ‘outdoor advertising’ is NOT reserved exclusively to the National Assembly or to ARCON.
“Rather, ‘outdoor advertising’ falls within the purview of the primary functions of the Local Government, which may (where properly delegated) be validly exercised by a State agency such as the 1st Defendant (ENSSAA).
“Third, I am satisfied that on the basis of the evidence before this Court, the 1st Defendant has established it had a validly delegated authority to issue the directive it gave on 9th February, 2026, for the regulation of advertisement of political campaigns,” she stated.
Guided by these foregoing conclusions, Justice Segun-Bello held that “it is not ultra vires the powers of the Enugu State Structures for Signage and Advertisement Agency and its General Manager (1st and 2nd Defendants) to pass executive decisions and publications imposing a mandatory payment of N150 million naira, as advertising permit that will enable the use of billboards in Enugu State.”
Continuing, she said, “It is also hereby declared that it is not ultra vires the legislative powers of the Enugu State House of Assembly (3rd Defendant) to make laws regulating advertisement in Enugu State.
“Consequently, the directive published by the 1st and 2nd Defendants on 9th February, 2026, mandating political parties and their candidates in Enugu State to pay N150,000,000.00 (One Hundred and Fifty Million Naira) as a pre-condition for obtaining an advertising permit to place billboards and posters for the 2026 and 2027 general election campaigns, is not an unlawful use of State Apparatus to the disadvantage of political parties, contrary to Section 99(2) of the Electoral Act, 2026.
“Save as expressly granted above, the remaining reliefs claimed by the Plaintiffs are hereby refused.”
Meanwhile, the Enugu State Government says that unlike the practice in most states, the N150 million fee is for each political party, not for candidates, as misrepresented on social media and by some commentators.
The Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Chidiebere Onyia, made the clarification recently while fielding questions from Government House correspondents in Enugu, adding that there was no court judgment on the fee by any FHC in Abuja, as falsely circulated.
In a related development, finding show that the Abia State Structures for Signage and Advertising Agency (ABSSAA) prescribed feea for candidates ranging from N20 million for State House of Assembly candidates to N200 million for presidential candidates.
Imo State fees range from N3.55 million for each House of Representatives candidate to N55 million for each governorship candidate, while the permit fees range from N300,000 for local council candidates to N150 million for presidential candidates.
The campaign permit fee ranges from N100,000 for each councillorship candidate to N50 million for each presidential candidate, while Kwara State fixed its fees at N2 million for each House of Assembly candidate and N100 million for presidential candidates.
The Certified True Copy of the Court Judgement :

-
News22 hours agoJUST IN: Former Delta Governor, Uduaghan, dies
-
Faith2 days agoAwka Anglican Diocese Rejects Ibezim’s Suspension, Threatens to Leave Church of Nigeria
-
News3 days agoBREAKING: Mbah Extends Enugu Movement Restriction to 10pm, Scraps Keke Ticketing
-
Politics2 days agoNigeria’s Weak Opposition and the Cost of One-Party Dominance: Can the Opposition Rebuild Before 2027?
-
News3 days ago2027: Keke Riders Endorse Mbah, Tinubu
-
News22 hours agoFederal High Court Upholds ENSSAA’s N150m Political Campaign Billboard Fee, CTC Reveals
-
News1 day agoCorruption turning Nigerian Courts to ‘market stalls’ — Retired Justice Augie
-
Politics1 day agoAA Assembly Candidate, Ugbaje Friday, Unveils Development Agenda for Ibaji




