Connect with us

News

Hardship: Protest will go on as planned, NLC insists

Published

on

We’re not after your job, implement our agreements, NLC replies Tinubu 
Spread the love
…says you can’t threaten us with contempt 

The Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC, has vowed to go ahead with its plan to hold rallies from Tuesday to Wednesday to register its displeasure over the rising cost of living the country.

The labour union, in a letter it wrote to the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, said it would not be dissuaded by Federal Government’s threat to initiate contempt proceedings against it.

The NLC, through its lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana, SAN, maintained that contrary to FG’s claim, no court barred its members from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of expression to protest against the excruciating economic pains being experienced by the masses.

It argued that FG, having withdrawn the contempt proceedings it earlier filed against both the NLC and the Trade Union Congress, TUC, for embarking on public protest on August 2, 2023, “ought not to have threatened the NLC with contempt.”

The Labour Union’s position was contained in it’s response to a letter the AGF wrote to its lawyer, titled: “MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REACHED BETWEEN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA AND THE TRADE UNION CONGRESS (TUC) AS A RESULT OF DISPUTE ARISING FROM WITHDRAWAL OF SUBSIDY ON THE PRICE OF PREMIUM MOTOR SPIRIT (PMS) ON MONDAY THE 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.”

Maduka College Advert

According to the NLC: “It would be recalled that following the removal of fuel subsidy by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on May 29, 2023, the Federal Government commenced negotiations with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) as the subsidy removal policy had brought untold hardship to Nigerians.

“While the negotiations were in progress, the Federal Ministry of Justice rushed to the National Industrial Court to file Suit No NICN/ABJ/158/2023 between Federal Government of Nigeria & Anor. v Nigeria Labour Congress & Anor in respect of the same issues. On June 5, 2023 the Honourable Justice Yemi Anuwe granted the application of the Federal Government for an ex parte order to restrain the NLC and TUC from embarking on strike against the removal of fuel subsidy.

“Although both the NLC and TUC complied with the ex parte order, they promptly filed an application to set aside same for want of jurisdiction. They equally asked for a stay of execution of the order ex parte pending the determination of the motion.

“The application to set aside the ex parte order filed by the Defendants and the motion for interlocutory injunction filed by the Claimants have not been considered as parties resolved to settle the case out of court.

“Even though the parties signed a 16-point memorandum of understanding, the Federal Government did not implement all the terms of the Agreement. Hence, on August 2, 2023, both NLC and TUC held a peaceful protest throughout the country.

“Instead of implementing the Agreement the Federal Government initiated contempt proceedings against the NLC and TUC at the National Industrial Court. We challenged the competence of the contempt proceedings. However, the Federal Government turned round to withdraw the application for contempt.

“On November 10, 2023, the Federal Government filed another Suit, No NICN/ABJ/322/2023 between Federal Government of Nigeria & Anor. at the National Industrial Court against the NLC and TUC, notwithstanding the pendency of Suit No. Suit No NICN/ABJ/158/2023.

“On that same day, the President of the National Industrial Court, the Honourable Justice Benedict Kanyip granted an ex parte order to restrain the NLC and TUC from embarking on the planned strike. However, His Lordship directed that the case file be transferred to Justice Olufunke Yemi Anuwe who is handling a similar labour dispute between the same parties.

“Both NLC and TUC challenged the competence of the fresh suit on the ground that it constitutes a gross abuse of court process, inter alia. The application has not been heard and determined by the National Industrial Court.

“Having withdrawn the contempt proceedings filed against the NLC and TUC for embarking on public protest on August 2, 2023, you ought not to have threatened the NLC with contempt of court over its plan to hold rallies from February 27-28, 2024 against the astronomical cost of living in the country.

“We submit, without any fear of contradiction, that the proposed public protest of the NLC is not contemptuous of the two ex parte orders of the National Industrial Court. In particular, the issue of contempt does not arise as the NLC has challenged the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Court to entertain the substantive case.

“It is further submitted that the National Industrial Court has not restrained the members of the NLC from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of expression to protest against the excruciating economic pains being experienced by the masses.

“In the case of Inspector- General of Police v All Nigeria Peoples Party (2008) 12 WRN 65, the Court of Appeal upheld the fundamental right of Nigerians to protest on matters of public interest without police permit. In the leading judgment of the Court, Olufunmilayo Adekeye JCA (as she then was) held inter alia:

“The right to demonstrate and the right to protest on matters of public concern are rights which are in the public interest and that which individuals must possess, and which they should exercise without impediment as long as no wrongful act is done…

“If as speculated by law enforcement agents that breach of the peace would occur our criminal code has made adequate provisions for sanctions against breakdown of law and order so that the requirement of permit as a conditionality to holding meetings and rallies can no longer be justified in a democratic society.

“Since freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are part of the democratic rights of every citizen of Nigeria the Court of Appeal further held that, “the legislature must guard these rights jealously as they are part of the foundation upon which the government itself rests.”

“Consequently, the National Assembly has ensured that the right of aggrieved citizens to protest peacefully for or against the Government is protected.

“Thus, section 83(4) of the Police Establishment Act 2020, which ‘where a person or organization notifies the police of his or its intention to hold a public meeting, rally or procession on a public highway or such meetings in a place where the public has access to , the police officer responsible for the area where the meeting rally or procession will take place shall mobilize personnel to provide security to provide security cover for the meeting, rally or the procession.’

“While we have advised the members of the NLC to conduct the rallies scheduled for February 27-28, 2024 in a peaceful manner, we urge you to use your good offices to direct the Inspector-General of Police to provide adequate security to the conveners and participants in the protest in line with the provisions of Section 83(4) of the Police Establishment Act.

“Finally, while awaiting your favourable reply to this letter, please accept, as usual, the assurance of our highest esteem,” the letter read.

News

Adeniyi Adeyemi: I borrowed N100m to secure PFIPC DG appointment — lenders have reported me to EFCC

Published

on

Adeniyi Adeyemi
Spread the love

Adeniyi Adeyemi, director-general (DG) of the “controversial” presidential foreign intervention promotion council (PFIPC), says those who lent him N100 million to secure the appointment have petitioned the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over repayment.

Adeyemi, who is facing allegations of forgery and impersonation over the existence of the PFIPC, spoke on Monday during an interview on Channels Television’s Politics Today.

The presidency has said the council does not exist and that Adeyemi was never appointed by the office of the chief of staff to the president.

On July 7, President Bola Tinubu directed the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to conduct a “thorough investigation” into the PFIPC controversy.

Responding to questions about the source of the funds he used to operate and resources at his disposal, Adeyemi said the money was borrowed.

Maduka College Advert

“Mr. Seun, I borrowed this money. In fact, those that I borrowed this N100 million have reported to EFCC,” he said.

“I borrowed this money to pay for this appointment. In fact, I can tell you, they have reported to the EFCC, asking me to refund their money. I borrowed this money.”

Adeyemi also dismissed allegations that he falsely claimed to have received an appointment from the United Nations (UN).

“It’s all sponsored. It’s a campaign of calumny. They should let us face the facts and documents. It is unfortunate that some actors in the government are taking up this matter. It’s unfortunate, and it’s embarrassing,” he said.

“Honestly, imagine the government claiming that one man, and called me a con artist, manoeuvred the whole system; it is unfortunate.”

Reacting to reports that a US-based lobbying firm is helping him seek asylum abroad, Adeyemi denied planning to leave Nigeria.

“I just ignored it because they sponsor a lot of people to bring my social media handle down,” he said.

“I don’t really know much about what is going on again. They said I was about to run away out of Nigeria. I’m still in Nigeria. I’m not going anywhere.”

Source: TheCable

Continue Reading

News

Umahi And The 5 Missing NELAN Engineers

Published

on

Minister of Works , Engr Dave Umahi
Spread the love

By Charles Ogbu

Many Nigerians may have heard that five Enugu-based Engineers (all Igbo) who had issues with Dave Umahi when he was the governor of Ebonyi state went to work in Ebonyi sometime in 2021 and never returned home till date but only a few know the full gist. Come with me as we dive into the detail of what has come to be known as the ‘NELAN FIVE’

Sometime in 2021, when the current Nigeria’s minister of works, Senator Engineer David Nweze Umahi, CON was the governor of Ebonyi state, it happened that the Umahi led govt felt the need to construct the Abakaliki Ring Road with loan from the African Development Bank (AFDB) and as is the case with many project funded by the AfDB, part of the condition for the loan was that AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTING FIRM would be employed to supervise the project to ensure the construction followed the terms upon which the loan was agreed

NELAN CONSULTING LIMITED, an Enugu-based consulting engineering firm specializing in project supervision, consultancy, and oversight for infrastructure projects, was hired through INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVE BIDDING to monitor and supervise the main contractors, ensure compliance with contract terms, AfDB standards, and quality

Maduka College Advert

The firm detailed 5 of their best engineers on the project. They were;

Engr. Nelson Onyemeh — Lead consultant/CEO of NELAN Consultants, from Ihiala, Anambra State.
• Engr. Ernest Edeani — From Nkanu, Enugu State.
• Engr. Ikechukwu Ejiofor — From Umunya, Anambra State.
• Engr. Samuel Aneke — From Nkanu, Enugu State.
• Engr. Stanley Nwazulum — From Amawbia, Anambra State.

In the course of their job, there was serious tensions between NELAN and the Umahi administration over project control and payments. According to the families of the 5 engineers, the Umahi government allegedly wanted NELAN to “take a back seat” so the state could exercise direct control, issue payment certificates, and give instructions to contractors. The then governor Umahi reportedly wanted NELAN to sign/approve certificates of satisfactory completion for work supervised or executed by other engineers/contractors — something NELAN refused, arguing it violated AfDB contract terms, their professional obligations, and risked the firm (and possibly the project) being blacklisted by the AfDB.

This disagreement created bad blood between the Umahi govt and the NELAN Engineers.

On November 3, 2021, the 5 engineers left Enugu for Ebonyi state in an official Toyota Hilux with registration ERR 001 EB for site supervision but never came back till this very moment neither were their remains found till date.

The Umahi-led Government issued a statement describing the incident as an unfortunate abduction by unknown gunmen linked to the Effium/Ezza-Effium communal crisis going on in a part of the state then adding that upon receiving news of the disappearance, the state govt mobilized security agencies for a search and rescue operation.

But in late November 2021, reportedly during a State Executive Council/Security Council meeting, Umahi publicly announced that the five engineers had been killed and buried in the bush by “Ezza warriors”, based on alleged confessions from arrested suspects. It should be noted that the then governor Umahi made this statement WHILE police and DSS investigations were still ongoing.

The families of the missing engineers described the statement as premature and shocking and insisted that the disappearance of the engineers was targeted and not a result of some random communal violence as alleged by the govt. They cite the “control of certifications and payments” dispute between the engineers and Umahi as being connected to the disappearance.

On their part, the Police and DSS launched investigations which led to the arrest of at least six suspects who were charged with kidnapping (and in some references, murder) in Charge No. HKW/7C/2022 at the Ebonyi State High Court in Ezzamgbo before Justice John Igboji.

Skeletal remains the security agencies believed to be those of the engineers were presented to the families but an INDEPENDENT DNA tests funded by the families to verify the same skeletal remains came back negative for the engineers; one set reportedly belonged to a female even when all five victims were men. This again, fueled the families’ suspicions that the disappearance of the engineers was masterminded by some person(s) and that even those claiming to be investigating may be trying to cover up the real truth.

To add to the families’ suspicion, a notorious kidnapper known as “Small” with a phone number – 08088985480 – allegedly first contacted the families shortly after the disappearance, claiming one engineer was in an accident and demanding ₦50,000 for treatment. Families paid in an attempt to trace him only for “Small” to end up reported killed (some account said by Anambra vigilantes in 2025 while some said he was killed earlier by his own people).Determined to find out the truth, the families hired private trackers to do a Phone tracking/triangulation on “Small” phone numbers (the result of which was reportedly reviewed by some investigators) and the result allegedly showed “Small” communicating repeatedly with individuals linked to the road project, including one Barrister Chioma Nweze who was then a close adviser to Umahi and involved in the Ring Road project (now Senior Special Assistant to President Tinubu on Community Engagement, South-East) and Felix Otta (project coordinator). Families believe that these links suggest the disappearance of the engineers was carefully planned and executed by powerful highly placed persons, and not some random community violence. Chioma Nweze strongly denied communicating with any attackers. 

The families equally alleged that a Key DSS investigator (Victor Chijioke Onyesom) was allegedly removed/sacked at a critical stage of the investigation without proper process or replacement. They queried why the security agents rushed to file charges without producing bodies or concluding investigations. On November 29, 2021, at a project progress review meeting, one Engr. S. Sowomi allegedly represented NELAN while the five-man management team was missing. This, the families deemed outrageous.

Since November, 2021 till date, the five wives of the five engineers — Patricia Onyemeh, Lovette Edeani, Ifeoma Ejiofor, Esther Aneke, and Mrs. Nwazulum — have been vocal and consistent in demanding answers from Dave Umahi and the relevant authorities. They insist the engineers traveled for a legitimate official assignment/meeting connected to the project and were targeted because of NELAN’s resistance to Umahi’s alleged attempts to bypass proper supervision and control payments/certificates against AfDB rules.
They reject the “general communal clash” narrative as a cover-up, calling it “outrageous, misconceived, misrepresented, and flawed.” while maintaining there is a coordinated cover-up, including impersonation at meetings, interference in investigations, rushed prosecutions to shield real culprits, and threats (including from an undisclosed “ghost client” after petitioning authorities).

They have been consistent in asking: IF THE KILLERS WERE ARRESTED AND CONFESSED, WHERE THEN ARE THE BODIES? Why charge the suspects for murder without bodies?

They have submitted petitions to President Tinubu, Senate President Akpabio, Speaker Abbas, NHRC, relevant security agencies, and state governments (Anambra, Enugu).

On March 16, 2026, they protested at the Federal Ministry of Works in Abuja (moved from National Assembly grounds), demanding justice, bodies, and accountability from Umahi. Two months after on May 2026, they issued a strong public rejoinder accusing Umahi of cover-up and demanding fresh probe. July 2026, through their lead counsel (including Femi Falana SAN in some actions), they obtained the Certified True Copy (CTC) of court proceedings in Charge HKW/7C/2022 and petitioned the National Judicial Council (NJC), Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), and others for independent review, citing irregularities. 

On the Court Proceedings and Current status of the case;
In Charge No. HKW/7C/2022:
Six defendants were arraigned for kidnapping while applications to strike out names were filed early on.
In May 2025, the court noted that three applicants “enjoying the amnesty of the Ebonyi State Government” were admitted to bail on self-recognisance.
The case has seen repeated absences of defendants and counsel. On one occasion, the judge openly expressed frustration, noting the prosecution had informed the court about amnesty and that defendants would “do the needful,” only for them to stay away. The judge then ordered a senior state counsel to appear and explain.

In summary, the case remains stalled for now while the families continue to demand for a fresh INDEPENDENT FEDERAL LEVEL INVESTIGATION.

Continue Reading

News

FG suspends proposed WAEC, NECO fee hike

Published

on

Minister of Education, Dr Maruf Tunji Alausa.
Spread the love

The Federal Government has suspended the proposed review of registration fees for the 2027 West African Senior School Certificate Examination and the National Examinations Council Senior School Certificate Examination, pending wider consultations with stakeholders.

In a Monday statement issued by the Federal Ministry of Education, the ministry said the letter conveying the proposed fee adjustment, dated June 18, 2026, had been withdrawn to allow for a comprehensive review before any final decision is taken.

The ministry, in the release signed by the Director, Press and Public Relations, Boriowo Folasade, said the suspension followed concerns and feedback from members of the public.

“The Federal Ministry of Education announced that the letter conveying the proposed fee adjustment, dated 18 June 2026, has been withdrawn to allow for a comprehensive review and broader consultations with all relevant stakeholders before a final decision is taken,” the statement said.

 

Maduka College Advert

So This Happened (EP 411): Nigeria Extends Evacuation of Citizens from South Africa | Punch0:00 / 1:01

According to the ministry, the proposed fee review was driven by rising costs associated with conducting national examinations, noting that registration fees have remained largely unchanged for several years despite increasing operational expenses.

It cited higher costs of logistics, security, printing of examination materials, technology deployment, quality assurance and other services required to maintain the credibility of public examinations.

The statement said the Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, directed that the proposal be put on hold in line with the Federal Government’s commitment to inclusive and evidence-based policymaking.

“The Honourable Minister of Education, Dr. Maruf Tunji Alausa, CON, has directed that the proposal be placed on hold in line with the Federal Government’s commitment to inclusive, transparent and evidence-based policymaking,” it said.

Oyebanji retains governing councils of Ekiti tertiary institutions
The ministry said the decision reflects its commitment to ensuring that policies affecting students and their families are carefully considered and responsive to public interest.

It added that consultations would be held with examination bodies, state ministries of education, school proprietors and administrators, parents’ associations, organised labour, education stakeholders and other critical partners before any decision is reached.

Accordingly, the ministry said the proposed review of examination registration fees would not take effect as earlier communicated until the consultation process is concluded.

The Federal Ministry of Education reiterated that students’ welfare, equitable access to quality education and responsible policymaking remain central to the Federal Government’s education agenda and pledged to keep the public informed throughout the consultation process.

FG said it approved N50,000 as the new examination fee for WAEC and NECO for secondary school candidates from 2027.

The initial registration fee was N27,500, which means the new increment comes with an 82 per cent hike.

In a statement on June 18, 2026, issued by the Director of Senior Secondary Education of the Ministry of Education, Adeniji Ibrahim, the approval followed a request by WAEC for an upward review of the fee for the Senior School Certificate Examination for candidates from 2027.

Meanwhile, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and the National Association of Nigerian Students had earlier kicked against the Federal Government’s approval of a uniform N50,000 fee for candidates.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert