
News
Nigeria to save $326.895m from agreement with INTELS on contentious pilotage contract
The Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) has explained how INTELS Nigeria Limited waived $193 million as part of deliberate and conscious effort to resolve the stalemate on the pilotage contract with the federal government.
The NPA said that the agreement that culminated in the waiver of the $193,317,556 accumulated interest on debt owed, which was reached with INTELS was done in the national interest.
It assured stakeholders and Nigerians that revenue generation would now increase as a result of the effort, even as it praised the Minister of Transportation, Marine and Blue Economy, Adegboyega Oyetola, for working tirelessly to ensure that the crisis was resolved.
The Authority pointed out that the minister was disheartened by the needless loss of revenue as a result of the stalemate on the pilotage contract, adding that the minister’s show of concern underscored his commitment and patriotism towards resolving the protracted dispute.
Significantly, the NPA disclosed that Nigeria would save a princely $326.895 million from the agreement it reached with INTELS on the contentious pilotage contract.

The Authority said the federal government would earn a benefit to the tune of over $500,000,000.00 – taking into consideration the interest waiver of $193,317,556.
The arrangement also included the reduction in interest rate on the outstanding debt from 6-months LIBOR rate + 6.5 per cent to 6-months SOFR rate + 3 per cent, the spread of the repayment of the debt over 15 years, with the first two years interest-free and the reduction in commission from 28 per cent to 24.5 per cent.
The NPA said, in a statement entitled: “Setting the Record Straight in Respect of Service Boat Monitoring Operation in Nigerian Ports Authority: Reinstatement of INTELS Nigeria Limited as Management Agent,” that there was misinterpretation in a section of the media, citing a letter issued by the Port Manager, Lagos Port Complex, Apapa and addressed to Shipping Companies on the matter.
The Autority said that “It is has become necessary to put the record straight for the benefit of the public and the generality of stakeholders in the Port industry.
“This is also to avoid distortions and conjectures, which may arise by reason of wrong interpretation of the aforementioned letter.”
The NPA said it agreed a waiver of the sum of $100,000,000 being part of the accrued interest as of 31st July, 2023 on the indebtedness to Deep Offshore Services Limited under the Phase 4B agreement.
According to the Authority: “A further waiver of the interest accruing on the outstanding debt under the Phase 4B Agreement for the period of two years commencing from 1st of July 2023 and ending on the 30th of July, 2023 which is estimated in the sum of $93,317,556.
“Reduction of the interest rate on the indebtedness to Deep Offshore Services Limited from 6-months LIBOR rate + 6.5% to 6-months SOFR rate + 3% effective from the date of execution of Supplemental Agreement. The Authority will be saving a total sum of US$ 326,895,226 as a result of waiver of part of accrued interest and reduction of interest rate from 6.5% to 3% on the debt over the next 15 years.
“Reduction of the agency commission on Pilotage collections from 28% to a lower commission of 24.5% as opposed to increasing it due to astronomical rise in cost of operations. The proposed spread of the debt of $522,433,453.25 to be paid back over a 15-year period will, of itself, earn for the Authority a huge benefit in terms of preservation of funds to meet its other operational needs over the period.”
The NPA stated that the above facts represented the true position on the matter, adding that, “The interest of the authority is to ensure that services are provided in line with international best practices and to enhance the revenue profile of the federal government. In order to mitigate the attendant loss of revenue and surmount the legal impasse created by the dispute, the authority proposed a settlement initiative with INTELS, which was submitted to the to the federal government through the Ministry of Transportation.
“Intels also made proposal for settlement on behalf of itself and Deep Offshore Services Nigeria Limited. Protracted negotiations followed and the parties eventually reached a settlement following remarkable concessions by Intels/Deep Offshore and verifiable gains by NPA/the federal government.
“The parties agreed to the following proposed Terms of Settlement; waiver of the sum of $100,000,000.00 on the outstanding indebtedness of the authority to Deep Offshore Services Limited, a further waiver of interest which may accrue on the outstanding debt to Deep Offshore Services Limited over a period of two years between 1st of July, 2023 to 30th June, 2025 which is estimated in the sum of $93,317,556, reduction of interest rate on the outstanding indebtedness to Deep Offshore Services Limited from Libor+6.5 per cent to SOFR+3 per cent, reduction of the agency commission on Service Boat Pilotage collections from 28 per cent to 24.5%. The agreement to be renewed for a further period of 15.”
The NPA added that the federal government considered the proposal and approved the same on the 18th of August, 2023.
“The federal government further directed that the withdrawal of the cases was to be carried out by filing Terms of Settlement by the parties and for the Court to adopt same as Judgment of the Court. The authority was also to discontinue the un-concluded procurement process, which process was in dis-obedience to the Orders of the Federal High Court, Lagos.
“The Parties executed Terms of Settlement on the 24th of August, 2023, and same was adopted as the Judgment of the Federal High Court in Suit No. FHC/L/CS/1058/2020 on the 21st of September, 2023 by Honourable Justice A.M. Liman. Arising from the foregoing, the authority also filed a Notice of Withdrawal at the Court of Appeal, Lagos in respect of the appeal at the Court of Appeal, Lagos.
“Following the Judgment of the Federal High Court, Lagos, the Nigerian Ports Authority and Intels Nigeria Limited executed the managing agency agreement, while a Supplemental Agreement with Deep Offshore Services Limited for the Phase 4B Port Development was also executed in view of the fact that the initial Agreement was suspended.”
The NPA further stated that the federal government lost humongous revenue in the period the NPA took over the management of pilotage.
According to the NPA, “After the expiration of the Service Boat Management Agreement, the authority took over the performance of the service through various Departments and Divisions. However, due to the constraint of not having the requisite technology to monitor the operations, the expected revenue dwindled and it resulted in the drastic reduction of revenue generation for the Authority.
“An analysis of its impact on the authority’s revenue showed a sharp decline from $216million and $209 million in 2014 and 2015 respectively under INTELS agency to $130 million and $99 million in 2020 and 2021 respectively after take over by NPA. The situation in 2023 is even worse as the collection up to June 2023 was only $55.3 million.”
While admitting that errors were made by the past management of the NPA, it stated, “Prior to the expiration of the Service Boat Monitoring Agreement, the authority commenced the procurement process for the engagement of Service Boat Operations Monitoring Agents.
“Several companies submitted bids and the Parastatal Tenders Board of the authority considered the proposals and approved to forward the Four Nos. companies considered qualified for the next stage of the process, to the Ministerial Tenders Board for further procurement processes in line with the requirement of the Public Procurement Act. The Four companies are; Pacific Silverline Limited, Nexttee Oil and Gas Trading Company Nigeria Limited, ICA Logistics Limited and Ishasha Investments Limited.
“Shortly after the opening of the bids, Intels Nigeria Limited and Deep Offshore Services Limited instituted a suit no FHC/CS/L/1058/2020 at the Federal High Court, Lagos against the Authority seeking orders of the Court to restrain the authority from engaging new Service Providers to carry out the monitoring of Service Boat Operations in the Exclusive Economic Zone.
“Intels further claimed that the authority was in breach of the management agreement and sought reliefs including that the contractual status quo remains. Deep Offshore claimed that the termination of the Managing Agency Agreement will negatively affect process of recovery of the Project cost from the Authority.
“The Federal High Court, Lagos per Justice Oweibo by an Order of Interim Injunction dated 24th July, 2020 restrained the authority from giving effect to the Public Notice calling for Expression of Interest for the provision of the Service Boat Operation from interested entities in line with the Procurement Act.”
It added, “The authority notified Intels Nigeria Limited vide its letter dated 5th August, 2020 of the expiration of the Service Boat Management Agreement on the 8th of August, 2020 and of its intention to take over the provision of the said Service Boat Operation. A Public Notice was equally issued to all Service Boat Operators requesting them to deal with the various Port Management on all Service Boat issues. Intels Nigeria Limited again approached the Federal High Court, Lagos in suit no. FHC/L/CS/1058/2020 requesting for an Order of the Court to restrain the Authority from giving effect to the Notice of Expiration served on Intels.
“At the Federal High Court, Lagos Coram Hon. Justice Aikawa granted an Ex parte Order of Interim Injunction on the 28th August, 2020 restraining the authority from giving effect to the Notice of expiration of the Agreement pending the determination of the arbitration between the parties.
“By another application dated the 18th of September, 2020, the Authority challenged the jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the suit without first issuing and serving on the authority the mandatory pre-action Notice as provided in the Nigerian Ports Authority Act. The Federal High Court, Lagos Coram Oweibo J., notwithstanding the above objection extended the lifespan of the Interim Injunction and thereafter referred the matter to Arbitration.”
The NPA said that the orders of the Federal High Court should have effectively stalled the Procurement process adding, “However, despite the orders of the Court, the authority continued with the procurement process and forwarded the names of the companies to the Federal Ministry of Transportation. The procurement process was subsequently put on hold based on the advice from the Federal Ministry of Transportation that the authority should comply with the orders of Court.
“The authority was thereafter sued by Pacific Silverline Limited, Nexttee Oil and Gas Trading Company Nigeria Limited, ICA Logistics Limited and Ishasha Investments Limited at the Federal High Court, Lagos in suit No. FHC/L/CS/1772/2022 seeking declarative reliefs and an injunction restraining the Authority and the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation from awarding the contract for the Service Boat Operations Monitoring contract in the four pilotage districts to any other entity other than one which participated fully in the procurement process.
“The Federal High Court on the 11th of July, 2023 upheld the objection of the authority and struck out the suit. The claimants have since filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal against the ruling of the Federal High Court and also applied for an injunction to restrain the Authority from executing the ruling of the Court. The appeal is pending at the Court of Appeal, Lagos and no date has been fixed for the hearing of same.
“Messrs Pacific Silverline Limited recently filed another suit at the Federal High Court, Kano in suit no. FHC/KN/CS/245/2023 against the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation challenging the approval granted the authority to settle the cases between the Authority and Intels Nigeria Limited. The Federal High Court wholly dismissed the said suit on the 30th of November, 2023.”
It continued: “In order to mitigate the attendant loss of revenue and surmount the legal impasse created by the dispute, the authority proposed a settlement initiative with INTELS which was submitted to the federal government through the Ministry of Transportation. Intels also made proposal for settlement on behalf of itself and Deep Offshore Services Nigeria Limited. Protracted negotiations followed and the parties eventually reached a settlement following remarkable concessions by Intels/Deep Offshore and verifiable gains by NPA/the federal government.”
News
Court Orders Interior Minister Tunji-Ojo to Respond to Suit Seeking Release of His NYSC Records
The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday ordered the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, to respond to a suit seeking to compel the release of records of his National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) scheme.
Justice Salim Ibrahim gave the order when the matter came up for hearing.
The Incorporated Trustees of Pathway to Equity and Charity Foundation had filed the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1812/2026.
The group prayed the court to compel the NYSC to disclose documents supporting the minister’s claim that he completed the mandatory one-year national service.
The foundation also sought an order of mandamus directing the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA), the 2nd respondent, to produce records showing that the minister did his primary assignment at the FCTA.

When the case was called, counsel to the applicant, Chief Solomon Akuma, SAN, told the court he was ready to proceed with the hearing.
However, Abiola Olaniji, who appeared for the minister, said he had filed an application for Tunji-Ojo to be joined as the 3rd respondent.
Olaniji said the applicant (foundation) had responded with a counter affidavit raising serious issues, to which he needed time to reply.
The lawyer stated that the minister was ready to take part in the proceedings as an interested party.
But Akuma opposed the application, arguing that the minister was not a proper party.
He said the suit only sought an order of mandamus compelling the respondents (NYSC and FCTA) to produce documents that are not in the minister’s custody.
Justice Ibrahim directed the minister to file and serve his reply to the applicant’s counter affidavit, which opposed his application to be joined as a party in the suit before the next hearing date.
The judge then adjourned the matter until Oct. 18 for hearing.
The applicant had sought from the NYSC the mobilisation or call-up letter issued to Tunji-Ojo in 2006 or any other year; the posting letter to the FCTA in 2006 or any other year; and his application for mobilisation.
It also sought the evidence of approval of his remobilisation by the NYSC’s Director-General; evidence of payment of allowances to him; the record of his Community Development Service and his discharge certificate.
The foundation equally sought from the FCTA, the mobilisation or call-up letter, the posting letter, his attendance record during the service year, evidence of any allowance paid to him, among others.
It said the application was brought under Section 14 of the Federal High Court Act, Order 34 Rules 1, 2 and 5 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019.
It also cited Sections 20, 21 and 25 of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, 2011.
(NAN)
News
Reject money requests from home, Obi tells UK-based Nigerians
The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, has advised Nigerians residing in the United Kingdom to stop sending money to people who seek financial help at home.
Obi also advised them to urge their relatives to vote for productive leaders.
He made the remarks at a town hall meeting with diaspora supporters in Manchester, United Kingdom, on Sunday.
He stressed that Nigeria’s prevailing economic hardship resulted from bad leadership, arguing that continuous financial assistance only cushions the effects of poor governance without addressing the root causes.
“You have people at home in Nigeria today who are begging you for money. Tell them no!” he said.

The former Anambra State governor insisted that his record in public office distinguished him from other governors, claiming none of them matched his achievements in saving public funds.
“I’m not saying I’m a saint, but I saved money. I’ve not seen one governor who has saved 10 per cent of what I saved. No governor has done it.
“Let’s start with this one that is less corrupt. That’s how other countries change.”
He maintained that his conversations with the people reinforced the need for collective responsibility, stressing that building a new Nigeria would require citizens to take an active role in addressing challenges facing the country.
Obi also urged Nigerians to take the 2027 election seriously, describing the contest as a critical moment for the nation.
News
Federal High Court Upholds ENSSAA’s N150m Political Campaign Billboard Fee, CTC Reveals
Contrary to false and misleading reports on social media that a Federal High Court (FHC) sitting in Abuja had nullified the N150 million fee prescribed by the Enugu State Structures for Signage and Advertisement Agency (ENSSAA) for political campaign billboards, findings have revealed that the court actually ruled in favour of the agency, upholding its powers to prescribe the fee.
According to a certified true copy (CTC) of a judgment of FHC sitting in Enugu, the court had on September 1, 2026, dismissed a suit by opposition parties and figures challenging ENSSAA’s authority to impose a mandatory N150 million fee on each political party seeking to erect campaign billboards or display posters ahead of the 2027 general election.
The judgment rendered by Justice Mabel Segun-Bello held that it was within the legislative competence of the Enugu State House of Assembly to make laws on outdoor advertising and for ENSSAA to exercise powers donated to it by state law.
The suit marked FHC/EN/CS/165/2026 had the Labour Party; Chairman of the Labour Party (LP) in Enugu, Hon. Kingsley Ugwu; Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC); NDC factional state Chairman, Engr. Ibuchukwu Obetta; the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and its state Chairman, Hon. Magnus Ezea, as plaintiffs, while ENSSAA; its General Manager, Mr. Francis Aninwike; the Enugu State House of Assembly; Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC); Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON); and Nigeria Police Force were the respondents or defendants.
The plaintiffs had in June 2026 approached the court seeking a declaration that, by virtue of Sections 99 (1) and (2) of the Electoral Act, 2026, and Section 153 of the 1999 Constitution, which donated exclusive powers to INEC to regulate electoral campaigns of political parties in Nigeria, it was ultra vires the powers of ENSSAA and its General Manager to make executive decisions and publications imposing a mandatory payment of N150 million by political parties and their candidates in the state as an advertisement permit fee for the placement of billboards for the council election and the 2027 election.

They equally sought a declaration by the court that it was unlawful and ultra vires the legislative powers of the Enugu State House of Assembly to make laws regulating the advertisement of political campaigns in the state.
Consequently, the plaintiffs sought an order of the court setting aside the mandatory N150 million fee, as well as an injunction restraining the agency and its GM, the Enugu State Government, its agents and representatives from enforcing ENSSAA’s executive directive.
They finally sought an order of the court mandating the Nigeria Police Force to protect political parties in Enugu State against possible harassment for the placement of billboards and posters for the council election and the 2027 elections.
However, delivering her judgment in September, after a careful consideration of the totality of the affidavit evidence, the exhibits, and submissions by both parties, the presiding judge, Justice Mabel Segun-Bello, held, among other things, that the National Assembly does not hold exclusive legislative powers over outdoor advertising.
“I accede to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants’ contention that the subject matter of ‘outdoor advertising’ is NOT reserved exclusively to the National Assembly or to ARCON.
“Rather, ‘outdoor advertising’ falls within the purview of the primary functions of the Local Government, which may (where properly delegated) be validly exercised by a State agency such as the 1st Defendant (ENSSAA).
“Third, I am satisfied that on the basis of the evidence before this Court, the 1st Defendant has established it had a validly delegated authority to issue the directive it gave on 9th February, 2026, for the regulation of advertisement of political campaigns,” she stated.
Guided by these foregoing conclusions, Justice Segun-Bello held that “it is not ultra vires the powers of the Enugu State Structures for Signage and Advertisement Agency and its General Manager (1st and 2nd Defendants) to pass executive decisions and publications imposing a mandatory payment of N150 million naira, as advertising permit that will enable the use of billboards in Enugu State.”
Continuing, she said, “It is also hereby declared that it is not ultra vires the legislative powers of the Enugu State House of Assembly (3rd Defendant) to make laws regulating advertisement in Enugu State.
“Consequently, the directive published by the 1st and 2nd Defendants on 9th February, 2026, mandating political parties and their candidates in Enugu State to pay N150,000,000.00 (One Hundred and Fifty Million Naira) as a pre-condition for obtaining an advertising permit to place billboards and posters for the 2026 and 2027 general election campaigns, is not an unlawful use of State Apparatus to the disadvantage of political parties, contrary to Section 99(2) of the Electoral Act, 2026.
“Save as expressly granted above, the remaining reliefs claimed by the Plaintiffs are hereby refused.”
Meanwhile, the Enugu State Government says that unlike the practice in most states, the N150 million fee is for each political party, not for candidates, as misrepresented on social media and by some commentators.
The Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Chidiebere Onyia, made the clarification recently while fielding questions from Government House correspondents in Enugu, adding that there was no court judgment on the fee by any FHC in Abuja, as falsely circulated.
In a related development, finding show that the Abia State Structures for Signage and Advertising Agency (ABSSAA) prescribed feea for candidates ranging from N20 million for State House of Assembly candidates to N200 million for presidential candidates.
Imo State fees range from N3.55 million for each House of Representatives candidate to N55 million for each governorship candidate, while the permit fees range from N300,000 for local council candidates to N150 million for presidential candidates.
The campaign permit fee ranges from N100,000 for each councillorship candidate to N50 million for each presidential candidate, while Kwara State fixed its fees at N2 million for each House of Assembly candidate and N100 million for presidential candidates.
The Certified True Copy of the Court Judgement :

-
Faith2 days agoAwka Anglican Diocese Rejects Ibezim’s Suspension, Threatens to Leave Church of Nigeria
-
News2 days agoBREAKING: Mbah Extends Enugu Movement Restriction to 10pm, Scraps Keke Ticketing
-
News10 hours agoJUST IN: Former Delta Governor, Uduaghan, dies
-
Politics2 days agoNigeria’s Weak Opposition and the Cost of One-Party Dominance: Can the Opposition Rebuild Before 2027?
-
News2 days ago2027: Keke Riders Endorse Mbah, Tinubu
-
News1 day agoCatholic priest dies as crucifix falls on him during Mass
-
News23 hours agoCorruption turning Nigerian Courts to ‘market stalls’ — Retired Justice Augie
-
News9 hours agoFederal High Court Upholds ENSSAA’s N150m Political Campaign Billboard Fee, CTC Reveals




