Connect with us

News

Simon Ekpa’s Monday sit-at-home flops in S’East as businesses, offices open

Published

on

BIAFRA: FG moves to extradite Simon Ekpa from Finland
Simon Ekpa
Spread the love

Residents of the five Southeast states yesterday largely ignored the sit-at-home order of the Simon Ekpa-led faction of the outlawed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

From Enugu, Abia, Imo, and Ebonyi to Anambra, they went about their activities without hindrance.

It is the first time in about two years that there will be normal activities in the region on a Monday.

In Enugu, most of the roads were busy as transporters and traders went about their normal businesses without being harassed. Many markets were open just as some commercial banks attended to customers.

There was no violent incident recorded as security operatives were deployed to various strategic points in Enugu capital city and other towns in the state, giving the residents assurances of their safety.

Maduka College Advert

Many residents expressed satisfaction with the determination and efforts of the Peter Mbah-led administration in Enugu State to ensure that the illegal sit-at-home was no longer observed in the state.

Also in Ebonyi, it was business as usual as people went about their normal activities, with banks, markets and government offices open.

Security agencies patrolled the city while some were positioned in strategic points across the state capital, Abakaliki.

Residents, backed by the state government, have long stopped obeying sit-at-home orders.

In Anambra, the armed criminals that enforced the sit-at-home directives were nowhere in sight.

There was no report of harassment or threat to life or property as businesses went on.

It was gathered that the hoodlums’ apparent disappearance followed their fear of being exposed by residents because security operatives had taken the battle to their doorsteps rather than waiting for them to strike first.

A security operative who spoke to our correspondent in confidence said enforcers of the directive were dealt with a few weeks ago in most of their hideouts in the forest and flash points.

“Residents, including community leaders and other stakeholders have now taken it as a duty to expose them wherever they may be as security is everyone’s business.

“That is why we are recording good results. Most of the people enforcing sit-at-home are criminals who capitalise on the situation to rob, assault, kidnap, assassinate and intimidate innocent people of the state,” he said.

Nevertheless, banks, courts, and some markets, among others remained shut despite Governor Chukwuma Soludo’s directives to market leaders and civil servants to return to their businesses and IPOB’s statement that sit-at-home had been cancelled.

The situation was similar in Abia where, although major markets, financial institutions and other establishments in the state were closed, most residents went about their businesses in peace.

There were commercial and economic activities in many parts of the state’s two major cities of Aba and Umuahia as motor parks and some private offices were open for business.

Some petrol stations were seen dispensing products to customers, unlike in the past when only a handful of petrol stations were open for business.

However, the gates to major markets including the popular Ariaria International Market, Cemetery, Shopping Centre and Ahia Ohuru were closed.

But at the popular St. Michael’s Road housing electronic and mobile phone dealers, some of the traders were seen in their shops.

Several business premises were open to customers in Imo as motorists and commercial motorcyclists were seen picking up passengers from various bus stops.

Apart from sensitive institutions like banks which did not open for business, supermarkets, markets and other petty traders attended to their businesses without hindrance.

A restaurant operator along Ikenegbu Road, who simply gave his name as Nze Nnadi, was thankful.

“We have been directed to resume operation on Mondays. We are grateful that normalcy is gradually returning to the state,” he said.

IPOB first declared the sit-at-home to demand the release of its leader Nnamdi Kanu, but after calling it off, the Ekpa faction continued to call for it.

Kanu, however, wrote an open letter to Ekpa, directing that there should be no more sit-at-home.

Meanwhile, the traditional ruler of Enugwu-Aguleri, Anambra East Council Area of Anambra State, Eze Chukwuemeka Eri absolved IPOB leader Mazi Nnamdi Kanu of blame for insecurity in the region.

Speaking at his palace in Aguleri, after visiting Kanu in Abuja the monarch quoted Kanu as saying, “I don’t derive joy from seeing children being denied going to school and workers staying idle on Mondays that is the beginning of the week.

“My vision for fighting for the emancipation and liberation of the peoples of Biafra is not such that will enslave them to economic deprivation.

“My suffering is not to destroy or harm rather to give a voice to Ndigbo, but some hoodlums have maximized my absence to perpetrate all forms of crime and criminality in the name of agitation.”

Other monarchs, including traditional rulers of Mkpunando and Enugwu-Otu Aguleri, Igwe Johnson Mbanefo and Igwe Emmanuel Ejiofor, corroborated his position.

Also yesterday, the President-General of Ohaneze Ndigbo Worldwide, Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu said restructuring was the only panacea to the country’s political and economic woes.

Iwuanyanwu in a recent online town hall meeting held in the United States of America said restructuring would avail all ethnic groups the opportunity to focus on their needs and interests and use their resources to execute projects that are vital in various federating units.

The President General promised to use his position as the leader of the foremost Igbo group to begin a massive economic revolution in Igboland by harnessing both human and natural resources in the zone as a stepping stone.

”Henceforth, adequate attention will be paid to education, mining, transportation industries and infrastructural development to make the zone an investment destination of Nigeria and beyond,” he added.

News

Court Orders Interior Minister Tunji-Ojo to Respond to Suit Seeking Release of His NYSC Records

Published

on

Minister knocks NIS for asking married women to travel to Abuja for change of name
Bunmi Tunji-Ojo, Minister of Interior
Spread the love

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday ordered the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, to respond to a suit seeking to compel the release of records of his National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) scheme.

Justice Salim Ibrahim gave the order when the matter came up for hearing.

The Incorporated Trustees of Pathway to Equity and Charity Foundation had filed the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1812/2026.

The group prayed the court to compel the NYSC to disclose documents supporting the minister’s claim that he completed the mandatory one-year national service.

The foundation also sought an order of mandamus directing the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA), the 2nd respondent, to produce records showing that the minister did his primary assignment at the FCTA.

Maduka College Advert

When the case was called, counsel to the applicant, Chief Solomon Akuma, SAN, told the court he was ready to proceed with the hearing.

However, Abiola Olaniji, who appeared for the minister, said he had filed an application for Tunji-Ojo to be joined as the 3rd respondent.

Olaniji said the applicant (foundation) had responded with a counter affidavit raising serious issues, to which he needed time to reply.

The lawyer stated that the minister was ready to take part in the proceedings as an interested party.

But Akuma opposed the application, arguing that the minister was not a proper party.

He said the suit only sought an order of mandamus compelling the respondents (NYSC and FCTA) to produce documents that are not in the minister’s custody.

Justice Ibrahim directed the minister to file and serve his reply to the applicant’s counter affidavit, which opposed his application to be joined as a party in the suit before the next hearing date.

The judge then adjourned the matter until Oct. 18 for hearing.

The applicant had sought from the NYSC the mobilisation or call-up letter issued to Tunji-Ojo in 2006 or any other year; the posting letter to the FCTA in 2006 or any other year; and his application for mobilisation.

It also sought the evidence of approval of his remobilisation by the NYSC’s Director-General; evidence of payment of allowances to him; the record of his Community Development Service and his discharge certificate.

The foundation equally sought from the FCTA, the mobilisation or call-up letter, the posting letter, his attendance record during the service year, evidence of any allowance paid to him, among others.

It said the application was brought under Section 14 of the Federal High Court Act, Order 34 Rules 1, 2 and 5 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019.

It also cited Sections 20, 21 and 25 of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, 2011.

(NAN)

Continue Reading

News

Reject money requests from home, Obi tells UK-based Nigerians

Published

on

Labour Party knocks Middle Belt movement for allegedly gagging Peter Obi
Peter Obi
Spread the love

The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, has advised Nigerians residing in the United Kingdom to stop sending money to people who seek financial help at home.

Obi also advised them to urge their relatives to vote for productive leaders.

He made the remarks at a town hall meeting with diaspora supporters in Manchester, United Kingdom, on Sunday.

He stressed that Nigeria’s prevailing economic hardship resulted from bad leadership, arguing that continuous financial assistance only cushions the effects of poor governance without addressing the root causes.

“You have people at home in Nigeria today who are begging you for money. Tell them no!” he said.

Maduka College Advert

The former Anambra State governor insisted that his record in public office distinguished him from other governors, claiming none of them matched his achievements in saving public funds.

“I’m not saying I’m a saint, but I saved money. I’ve not seen one governor who has saved 10 per cent of what I saved. No governor has done it.

“Let’s start with this one that is less corrupt. That’s how other countries change.”

He maintained that his conversations with the people reinforced the need for collective responsibility, stressing that building a new Nigeria would require citizens to take an active role in addressing challenges facing the country.

Obi also urged Nigerians to take the 2027 election seriously, describing the contest as a critical moment for the nation.

Continue Reading

News

Federal High Court Upholds ENSSAA’s N150m Political Campaign Billboard Fee, CTC Reveals

Published

on

Spread the love

Contrary to false and misleading reports on social media that a Federal High Court (FHC) sitting in Abuja had nullified the N150 million fee prescribed by the Enugu State Structures for Signage and Advertisement Agency (ENSSAA) for political campaign billboards, findings have revealed that the court actually ruled in favour of the agency, upholding its powers to prescribe the fee.

According to a certified true copy (CTC) of a judgment of FHC sitting in Enugu, the court had on September 1, 2026, dismissed a suit by opposition parties and figures challenging ENSSAA’s authority to impose a mandatory N150 million fee on each political party seeking to erect campaign billboards or display posters ahead of the 2027 general election.

The judgment rendered by Justice Mabel Segun-Bello held that it was within the legislative competence of the Enugu State House of Assembly to make laws on outdoor advertising and for ENSSAA to exercise powers donated to it by state law.

The suit marked FHC/EN/CS/165/2026 had the Labour Party; Chairman of the Labour Party (LP) in Enugu, Hon. Kingsley Ugwu; Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC); NDC factional state Chairman, Engr. Ibuchukwu Obetta; the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and its state Chairman, Hon. Magnus Ezea, as plaintiffs, while ENSSAA; its General Manager, Mr. Francis Aninwike; the Enugu State House of Assembly; Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC); Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON); and Nigeria Police Force were the respondents or defendants.

The plaintiffs had in June 2026 approached the court seeking a declaration that, by virtue of Sections 99 (1) and (2) of the Electoral Act, 2026, and Section 153 of the 1999 Constitution, which donated exclusive powers to INEC to regulate electoral campaigns of political parties in Nigeria, it was ultra vires the powers of ENSSAA and its General Manager to make executive decisions and publications imposing a mandatory payment of N150 million by political parties and their candidates in the state as an advertisement permit fee for the placement of billboards for the council election and the 2027 election.

Maduka College Advert

They equally sought a declaration by the court that it was unlawful and ultra vires the legislative powers of the Enugu State House of Assembly to make laws regulating the advertisement of political campaigns in the state.

Consequently, the plaintiffs sought an order of the court setting aside the mandatory N150 million fee, as well as an injunction restraining the agency and its GM, the Enugu State Government, its agents and representatives from enforcing ENSSAA’s executive directive.

They finally sought an order of the court mandating the Nigeria Police Force to protect political parties in Enugu State against possible harassment for the placement of billboards and posters for the council election and the 2027 elections.

However, delivering her judgment in September, after a careful consideration of the totality of the affidavit evidence, the exhibits, and submissions by both parties, the presiding judge, Justice Mabel Segun-Bello, held, among other things, that the National Assembly does not hold exclusive legislative powers over outdoor advertising.

“I accede to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants’ contention that the subject matter of ‘outdoor advertising’ is NOT reserved exclusively to the National Assembly or to ARCON.

“Rather, ‘outdoor advertising’ falls within the purview of the primary functions of the Local Government, which may (where properly delegated) be validly exercised by a State agency such as the 1st Defendant (ENSSAA).

“Third, I am satisfied that on the basis of the evidence before this Court, the 1st Defendant has established it had a validly delegated authority to issue the directive it gave on 9th February, 2026, for the regulation of advertisement of political campaigns,” she stated.

Guided by these foregoing conclusions, Justice Segun-Bello held that “it is not ultra vires the powers of the Enugu State Structures for Signage and Advertisement Agency and its General Manager (1st and 2nd Defendants) to pass executive decisions and publications imposing a mandatory payment of N150 million naira, as advertising permit that will enable the use of billboards in Enugu State.”

Continuing, she said, “It is also hereby declared that it is not ultra vires the legislative powers of the Enugu State House of Assembly (3rd Defendant) to make laws regulating advertisement in Enugu State.

“Consequently, the directive published by the 1st and 2nd Defendants on 9th February, 2026, mandating political parties and their candidates in Enugu State to pay N150,000,000.00 (One Hundred and Fifty Million Naira) as a pre-condition for obtaining an advertising permit to place billboards and posters for the 2026 and 2027 general election campaigns, is not an unlawful use of State Apparatus to the disadvantage of political parties, contrary to Section 99(2) of the Electoral Act, 2026.

“Save as expressly granted above, the remaining reliefs claimed by the Plaintiffs are hereby refused.”

Meanwhile, the Enugu State Government says that unlike the practice in most states, the N150 million fee is for each political party, not for candidates, as misrepresented on social media and by some commentators.

The Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Chidiebere Onyia, made the clarification recently while fielding questions from Government House correspondents in Enugu, adding that there was no court judgment on the fee by any FHC in Abuja, as falsely circulated.

In a related development, finding show that the Abia State Structures for Signage and Advertising Agency (ABSSAA) prescribed feea for candidates ranging from N20 million for State House of Assembly candidates to N200 million for presidential candidates.

Imo State fees range from N3.55 million for each House of Representatives candidate to N55 million for each governorship candidate, while the permit fees range from N300,000 for local council candidates to N150 million for presidential candidates.

The campaign permit fee ranges from N100,000 for each councillorship candidate to N50 million for each presidential candidate, while Kwara State fixed its fees at N2 million for each House of Assembly candidate and N100 million for presidential candidates.

The Certified True Copy of the Court Judgement :

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert