
News
US Sanctions: Kano Deputy Gov, Buba Galadima, Idahosa, Kwankwasiyya defend Kwankwaso
• Want ex-Kano governor removed from list
There was a groundswell of opinion within the political spectrum yesterday demanding the removal of former Kano State Governor, Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso, from a so-called United States sanctions list, with his associates describing his inclusion on the list as politically motivated and unjustifiable.
Kano State Deputy Governor, Aminu Gwarzo; elder statesman, Buba Galadima; Kwankwaso’s running mate in the 2023 presidential election, Bishop Isaac Idahosa; and key figures within the Kwankwasiyya movement insisted that he had committed no offence warranting punitive action.
Gwarzo urged the U.S. Congress to remove Kwankwaso from the proposed bill that sought to impose sanctions on him over alleged religious persecution, describing the claims against the former presidential candidate as unfounded and misleading.
The proposed Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026, sponsored by U.S. Reps. Riley Moore and Chris Smith, seeks sanctions against Fulani militias and includes Kwankwaso among individuals cited over alleged religious persecution.
Discover more
newspaper
Newspaper
In a statement, his spokesperson, Ibrahim Shuaibu, quoted Gwarzo as saying the allegations against Kwankwaso were “unfounded, misleading, and inconsistent with the verifiable public record of his life and service”.
The Kano State deputy governor stated, “Kwankwaso has held several senior political positions over more than three decades, serving as Deputy Speaker of Nigeria’s House of Representatives, two-term Governor of Kano State, Minister of Defense, Senator, and, most recently, a presidential candidate.

“At no time has he been indicted, prosecuted, or credibly accused of religious persecution, extremism, or human rights violations.”
Gwarzo challenged those behind the allegations to identify the “real perpetrators” rather than defame an “attitude” politician and democrat. He stated that Kwankwaso had consistently opposed violence, extremism, and terrorism.
The statement said Kwankwaso maintained constructive engagement with Christian leaders and minority communities during his time in office and consistently promoted peaceful coexistence.
It also cited his 2023 presidential ticket with Idahosa, a Catholic priest, as evidence of his commitment to religious inclusion and national balance.
The deputy governor called on U.S. lawmakers to “reject this recommendation outright” and remove Kwankwaso’s name from the proposed legislation. He suspected that the inclusion of Kwankwaso in the bill might have been influenced by individuals seeking to settle personal scores or his political rivals.
Kwankwaso “remains a nationalist, a democrat and a statesman whose public service has been anchored on justice, unity and inclusive governance”, the statement added.
Galadima, a chieftain of New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), also blamed Kwankwaso’s addition to the sanctions list on politics and those thinking the former governor of Kano State had a vice presidential aspiration.
Galadima, who spoke on Arise Television’s Morning Show, described the claims as unfair, stressing that Kwankwaso’s integrity as a peaceful Nigerian is being unjustly attacked.
Galadima maintained that Kwankwaso did not establish Sharia law in Kano. He said the law was enacted by Kano State House of Assembly amid public pressure at the time. He added that Kwankwaso was among the last governors in northern Nigeria to implement Sharia.
Galadima stated, “I think that it is most unfair to Kwankwaso. Most unfair to his person and most unfair to his integrity as a peaceful Nigerian. The matter came offshore, that is in the US, and we wonder where did they get that story. Kwankwaso was the victim of Sharia.
“Sharia law was established in Kano, and it was not established by Kwankwaso, it was promulgated by the House of Assembly of Kano under pressure. And people should remember that during the pressure for Sharia, Kwankwaso was reluctant.
‘’He was about the last governor in Nigeria to do a Sharia law. Ibrahim Shekarau used that platform of religion and Sharia, that he was coming to perfect Sharia and Kwankwaso was not doing anything as the governor of Kano.
“So, how can anybody in his right senses accuse Kwankwaso, who was a loser during that Sharia debacle in Nigeria, of promulgating Sharia? How about those that started it
Kwankwasiyya Movement declared that the allegations made against Kwankwaso on claims of “severe religious freedom violations” were totally unfounded, misleading, and inconsistent with the verifiable public record of his life and service.
The movement said it was deeply concerned that an opposition political leader with a longstanding national profile, who had consistently spoken on issues of governance and security, would be isolated in a matter of such gravity without transparent and verifiable findings.
It rejected the proposed bill before the United States Congress, titled, “The Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act 2026 (HR 7457),” which referenced the name of Kwankwaso.
A statement by spokesperson of Kwakwansiyya Movement, Habibu Mohammed, stressed that for over 30 years, the senator had served Nigeria at the highest levels, as Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, two-term Governor of Kano State, Minister of Defence, Senator of the Federal Republic, and presidential candidate.
Mohammed said throughout the period, Kwakwanso was never indicted, prosecuted, or credibly accused of religious persecution, extremism, or human rights violations.
The Kwakwansiyya Movement said the constitutional development of Sharia-based legal systems in certain northern Nigerian states was neither unique to Kano State nor the initiative of one individual.
Discover more
Newspaper
newspaper
The statement said, “Multiple states adopted similar legal frameworks within the ambit of Nigeria’s federal constitution, legislative processes, and judicial safeguards. These systems remain subject to constitutional oversight and appellate review.
“To single out Senator Kwankwaso while similar constitutional arrangements exist across several states raises serious questions about the basis, consistency, and evidentiary standard behind such a recommendation.”
Archbishop-Designate and Founder/Presiding Bishop of God First Ministries International, also known as Illumination Assembly, Isaac Idahosa, called on the United States Congress to reconsider the proposed visa ban reportedly targeting Kwankwaso.
In a letter yesterday, addressed to members of the U.S. Congress in Washington D.C., Idahosa expressed concern over what he described as inaccurate information used in recommending Kwankwaso for inclusion in the visa restriction.
Idahosa, who served as Kwankwaso’s running mate in the 2023 presidential election, vouched for the former governor’s character, describing him as a committed public servant with a long record of inclusive governance.
“As his former running mate, I attest to Sen. Kwankwaso’s commitment to public service and inclusive governance,” Idahosa stated, adding that Kwankwaso has never been linked to religious extremism, violence, or riots either in public office or private life.
The cleric highlighted Kwankwaso’s political career, stating that he has served in several high-profile roles, including Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, two-term Governor of Kano State, minister, senator, and presidential candidate.
He also stressed that Kwankwaso had consistently promoted interfaith dialogue and peaceful coexistence among Nigerians, maintaining that he would not have accepted to run alongside him if he held extremist views.
Idahosa further cited the 2003 political events during the Sharia debate under former President Olusegun Obasanjo, stating that Kwankwaso supported Obasanjo, a Christian, over his kinsman, late former President Muhammadu Buhari, a decision, he said, cost Kwankwaso his re-election bid as governor.
According to him, the move demonstrated Kwankwaso’s commitment to national unity above personal political interests.
The cleric also defended Kwankwaso’s stance on national security, describing it as cautious and responsible rather than extremist.
He stated that many Nigerians were surprised by the reported visa ban proposal and urged U.S. lawmakers to conduct a thorough review to ensure fairness and accuracy.
Idahosa condemned individuals, allegedly, behind petitions against the former governor, describing Kwankwaso as “one of Nigeria’s finest liberal politicians”.
He warned that any decision based on inaccurate information could undermine trust in international information channels and efforts to support Nigeria.
He appealed to the U.S. Congress to reconsider the alleged decision in the interest of justice and fairness.
News
ICPC: Why we detained ex-minister uche Nnaji
The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has disclosed that there are two main reasons a former Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Uche Nnaji, is being detained by the commission.
It also revealed that legal action was taken against the Enugu-born politician after he failed to honour several invitations extended to him through a letter referenced ICPC/HC/CSTF/GUN/GBT/T.1/VOLV16, and dated 15 May 2026.
John Odey, the spokesman of the commission in a statement on Wednesday explained that the commission later approached Federal High Court, Abuja Division, with the suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1160/2026) in order to effect Nnaji’s arrest after his failure to honour invitation.
Nnaji was arrested at the Akanu Ibiam International Airport, Enugu, when he boarded a private jet to Abuja.
Corroborating the development, the ICPC spokesman said Nnaji’s arrest was effected at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, upon his arrival where he was led to the commission’s custody immediately.
According to him, Nnaji is being probed on forgery of academic credentials, specifically concerning a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) and False National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) Discharge Certificate, which was submitted during his ministerial screening process in 2023.

The statement read, “The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has arrested the immediate past Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Hon. Geoffrey Uchechukwu Nnaji (M), following the execution of a bench warrant issued by the Federal High Court of Nigeria.
“The arrest was effected on Wednesday, 1st July 2026 at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, upon Mr. Nnaji’s arrival.
“He was apprehended with the assistance of the Department of State Services (DSS) and subsequently handed over to the ICPC for further investigation.
“The Commission had earlier extended formal invitations to the former minister through a letter referenced ICPC/HC/CSTF/GUN/GBT/T.1/VOLV16, dated 15 May 2026.
“The invitation notices were duly served to his known addresses in Abuja and Enugu, as well as via his electronic mail address.
“Despite service through multiple channels, Mr. Nnaji failed to appear for investigative interviews on the scheduled dates, necessitating further legal action.
“The legal action followed a court order granted by the Federal High Court in the Abuja Judicial Division (Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1160/2026).
“The order, issued on 11 June 2026, directed the ICPC to arrest the former minister to enable investigation into allegations bordering on:
“Forgery of academic credentials, specifically concerning a degree certificate from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN); and “False National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) Discharge Certificate, which was submitted during his ministerial screening process in 2023.
“Following the arrest, Mr. Nnaji has been taken into custody at the ICPC headquarters in Abuja, where investigations are expected to continue. The Commission assures the public that the matter will be pursued diligently in accordance with the law.”
News
BREAKING: Ex-Minister Uche Nnaji arrested over alleged certificate forgery probe
The immediate past Minister of Science and Technology, Uche Nnaji, was arrested on Wednesday at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on arrival from Enugu via a chartered flight.
Authoritative sources at the airport confirmed the arrest to PREMIUM TIMES, saying Mr Nnaji would be handed over to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) for interrogation.
The reported arrest comes weeks after the Federal High Court reportedly granted the ICPC permission to arrest and investigate Nnaji over the allegations.
The court also authorised the anti-graft agency to declare him wanted through newspapers, social media platforms and other media channels after the commission alleged that he repeatedly failed to honour invitations for questioning.
According to the ICPC, its application to the court followed Nnaji’s alleged refusal to appear before investigators despite several invitations relating to the forgery allegations.
The case stems from a two-year investigation published by Premium Times in October last year, which alleged that Nnaji submitted forged University of Nigeria degree and National Youth Service Corps certificates during his ministerial screening and confirmation process in 2023.

The report alleged that the documents were presented to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the Nigerian Senate, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and the State Security Service.
According to the publication, Nnaji later acknowledged that the University of Nigeria did not issue him the degree certificate in question, a development the newspaper said corroborated its investigation.Newspapers
The former minister had previously denied the existence of the court order authorising his arrest, dismissing the publication as a “media trial.”
However, on June 18, he reportedly filed an appeal before the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn the arrest order.
As of the time of filing this report, the ICPC had not issued an official statement confirming the reported arrest, while Nnaji’s legal team had yet to publicly respond to the latest development.
News
Alleged Cybercrime: Court grants Sowore N200m bail, orders two sureties, passport surrender
The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, restored the bail it had earlier granted to activist and presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore.
Sowore is facing a two-count cybercrime charge filed against him by the Department of State Services (DSS) for calling President Bola Tinubu a “criminal” in a social media post.
Trial Justice Muhammed Umar, who had earlier granted the defendant bail on self-recognisance, on June 16 revoked the bail and issued a warrant for his arrest.
The order came after Sowore failed to appear before the court for the continuation of his trial, even though he wrote a letter explaining his absence and requesting a new date.
When proceedings resumed in the case on June 22, Justice Umar ordered the remand of the defendant in Kuje prison.
Dissatisfied with the actions the court took against him, Sowore—whose legal team had initially withdrawn from the case over alleged bias by the judge—secured a new lawyer, who promptly filed a motion to restore his bail and quash the arrest warrant.

When the case came up on Tuesday, Justice Umar held that he was minded to admit the defendant to bail.
However, the court listed some conditions that had to be met before he would be released from prison custody.
Aside from granting him bail to the tune of N200 million, the court held that the defendant must produce two sureties in like sum.
The court also ordered the defendant to surrender his international passport.
Related News
2027 Polls: Court orders INEC to register, grant access code to ADA wiithin 72 hours
NDC, Peter Obi, Sowore, Bolaji, Paul Ibe, PDP reject Lokoja court ruling
Sowore’s detention undermines fair trial, free speech — Gani Adams, Odumakin
Sowore, in the application he anchored on Sections 35(4), 36(1), and 66 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, as well as Sections 169 and 352 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, insisted that the orders the court made against him were unjust and unwarranted.
The defendant had, on December 2, 2025, pleaded not guilty to the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/484/2025, filed against him by the Department of State Services (DSS).
The charges allege offences under Sections 24(1)(b) and 24(2)(a), (b), and (c) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024.
The offending posts, made on August 25, 2025, were in response to President Tinubu’s claim, made in Brazil, that his administration had ended corruption in Nigeria.
Angered by the posts, the DSS demanded that X Inc. (formerly Twitter) and Meta Platforms Inc. ban Sowore’s accounts and remove the posts.
The security agency also wrote to Sowore, asking him to delete the posts from all platforms.
Non-compliance with the request led to the charges.
The prosecution claims the defamatory posts were intended to cause a breakdown of law and order and to tarnish the president’s reputation.
Exhibits include printouts of the posts and the DSS letters.
X Inc. and Meta were initially co-defendants but were delisted in the amended charge.
-
News1 day agoBREAKING: Ex-Minister Uche Nnaji arrested over alleged certificate forgery probe
-
News2 days agoPeter Obi’s name uploaded on INEC portal as NDC presidential candidate as party files stay of execution
-
News2 days agoDownpour triggers widespread flooding in Lagos
-
News2 days agoAlleged Cybercrime: Court grants Sowore N200m bail, orders two sureties, passport surrender
-
International2 days agoThousands flee South Africa as anti-immigrant deadline sparks nationwide protests
-
News2 days agoRampaging soldiers invade university hostels, assault students, seize phones
-
News14 hours agoICPC: Why we detained ex-minister uche Nnaji
-
Uncategorized14 hours agoKenneth Okonkwo eats his words, emerges as Atiku’s spokesperson



