Connect with us

News

Terrorism: We don’t seek foreign bench legitimacy, APC fires Canadian court

Published

on

Spread the love

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has dismissed the ruling of a Federal Court of Canada that classified the party with the opposition Peoples Democratic Party, (PDP) as terrorist organisations.

Justice Phuong Ngo was reported to have ruled on June 17, 2025, that the two major parties in Nigeria are terror organisations while denying asylum to one Douglas Egharevba over his decade-long affiliation with both political parties.

The judge dismissed Egharevba’s application for judicial review after the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD), found him inadmissible under Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, IRPA.

The Canadian Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness was said to have argued that the APC and PDP were implicated in political violence, subversion of democracy and electoral bloodshed in Nigeria.

The court records also showed that Egharevba was a PDP member from 1999 to 2007 before joining the APC where he remained until 2017. He moved to Canada in September 2017 and disclosed his political history.

Maduka College Advert

Reacting to the judgement in Abuja on Thursday, APC National Secretary, Senator Ajibola Bashiru said the APC is a credible democratic political organization and does not seek legitimacy from a foreign bench and under a law that has no extra territorial application.

Dismissing the judgement, Bashiru noted thar the presiding judge must be an ignoramus. He argued that APC was not party to the suit, maintaining that “the court has no jurisdiction to determine the status of a Nigerian recognized political party not to talk of declaring it as a terrorist organization.

“The so-called judgment was obviously delivered from a jaundiced perspective and within the narrow confines of determining eligibility for asylum by an applicant.

“The APC is a credible democratic political organization and does not seek legitimacy from a foreign bench and under a law that has no extra territorial application”

Bashiru, however, noted that “it is unfortunate that some desperate and unpatriotic Nigerians will allow the name of the country to be brought to unpalatable commentary by racist judges on account of self contrived application for asylum.”

Reports said that the Canadian immigration authorities flagged Egharevba’s affiliations, citing intelligence reports linking both parties to electoral violence and politically motivated killings.

The IAD was also quoted to have based its decision largely on the PDP’s conduct during the 2003 state elections and 2004 local government polls, when the party allegedly engaged in ballot stuffing, voter intimidation and killing of opposition supporters.

The tribunal found that the party leadership benefited from the violence and took no action to stop it, meeting Canada’s legal definition of subversion under paragraph 34(1)(b.1) of the IRPA.

Justice Ngo affirmed that mere membership in an organisation linked to terrorism or democratic subversion is enough to trigger inadmissibility under paragraph 34(1)(f) of the IRPA, even without proof of personal involvement.

News

Gunmen kill vigilante commander, three women in Rivers

Published

on

SIT-AT-HOME: Five feared killed as gunmen  attack two Anambra communities
Spread the love

Gunmen suspected to be cultists shot and killed the zonal commander of a local security outfit codenamed OSPAC in Omoku, the headquarters of Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area of Rivers State, identified as Ozomela Stephen Nwaocha, on Tuesday evening.

Also killed were three women, including the commander’s sister, who were with him during the attack.

OSPAC is the acronym for the Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area Security Planning and Advisory Committee.

The assailants reportedly attacked the vigilante commander while he was relaxing outside his compound with the women along Oba Road in Omoku.

It was gathered that the killing may have been a reprisal following a violent clash linked to a community dispute.

Maduka College Advert

A source told our correspondent that a youth meeting had been disrupted earlier on Tuesday after armed security personnel and OSPAC members allegedly stormed the venue and opened fire, leaving two youths with gunshot injuries.

Videos of the aftermath of the attack circulating on social media and seen by our correspondent on Wednesday showed multiple casualties, including the three women. (Punch)

Continue Reading

News

Deputy Speaker Kalu breaks silence on N780m Budget controversy, says Fund not meant for Churches alone

Published

on

Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu
Spread the love

Deputy Speaker House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu has said that the N780m (seven hundred and eighty million naira) featured in the 2026 Federal budget was not solely earmarked for procurement of church musical instruments in his Bende Federal constituency, as being circulated in news.

Kalu was reacting to the social media reports which alleged that one billion naira had been set aside to purchase church musical instruments in the Deputy Speaker’s constituency in Bende.

A statement issued on Wednesday by Levinus Nwabuhiogu, the Chief Press Secretary to the Deputy Speaker, said that the actual amount involved in the budget proposal was N780 million after Vat and other tax deductions.

He said that more than 130 churches in Bende were to receive between N5m and N6m each as support for first phase youth re-orientation and social support programmes delivered evangelistically through faith-based organizations in Bende federal constituency of Abia State.

The Deputy Speaker noted that the equipment of churches was to expand existing youth engagement platforms focused on character reform, discourage narcotics use, sexual offense and violent crimes among the youths.

Maduka College Advert

“The funds are intended to support the purchase of evangelical instruments and public address systems to promote campaigns against vices like the spread of narcotics, sexual offences, violent crimes while instilling discipline, values, peace, and character development among young people in the communities”, the statement said.

Kalu, who said that the N780 million fund is yet to be released because the 2026 budget had not been implemented, noted that selected churches would be credited when procurement processes are concluded.

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC Probe: Why Tinubu’s Chief of Staff, Head of Service, Accountant-General should step aside — Opara

Published

on

Edugate: Leaked memo implicates Gbajabiamila, as EFCC quizzes AGF
Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila
Spread the love

The Chief of Staff to the President and the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation and the Accountant-General of the Federation have been called upon to step aside over their alleged links to the fake Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC).

Making the call yesterday, Tuesday, July 21, 2026, lawyer and public affairs commentator Maxwell Opara, insisted that no public official should remain in office while under criminal investigation.

Speaking during an interview with ARISE News, Opara stated that the alleged establishment of the fake agency, the allocation of office space and the opening of bank accounts pointed to an already established criminal case that required equal treatment of all those implicated.

“There is an established crime. A fake agency was established. An office was given to the fake agency. An account was opened for the fake agency. Somebody was acting as a director in the fake agency.”

He maintained that while the alleged fake director had been arrested, other public officials mentioned in the investigation should not be treated differently.

Maduka College Advert

“The Chief of Staff, the Head of Service and the Accountant-General are suspects. None of them is above the law.”

Opara criticised the decision to invite some officials for questioning while leaving them in office, arguing that such an approach could undermine public confidence in the investigation.

“If you have arrested somebody, these other suspects should be arrested like the principal suspect. Nobody is above the law.”

He further stated that public officials occupying sensitive positions should voluntarily step aside to allow an independent investigation.

“One expected all of them that are suspects in this matter to step down. If you cannot resign, step aside.”

According to him, remaining in office while under investigation creates the impression that those officials could influence the outcome of the probe.

“You cannot be a judge in your own case. People will see it as though you want to use your office to influence investigators.”

Responding to questions about evidence involving a deceased intermediary allegedly linked to financial transactions in the case, Opara said the courts would determine the weight of such evidence based on available testimony and documentary records.

“The court will decide based on the evidence presented, the testimony before it and the outcome of cross-examination.”

He also dismissed the Chief of Staff’s reported decision to pursue a defamation suit against the principal suspect, describing it as a distraction from the ongoing investigation.

“Rushing to court to sue for defamation is a distraction. The priority should be to step aside and allow the investigation to proceed.”

Opara expressed doubts about the outcome of the investigation, arguing that the seniority of those allegedly involved could affect the process.

“If they want Nigerians to believe they are fighting corruption, they should treat everybody equally. Nobody should be made a scapegoat.”

He concluded that public confidence in the investigation would depend on whether anti-corruption agencies applied the laws guiding impartially, regardless of the status or position of those implicated.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert