
Opinion
FALLACIOUS PLEA BARGAIN: Why NBA must sanction George Ogara, Ejike Obumneme
By Charles Nworie
It is no longer news that the PDP governorship candidate in Enugu State, Dr. Peter Mbah, dragged the APC deputy governorship candidate in Enugu State, Barr. George Ogara, and another lawyer, Mr. Ejike Obumneme, before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) for flagrant breach of the Legal Practitioners Rules of Professional Conducts 2007.
It is a well-known fact that many unscrupulous lawyers take advantage of a highly challenged system to file all manners of lawsuits and manipulate the judicial system to the advantage of their equally crooked clients.
It is against this backdrop that it becomes imperative to x-ray Mbah’s decision to seek actions by the LPDC to help rid the noble legal profession of bad eggs like Ogara and Obumneme, to preserve the sanctity of the profession and serve as deterrent to their likes.
Crux of the Matter: A Willful Misrepresentation of Facts to Mislead the Court and Destroy Another
On 7 December 2022, Ejike Obumneme Esq. filed a suit in the Federal High Court Abuja on behalf of Felix Ugwu, Jonathan Ndubuisi, Ikechukwu Eze, Agbachi Ude, Chris Ugwu and Emeka Aroh, in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2257/2022 seeking a declaration that by the express provisions of Section 182(1)(e) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), the 1st defendant in the said suit (Dr. Peter Mbah) is ineligible to contest any election to the office of Governor of a State within a period of less than ten years from 7th day of July 2015. The suit alleged that Peter Mbah and the 2nd defendant (Dr. Chimaroke Nnamani) made a charge or plea-bargains and a plea of guilty was entered on behalf of them in Charge No. FHC/L/09C/2007 by the Federal High Court on July 7, 2015.

Consequently, they claimed that Peter Mbah became a convict as a result. The litigants further alleged that Justice M.N Yunusa of the Federal High Court found Peter Mbah guilty in the said Charge No. FHC/L/09C/2007 and imposed sentence of forfeiture of assets on him. The lawsuit equally alleged that the Federal High Court found Peter Mbah and the 2nd defendant guilty of money laundering offences in Charge Nos. FHC/L/09C/2007 and FHC/L/230C/2007.
However, the allegations against Peter Mbah as contained in the lawsuit filed by Ejike Obumneme Esq. on behalf of the plaintiffs were to Mr. Obumneme’s knowledge false and malicious, as Peter Mbah never entered into any charge or plea bargain howsoever in Charge No. FHC/L/09C/2007.
On the contrary, Mbah had been discharged from the said charge about two clear years before the alleged charge or plea bargain of July 7, 2015. Following an application by the EFCC through its counsel, Kevin Uzozie, in Charge No. FHC/L/09C/2007 (Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Nnamani Chimaroke & 11 Ors.), Justice M.N. Yunusa of the Federal High Court delivered a ruling on March 7, 2013 and discharged Mr. Peter Mbah and two other accused persons from the charge before the commencement of the trial.
So, clearly, the allegation as contained in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2257/2022 that a charge/plea bargain was made on behalf of Peter Mbah and a plea of guilty entered for him by Justice M.N Yunusa on July 7, 2015 was to Mr. Obumneme’s knowledge false, contrived and intended to mislead the court to disqualify Mr. Peter Mbah from the gubernatorial race, which he is running on the platform of the PDP. But as a lawyer, Mr. Obumneme undoubtedly knows or ought to reasonably know that Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2257/2022, which he filed on behalf of the litigants, is intended to maliciously injure and destroy Mr. Mbah’s political ambition and his reputation as a renowned entrepreneur because there is no way someone, whose name was struck out of a charge sheet at the instance of the prosecutor in 2013 would have become a party to any plea bargain two years later in 2015 as alleged.
Interestingly, the 1st Plaintiff in the controversial lawsuit (Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2257/2022), Mr. Felix Ugwu deposed at paragraph 13(c) of the affidavit in support of the originating summons, that George Ogara, who is a legal practitioner and deputy governorship candidate of APC in Enugu gave him the false facts at the latter’s office in Enugu on October 10, 2022. Yet, those facts were to Ogara’s knowledge false and malicious since Peter Mbah had been discharged from the said suit two years before the alleged plea bargain.
Since George Ogara is the deputy gubernatorial candidate of the APC party in Enugu State for the 2023 election, does anyone need the gift of clairvoyance to know that he deliberately and deviously cooked up the stories against the person of Peter Mbah in furtherance of his political ambitions?
SPECIFIC RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 2007 VIOLATED
Every trade has its rules of professional conduct to protect the society from any abuse and also preserve the reputation of the profession, and the legal profession is not left out. In fact, it is one of the professions that have strictly applied their rules. Some lawyers have been disbarred, while some Senior Advocates of Nigeria have been stripped of that privilege. In this instance, Obumneme, who relied on the “facts” Ogara provided has clearly breached Rules 1, 15, 24, and 32 of the Rules of Professional Conduct 2007 as hereunder abridged. Ogara, on his part, urinated on Rule 1 of “The Rules of Professional Conduct 2007”.
*General Responsibility of a Lawyer:*
Rule 1: A Lawyer shall uphold and observe the rule of law, promote and foster the cause of justice, maintain a high standard of professional conduct, and shall not engage in any conduct which is unbecoming of a legal practitioner.
*Representing Client within the Bounds of Law:*
15(2) In his representation of his client, a lawyer shall-
(a) Keep strictly within the law notwithstanding any contrary instruction by his client and, if the client insists on a breach of the law, the lawyer shall withdraw his service;
(b) not file a suit, assert a position, conduct a defence, delay a trial, or take over action on behalf of his client when he or ought reasonably to know that such action would serve merely to harass or maliciously injure another;
(c) not knowingly advance a claim or defence that is unwarranted under existing law, but he may advance such claim or defence if it can be supported by argument in good faith for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law;
(g) not knowingly make a false statement of law or fact;
(h) not counsel or assist his client in conduct that the Lawyer knows to be illegal or fraudulent.
*Responsibility for Litigation:*
24(3) A lawyer shall not conduct a civil case or make defence in a civil case when he knows or ought reasonably to know that it is intended merely to harass or to injure the opposite party or to work oppression or wrong.
*Candid and Fair Dealing:*
32(1) In appearing in his professional capacity before a Court or Tribunal, a lawyer shall not deal with the Court otherwise than candidly and fairly; or
(j) promote a case which to his knowledge is false; or
22(k) in any other way do or perform any act which may obviously amount to an abuse of the process of the court or which is dishonourable and unworthy of an officer of the law charged, as a lawyer, with the duty of aiding in the administration of justice.
So, clearly, by filing a lawsuit, which he knew its intent is anything other than pursuit of justice; by joining in the creation and use of a palpably false evidence as contained in the affidavit in support of the originating summons in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2257/2022; by filing a lawsuit fraught with malicious, false and misleading information in a desperate move to mislead the court and destroy Peter Mbah’s political ambition and his standing as an entrepreneur, it is correct to conclude that Ejike Obumneme, a lawyer called to serve in the temple of justice, has desecrated that hallowed temple and also acted in a most malicious, dishonorable and devious manner unworthy of an officer of the law charged with the duty of aiding the administration of justice? Likewise, Ogara has behaved in a manner that shames his age and the noble legal profession.
According to the Holy Scriptures, unless judgment against an evil work is executed speedily, the heart of the sons of men will be fully set in them to do evil. The LPDC should therefore act expeditiously on these petitions to save the nation’s democracy and the legal profession. Let the hammer fall, and let it fall hard too.
Nworie writes from Enugu.

Opinion
Enugu State, Governor Mbah and The Road Revolution
By Samson Ezea
There is no meaningful development without infrastructure, and no infrastructure impacts the daily lives of the people more directly than roads. Roads connect communities, drive commerce, reduce travel time, improve security, attract investments, and open up rural areas for economic growth. In Enugu State today, one of the most visible signatures of Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah’s administration is the aggressive push in road construction and reconstruction across the state. From urban renewal projects to strategic rural link roads, the administration has continued to redefine the state’s infrastructural landscape.
Recently, I had cause to travel to Nsukka. I began my journey from Independence Layout through the Enugu–Port Harcourt Expressway and passed through Abakpa Junction. What immediately caught my attention was the impressive level of work on the second lane of the Enugu–Onitsha Expressway, which has already been opened for use, as well as the ongoing construction of the flyover bridge at Abakpa Junction.
On getting to Penoks Junction, I became even more excited seeing the extent of the dualisation project stretching from the junction down to the flyover bridge at T-Junction as part of the ongoing dualisation of the Penoks–Opi–Nsukka Road by Governor Mbah’s administration. Unlike in the past, when journeys to Nsukka were stressful and time-consuming, I arrived in less than 40 minutes.
Apart from the already completed sections, construction work is progressing rapidly on other parts of the road, particularly from the Opi Nsukka Junction axis towards Enugu. Just like every other road, Governor Mbah’s administration has constructed and reconstructed in the state, one remarkable feature of the project is the provision of proper drainage systems on both sides of the road to ensure easy flow of erosion and floodwater. This was largely absent on the old road and had contributed significantly to its deterioration over the years.
Beyond eliminating the usual traffic congestion and gridlock associated with the route, the economic benefits and long-term impact of the dualisation of this strategic road cannot be overemphasized. It is a major gateway linking Enugu State to northern Nigeria and other parts of the South-East.

Also, during the grand finale of the Tomorrow Is Here Movement, the vibrant support group of Governor Mbah’s administration, held at Owo Junction last month, I took time to travel through the ongoing 44.5-kilometre dual carriage road being constructed from scratch from Owo Junction through Ubahu down to Ikem. The road, when completed, will serve as another major access route connecting Enugu State to Northern Nigeria, while opening up several rural communities to development and economic opportunities.
Across Enugu State, from urban centres to rural communities, I have personally driven through several strategic roads either under construction or undergoing rehabilitation by Governor Mbah’s administration, roads I never even knew existed from my undergraduate days in Enugu till date.
Despite the huge backlog of infrastructural deficits inherited from decades of neglect by successive administrations, even before the creation of Enugu State in 1991, Governor Mbah’s administration has performed remarkably well in critical infrastructure development, particularly in roads, schools, hospitals, and related sectors. These projects are gradually transforming the developmental outlook of the state and positioning Enugu as an emerging investment destination.
From the outset, it was obvious that Governor Mbah came prepared for governance. This became even clearer on August 31, 2024, when he commissioned the Enugu State ultra-modern Mega Asphalt Plant, one of the best in the South-East region. The plant was established specifically to tackle the high cost and logistical challenges associated with road construction, especially asphalt production, which constitutes a major component of road projects.
The establishment of this important facility has significantly accelerated the pace and quality of road construction across the state.
Aside from occasional delays caused by the rainy season, most of the roads awarded by the administration are progressing steadily. Importantly, none of the projects awarded by Governor Mbah’s government has been abandoned. Construction activities are ongoing on virtually all of them, earning commendations from residents and indigenes alike.
Even as political activities ahead of the 2027 general elections intensify, with many politicians focusing more on strategies for electoral victory, Governor Mbah appears determined to allow his performance speak for him. This perhaps explains why the administration has continued to award more strategic road projects across the state.
Among the recently flagged-off projects is the 52.2-kilometre Nsukka–Leija–Aku–Akpakumeze–Eke-Ebe Road, inaugurated during the Enugu North Mega Endorsement Rally in May 2026. Other newly awarded projects include:
Beach Junction–Ovoko Afor Road, Nsukka
Enyichiru Barracks Junction Road, Nsukka – 1.2km
Mechanic Road Barracks Junction, Nsukka – 1.15km
Ugwuachara Road, Nsukka – 1.55km
Ezeagu–Umumba–Orie Engine Ebenebe Road – 10.1km
Enugu United Palm Plantation (EUPP) Access Road at Ibite Olo, Ezeagu – 14.5km
Umabi–Umuaga Link Road – 3.6km
Eke Obinagu–Obodo Nike–Umuode–Oruku–Aguikpa–Amaechi Idodo Road – 18.23km
Obodo Ukwu–Inyi Road – 5.6km
Ehuhe–Achi–Umabi Road – 13.05km
Amanpunato Achi–Amoli Road – 16.47km
Altogether, these projects cover over 151 kilometres of roads across different parts of the state.
These are not just ordinary roads; they are economic lifelines. They will boost agriculture, enhance rural commerce, improve access to healthcare and education, reduce travel time, and strengthen connectivity between rural communities and urban centres.
That is why it is amusing to read the propaganda and misinformation being circulated by some sponsored social media hirelings attempting to downplay the achievements of Governor Mbah’s administration in road construction. Their aim may be to score cheap political points ahead of the 2027 elections, but facts remain sacred.
Even to the blind, it is obvious and indisputable that Governor Mbah’s administration has done remarkably well in road construction and reconstruction across Enugu State. The administration has not abandoned any road project awarded so far and continues to initiate new projects despite growing political distractions.
The construction of the Mega Asphalt Plant at the early stage of the administration clearly demonstrated foresight, seriousness, and preparedness to tackle the long-standing challenge of deplorable roads across the state.
However, one undeniable reality remains: the infrastructural decay inherited over several decades is enormous.
Even if Governor Mbah were given another eight years focused solely on road construction, it would still be difficult to completely erase the backlog of dilapidated roads across the state. That is simply the magnitude of neglect accumulated over the years.
Nevertheless, the progress made so far deserves recognition and appreciation. Road construction is highly capital-intensive and requires careful planning, technical expertise, and time to ensure durability and quality delivery. Therefore, development should not only be assessed based on whether roads in one’s immediate community have been reconstructed. Governance must be viewed from a broader perspective.
In all fairness, Governor Peter Mbah’s administration has shown commitment, vision, and determination in addressing Enugu State’s infrastructural challenges. The ongoing road revolution across the state is not merely about laying asphalt; it is about opening up communities, stimulating economic growth, improving the quality of life of the people, and laying a solid foundation for future generations.
Indeed, the roads are speaking for the administration.
• Ezea writes from Independence Layout, Enugu State

Business
Amukpe-Escravos pipeline and the real cost of ignoring current value, By Sufuyan Ojeifo
Nigeria’s oil infrastructure has a habit of telling uncomfortable truths. Not just about barrels and flow rates, but about how a country chooses to value what it cannot afford to lose, and what it risks when it gets that calculation wrong.
Take the Amukpe-Escravos Pipeline, for example. A syndicate of lenders, led by Sterling Bank, is pushing back against efforts to revive a collapsed transaction involving a 40% stake in the asset. Their argument is not complicated. It is rooted in numbers and contractual discipline.
To be clear, a deal that fell apart in 2024 is being reconsidered using a valuation from that same year. However, since then, the asset has proved its worth. Independent assessments now place that stake closer to $600 million. The earlier benchmark sits far below that. The gap is not cosmetic. It is material. And if left unaddressed, it becomes a cost.
The original $243 million offer did not collapse by accident. It was terminated in October 2024 after Conpurex Limited failed to meet payment obligations, breached key terms, and sought to shift risk back to the seller. By the time the Technical Committee closed the process, confidence had already drained out of it. That much is settled.
Ordinarily, that should have been the end. Instead, there are moves to return to a September 2025 approval linked to that same process. The lenders describe this as an administrative carryover. Their response is simple. Start again. Set aside the old approval. Bring in an independent adviser. Return the asset to the market and let current value speak.
What is striking is not just the position itself, but how unusual it sounds in the Nigerian context. In a system where strategic assets have too often travelled through corridors of convenience, an insistence on valuation and process can sound almost rebellious. It should not be so.

Because this is not entirely about one pipeline. It is about whether a terminated deal remains terminated. Whether contracts still mean what they say. Whether performance counts for anything once the paperwork has been filed away. And, crucially, who bears the cost when value is ignored.
The numbers, as always, are blunt. A 2025 independent valuation, referenced in the March 2026 edition of Africa Oil+Gas Report, places the 40% stake at a mid-case of $372 million, a high case of $544 million, and an upside of $641 million. These are not speculative figures. They reflect an asset that has quietly done its job in a difficult environment.
With a capacity of 160,000 barrels per day and uptime consistently above 95%, the Amukpe-Escravos Pipeline has become one of the more reliable evacuation routes in a system where reliability is often in short supply. While other corridors struggle with theft and disruption, this one works.
That fact matters a great deal. Because when an asset proves itself under pressure, its value does not stand still. It moves. To price it as though nothing has changed is not just a technical choice. It is a financial one. And every financial choice has consequences.
It says performance can be ignored. It says time does not count. It says administrative continuity can outrun economic reality. To be fair, the earlier process gave enough warning signs. Lenders questioned the assumptions. Coordination was weak. When Continental Oil and Gas stepped back, Conpurex entered without a clean transition and soon began to reopen settled terms, shifting obligations and introducing new conditions that unsettled the commercial balance. The eventual termination was not dramatic. It was inevitable.
What unsettles stakeholders now is the possibility that a process that ran its course may still shape the outcome. If a concluded transaction can reappear without a clear restart, the line between closure and continuity begins to blur. Once that line blurs, contractual uncertainty follows. And when certainty weakens, serious capital takes notice.
This is where the issue widens beyond the pipeline itself. Back in March, Africa Oil+Gas Report described the Amukpe-Escravos matter as no longer just a transaction story, but a test of how Nigeria governs, values, and safeguards strategic oil infrastructure. That reading feels even more relevant now.
Because what is at stake is not simply who acquires a stake in a pipeline. It is how the country signals to those willing to invest in its most critical assets. It is about whether value is recognised only in theory, or protected in practice. It is about whether losses are acknowledged, or quietly absorbed.
The lenders’ position is often described as resistance. It is better understood as discipline. Reset the process. Revisit the approval. Bring in independent oversight. Return the asset to the market through a transparent and competitive process that reflects present realities. Ensure capable counterparties. Align all stakeholders.
These are not extravagant demands. They are the basics. Nigeria has seen too many assets drift from promise to regret. Too many structures that once worked reduced to cautionary tales. When something works, when something proves resilient in a difficult system, the least that can be done is to treat it with the seriousness it has earned.
Moments like this do not announce themselves as turning points. They arrive quietly, dressed as routine decisions.
But they reveal everything. For an economy seeking disciplined capital and trying to rebuild confidence, the signal matters. Let the process be reset. Let valuation reflect reality. Let the outcome show that when Nigeria recognises value, it also knows how to protect it, and what it stands to lose when it does not.
Until then, the lenders’ position stands as a reminder that in a system where too much has been taken for granted, some lines are too important to be crossed and must be held.
● Sufuyan Ojeifo publishes THE CONCLAVE online newspaper.

Health
How Gov Peter Mbah is rewriting Enugu’s healthcare story
By Dr. Collins Ogbu
In the life of every society, there comes a defining moment when leadership either sustains the status quo or boldly reimagines the future. For Enugu State, that moment is now. At the centre of this transformation is Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah, whose administration is not merely responding to challenges in the health sector but fundamentally rebuilding it. Recent public discourse surrounding the suspension of a health assistant trainee by a private institution has, perhaps inadvertently, created an opportunity to restate a deeper truth: the Enugu State Government remains focused, deliberate, and fully committed to repositioning healthcare delivery across the state.
For years, Enugu’s healthcare system reflected a troubling pattern familiar in many subnational contexts; underfunded primary healthcare centres, overstretched personnel, aging and inadequate infrastructure, and an overreliance on private or out-of-state medical services. Rural communities were particularly disadvantaged, often forced to travel long distances for basic care. Training institutions operated with limited capacity, while secondary and tertiary facilities struggled with outdated equipment and insufficient staffing. The system was largely reactive, constrained by years of neglect and unable to meet the growing needs of the population.
Governor Mbah’s administration has decisively broken from that past. Anchored on the principle that healthcare is a right and not a privilege, the government undertook a comprehensive audit of the sector and initiated a far-reaching reform agenda. Rather than incremental adjustments, the approach has been bold and systemic; targeting every layer of healthcare delivery, from primary care to specialised services.
Central to this transformation is the rollout of 260 Type-2 Primary Healthcare Centres across all political wards in the state. This initiative directly addresses the longstanding gap in grassroots healthcare access. Where communities once depended on poorly equipped facilities or distant hospitals, modern, well-positioned centres are now being established to provide quality care within reach. This effort is further strengthened by the recruitment of over 2,250 healthcare workers, a significant intervention aimed at resolving the manpower shortages that previously undermined service delivery.
At the secondary level, general hospitals are undergoing extensive rehabilitation to restore their capacity as reliable referral centres. Facilities such as Uwani General Hospital, which once symbolised infrastructural decline, are being transformed to meet modern standards. These upgrades are ensuring a more efficient continuum of care between primary and tertiary institutions.

The transformation is even more pronounced in tertiary healthcare. The Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Parklane, is experiencing unprecedented infrastructural expansion, including the construction of a twin six-floor Laboratory and Clinical Complex, a seven-floor Nursing Complex equipped with advanced diagnostic facilities, and a modern Accident and Emergency Department. These developments represent a significant leap from the limitations of the past, positioning the institution as a centre of excellence in both service delivery and medical training.
In the area of medical education, the administration has recorded a landmark achievement with the reaccreditation of the ESUT College of Medicine and the subsequent increase in its admission quota to 350 students – the highest among state-owned institutions in Nigeria. This milestone reflects a strategic commitment to building human capital and ensuring a steady pipeline of highly trained medical professionals for the future.
Equally significant is the completion of the State University of Medical and Applied Sciences (SUMAS) Teaching Hospital in Igbo-Eno. Unlike in previous years when a single teaching hospital struggled to meet demand, Enugu now has a second fully equipped facility, with recruitment already underway to commence full-scale operations. This expansion not only improves access to tertiary care but also strengthens the state’s capacity for medical training and research.
Crowning these efforts is the nearly completed 300-bed Enugu International Hospital, a state-of-the-art, super-specialist facility designed to elevate healthcare standards and reduce the need for outbound medical tourism. For decades, many residents sought advanced medical care outside the state or country, often at great financial and emotional cost. This facility represents a turning point, offering world-class services within Enugu and reinforcing the state’s emergence as a healthcare hub.
Amid these sweeping reforms, the government has also demonstrated a strong commitment to transparency and responsible governance. By clearly distancing itself from the internal disciplinary processes of a private institution while engaging relevant stakeholders, it underscores respect for institutional autonomy alongside responsiveness to public concerns.
What is unfolding in Enugu today is not merely policy execution but a comprehensive transformation. The contrast between the past and the present is both clear and compelling; where there were once gaps, there is now structure; where there was decline, there is now renewal. The state is moving from a system defined by limitations to one driven by vision, investment, and measurable progress.
While challenges inevitably remain, the trajectory is unmistakable.
Enugu State is no longer managing a fragile healthcare system; it is building a resilient, modern, and inclusive one. In the final analysis, Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah’s strides in the health sector are redefining not just infrastructure and policy, but the very experience of healthcare for Ndi Enugu, laying the foundation for a future where quality care is accessible, reliable, and sustainable for all.
• By Dr. Ogbu is a Senior Special Assistant, SSA to Enugu State Governor on Strategic Communications

-
News2 days agoWoman passes out after receiving 100 strokes of cane for having sex outside marriage
-
Politics2 days agoPDP suspends Enugu Guber Aspirant over alleged anti-party activities
-
News21 hours agoSupreme Court restrains FG from controlling waterfront lands in states, voids parts of NIWA Act
-
News2 days agoPolice arrest suspect over killing of Imo Nursing Student
-
News20 hours agoDISCLAIMER: NDC disowns John Paul Anih
-
News2 days agoAbductors of Oyo Schoolchildren begin negotiations, give conditions for release
-
News3 days agoPresidency denies plan to rename Nigeria, abolish Sharia law
-
Politics1 day agoImo North chooses experience: Araraume’s primary election win and what it means, By Sufuyan Ojeifo


