Connect with us
Maduka University Advert

News

US Sanctions: Kano Deputy Gov, Buba Galadima, Idahosa, Kwankwasiyya defend Kwankwaso

Published

on

Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso
Spread the love

•  Want ex-Kano governor removed from list

There was a groundswell of opinion within the political spectrum yesterday demanding the removal of former Kano State Governor, Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso, from a so-called United States sanctions list, with his associates describing his inclusion on the list as politically motivated and unjustifiable.

Kano State Deputy Governor, Aminu Gwarzo; elder statesman, Buba Galadima; Kwankwaso’s running mate in the 2023 presidential election, Bishop Isaac Idahosa; and key figures within the Kwankwasiyya movement insisted that he had committed no offence warranting punitive action.

Gwarzo urged the U.S. Congress to remove Kwankwaso from the proposed bill that sought to impose sanctions on him over alleged religious persecution, describing the claims against the former presidential candidate as unfounded and misleading.

The proposed Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026, sponsored by U.S. Reps. Riley Moore and Chris Smith, seeks sanctions against Fulani militias and includes Kwankwaso among individuals cited over alleged religious persecution.

Discover more
newspaper
Newspaper
In a statement, his spokesperson, Ibrahim Shuaibu, quoted Gwarzo as saying the allegations against Kwankwaso were “unfounded, misleading, and inconsistent with the verifiable public record of his life and service”.

The Kano State deputy governor stated, “Kwankwaso has held several senior political positions over more than three decades, serving as Deputy Speaker of Nigeria’s House of Representatives, two-term Governor of Kano State, Minister of Defense, Senator, and, most recently, a presidential candidate.

Maduka College Advert

“At no time has he been indicted, prosecuted, or credibly accused of religious persecution, extremism, or human rights violations.”

Gwarzo challenged those behind the allegations to identify the “real perpetrators” rather than defame an “attitude” politician and democrat. He stated that Kwankwaso had consistently opposed violence, extremism, and terrorism.

The statement said Kwankwaso maintained constructive engagement with Christian leaders and minority communities during his time in office and consistently promoted peaceful coexistence.

It also cited his 2023 presidential ticket with Idahosa, a Catholic priest, as evidence of his commitment to religious inclusion and national balance.

The deputy governor called on U.S. lawmakers to “reject this recommendation outright” and remove Kwankwaso’s name from the proposed legislation. He suspected that the inclusion of Kwankwaso in the bill might have been influenced by individuals seeking to settle personal scores or his political rivals.

Kwankwaso “remains a nationalist, a democrat and a statesman whose public service has been anchored on justice, unity and inclusive governance”, the statement added.

Galadima, a chieftain of New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), also blamed Kwankwaso’s addition to the sanctions list on politics and those thinking the former governor of Kano State had a vice presidential aspiration.

Galadima, who spoke on Arise Television’s Morning Show, described the claims as unfair, stressing that Kwankwaso’s integrity as a peaceful Nigerian is being unjustly attacked.

Galadima maintained that Kwankwaso did not establish Sharia law in Kano. He said the law was enacted by Kano State House of Assembly amid public pressure at the time. He added that Kwankwaso was among the last governors in northern Nigeria to implement Sharia.

Galadima stated, “I think that it is most unfair to Kwankwaso. Most unfair to his person and most unfair to his integrity as a peaceful Nigerian. The matter came offshore, that is in the US, and we wonder where did they get that story. Kwankwaso was the victim of Sharia.

“Sharia law was established in Kano, and it was not established by Kwankwaso, it was promulgated by the House of Assembly of Kano under pressure. And people should remember that during the pressure for Sharia, Kwankwaso was reluctant.

‘’He was about the last governor in Nigeria to do a Sharia law. Ibrahim Shekarau used that platform of religion and Sharia, that he was coming to perfect Sharia and Kwankwaso was not doing anything as the governor of Kano.

“So, how can anybody in his right senses accuse Kwankwaso, who was a loser during that Sharia debacle in Nigeria, of promulgating Sharia? How about those that started it

Kwankwasiyya Movement declared that the allegations made against Kwankwaso on claims of “severe religious freedom violations” were totally unfounded, misleading, and inconsistent with the verifiable public record of his life and service.

The movement said it was deeply concerned that an opposition political leader with a longstanding national profile, who had consistently spoken on issues of governance and security, would be isolated in a matter of such gravity without transparent and verifiable findings.

It rejected the proposed bill before the United States Congress, titled, “The Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act 2026 (HR 7457),” which referenced the name of Kwankwaso.

A statement by spokesperson of Kwakwansiyya Movement, Habibu Mohammed, stressed that for over 30 years, the senator had served Nigeria at the highest levels, as Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, two-term Governor of Kano State, Minister of Defence, Senator of the Federal Republic, and presidential candidate.

Mohammed said throughout the period, Kwakwanso was never indicted, prosecuted, or credibly accused of religious persecution, extremism, or human rights violations.

The Kwakwansiyya Movement said the constitutional development of Sharia-based legal systems in certain northern Nigerian states was neither unique to Kano State nor the initiative of one individual.

Discover more
Newspaper
newspaper
The statement said, “Multiple states adopted similar legal frameworks within the ambit of Nigeria’s federal constitution, legislative processes, and judicial safeguards. These systems remain subject to constitutional oversight and appellate review.

“To single out Senator Kwankwaso while similar constitutional arrangements exist across several states raises serious questions about the basis, consistency, and evidentiary standard behind such a recommendation.”

Archbishop-Designate and Founder/Presiding Bishop of God First Ministries International, also known as Illumination Assembly, Isaac Idahosa, called on the United States Congress to reconsider the proposed visa ban reportedly targeting Kwankwaso.

In a letter yesterday, addressed to members of the U.S. Congress in Washington D.C., Idahosa expressed concern over what he described as inaccurate information used in recommending Kwankwaso for inclusion in the visa restriction.

Idahosa, who served as Kwankwaso’s running mate in the 2023 presidential election, vouched for the former governor’s character, describing him as a committed public servant with a long record of inclusive governance.

“As his former running mate, I attest to Sen. Kwankwaso’s commitment to public service and inclusive governance,” Idahosa stated, adding that Kwankwaso has never been linked to religious extremism, violence, or riots either in public office or private life.

The cleric highlighted Kwankwaso’s political career, stating that he has served in several high-profile roles, including Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, two-term Governor of Kano State, minister, senator, and presidential candidate.

He also stressed that Kwankwaso had consistently promoted interfaith dialogue and peaceful coexistence among Nigerians, maintaining that he would not have accepted to run alongside him if he held extremist views.

Idahosa further cited the 2003 political events during the Sharia debate under former President Olusegun Obasanjo, stating that Kwankwaso supported Obasanjo, a Christian, over his kinsman, late former President Muhammadu Buhari, a decision, he said, cost Kwankwaso his re-election bid as governor.

According to him, the move demonstrated Kwankwaso’s commitment to national unity above personal political interests.

The cleric also defended Kwankwaso’s stance on national security, describing it as cautious and responsible rather than extremist.

He stated that many Nigerians were surprised by the reported visa ban proposal and urged U.S. lawmakers to conduct a thorough review to ensure fairness and accuracy.

Idahosa condemned individuals, allegedly, behind petitions against the former governor, describing Kwankwaso as “one of Nigeria’s finest liberal politicians”.

He warned that any decision based on inaccurate information could undermine trust in international information channels and efforts to support Nigeria.

He appealed to the U.S. Congress to reconsider the alleged decision in the interest of justice and fairness.

News

Tinubu names Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu as Minister of Foreign Affairs

Published

on

Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Spread the love

…Nominates Amb. Sola Enikanolaiye as Minister of State

President Bola Tinubu has appointed Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu as Nigeria’s new Minister of Foreign Affairs after the resignation of Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar, who is reportedly preparing for a political move ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The President also forwarded the name of Ambassador Sola Enikanolaiye for appointment as Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, pending approval by the Senate.

The appointments were disclosed in a statement released on Wednesday by presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga.

According to the statement, the reshuffle is aimed at improving Nigeria’s diplomatic strategy and ensuring that the country’s foreign policy supports the administration’s economic agenda more effectively.

“These adjustments are part of ongoing efforts to reposition Nigeria’s foreign policy architecture for greater efficiency, strategic engagement, and stronger global partnerships,” the statement read.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu, who previously served as Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and has years of diplomatic experience, is expected to oversee Nigeria’s international relations as the government intensifies focus on economic diplomacy, regional peace, and wider global partnerships.

Maduka College Advert

The presidency highlighted her long-standing involvement in global affairs, stating:

“Ambassador Odumegwu-Ojukwu brings decades of diplomatic experience and a deep understanding of Nigeria’s engagement with the global community,” the statement read.

Enikanolaiye, a seasoned career diplomat, had earlier worked as Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and International Relations.

He has represented Nigeria in several cities around the world, including Addis Ababa, London, Ottawa, Belgrade, and New Delhi.

The statement noted that his nomination is expected to strengthen institutional continuity within the foreign service.

“Ambassador Enikanolaiye’s extensive experience across multiple diplomatic missions will support Nigeria’s evolving foreign policy objectives,” the statement added.

President Tinubu congratulated the two diplomats and urged them to place national interest at the forefront while promoting economic diplomacy and improving the welfare of Nigerians living abroad.

Continue Reading

News

Awka blacksmiths lament neglect by Govt, indigenes

Published

on

Spread the love

Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court fixes Thursday for judgement on ADC leadership dispute

Published

on

FJSC nominates 22 Justices for Supreme Court Bench
Spread the love
The Supreme Court has fixed Thursday, April 30, for judgment in the leadership dispute rocking the opposition African Democratic Congress (ADC).The apex court had reserved judgement in the case, prompting the opposition party to petition the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) that time was not on its side.

However, on Wednesday, the apex court announced that the judgement would be delivered by 2pm, on Thursday.

A five-member panel of the apex court, led by Justice Mohammed Garba, had fixed the matter for judgment after parties adopted their final written addresses.

Mark, who leads a faction of the party, is challenging the March 12 judgment of the Court of Appeal, which ordered parties to maintain the status quo in the dispute.

In his appeal, the former Senate President argued that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction and insisted that the crisis bordered on internal party affairs, which courts lack powers to adjudicate.

The suit was initiated by aggrieved party members led by Nafiu Bala Gombe, who is contesting the legitimacy of the Mark-led leadership of the party.

Maduka College Advert

Other respondents in the appeal include the ADC, its National Secretary, Rauf Aregbesola, the Independent National Electoral Commission, and a former national chairman, Ralph Nwosu.

Mark is also seeking an order restraining INEC from recognising any leadership other than his faction, pending the determination of the appeal.

However, the respondents urged the apex court to dismiss the appeal, maintaining that the lower court was properly seized of the matter.

In a letter dated April 28, 2026 and signed by Shaibu Enejoh Aruwa, ADC counsel, the Mark-led faction said if the judgment of the apex court is not delivered within the next three days, the ADC “stands the grave and irreversible risk of being excluded from participating in the 2027 General Election”.

The Mark-led faction said the development would deny the constitutional right of millions of Nigerians to contest the elections under the platform of the party.

“My Lord, this appeal was graciously heard expeditiously on the 22nd April, 2026 and judgment was thereafter reserved to a date to be communicated by the court,” the letter reads.

“However, My Lord, we are most respectfully constrained to request for my Lord’s kind intervention and directive in ensuring that the judgment is rendered timeously having regard that INEC the 4th Respondent in the said Appeal purportedly, acting pursuant to the judgment of the lower court in

“Appeal No: CA/ABJ/145/2026 acted to remove or de-recognize the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) leaving the ADC without leadership at the moment even though the ADC remains a recognized registered political party in Nigeria.

“My Lord, we also respectfully draw Your Lordship’s attention to the INEC Timetable for the 2027 General Elections and the activities in readiness which have already commenced.

“Your Lordship’s would find attached copies of the INEC Press Release de-recognizing the leadership of ADC and the Revised INEC Timetable for the 2027 General Elections.

“My Lord, the ADC’s ability to comply with these statutory requirements to participate in the 2027 General Elections is wholly dependent on the timely delivery of the judgment in the instant Appeal.

“Without the delivery of judgment within the next three days from the date of this letter, the ADC stands the grave and irreversible risk of being excluded from participating in the 2027 General Elections.

“This would disenfranchise millions of Nigerians who have subscribed to the ideals of the ADC and deny them their constitutional right to freely associate and contest elections through a political party of their choice.

“My Lord, we are mindful of the enormous responsibilities and workload of this Honourable Court. We are equally aware that justice delayed, in this peculiar circumstance, would amount to justice denied. The entire political future of our client and the legitimate expectations of its members nationwide now hangs in the balance.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert