Connect with us

News

Judges led bribe takers in Nigeria in 2023 – NBS Report

Published

on

Spread the love

A recent report published on the National Bureau of Statistics website indicates that a staggering sum of N721 billion ($1.26 billion) was disbursed as cash bribes to public officials in 2023.

The report, derived from a survey jointly conducted by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes (UNODC) and the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) under the title “Corruption in Nigeria: Patterns and Trends”, highlights the pervasive issue of corruption within the country.

The average cash bribe documented in this report stood at N8,284, a notable increase from the previous nominal amount recorded in 2019 at N5,754.

The comprehensive survey estimated a total of $1.26 billion exchanged hands as bribes to public officials in the same year.

Breaking down the data by recipient, judges emerged as the recipients of the highest average bribe amount, receiving N31,000 per bribe.

Following closely were the Nigeria Customs and Immigration Service officials at N17,800, members of the armed forces at N16,600, land registry officials at N11,700, and police officials at N10,400.

Maduka College Advert

These figures underscore the deep-rooted nature of corruption across various sectors and the pressing need for stringent anti-corruption measures to curb this pervasive phenomenon.

Additionally, the report noted that 46 percent of public officials employed by the government resorted to offering bribes for employment opportunities or to expedite their recruitment processes.

This figure represents a considerable increase—1.5 times higher than that revealed in a previous survey conducted in 2019.

Moreover, the report revealed that six out of every ten individuals who secured positions in the public sector confessed to leveraging nepotism, bribery, or a combination of both to enhance their prospects of being recruited.

This data underscores the prevalence of corrupt practices in the public sector recruitment process and highlights the imperative for systemic reforms to promote transparency and meritocracy in hiring practices.

The prevalence of bribe-taking is disturbing in itself, but the disheartening reality of judges ranking at the forefront of bribe recipients is profoundly distressing.

The revelation that Nigerian judges stand as the primary recipients of bribes raises fundamental doubts about the integrity and efficacy of the Nigerian judiciary.

Judges, as the custodians of justice, are expected to embody impartiality and maintain a demeanour of dignified neutrality to adjudicate matters fairly.

However, when judges are not just linked to bribery and corruption but are identified as the foremost recipients of bribes, the foundational values of the judiciary are compromised.

This unsettling trend should be a cause for alarm for every Nigerian citizen. The judiciary ought not to be implicated in such misconduct.

The fact that the judiciary now leads the tally reflects a systemic breakdown in the administration of justice. How can the courts serve as the ultimate refuge for the ordinary citizen when judges are renowned for their involvement in bribery?

The revelation that judges rank highest among bribe recipients in Nigeria raises profound concerns about the integrity of the judiciary, the rule of law, and the overall quality of governance.

This unsettling revelation has far-reaching implications for the judicial system, public trust, and the sanctity of legal processes in the country.

Judges as leading recipients of bribes undermines the credibility and impartiality of the judicial system. When those entrusted with upholding justice and interpreting the law are embroiled in corrupt practices, the integrity of court decisions and the fairness of legal proceedings are eroded.

The perception of judicial corruption tarnishes the legitimacy of judgments, weakens the rule of law, and perpetuates a culture of impunity.

Judges engaging in corrupt acts not only compromise their judicial independence but also subvert the principles of justice and equality before the law.

Bribery distorts the legal process, skews outcomes in favour of the highest bidder, and perpetuates a system where the wealthy and influential can manipulate justice.

This erosion of judicial integrity perpetuates inequality, undermines the social contract, and fosters a climate of lawlessness and injustice.

Few would have faith in the adjudication process when judges are perceived to be deep into corruption and bribery.

Thus, judges being implicated in bribery and corruption extends beyond individual cases to the broader effectiveness of the rule of law in Nigeria.

When judges are susceptible to bribes, it compromises the judiciary’s ability to serve as a check on executive power, uphold constitutional rights, and dispense impartial justice.

The erosion of judicial integrity weakens the rule of law, diminishes respect for legal institutions, and undermines efforts to combat corruption and promote accountability.

Corruption in the judiciary erodes the foundation of a fair and impartial legal system, jeopardizing the enforcement of contracts, protection of property rights, and resolution of commercial disputes.

Businesses rely on a robust and impartial legal system to safeguard their interests, ensure contractual compliance, and uphold commercial norms.

However, when judicial corruption distorts legal outcomes, businesses face heightened risks, financial losses, and reputational damage, impacting their competitiveness and sustainability.

When businesses encounter corrupt practices within the judiciary, their trust in the legal framework diminishes, leading to uncertainty, legal risks, and a lack of confidence in the resolution of disputes.

This hampers business dealings, deters investment, and stifles economic development.

We expect judges to be alarmed and disgusted by this report which portrays them as very undeserving of the position and status they currently hold and occupy.

The judiciary must clean house. The National Judicial Council should be sufficiently worried to catalyse reform of the judiciary. Corruption in the judiciary must be addressed to restore public trust, uphold the principles of justice and strengthen the rule of law.Combating bribery and corruption within the judiciary is essential to safeguarding the integrity of the legal system and upholding the foundational values of a just and democratic society.

Source: Nigerian Tribune Editorial

News

Atiku rejects ICPC probe of PFIPC, demands independent panel with ADC, PDP, NDC included

Published

on

Atiku Abubakar
Spread the love

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has demanded the establishment of an independent commission of inquiry to probe the controversial Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC).

The PFIPC has come under scrutiny over the N1.3 billion budgetary allocation made to the council in the 2026 budget.

On June 11, Femi Gbajabiamila, chief of staff to President Bola Tinubu, issued a public disclaimer disowning the appointment of Adeniyi Adeyemi as the head of the council.

The former speaker of the house of representatives said such an office “does not exist” under Tinubu’s government, and no appointment has been made in that regard.

But Adeyemi rejected Gbajabiamila’s claim, describing it as a contradiction in official government records.

The presidency would later accuse Adeyemi of forging documents, including an appointment letter, to present himself as the head of the alleged non-existent government agency.

Maduka College Advert

On Tuesday, Tinubu directed the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to conduct a “thorough investigation” into the PFIPC controversy.

‘FG MUST SET UP AN INDEPENDENT PANEL’

In a statement issued on Wednesday through Phrank Shaibu, his senior special assistant on public communication, Atiku said Tinubu’s directive to the ICPC to investigate the matter was a response to the seven-day ultimatum he had earlier issued demanding a transparent probe.

He said Tinubu’s directive to the ICPC exposed contradictions in the presidency’s previous position that the matter had already been comprehensively investigated by the police, with a suspect arrested and criminal charges filed.

“If all of that is true, what exactly is the ICPC expected to spend another 30 days investigating?” Atiku asked.

The presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) said if the police probe was indeed comprehensive, another investigation by a government agency would be unnecessary.

“What Nigerians demanded was never another internal government investigation. We demanded an independent investigation,” he said.

Atiku proposed the immediate establishment of a special independent commission of inquiry comprising 10 eminent Nigerians nominated by the federal government, the ADC, the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), civil society organisations (CSOs), the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), and retired judicial officers.Politics (Left)

He said the proposed panel should be empowered to conduct a comprehensive investigation into every aspect of the PFIPC affair, review investigative records compiled by the police and other security agencies, summon serving and former public officials where necessary, publish a white paper containing its findings and recommendations, and conclude its assignment within one month.

Atiku said only an independent commission, with representation from the government, opposition parties and CSOs, would command public confidence and restore trust in the outcome of the investigation.

Continue Reading

News

Court awards N10m in damages against EFCC for defaming ex-Minister

Published

on

Spread the love

Justice Peter Kekemeke of the FCT High Court on Wednesday awarded N10 million in damages against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for defaming the reputation of former Minister of Power, Dr Olu Agunloye.

The judge found the commission guilty of defamation while delivering judgment in a N10billion suit filed against the EFCC by Agunloye.

Agunloye claimed that the publication on the commission’s Website and X (formerly Twitter) handle, entitled “EFCC arraigns Agunloye over $6billion fraud”, damaged his reputation.

Agunloye had, through his counsel, Adeola Adedipe SAN, suit marked FCT/HC/CV/1199/2024, claimed that the EFCC caused harmed his reputation.

He added that he (Agunloye) was said to be a corrupt and fraudulent individual through a post published on its official website and other allied online platforms, with the caption, “EFCC arraigns Agunloye over $6billion fraud”.

Delivering judgment , Justice Kekemeke held that there were elements of defamation in the posts.

Maduka College Advert

The judge held that in the instant case, the contentious publication is in permanent form, adding that Agunloye’s name was mentioned.

The court further held that EFCC’s sole witness in the case, Assistant Commissioner of Police Umar Babangida, inspite of the fact that he initially denied knowledge of the said publication, later owned up and admitted that it was from the defendant’s media department.

He held that the case before him does not challenge EFCC’s power to investigate economic and financial crime as claimed by the defendant.

“Having gone through the charge in the criminal case against the claimant before a FCT high court in Apo, there is no where in it that claimed fraud, contrary to the EFCC publication.

“The issue of fraud is not in any of the exhibits tendered before the court in the course of hearing the case.

”The EFCC failed to prove the truth in the said publication. That is not fair and does not represent the court’s proceedings,” the judge held.

He held that the EFCC was not a news agency but an investigative agency.

Justice Kekemeke held that the commission knew that Agunloye was not involved in a fraud of six billion Naira.

The court declared that the contentious publication on EFCC official website and X handle as false and defamatory.

The judge ordered the commission to retract the publication and offer public apology on its website and two other national dailies.

The court further ordered a perpetual injunction restraining EFCC from defaming the former minister.

Reacting to the judgment in an interview with newsmen, counsel for the EFCC, Dr Wahab Shittu SAN, declared the commission will appeal the judgment.

“Though the court has made it pronouncement, the case is premature as the claimant’s criminal charge is yet to be concluded and judgment delivered,” he said.(NAN)

Continue Reading

News

Presidency dismisses Peter Obi’s safety concerns as false

Published

on

Peter Obi
Spread the love

The Presidency has dismissed claims by the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) presidential candidate, Peter Obi, that he is being targeted by the Federal Government, describing the allegations as false, misleading, and without basis.

Obi had said he may not be alive to contest the next presidential election, alleging that the Federal Government is systematically frustrating his activities and targeting opposition figures.

He said this during an interview on With Chude, hosted by media personality Chude Jideonwo.

A clip of the interview was shared on Jideonwo’s X handle on Wednesday.

Speaking on the possibility of participating in the 2027 presidential race, the former Anambra State governor said the challenges he faces had become so intense that he could not even be certain he would still be alive by then.

“Not even a candidate. I might not even be alive. I’m telling you. Every single thing I do for a living, this government is frustrating it. Deliberately so. Everything. So, there is even a possibility, if they have the opportunity, I will not be alive,” he said.

Maduka College Advert

Reacting in a statement, the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, said Obi’s recent claims, including an alleged incident involving his vehicle at an airport and fears about his safety ahead of the 2027 general election, were unfounded and lacked credible evidence.

Onanuga described Obi as a “pathological and serial liar,” hellbent on dragging the government into every personal inconvenience he encounters.

He said: “As a pathological and serial liar, Mr Obi is intent on dragging the government into every personal inconvenience he encounters, often resorting to exaggeration and baseless allegations.

“His claim that he may not be alive for the January 2027 election and that people are being pressured not to invite him to social events is nothing more than a fabricated narrative, a page from his book of lies and propaganda.

“These claims lack substance and are designed to attract undue sympathy and deflect attention from his credibility deficit and the problems faced by his SPV and his adopted political association, the NDC.”

The presidential spokesman further stated that the federal government had no interest in targeting Fidelity Bank, in which Obi is said to have a substantial interest, stressing that the financial institution continues to thrive under the current administration’s economic reforms.

Onanuga stressed the administration of President Bola Tinubu remains focused on implementing reforms designed to strengthen the economy and improve the welfare of Nigerians, rather than engaging in political distractions.

He added: “It is important to note that Mr Obi has a substantial interest in Fidelity Bank. The institution continues to thrive as a result of the current administration’s robust economic reforms.

“The government is certainly not targeting the bank. Rather than being “haunted” by the government, Mr Obi appears to be grappling with the consequences of his litany of unfounded statements.

“The Tinubu government remains fully focused on consolidating its historic and beneficial reforms for the good of all Nigerians. It has neither the time nor the inclination to be distracted by Mr Obi’s self-serving narratives and lies or by his candidacy, as he constantly diminishes himself with specious, unverifiable utterances.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert