
News
Group demands urgent review of Kogi governorship election
A group, Forum for the Advancement of Development and Democracy, FADD, has formally written the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Mahmood Yakubu requesting an urgent review of the Kogi State governorship election held on November 11, 2023 and the declaration of the candidate with the highest number of lawful votes as winner.
FADD said the issue of pre-filling of INEC election result sheets should not be swept under the carpet by INEC leadership, stressing that “INEC should condemn in strong terms the new innovation of printing or purchasing INEC election result sheets and pre-filling of same” in order to rig election as witnessed in Kogi governorship poll.
In a copy of the letter addressed to the INEC chairman and signed by the legal officer of FAAD, Oruma Musa, the group observed that having reviewed and studied all the press statements from INEC since the commencement of the Kogi State gubernatorial election and interviews by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan of Kogi Central Senatorial election and Senator Dino Melaye, the PDP candidate in the election, it was convinced that “the report of allegation of pre-filling of result sheets is real.”
“In many polling units in some local Government Areas, particularly Okene, Adavi, Okehi and Ajaokuta LGAs where BVAS were used for accreditation the number of alleged voters were in excess of the number of people who were said to have presented for accreditation, and INEC ad hoc staff refused to cancel the election as provided by law (Section 51(2)), and this has created serious acrimony and tension in Kogi State.
“The so called synchronisation of accreditation figures for LGAs in Kogi Central Senatorial District alone, barring the West and East Senatorial Districts, on the IREV portal forty eight hours after the return of the election was made, and the reversion of accreditation figures to what it was originally after public outcry, has further exposed the complicity of INEC Headquarters.
“INEC promised to examine the allegation and has not produced any report on the findings but hurriedly made a return of same election,” the group stated.

In the letter dated November 15, 2023 a copy of which was acknowledged by INEC headquarters, FADD while emphasizing the need for urgent review of the Kogi election, noted that the off-circle elections in Bayelsa, Imo and Kogi, the first since the Supreme Court affirmed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, “have generated a lot of interest and thrown up new issues on the pre-filling of results sheets ahead of voting, particularly in Kogi State.
“Unfortunately INEC Headquarters, through its National Commissioner that covers Kogi is implicated in supervising this ill-fated election in Kogi State, most likely for pecuniary reasons. This is the new thing that INEC Headquarters through its National Commissioner now determines outcome of election and not the voting on the field on election day.
“The pre-filling of election results sheets is a new thing in Nigeria introduced first in Kogi State under the supervision of Prof Sani Muhammed Adam, SAN. This new development has woken us up from our slumber.”
Continuing, FADD said it had monitored the Kogi Resident Electoral Commissioner, REC, Professor John Longpet, closely to see whether he had capacity for fair play as an umpire, and didn’t find him unworthy, pointing out that it was Prof John Longpet who saved INEC when the list that came from the ICT department from INEC Headquarters Abuja showed a preponderance of people from the Central Senatorial District (over 85%).
The election monitoring group pointed out that Prof John Longpet responded to the protest by allowing people who registered online from Kogi East and were available in Lokoja to gate crash and be trained.
“FADD further observed that the vigilance of the general public has helped to improve the outcry of the people to the new issue of pre-filling of INEC result sheets in Kogi State, insisting that “INEC Headquarters is clearly an interested party in the Kogi State gubernatorial election on November 11 2023.”
News
My name has been cleared, says Alison-Madueke after London Jury acquits her of corruption charges
Former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, has declared her complete vindication after being acquitted of all charges brought against her by a jury at Southwark Crown Court in London.
In a statement issued on Wednesday through her representative, Bolouere Opukiri, Alison-Madueke said the verdict marked the end of an eleven-year legal battle that had subjected her and her family to intense public scrutiny.
“Today, at Southwark Crown Court, I was acquitted of all charges brought against me,” she said.
Reflecting on the lengthy legal process, the former minister described the period as one of immense hardship and personal suffering.
“For eleven arduous years, this matter has weighed heavily upon me and my family. Today, a decade of unrelenting and unjust vilification, condemnation, and scrutiny has finally concluded,” she stated.
Alison-Madueke expressed gratitude to God, her legal team, family and friends for their support throughout the trial.

“I give thanks to Almighty God for His faithfulness and for the complete vindication I have received. I am grateful to my legal counsel for their diligence, and to my family and friends for their steadfast support and encouragement throughout this period,” she said.
The former minister said the verdict had brought a sense of relief and closure after years of legal uncertainty.
“I am profoundly relieved. My name has been cleared, and this ordeal has come to an end,” she added.
Despite the acquittal, Alison-Madueke indicated that she intends to speak further about the events of the past decade and outline her future plans.
“This, however, is not the final chapter. In due course, I shall address this difficult period in greater detail and share my intentions for the future. For now, I intend to embrace the freedom that has been unjustly denied me for many years,” she said.
The statement followed her acquittal at Southwark Crown Court, bringing to a close a legal case that had attracted significant public attention over the past eleven years.
News
London court acquits Alison-Madueke of all corruption charges
Diezani Alison-Madueke, the former Minister of Petroleum Resources, was on Wednesday acquitted by a London jury of six bribery charges, after a rare corruption trial of a high-profile former energy official.
Alison-Madueke was minister between 2010 and 2015 under then-president Goodluck Jonathan.
She stood trial charged with five counts of accepting bribes and a charge of conspiracy to commit bribery, which she denied.
Prosecutors alleged Alison-Madueke, 65, was given “a life of luxury” in London from oil and gas industry figures seeking lucrative contracts in Nigeria, which has long grappled with mismanagement and corruption.
But the former minister, who was also briefly president of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, said she never took any bribes and had no real influence over awarding of lucrative government contracts.
After a trial at London’s Southwark Crown Court, Alison-Madueke was acquitted by a jury of all six charges she faced after more than 46 hours of deliberation.

The not guilty verdicts are a major blow to British authorities, which began their investigation into corruption allegations against Alison-Madueke more than a decade ago.
Alison-Madueke stood trial alongside oil industry executive Olatimbo Ayinde, 54, who was charged with one count of bribery relating to Alison-Madueke and a separate count of bribery of a foreign public official.
Alison-Madueke’s brother Doye Agama, 69, was charged with conspiracy to commit bribery with his sister relating to payments made to Agama’s church.
Both Ayinde and Agama denied the charges against them and were also acquitted by the jury. (Reuters)
News
Court martial: 12 soldiers face trial over alleged murder, other criminal offences
The Commander, 4 Special Forces Command, Nigerian Army, Doma, Maj.-Gen. Olurotimi Awolo, has inaugurated a General Court Martial (GCM) to try 12 soldiers accused of various offences, including alleged murder, assault and aiding criminality.
Speaking during the inauguration on Tuesday in Doma, the Commander, represented by the President of the General Court Martial, Col. Salihu Ibrahim, said the convening order was issued pursuant to powers conferred on him by Section 131(2)(d) of the Armed Forces Act, Cap A20, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
He said the court was constituted to hear the cases of all accused personnel and determine each matter strictly on its merit.
“The court will be guided throughout the trial by the principles of natural justice as enshrined in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
“We are also mindful of the cardinal principle of criminal justice that every accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
“Where the prosecution fails to establish any allegation beyond reasonable doubt, the court will discharge and acquit the accused person.

“Conversely, where an accused person is found guilty, the law will take its course in accordance with the provisions governing such offences,” he said.
He assured all parties of the court’s commitment to fairness, justice and professionalism, urging prosecution and defence counsels to avoid unnecessary delays and frivolous adjournments.
The court president maintained that speedy disposal of the cases would serve the interest of justice and ensure confidence in the military justice system.
However, trial could not commence immediately after the inauguration as six of the accused persons present in court were declared medically unfit to stand trial.
The court’s Medical Orderly, Sgt. Audu Ahmadu, informed the panel that five of the six accused persons had elevated blood pressure levels.
Following the development, the prosecutor, Capt. Shamsondeen Sadiq, urged the medical orderly to ensure that the affected personnel received adequate medical attention to enable the trial to commence.
The President of the court subsequently adjourned proceedings to a later date, which would be communicated to all parties.
Speaking with newsmen after the inaugural sitting, Barr. George Illah, counsel to one of the accused persons, commended the Command for constituting the court martial.
He expressed confidence in the competence of the panel, noting that the president of the court, other members and the Judge Advocate were qualified to discharge their responsibilities.
“As a defence counsel, I will do my best to ensure that the soldiers standing trial before this honourable court martial get the justice they deserve.
“It is important for people to understand that military personnel standing trial before a court martial are entitled to all constitutional and legal rights guaranteed under the law, and we will ensure that those rights are protected,” he said.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that members of the General Court Martial include Col. A.A. Buhari, Lt.-Col. Victor Yamu, Lt.-Col. A.K. Karma and Lt.-Col. S. Abdullahi.
Others are Maj. J.M. Usendeng, Maj. A.D. Ahmed, Maj. U. Ahmed, Maj. S.L. Sagu, while Capt. U. Nna serves as Judge Advocate. (NAN)
-
Politics2 days agoCourt orders INEC to deregister ADC, Accord, three others
-
News2 days agoPopular Businessman dies in captivity despite ₦5 million ransom payment
-
News2 days agoTroops rescue Widow of late Major General Rabe Abubakar
-
News3 days agoOver 50 Bandit Attacks Recorded in a Week as FG Spends N57.78bn on Security
-
News3 days agoInsecurity: Ministers, Senators, Governors may become targets — Buratai warns
-
Kenneth Okonkwo
Kenneth OkonkwoPolitics2 days agoKenneth Okonkwo dumps Atiku over appointment of VP candidate from South-South
-
Politics15 hours agoStakeholders demand sanctions against A’Court’s Justice Lifu, as Mark warns FG on political manipulation
-
News3 hours agoLondon court acquits Alison-Madueke of all corruption charges





