
News
Dismantling of ‘All Eyes on Judiciary’ Billboards: It’s beginning of dictatorship in Nigeria, Nigerians slam FG
In a bold and thought-provoking move, billboards emblazoned with the phrase ‘All Eyes on the Judiciary’ recently sprang up across Abuja, capturing the attention of passersby.
Similarly, on the streets and in the markets across the country, it has become fashionable for the youths and women to adorn T-shirts and carry bags with ‘All Eyes on the Judiciary’ message.
This development sparked a heated debate within Nigeria’s advertising and legal communities.
However, the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria, ARCON, swiftly deemed the billboards offensive and issued an order for their immediate removal.
The council also suspended its top officials for allowing the erection of the billboards while also disbanding their unit.

Director General of ARCON, Olalekan Fadolapo, said, “the advertisement is considered a blackmail against the Nigerian judiciary, the presidential election petition tribunal and particularly the justices of the tribunal who are expected to discharge their judicial functions without fear or favour over a matter that is currently jus pendis”.
This has left many pondering the implications of the council’s action for free speech and the upcoming judgments on the 2023 election petition cases.
The controversy surrounding the erection of the billboards has therefore ignited a nationwide discussion on the delicate balance between freedom of expression and responsible advertising.
Saturday Vanguard reports that some former state attorney-generals, lawyers, and activists who reacted to the action criticized the Federal Government, said nothing was disparaging about the billboards, and the message conveyed, while some citizens defended the government, insisting the billboards were unnecessary.
Nothing odious about the message- Nwoko, SAN
A former Attorney-General of Akwa Ibom State, Uwemedimo Nwoko, SAN, said: “As a lawyer, I see nothing offensive about the billboard or the message that it carries. I do not see why the government should take offence about such a billboard, except if there is anything in their conscience that makes it offensive.
Otherwise, I believe that if anybody says, ‘All eyes on you,’ it is for good because they are expecting you to do the right thing. Therefore, I see nothing wrong with the message of that billboard. I believe those who find the message offensive may think it is putting the judiciary on edge. However, this is truly my opinion.
Usman Dan Fodio said conscience is an open wound, and only the truth can heal it, so for me, if you work with a clear conscience and somebody says ‘all eyes are on you’, you should be happy and say ‘expect I will deliver on it’. I will not find myself as attacked or antagonized by that.
But if I have anything to hide and I do not intend to do the right thing, once somebody says ‘all eyes are on me,’ I will get jittery, and worried because what I will deliver will not be the expectation of the right- thinking members of the society. That is why I am worried the government is worried about that message”
It’s beginning of dictatorship in Nigeria —Ukpai Ukiro
Legal luminary, Chief Ukpai Ukiro, described the pulling down of the billboard with the inscription “ All Eyes Are on The Judiciary”, by the Federal Government as the beginning of dictatorship in Nigeria.
Ukiro who spoke with Saturday Vanguard in Umuahia said:”It’s a breach of right to freedom of thought, conscience and expression. That is the beginning of dictatorship. Once the Government is jittery or afraid of expression of free speech it begins to drift towards dictatorship. By the action of the Federal Government, the first step on the ignoble path of dictatorship has been taken. And that is why everybody who is a lover of democracy in Nigeria must rise up to condemn this and stand against it, otherwise we are doomed democratically “.
Danger signal to our democracy —Austin Mbaka
Another Abia-based legal practitioner, Mr Austin Mbaka, also condemned the action of the Federal Government, describing it as a danger signal to democracy in Nigeria. Mbaka further said it was a sign that the Federal Government was already uncomfortable over the possible outcome of the Presidential Election Petitions Court.
“I think the Federal Government is apprehensive about the outcome of the Presidential Election Petitions Court. Otherwise, I didn’t see any reason it would have dismantled the billboard that says all eyes are on the judiciary.
The message is not offensive in any way. Are all eyes not on the judiciary now? The bitter truth is that all eyes and of course, all ears are on the judiciary. We are all listening and watching to know what the judiciary will come up with concerning the pending election matter.
It’s also a violation of the right of freedom of speech of those who erected the billboard. We have freedom of speech in Nigeria. If those behind the message had made the necessary payments and got their receipts, the federal government had no right to act the way it did”
Message not offensive to right-thinking person —Atedo Peterside
In his own contribution, Atedo Peterside, founder of Stanbic IBTC Bank Plc and Anap Foundation, argued that the “All Eyes On The Judiciary” slogan recently seen on billboards across the country is far from being offensive.
In a tweet last Friday, Peterside said the slogan should not have been offensive to a right-thinking person. He said, “For the record, methinks #AllEyesOnTheJudiciary is a neutral slogan that should ordinarily not offend a right-thinking and sincere person in a civilised society.
I can understand someone rejecting a negative slogan like let us turn our noses up at the judiciary. Enough said.”
It is proper that eyes be on the judiciary–Ogwuche, lawyer
A legal practitioner, International Law advocate, and social activist, Festus Ogwuche, said: “The people responsible for billboards have their rights to freedom of speech and there is nothing in the publication that entails the withdrawal or derogation from that rights that is fundamental.
Indeed, it is a clarion call to the judiciary to understand the depth of feelings of the vast generality of the populace on the sacredness of the duty upon them to dispense justice with fairness and objectivity, and we make this call daily to remind the sector of this responsibility.
There is no social advocacy greater than this, particularly, as we are experiencing great failures and downturns in the judicial system that are becoming a huge threat to our existence as a nation.
Now, from that prediction, why would anybody think that it is offensive for one to demand that eyes should be on the judiciary? Are there guarantees that the present judicial officers that have churned out mind-boggling and unacceptable decisions that do not meet the minimum criteria or standards of justice have turned new leaves and the prospects of a wholesome adjudication devoid of useless technicalities and travesties are now workable? Is there any sign that the high-level corruption which the ICPC 2022 report finds the judicial sector deeply mired in has abated one bit? Yes, all eyes must be on the judiciary that has derogated from the nobility of its sanctity into the enclave of murk and putrid mockery disdain, and stench.
Eyes must be on the judiciary, which failure to stand up to its constitutional duties has resulted in the current doom and hopelessness that currently engulfed our dear nation.
We must not only put our eyes on the judiciary but also point fingers menacingly at it, for it is the abdication of justice stable for the esoteric lure, fascination of judicial drudgery, and lucre that impugn its integrity”.
The billboards didn’t say ‘All Guns on the Judiciary’ — Effiong, legal practitioner
Mr Inibehe Effiong, a prominent public interest and human rights lawyer emphasized the significance of the message conveyed by the billboards and the importance of closely monitoring the judiciary ahead of the upcoming judgements on the 2023 election petition cases.
According to him, “in the context of the upcoming 2023 election petition cases, it is paramount that we keep a close eye on the judiciary. Openness, accessibility, and accountability are the bedrocks of justice in any society, and citizens have the right to demand them from all branches of government.
Even the judiciary knows that all eyes are on it regarding the presidential election petitions. It is unacceptable and pathetic for some partisan individuals to abuse government power and deploy government agencies to clamp down on a harmless message.
Are not all eyes on the judiciary? Is there anyone in Nigeria who is not watching to see the outcome of the presidential election petition proceedings? This does not amount to a threat against the Justices of the Court of Appeal who are handling the cases; rather, the billboards merely express citizens’ interest in electoral litigation. The public was granted access to observe the proceedings, which were not held in secret. Justice is not afraid of the scrutiny of the people or the public’s interest in the administration of justice.
I fail to see how the phrase ‘All Eyes on the Judiciary’ is sub judice. The billboards did not say ‘All Guns are on the Judiciary.’ The position of ARCON, stating that the billboards were taken down because the cases are in court, lacks legal basis.
The law does not prohibit lawyers from commenting on the cases they are handling in court, as long as they do not do so in a manner that prejudices the outcome of the case. The inscriptions on the billboards are not even couched in a partisan manner; they don’t mention any political party. The eyes of all politicians are on the judiciary, including President Bola Tinubu and the Director-General of ARCON. Thus, this is just sickening hypocrisy.
If people have something they are hiding, they should be straightforward about it and stop trivializing such a serious matter. The government’s action amounts to a violation of the right to freedom of expression. The fact that some people are offended by those billboards is not enough reason to have them removed. The courts have ruled that the right to free speech is meaningless if people are not allowed to express views that may offend others, as long as they haven’t crossed the bounds of the law.”
Nigerians not bereft of creative ideas —Monye
Moses Monye, a rights advocate emphasized that the billboards served as a reminder for Nigerians to pay attention to the judiciary, particularly with regards to the upcoming judgments on the election petition cases.
He expressed disappointment at their removal and highlighted the necessity for stakeholders to engage in open discussions regarding the state of the justice system and to hold the nation’s institutions accountable.
Monye emphasized that the utilization of alternative methods by Nigerians to bypass the restrictions on billboards reflects a deep-rooted yearning for effective governance and a sense of order within the country.
He stated, “If you remove billboards, Nigerians will resort to posters; if you remove posters, they will resort to stickers; and if you remove stickers, people will end up becoming walking billboards, much like the style of the Lords Chosen. This highlights the level of frustration currently experienced by Nigerians. Do you know why? All eyes are on the judiciary.”
Erect more billboards–Dr. Mudiaga-Odje, constitutional lawyer
Constitutional lawyer and activist, Dr. Akpo Mudiaga-Odje, asserted, “This present scenario is a fallout of the outcome of the 2023 elections, which is expected in any democracy, especially where the main contenders and even pretenders to the elective offices, have surrendered themselves before the judiciary. The judiciary is now in focus and they expect its judgments to be just and fair in the circumstances.
To my limited knowledge of the law, I see nothing and absolutely nothing wrong with the erection of the said billboards, except they have not paid the required fee for erecting same.
I recently delivered a lecture to the University of Benin Alumni, Association, Warri Chapter, titled” The Judiciary In The Eyes Of The Storm”. Therefore, if I erected this lecture title, perhaps the regulatory authority will bring the billboard down as desecrating the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal.
That is completely incongruous with Section 39 of our 1999 Constitution as amended, which guarantees an unmitigated right to freedom of expression for all Nigerians. The words, ‘All Eyes on the Judiciary’ are indeed much wider than the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal, and include all courts in Nigeria hearing any matter relating to the 2023 elections. A militant bar and/or citizenry heralds a vibrant bench and/or judiciary.
Indeed, it is very axiomatic even without erecting it on a billboard that all eyes are actually on the judiciary now. It is the judiciary that will finally validate the election results and that automatically has put the same in the spotlight.
Before the announcement of the election results, ‘All eyes were on INEC’. After INEC, rightly, all eyes are on the judiciary. After the announcement of results, all eyes naturally are now on the judiciary, as people have filed petitions and cases for judicial determination. The erection of the said billboards is a welcome development and also a veritable means of arousing the sensibilities of our people.
That will make the judiciary sit up and live up to expectations. Therefore, the average person must now take such steps in erecting more of such billboards to protect their interest and indeed save the judiciary”.
Splitting hairs over nothing–King, activist
A human rights advocate and lawyer, Higher King, told Saturday Vanguard, “For me, the Federal Government doesn’t have to pull down billboards. They are dissipating energy on unnecessary things rather than focusing on fixing the bigger problem, which is the economy. The billboards have nothing to do with Presidential Election judgment, so why the hullabaloo? It is an infringement on the rights of the people that put up the billboards.
In the first place, they approved the billboards and collected fees before they erected those billboards, so why breach the contract?
Our eyes must be on the judiciary–Oyakonghan, ex-militant leader
Ex-militant leader, Josiah Oyakonghan, a.k.a Commander Oyimi, who spoke in Delta State, said, “Our eagle eyes should be on the judiciary because the judiciary is the last hope of the common people.
Focusing our eagle eyes on the judiciary is because Nigerians want the rule of law to be strong in the country, and they do not want to do something outside the rule of law. Anybody that says Nigerians’ eyes should not be on the judiciary, that person is ready to undermine the rule of law in Nigeria. Our eyes should be on the judiciary because the function of the judiciary is to correct wrongs.”
‘Govt must shun the hypocrisy’
Another rights activist, who preferred to speak to Saturday Vanguard anonymously, said, “The fact that top officials were suspended and their unit disbanded over billboards that highlight the importance of judicial oversight sends a worrying message. It raises questions about the state of our democracy and the willingness of authorities to tolerate dissenting voices. If anyone complains about the billboard stating ‘ALL EYES ON THE JUDICIARY,’ remind them that the Nigerian Supreme Court overturned a judgment in favor of Senator Ahmad Lawan, who never participated in legitimate primaries for the Senate race in Yobe State”.
Message unseemly; govt wrong in pulling down billboards —Emiaso, retired arbitrator
A retired President of the Delta State Area Customary Court, Miakpo Emiaso, however disagreed with the message on the billboards. He said, “I think the message in those billboards is inappropriate now that the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal is still sitting and has not delivered its judgment. It has the potential of affecting the psyche of the judges and that is not right. It is like sub judice though not commenting on the substance of what the tribunal is considering.
You do not intimidate a court; you do not influence the mind of the court when the court is still sitting over a matter. However, pulling down those billboards the way the Federal Government has gone about it without an appropriate court order is also in bad taste. That is not democracy, and that is not due process, it is the executive being the accuser and the judge in its case.
In a properly run democratic process, where the government thinks somebody has done something improper against the law, you seek a court order before you do what you have just done, otherwise, what you have done amounts to self-help, which is not allowed under our laws. You do not punish a citizen for a presumed offense without a court order. Those who put those bills there have done so ostensibly relying on their rights to free speech.
Let the judiciary breathe—Ikimi, lawyer
A senior lawyer and activist, Oghenejabor Ikimi, asserted: “Of course, the billboards with the inscription, “All Eyes on the Judiciary” mounted at strategic locations in Abuja, are no doubt targeted at judges of the Presidential Election Tribunal and this is unfair.
I submit the words conveyed to the public are most inappropriate and their removal appropriate. I agree that section 39(1) of the 1999 Constitution guarantees freedom of expression, but section 45(1) restricts the said rights in the interest of public safety, public order, public morality and for protecting the rights and freedom of another person. Who says members of the Presidential Election Tribunal do not have rights, dignity, and integrity to be protected by the Constitution? The words no doubt are derogatory of the judiciary and her respective judges put on trial, and unnecessary pressure. Let the judiciary breathe.
Frightening the judiciary—Omare, ex-IYC president, Delta
Former President of the Ijaw Youth Council, IYC, Eric Omare, maintained, “I am of the view that the billboards are inappropriate. It amounts to subtle intimidation of the judiciary for people with interest in pending cases before the election tribunal or any court to mount billboards. Parties through their witnesses and lawyers have presented their cases and they should leave the judiciary unfettered to do its job.
I do not support the promoters of those billboards and it amounts to interference with judiciary independence and an act of desperation. We do not need billboards to know that all eyes are usually on the judiciary after every general election once candidates present petitions to the tribunal.
Let those interested in the outcome be patient and act within the ambit of the laws”.
It will trigger violence–Morris, environmentalist, Bayelsa
Similarly, the Program Manager/Head, ERA’s Niger Delta Resource Center, Bayelsa State, Alagoa Morris, said: “Those who conceived, accepted, sponsored, and positioned the billboards were trying to mount undue pressure on the judges and by extension- the judiciary. If allowed, it becomes an unfortunate precedent that will not allow the judiciary to breathe. Let the judiciary breathe. The entire world is watching what is happening and, that is a fact.
We should be conscious enough to resist those we think are crossing the lines into areas they ought not to take us. If you place the billboard and they allow it, do you not think others can also think of how to physically go to the tribunal environment, and sing whatever songs, demanding justice for their preferred candidates? Will that not lead to violence? Violence is not only physical harm, it could be emotional too, this is my opinion, and I am expressing it without apology to anybody or group”. (Saturday Vanguard)
News
Enugu Pensioners Recount Past Ordeals as Mbah Pays 26-Year Gratuity Arrears
• Pensioners hail governor as promise keeper
• Mbah: No retiree should go to bed hungry
Enugu State pensioners under the auspices of the Nigeria Union of Pensioners (NUP) have hailed Governor Peter Mbah for keeping his campaign promise to clear legacy arrears, describing their decades of disappointment after serving their fatherland as a harrowing experience.
The pensioners spoke as retirees started receiving their gratuities dating back to the year 2000, with some also extending to the military era, saying the development had restored life to their bodies.
The Chairman, Enugu State chapter of NUP, Ikechukwu Ekere, confirmed the development at the weekend, describing it as “an emotional moment for pensioners, many of whom had long given up hope of receiving their gratuities in their lifetime.”
“Yes, I can confirm to you that our members have started receiving the alerts. Governor Mbah is a promise keeper; he has done it again and we can’t thank him enough,” he said.
In the same vein, the Caretaker Chairman of the Nigeria Union of Pensioners, Local Government Staff Pensions Board Branch, Kenneth Ugwueze, told journalists that the development had restored hope and joy in many homes, saying that Mbah had, once again, proven himself as a leader who could be trusted.

“You know what it means for a governor to pay debts incurred by many governors before him? It takes a large quantity of milk of human kindness. We are happy to see a day like this in our lifetime. We will continue to pray for him.
“We are also grateful and happy with the new dimensions brought in by our governor in pension administration, especially in the local government system.
“Before now, local government workers and primary school teachers who retired had to wait for two years before receiving their pensions. But since the conclusion of the verification exercise in July 2024, no pensioner in the local government system has been denied pension. We have been receiving our pensions as and when due.
“Now that our people have started receiving alerts for their gratuity, it is a thing of joy,” he said.
Some beneficiaries of the ongoing payments also expressed gratitude to the governor, describing the development as a rekindling of hope after years and devades of waiting. They said previous governments had not paid them even in the days of excess crude revenues.
Mr. Luke Obi Ezea, who retired in 2014, said he had since resigned himself to fate and put everything in the hands of God.
“I put in 35 years in service. Already, I had put everything in the hands of God because previous governors had made promises, but to no avail. They were just empty promises at the end of their eight years. But Peter Mbah is an action governor and keeps his word,” he stated.
Mr. Sunday Nwadi, a 2015 retiree, described Mbah as a godly and listening governor who does not play politics with the welfare of his people.
“I am enjoying today because, apart from this gratuity, he is not owing monthly pensions. He is up to date. He is not like the others, who would owe us pensions for many months. Nothing will happen to Mbah. He is returning for a second term.”
Susanna Emehelu, whose husband retired in 2013, said the man had been sick for a long time, and they had been hoping against hope that the gratuity would come to help ameliorate their challenges.
“When I broke the good news to him, he was so happy and asked me to rush to the office to confirm. Now, he is so happy that he would eat the fruits of his labour in his lifetime. May God bless our governor,” she stated.
Mr. Paul Ozoeze, a 2010 retiree, said the gratuity payment had restored life to his body, noting that it had been nearly 20 years of suffering for him.
Meanwhile, the Accountant-General of Enugu State, Mr. Tony Okenwa, recalled that Mbah had always insisted during discussions leading up to the verification and payment of backlogs that no senior citizen should go to bed hungry.
“These are old debts. Some of them date back even to the military era. But the governor has said that no retiree will stay without receiving his or her pension and gratuity, and he is very passionate about it.
“Whenever I went to him, he would ask: ‘Do you mean that people retire and then don’t go home with their gratuity?’
“He could not understand how somebody would work for many years, retire and still not receive what he had earned,” Okenwa said.
He said the State Executive Council, after several layers of verification, approved N32bn, with the governor releasing an initial N10bn, assuring that the releases would continue until the entire liabilities were cleared.
News
FUEL SUBSIDY: BRINGING IT BACK WILL WORSEN NIGERIA’S ECONOMIC CRISIS – MBAH
• Enugu needs another four years of my leadership to consolidate gains, says governor; defends Smart Green Schools, taxation, water supply, roads, 660MW power project
By Tony Edike
Governor Peter Mbah of Enugu State has defended the economic reforms of President Bola Tinubu, warning that bringing back the old fuel subsidy regime could worsen Nigeria’s economic challenges, trigger further currency depreciation and deepen poverty.
In this wide-ranging interview, Mbah speaks on his administration’s performance since assuming office in May 2023, explaining its investments in education, healthcare, agriculture, infrastructure, water supply, electricity and security.
He also addresses public concerns over taxation, delays in road construction, structural defects in some Smart Green Schools, the proposed 660-megawatt coal-fired power plant and allegations of marginalisation of Enugu North Senatorial District.
The governor defends his administration’s policies, outlines the challenges confronting some projects and makes a case for continuity beyond 2027, arguing that Enugu needs another four years of his leadership to consolidate ongoing investments and realise its development ambitions.

Looking back at your campaign promises in 2023, do you think the vision you presented to the people is beginning to take shape?
Before the 2023 election, we imagined what Enugu could become and presented that vision during our campaigns. We challenged our people to stretch their imagination and consider what the state could achieve if they gave us their mandate.
We imagined an Enugu where young people could build their futures, businesses would flourish, and children would receive an education that prepares them for the future. We also envisioned a state where people have access to quality healthcare, live securely and take pride in their environment.
I am excited to engage our people and hear whether they believe that ambition is beginning to take shape or whether it still exists only in their imagination. That is why I welcome this engagement.
Look around you. We are sitting in an international conference centre. Imagine an Enugu without such a facility a few years ago. Today, it has opened its doors to Nigeria and the world, creating limitless opportunities for our businesses and people.
Beyond this facility, we have the Enugu International Hospital, which is about to be commissioned; roads connecting our communities; improved transportation; Enugu Air; the revitalisation of existing industries and the establishment of new ones.
Coming from the business world, I understand the importance of performance management reviews, where promises are measured against results. That is essentially what we are doing here: measuring our promises against the results on the ground. I look forward to this engagement.
There has been considerable attention on the Smart Green Schools project. However, focusing on budgetary allocation and performance, what has education received under your administration?
Education was one of the first sectors we prioritised when we assumed office. We examined the data and became concerned about the situation. We recognised that if we wanted to eradicate poverty in the long term, build wealth and make Enugu a place where young people could build their futures, we needed an aggressive intervention in the sector.
Over the last three budget cycles, we have allocated an average of 33 per cent of our total budget to education. The lowest allocation was about 32 per cent.
We made that commitment because we understood the connection between education and development. It was never simply about building Smart Green Schools or creating beautiful physical structures. We recognised that the entire education sector required an intervention similar to an emergency declaration.
We could not continue to allow our children to go through the motions of learning without acquiring the relevant skills required in the modern world.
We have transformed the education system, including how we approach early childhood learning. For the first time in the history of the state, children from the age of three can access early childhood education in public schools on a large scale.
Beyond learning, we are using the same platform to intervene in their healthcare. When a child enters the system at age three, we assess the child’s health profile.
Our Smart Green Schools have clinics, each manned by a registered nurse. This enables us to assess the children’s medical records. Some of them, particularly those from rural communities, may not even have medical records. We help regularise those records and ensure they receive the necessary vaccinations and other preventive healthcare they should have received before the age of three.
We also assess their nutritional status, including stunting and wasting, and monitor their height and weight to ensure proper development.
The children progress through nursery, pre-primary one and pre-primary two before moving into the Basic One to Basic Nine system.
Previously, children attended primary school from Primary One to Primary Six, wrote the common entrance examination and then moved to another school. Parents had to spend additional money to secure admission for them.
We have eliminated that interruption in our Smart Green Schools. A child can start from Basic One and progress to Basic Nine without interruption. Technically, we have 12 years of compulsory and free education.

Governor Peter Mbah
And when we say free, we mean genuinely free. There are no registration fees. Parents do not have to buy uniforms because we provide them. Textbooks and notebooks are also provided free of charge.
We have equally transformed the teaching and learning methods. We have moved away from the traditional approach to experiential learning, where children acquire knowledge through practical experience.
Beyond digital skills, our schools have robotics and artificial intelligence hubs, as well as innovation hubs where children learn to build robots and acquire other practical skills.
Learning is no longer a one-way process in which teachers stand in front of classrooms and ask children to memorise and repeat information.
The children now see their classrooms as creativity hubs and themselves as potential problem-solvers. They are exposed to real-life social problems and taught how to develop solutions.
Some Smart Green Schools have reportedly experienced structural problems, including roofs being blown off during heavy rainfall. Are the schools we have today what you envisioned before assuming office?
We are talking about projects of enormous scale. In the last three years, we have built 268 Smart Green Schools. These are outstanding structures, and accomplishing such a feat could ordinarily take 10 to 20 years.
When you fast-track projects of that magnitude, you may encounter teething problems. We are not oblivious to the challenges, and the important question is whether we are prepared to address them. Certainly, we are.
Some of the issues people have observed involve physical defects, including roofs being blown off. These are challenges we are addressing, and we will ensure they are resolved.
We fast-tracked the projects because we wanted to achieve them within a short period. We could not afford to wait indefinitely. In our book, tomorrow is here.
We wanted to execute these projects on a large scale so that no child would be left behind.
We could have built just three Smart Green Schools, one in each senatorial district. That would still have been a significant achievement. We could even have settled for 17, one in each local government area.
But we went further and built 268 schools because we wanted every child in Enugu to have access to quality education.
Regarding the teething problems, including structural defects and roofs being blown off, we are addressing them and will ensure that all the schools are fit for purpose.
Does the decision to fast-track the projects absolve the contractors of responsibility for the defects?
Certainly not.
We have records of all the contractors. Those whose projects have defects are expected to return and fix them. Contractors who have been recalcitrant are blacklisted, and there are consequences for their actions.
We also obtained advance payment guarantees from all the contractors. Where necessary, we have the option of calling up those guarantees.
Your administration promised to revitalise agriculture, particularly palm oil production, and develop infrastructure to support sustainable growth. What has been achieved so far?
When we assumed office, we upgraded the Ministry of Agriculture to the Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-industrialisation. We did not change the name simply for cosmetic reasons. We recognised agriculture’s contribution to our GDP.
Our target was to grow the state’s GDP sevenfold in eight years. We therefore needed to concentrate on the critical sectors driving that growth, and agriculture was number one.
We immediately set out to activate the state’s dormant agricultural assets.
First, we entered into a joint venture with Pragmatic Farm to reactivate United Farm Products Limited, now known as Enugu United Farm Products Limited (EUPPL).
The joint venture is expected to attract an investment of about ₦100 billion into the plantation.
Today, the plantation is active and covers approximately 6,700 hectares. Some of the trees had become unproductive because of their age, but more than 2,000 hectares have now been cultivated and are producing. We have also rehabilitated some of the old trees and returned them to production.
We have equally reactivated what used to be Anambra Vegetable Oil Products (AVOP), now known as Enugu Vegetable Oil Products (EVOP).
We are producing palm oil at the UPPL plantation, and we are taking the process further. We will soon receive equipment for the refinery because we want to process the palm oil into vegetable oil and other related products.
Another example is the former Songhai facility in Heneke, Ezeagu. It was dormant, but today it is active. We are working with a private investor, Tribu, and it is now known as Tribu Songhai Farm. The facility covers about 10,000 hectares.
The Sunrise Flower Mill is another example. It was previously dormant, but it is being reactivated through the cultivation of 10,000 hectares of cassava. The facility is also being upgraded to process cassava in addition to wheat.
We have six pilot farm estates under development. Our plan is to establish at least 260 farm estates, with each ward having a minimum of 200 hectares.
Each estate will have perimeter fencing, warehouses and the necessary machinery. The objective is to help smallholder farmers transition from subsistence farming to mechanised agriculture.
We also have over 167,000 hectares of land available as a land bank for commercial farmers. These are lands freely donated by communities to the government to attract investors, create employment and generate wealth.
We welcome investors interested in our agricultural sector. They are already coming, and we are engaging with several of them. Examples include investments in Isi-Uzo and Adani, as well as our partnership with Ellah Lakes Plc.
We have also established a tractor assembly plant. More than 60,000 farmers are in our database, cultivating over 80,000 hectares of land. We have the geographical coordinates of their farms.
A few months ago, we distributed over 60,000 bags of fertiliser. Unlike some states that charge farmers for such support, we distributed ours free of charge.
We also provided other agricultural inputs, high-yielding seedlings, handheld tractors and equipment to improve production.
However, our focus is not limited to production. We are also investing in processing. We are building agro-transformation centres across the three senatorial districts, in addition to the Special Agro-Processing Zone, which will serve as the main production centre.
We are also building what will become the biggest ranch in the country, with the capacity to accommodate more than 20,000 cattle. It is known as the Integrated Livestock Hub and is being developed around Obahu and Umualo.
Additionally, we secured Federal Government approval for Enugu to be one of three states where an Integrated Poultry Hub will be established. The other states are Kaduna and Oyo.
On water supply, would you say Enugu State now has a reliable system that meets residents’ needs?
I know this question will come up, particularly regarding my 180-day commitment. I promised that within 180 days, water would flow in every household. We made that commitment because we understood how important access to water was to our people.
I recall during my campaign seeing children queuing to fetch water from tankers. I understood that the absence of water could keep a child out of school or prevent the child from doing homework because of the time spent searching for water.
Before making that commitment, I had already begun analysing the situation. Between my election and inauguration, I examined the production segment, particularly the upstream capacity.
I discovered that the state was producing only about two million litres of water daily, whereas Enugu needed approximately 80 million litres to ensure adequate supply across the city.
We immediately front-loaded the procurement process because some of the equipment required were long-lead items. They were not readily available, and some had to be customised. Procuring certain equipment, particularly the major pumps, could take about four months.
By front-loading procurement, we saved at least two months. Two months into our administration, the pumps arrived, and we began increasing production. We also reactivated the Ninth Mile water scheme, which had been dormant for years.
By the 180th day, we had increased production capacity to 120 million litres daily.
However, as production increased, the pipes began to burst. The existing pipes had become brittle and exceeded their design lifespan. We also had to contend with asbestos pipes and situations where buildings had encroached on the pipelines’ rights of way.
We faced a difficult choice: demolish buildings constructed on the rights of way or develop a new distribution network.
We decided that these were our citizens and that we did not want to demolish their buildings. Instead, we began reconnecting the network and establishing new connections.
Today, Enugu has the production capacity to serve the entire city, with a buffer of more than 50 per cent. Our challenge is ensuring that water reaches the last mile.
We have divided the city into approximately 14 zones, and work is ongoing across all of them to establish last-mile connections.
The process is slower because of the obstructions we encounter. We have also procured thrust-boring equipment to enable horizontal drilling, which will eliminate the need to cut open roads in many cases.
We will solve the water problem. I understand its importance to our people, and I receive daily briefings on progress in the sector.
Residents continue to complain about the condition of roads across the state, particularly delays in completing some projects. What is responsible for these challenges?
You can imagine how I feel whenever I notice that the weather is changing and the rainy season is approaching. We have a limited period of dry weather each year during which we can effectively undertake road construction.
If you fail to take advantage of that dry-season window, you may have to wait until the next year. No matter how much pressure you put on contractors, there are certain construction activities they cannot undertake during persistent rainfall without compromising quality.
I have often wondered whether there are innovative ways to undertake road construction even during the rainy season.
Unfortunately, we have barely five months in a year to carry out road construction effectively.
For instance, we expected the dry season to begin early this year. That was why I became disturbed when I saw the rain recently.
We had experienced only two days of dry weather, and I had already informed contractors that the rains were over and that they should return to their sites.
Those roads have been fully cash-backed. They have been fully funded. In fact, for many of the projects, contractors have not even completed work to the extent of the payments already made to them.
It is unfortunate that they cannot proceed while the rains persist because certain construction activities cannot be carried out during the wet season without affecting the quality of the roads.
Poverty eradication, zero hunger and ease of doing business were among the measurable indicators in your 2023 manifesto. However, taxation remains a major complaint among residents, with traders alleging that your administration is overtaxing them. What is your response?
Thank you for raising the issue of taxation because it is one of the allegations that have been repeated so often that some people are beginning to accept them as truth.
I think those who believe we are excessively taxing the people are looking at the growth recorded in our internally generated revenue (IGR). They probably cannot imagine how such growth could have happened within this period, so they conclude that we must have imposed additional burdens on the people.
That is far from the truth.
I have explained this on several occasions. We cannot legislate on taxation in areas outside the state’s constitutional competence. Personal income tax rates, company income tax, value-added tax, withholding tax and other related taxes are legislated upon by the National Assembly.
Perhaps what some people consider taxation may, in a generic sense, be payments for services, such as waste disposal, business premises fees, water charges, Certificate of Occupancy fees, estate management fees and land use charges.
If you examine the fees we charge for those services, you will understand what we have done.
We enacted a state law to consolidate the charges because businesses previously complained about multiple taxation. People were asked to pay different taxes, fees, rates and levies.
We decided to consolidate these payments into one annual charge.
How much did we decide to charge? ₦36,000 annually for businesses. This covers business premises fees and several other rates. Once you make that payment, nobody is permitted to approach you for additional payments for those services.
That amounts to barely ₦100 daily or about ₦3,000 monthly.
When the controversy became intense, I exercised caution and set up a committee, headed by the Secretary to the State Government, to compare our charges with those of other states.
I directed the committee to examine what was obtainable in neighbouring states, Lagos and Abuja. After about three weeks, I received its report, which showed that Enugu charged the lowest rates in the South-East for those services.
Regarding land use charges, before the committee was inaugurated, the fees were around ₦150,000 and, in some cases, ₦200,000. We reduced them significantly.
We also expanded the tax net. When we assumed office, barely 9,000 units were receiving demand notices for land use charges. But a survey showed that there were more than 800,000 billable household units.
I decided that since we were expanding the tax net, we should also reduce the rates to encourage voluntary compliance. We brought the charge down from over ₦100,000 to ₦25,000.
We also received complaints about people going to markets, apparently from local governments, to collect money from traders. I announced that the practice should stop. Nobody should collect ₦100 or ₦200 from our market women.
We have also made recent announcements concerning tricycle operators, although those charges have little impact on our IGR.
So, how have we grown our IGR?
First, we plugged leakages. We were shocked by the extent of financial leakages in the system. Today, nobody collects cash on behalf of the state government. All payments go into the Treasury Single Account.
We have also activated dormant government assets, which are now generating substantial revenue.
Before we came into office, the government was spending money to sustain Nike Lake Hotel and support its management. Today, we earn over ₦300 million from the arrangements we have put in place.
For Hotel Presidential, the government earns over ₦1 billion. The International Conference Centre is also generating substantial revenue.
The same applies to our partnerships in United Farm Products Limited, where the government owns 40 per cent; Sunrise Flower Mill, where we also own 40 per cent; and Tribu Songhai, where our interest is about 30 per cent.
The government is now generating revenue from assets that were previously dormant. That is what you are seeing reflected in the growth of our IGR.
Property owners have also complained about capital gains tax. What is your administration’s position on this?
I am yet to understand whether you are referring specifically to capital gains tax.
You cannot be charged capital gains tax if you have not carried out a transaction. Capital gains tax arises when you sell your land or house and there is a difference between the price at which you acquired the property and the price at which you sold it.
The government then charges a percentage of that gain. It is not a tax whose rate is legislated by the state government. Capital gains tax is also within the exclusive legislative competence of the National Assembly.
Land use charge, of course, is something we legislate on, and, as I have explained, we have done everything possible to reduce it.
Nobody should charge you capital gains tax if you have not carried out a land transaction. It becomes applicable when you complete a transaction involving the sale of land or property.
Is your administration open to engaging businesses differently, particularly through bespoke arrangements to address concerns about taxation and other business-related issues?
When we committed ourselves to growing the state’s economy sevenfold, we knew that businesses and private capital would drive that growth.
We are therefore not just interested in creating an environment where businesses can thrive. In many cases, we get directly involved. We support businesses and even inject funds where we believe such assistance will help them survive and grow.
We do this deliberately because we appreciate the employment opportunities they create and the wealth they generate for the state.
These are young people taking initiatives and investing their resources. We recognise the benefits that come when businesses succeed.
I am therefore more than happy to engage directly with business owners on specific areas where they want government intervention.
You promised that the groundbreaking ceremony for a 660-megawatt coal-fired power plant would take place in July, with a 24-month construction timeline. That promise is yet to be fulfilled. What is happening?
That brings me back to the issue of the rainy season. We have been ready since July.
In fact, when we experienced those two days of dry weather, I was already speaking with our partners about commencing preparations.
The plant has been procured. It is not the state government that procured it; we are working with an investor.
The plant is ready. What we need to do is prepare our base, which involves the civil works. We also need to construct an access road to the location because the plant will be situated at Amansiodo, close to the fuel source.
The plant will be powered by coal, and Amansiodo has our largest coal reserves. That is why we selected the location: we wanted the power plant to be close to the source of production.
As I speak to you, the plant is being brought in from China. Its commissioning process is ongoing, although that also takes time.
Everything remains on track.
The reason we have not held the groundbreaking ceremony as promised in July is the rainy season. We are hoping that once we have a favourable weather window, we will hold the ceremony and commence the civil works.
How would you assess President Bola Tinubu’s economic policies, particularly against the backdrop of the hardship Nigerians are experiencing?
When you assess Nigeria’s macroeconomic indicators, you will notice that before the bold and courageous decisions taken by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the country was almost at an economic precipice.
I am sure you remember the Ways and Means advances we had accumulated. We were talking about more than ₦27 trillion.
What that meant was that we were in a hole, and the only way we were trying to get out was by digging deeper. I do not think that was sustainable.
If we had continued along that trajectory, we could have witnessed total economic collapse and possibly become a failed nation.
The President could have come into office and decided that, because of the ₦27 trillion Ways and Means advances, we should continue printing money and digging deeper. That would have been disastrous.
Even the economic hardship we are discussing today, including pressure on households and unemployment, would have been relatively minor compared with what we might have experienced if those decisions had not been taken.
For a nation to function effectively, it must first address its macroeconomic pressures. Without stability at that level, sustainable growth becomes difficult.
For example, our foreign reserves are currently about $56 billion to $58 billion, which is the highest level in almost two decades. They can sustain us for approximately 10 to 11 months.
Look at the foreign exchange market. It has become relatively stable because we have allowed it to be driven by market forces. The exchange rate was floated rather than being artificially controlled.
Previously, we were controlling what we could not back. That was why our foreign reserves were declining rapidly because we were not generating the corresponding foreign exchange.
People were also losing confidence in the naira. Even workers, after receiving their salaries, would convert their money into foreign currencies because they no longer had confidence in the local currency.
Today, the economy is stabilising because the macroeconomic indicators are looking better. The next thing we need to pursue is growth.
Once you achieve stability, private capital becomes a major driver of growth. Investors will not bring their money into an economy they consider unstable.
You must first stabilise the economy to attract investment. When those investments begin to come in, people will experience shared prosperity through job creation, increased earning power and poverty reduction.
That is what this President has done, and I believe we must commend his courage in taking those decisions.
We have not had many administrations with the courage to take such bold decisions. We are on the right path, and based on the numbers and growth we are witnessing, we are beginning to see light at the end of the tunnel.
You have often spoken about Enugu’s relationship with the Federal Government and the importance of regional collaboration. Has the state recorded any security benefits from this relationship?
Certainly. Do not forget that even the idea of establishing the Distress Response Squad (DRS) received approval from the Federal Government.
The squad is not simply about having police officers working under the DRS. It is essentially helping to ensure that the command and control centre functions effectively.
Regional cooperation is another area where we have benefited significantly.
We now have a level of intelligence-sharing across the region that was not available previously. You may not see the physical structure of a regional central command and control centre, but there is considerably more collaboration among the states and security agencies than we had before.
We also receive support from security agencies.
We work very well with the Army, Police, Department of State Services, Air Force and other security agencies in the state, including the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps.
We have a very good working relationship with them, and Ndi Enugu have derived several benefits from our connection with the Federal Government.
Enugu has always been a regional hub. We attained township status even before amalgamation. That tells you how important the city has historically been.
However, we were gradually losing that pre-eminence because we were increasingly being displaced. We were not sufficiently connected to places where important national activities were taking place.
Today, conferences and national functions are returning to where they belong.
The National Festival of Arts and Culture (NAFEST) is scheduled to take place here in November. We also have the National Sports Festival, the National Council on Agriculture and several other national activities taking place in Enugu.
These events are creating opportunities for our businesses and people.
Could you give an overview of your administration’s achievements in the healthcare sector? Also, what is the government doing about housing regulations in Enugu State?
We have invested significantly in healthcare. However, our investment is not primarily about physical structures. We are more interested in health indicators, which we monitor and measure closely.
For example, we knew the maternal mortality figures when we assumed office, and we know where they stand today.
We had a situation where, for every 100,000 live births, we recorded more than 700 maternal deaths. Today, that figure has dropped to below 100.
What accounted for that improvement? We increased access to skilled healthcare for pregnant women.
Before we came into office, about 40 per cent of our women had access to a skilled health professional during delivery. Today, barely four per cent lack such access.
We have midwives and family healthcare professionals providing those services. We do not want any pregnant woman to die while trying to bring a child into the world.
Our target is zero maternal mortality. We do not believe any woman should die simply because she wants to give birth.
That is also why I approved the recruitment of 2,250 healthcare personnel for our primary healthcare centres.
We first assessed personnel shortages across our primary healthcare facilities. When we discovered the extent of the deficit, we decided to bridge the gap.
Out of the 2,250 personnel, we have recruited 1,350. We are currently in the fourth phase of the recruitment exercise, with 450 personnel being recruited in each phase. We are working towards the next batch of 450.
Our objective is to recruit all 2,250 additional healthcare personnel. This will help address pressure on our facilities and improve under-five mortality figures.
What we are doing through the Smart Green Schools will also contribute to this effort because we are regularising the medical records of children who enrol in early childhood education.
Our primary healthcare centres are equipped to provide vaccinations. Mothers can take their children, particularly infants and under-five children, to these centres for immunisation.
Vaccination is preventive and can help prevent several childhood diseases and deaths.
Our current figures are significantly below the national average. In Enugu, we currently record about 60 deaths for every 1,000 live births among children under five. The same applies to infant mortality.
We are monitoring these figures closely because our objective is to ensure that children do not die from preventable conditions.
Regarding the retention of healthcare personnel, I think healthcare professionals themselves would be in a better position to tell you what we have done.
We have achieved 100 per cent of the Consolidated Medical Salary Structure (CONMESS).
For the Consolidated Health Salary Structure, we have achieved 80 per cent. We are still 20 per cent short, but we are working towards full implementation.
When we came into office, that figure was about 40 per cent. Today, we have moved it to 80 per cent.
Our objective is to achieve full implementation so that Enugu can become a major destination for healthcare professionals.
In the last two months, since the beginning of electioneering activities, you have made more than 800 appointments. Some people believe these appointments are driven by anxiety over the coming election. How do you intend to sustain them?
You are asking whether the appointments are sustainable and whether I am nervous.
What I understand you to be saying is that, at a time when some people believe the administration is approaching its end, we are instead doubling down, bringing in more people and accelerating the pace of work.
I think you should give us credit for bringing in additional hands to ensure that we accelerate development.
That is exactly what we are doing. It is not because we are nervous. We recognise that there is still a lot of work to be done, and we must do it.
There is controversy over the ₦150 million fees reportedly imposed on political parties for campaign posters and other political signage in Enugu State. What is your explanation?
The fees people pay for signage are not imposed through an executive order. They are provided for by the laws of Enugu State.
Some people have actually gone to court to challenge the law, and the court has given judgments affirming its legality because it is established by law.
It is a law of general application. Nobody is exempted.
Let me repeat that: go back to the law and review it. I challenge you to examine the law. You will never find any provision exempting the APC.
That means the law applies to everybody. Every political party is covered, and the prescribed fees must be paid. Failure to comply amounts to a violation of the law.
You are the general coordinator of the APC Presidential Campaign Council in the South-East. There is controversy surrounding the Rainbow Coalition led by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Chief Nyesom Wike. What is your position on the development?
Frankly, politics is about alignment and realignment.
If the APC is today being treated as a beautiful bride and several interests and individuals are willing to align with us, it would be inappropriate to push them away.
We are happy to welcome any party willing to join forces with us to ensure the re-election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on the platform of the APC and support the re-election of our other APC candidates.
Essentially, it is about bringing together as many forces as possible.
What is your position on calls for the possible return of fuel subsidy as a way of addressing the hardship facing Nigerians? How do you also explain the confusion surrounding the 30-day petrol discount announced for NNPC filling stations?
I think there is a misconception rather than confusion. What we should do whenever we have an opportunity or platform like this is to dismantle those misconceptions.
First, as you mentioned, my background is in business, particularly the oil and gas sector. More specifically, I worked in the downstream subsector. That is my area of expertise.
Even before entering public service, I had written several articles explaining why fuel subsidy was unsustainable and why it needed to be removed.
I knew from the project I undertook in Lekki that it could only thrive in a non-subsidy environment.
I understood that petroleum subsidy was unsustainable because it was not targeted. It was a general subsidy.
Typically, when you have a general subsidy, the people who benefit most are often the wealthy and affluent members of society.
Do not forget that subsidy had long been removed from diesel, which is used by many mass transit vehicles. The subsidy we were dealing with was on Premium Motor Spirit (PMS).
If you think about it, owners of SUVs and other large vehicles benefited more from that subsidy.
So, if we are talking about subsidies, I do not think the model we operated before the President removed it was even the right one for the country.
The people we claimed to be helping benefited only marginally, while the wealthy benefited significantly.
However, you can have targeted subsidies, where the government identifies specific segments of society, particularly vulnerable people, and directs support to them.
I think you can already see that the government is doing something along those lines.
The government is implementing cash transfers. There is also the World Development Programme, through which the government is targeting 1,000 people in each ward across the country to provide seed capital that will enable them to become economically productive.
That is targeted support.
You can see that funds saved from subsidy removal are being channelled towards the segments of society that genuinely need assistance.
Anybody advocating a return to the old subsidy regime, in my view, is advancing a misconception about the direction in which the country should go.
I have heard the Minister of Finance and the Coordinating Minister of the Economy explain that the consequences of reversing the policy could be severe.
I believe those figures are accurate. If you remove the subsidy today, whatever you think you are gaining from that decision could be lost many times over through the poverty and economic consequences that would follow.
The naira could automatically be devalued, and we could be dealing with an exchange rate of about ₦4,000 to the dollar, according to a prediction made by the minister. I have not independently verified that figure, but even if you imagine such a possibility, do we really want to take the country back to where it was?
I think what we should focus on now is encouraging private capital to flow into the economy.
Look at the changes in the stock market and the growth we have experienced in that sector. We are witnessing considerable inflows of funds into the country, not just portfolio investments but also direct investments.
That trend will become stronger because the macroeconomic indicators are becoming more stable.
If we had failed to stabilise those indicators, we would still be struggling, and there would be little reason for hope. But because the macroeconomic indicators are largely stabilising, we have reason to hope.
There have been allegations of marginalisation of Enugu North Senatorial District, particularly the Nsukka zone. How would you respond to these concerns?
If there is one thing we take great pride in, it is inclusivity.
I do not think there has been any development model in the history of Enugu State that recognises development at the ward level in the way our administration does.
This is the first time in the state’s history that development across critical sectors, particularly those that determine its future, is being implemented at the ward level.
If you look at the senatorial district with the highest number of wards, it is Enugu North. So, if you ask me which zone stands to benefit most, I would say Enugu North.
Our biggest area of expenditure is education. The people benefiting most from that intervention include those in Enugu North.
The same applies to healthcare. Enugu North is also among the major beneficiaries.
So, how can you say the zone is being sidelined?
Having watched your administration for nearly four years, why should the people of Enugu State vote for you and renew your mandate?
Let me invite Ndi Enugu to imagine something with me.
Let us imagine the Enugu we knew four years ago. Imagine an Enugu without Hotel Presidential. Imagine an Enugu without the International Conference Centre. Imagine an Enugu without Enugu Air.
You do not want to imagine an Enugu without the International Hospital, CNG buses or Niger Gas. The list is endless.
Let us stretch that imagination further. Imagine an Enugu, four years from now, generating 660 megawatts of electricity and providing 24-hour electricity across the entire state.
Imagine returning home without worrying about power outages. Businesses can flourish, and people can operate throughout the week without worrying about the cost of diesel.
Imagine an Enugu where we generate electricity and residents buy power at ₦120 because they own the coal that powers the electricity.
Imagine an Enugu where you do not just travel on CNG buses but also have a monorail that can take you from one point to another.
Imagine an Enugu where you can fly directly from here to the United Kingdom, the United States, China and Dubai.
We have asked you to imagine what Enugu was like a few years ago, before we came into office.
But even more important is the work ahead of us.
Imagine an Enugu where our children receive an education that prepares them for the world because they have acquired the evolving 21st-century skills required to compete globally.
Imagine an Enugu where all the roads are paved and there is no part of the city with an unpaved road.
The decisions we make in the coming days, weeks and months will be decisive.
We have a responsibility to uphold this Enugu of our dreams, the Enugu we have imagined for generations and which is now beginning to take shape before our eyes.
If this vision captures our imagination, then we have a duty to work towards sustaining it. We must ensure that the standard we have set does not decline and that the development trajectory we have established is sustained.
I therefore invite Ndi Enugu to continue to keep faith with us on this journey. It is a journey of greatness, growth and development.
News
Nkwocha Urges FG, Investors to Establish Waste Recycling Plants Across Nigeria
Waste-to-wealth advocate and reputation management expert, Dr Jossy Nkwocha, has called on the Federal and State Governments, as well as private investors, to adopt Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in establishing waste recycling plants across Nigeria to transform waste into economic resources and tackle environmental pollution.
Nkwocha made the call on Thursday, November 5, 2026, while delivering a keynote address at the third edition of the Waste to Wealth Summit and the unveiling of the Nigerian Institute of Regenerative Resources Management and Protection Technologies (NIPRMPT) in Port Harcourt, Rivers State.
The keynote presentation, titled “Innovation for Tomorrow: Regenerative Technologies and Sustainable Resource Governance,” examined the role of regenerative technologies in sustainable development and outlined nine recommendations for advancing regenerative resource management and governance in Nigeria.

Dr Jossy Nkwocha
Dr Nkwocha, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Reputation Masters Limited and immediate past Group Head of Corporate Communications of Indorama Eleme Petrochemicals and Fertilizer Group, Port Harcourt, urged the Institute and relevant government authorities to integrate regenerative practices and principles into Nigeria’s national development agenda.

He explained that regenerative technologies encompass systems, tools and scientific methods designed to prevent damage, repair existing harm, restore degraded resources and renew human tissues and natural ecosystems, including soil, forests, water bodies, air, the environment, livestock and other natural resources for the benefit of present and future generations.
He identified four major areas of regenerative technologies as regenerative medicine, regenerative engineering, regenerative environment and regenerative agriculture.
The keynote address, delivered as part of the induction ceremony for the Institute’s Fellows and Members, also recommended increased public awareness and capacity-building on regenerative practices to improve human health, environmental sustainability and agricultural development.
According to him, the Institute should undertake extensive research into ways of maximising the benefits of regenerative practices in Nigeria.
He further called on the Federal and State Governments to support the emerging Institute to establish a strong foundation in the relatively new field of regenerative resource management and governance.
Dr Nkwocha also urged relevant Federal Government agencies to facilitate the Institute’s access to essential equipment, materials and other resources required to implement regenerative practices.
Other recommendations included encouraging the Institute to contribute to the prevention of further biodiversity loss, restoration of degraded ecosystems, promotion of sustainable waste management practices and effective pollution control.
A major highlight of the event was the decoration of the Institute’s Chancellor, Sir Daminabo Amos Atuboyedia, alongside other board members, as Fellows of the Institute.
The decoration was performed by the Chairman of the occasion, Prof. Andrew Adesola Obafemi of the University of Port Harcourt, alongside the keynote speaker, Dr Nkwocha.
Earlier, at the opening ceremony of the summit on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, Dr Nkwocha was honoured with the Nigerian Sustainability Impact Development Award in recognition of his contributions to sustainability advocacy and development.
-
News3 days agoPSC Appoints Fidelis Ogarabe Enugu Police Commissioner, Deploys Three Others
-
News2 days ago‘I Had Lost Hope, But Prayed To Receive My Gratuity Alive’ – Enugu Retirees Thank Mbah After Years Of Waiting
-
News2 days agoEnugu Gratuity: ‘It’s Wrong to Retire Without Gratuity for Years’ – Mbah Releases ₦10bn, Pays 1,893 Retirees in First Batches
-
News22 hours agoMarriage Under Threat: Has Love Disappeared? Why Many Marriages Are Crashing and Young Men Are Afraid to Marry
-
Entertainment2 days agoDiewait Ikpechukwu Dies at 71: Nollywood Veteran, Former Footballer, Husband and Father
-
News17 hours agoAdeboye Ordered Refund of Billions in Suspected Illicit Donations to RCCG, EFCC Chairman Reveals
-
News2 days ago10 Key Things to Know about Justice Lifu’s Judgment Affecting ADC, Atiku, By Abdulrahman Abdulaziz
-
News2 days agoMbah Inaugurates 68 Development Centre Administrators, Tasks them on Grassroots Governance




