
Opinion
Under-Age Voters: A Call For Sympathy
By Sam Otuonye
“The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children’s teeth are set on edge” – (Holy Book: Jeremiah 31:29b)
A voting age is a minimum age established by law that a person must attain before he or she becomes eligible to vote in public elections. Nigeria, like most democracies in the world practices Universal Adult Suffrage system of voting. In other words, before a person can vote in elections he or she must have attained the statutory and constitutional age of 18 years, which is the full age. The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended, Section 29(4)(a) defines “full age” as the age of eighteen (18) years and above. Hence, anybody who is below the age of 18 is not permitted by law to vote in elections. He or she is a minor or child.
According to Child Rights Act (2003), (which is a law that guarantees the right of all children in Nigeria), a child is anyone below the age of 18. The part 111 of it even stipulates that teenage girls in Nigeria should not be married before the age of 18. Surprisingly, the Nigerian Constitution stipulates that upon marriage a girl is to be regarded as an adult regardless of the child’s age when she is married.
The Electoral Act (2022) Section 12(1)(b) ; asserts that, ”A person shall be qualified to be registered as a voter if such a person has attained the age of 18 years”. An under-age voter, in my opinion, therefore, is that person who is below the age of 18 years but lured with some monetary or material inducement by some politicians or their surrogates to register and vote in elections, for their candidates. In other words, this minor has been misled by these political interlopers to pretend to have attained the age of 18, in order to vote for the choice of their candidates without recourse to the consequences therein.

INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu

A legal icon, Mr. Babatunde Fashola (SAN),as reported in ThisDay Newspapers, wondered why a minor should get involved in voter registration much more queuing at the polling booth to vote in an election. He said; “By the nomenclature of it, under-age voting is unlawful. If you are not old enough to vote, why should you even go and register in the first place. So, it shouldn’t even arise; it shouldn’t happen; why should an under-age person go near the polling station on the Election Day if the process is what it is: the Act is impersonation and the law is very clear on what should happen to whoever is caught doing so”.
What will then happen to a juvenile who impersonates to vote in an election? The Oxford Dictionary defines the word ‘impersonate’ as; ”the act of pretending to be someone else”. The law frowns at impersonation because the aim of the act is to deceive another into believing someone is who he really is not. It is a crime and duly provided for in the Criminal Code Act, chapter 46 Section 484, which states thus: “Any person who, with intent to defraud any person, falsely represents himself to be some other person, living or dead, is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for three years”. In other words, the under-age voters are committing prosecutable and imprisonable offence. They are toying with three years imprisonment without their knowledge.
By the way, what is Age? It is the length of time that a person has lived or thing has existed. Collins English Dictionary defines age as the state of being old or the process of becoming older”. It added: humans grow wiser with age. Psychologists define age as a combination of physical, psychological, biological, and social maturity. They further divided age into four types: Chronological Age – which is the age calculated based on the year of birth; Appearance Age –the way one looks; Biological Age –the age that is measured by the body’s vital organs at a cellular and molecular level; and Psychological Age – this is associated with behavioral and thought processes. The chronological age is apt in the context of this expose; given that it is the type of age that is statutorily required for voting.
But the Appearance Age has become consequential as the sponsors of under-age voters claim that their looks are deceptive. This was well alluded to by the Commissioner of Police in Kano State at the just concluded 2023 presidential and National Assembly elections when he told the press that he could not stop or arrest ‘under-age’ children casting their vote at the polling station because it would be difficult to ascertain whether they were truly under-age by their looks, as some people suffer from stunted growth. In other words, age, like beauty, is in the eyes of the beholder!
Also, according to www.dictionary.com, Age is “a period of human life, measured by years from birth, usually marked by a certain stage or degree of mental or physical development and involving legal responsibility and capacity.” This obviously, includes the age of voting, consent, discretion, drinking, smoking, marriage, etc.
Stemming from the above definitions therefore, under-age voters lack the mental, legal responsibility, maturity and capacity to make informed choices and critical decisions. Their mentality is not well-developed to study and appreciate political parties and candidates manifestoes, historical trajectories, and political maneuverings, etc. Unfortunately, many a politician and their stakeholders are callously harvesting these innocent juveniles to perpetrate this ungodly act at every election season. And INEC and Law Enforcement Agencies are doing little or nothing to check it.

An under-age voter with Permanent Voter’ Card PVC
Vanguard Newspaper Editorial of February, 23, 2023, titled; ‘INEC and the scourge of underage voters’, opined that “Allowing or encouraging juveniles to register and vote is one of the many ways of undermining our electoral system. Unfortunately, electoral officers who are supposed to strictly implement the eligibility criteria fail to do so. They enroll these minors and allow them to vote. Even the security agencies sent to maintain the law at the polling stations allow the juvenile felons to get away with it.”
The INEC’s National Commissioner for information and voter education, Mr. Festus Okoye, in an interview with Arise News, claimed that INEC had called all of its staff in regions where under-age registrations (towards 2023 elections) had occurred to remedy the problem. He said, ”They will appear before a special panel of the Commission and it is ongoing. We have also made it very clear that any visibly under-age person should not on any account, approach any of our polling units on election day because if the person does, the person will be arrested”. And he added, “The parents will also be arrested for aiding and abetting such venture”.
The Guardian Newspapers, in 2019, reported that the Director of Publicity and Voter Education, Mr. Oluwole Osaze-Uzzi, announced that “INEC registered minors because its agents were threatened by members of the communities in those states”. Quite shocking! This captures the impunity with which the perpetrators of this perennial electoral violation hold sway. Politicians and their allies are liable. Hardly any parents encourage their children to indulge in such immoral act. Those juveniles stray to the polling stations at the behest of their unconscionable sponsors. Hence, the call for the arrest of the parents, by Mr. Festus Okoye is unfounded. It is all about the politicians. INEC and Security Agencies should rise to the assigned task; garner enough political and constitutional will, to deal with the sponsors of this national tragedy.
The fact is that, the call by INEC and Security Agencies to arrest the juvenile voters including their parents seems like playing the ostrich. Do they want to disinform Nigerians that it is the parents and their under-age children that orchestrate this electoral fraud? Keeping under cover the political high and mighty and their staff, who have been grossly alleged as the hatchers of the rotten egg. Let no one misinterpret or misunderstand the Holy Book quoted above, in the use of ‘fathers’, to mean biological parents only. It encompasses the political leaders, religious leaders, community leaders, academic leaders, executive leaders, legislative leaders, judicial leaders, economic leaders, elders, guardians, and any responsible adult that can differentiate good from evil. And no amount of threat or law will stop the menace unless the leaders at all levels resolve to quench it. They should go after those (known) politicians and their stakeholders and make a public show of them as stipulated by law.
To be sure, these children, by the constitution, are termed minors. And as such, do not have the capacity to make informed decisions and choices, particularly, the Northern Nigeria children in the category of the Almajiris, who are predominantly homeless, hungry, uneducated, hopeless and hapless. This set of children cannot read nor understand what the law says. They do not even have access to the media channels that disseminate voter information. Who has ever taken this voter education issue to them in small and medium groups in the language and culture they understand, teaching them the odious implications of under-age voting? They really need help!
Nigeria is not the only country in the world that has adopted the age of 18 years as constitutional eligibility for electoral franchise. United States of America, Canada, most countries in Europe and Africa, practice Universal Adult Suffrage and this odious stench of under-age voting does not ooze out from their elections. Brazil, Cuba, Argentina, etc., pegged theirs between 16 and 17 years. Historically, the British colonial governments of Hugh Clifford, (Clifford constitution 1922), granted only Nigerian men of age 21 and above the right to vote, provided they were British subjects or natives of British Protectorates, had earned 100 pounds and residing in Calabar and Lagos. It remained so for 28 years until 1951 when Sir John Macpherson (Macpherson constitution 1951) came and granted full adult male suffrage. Oliver Lyttleton 1954 (Lyttleton Constitution 1954) enlarged the specter to include women but only to the Eastern and Southern extraction. Then come, 1979 Constitution that reduced the voting age to 18 years.
To strategically snatch Nigerian children from the temptation of this illegal voting, aggressive sensitization is sacrosanct. Community leaders, religious leaders (churches and mosques), Advocacy Groups, etc., should form Election Counseling Channels, on under-age voting, particularly in the North where the menace is prevalent. They should identify some of the children that have taken part in the unlawful behavior and use them as Change Ambassadors to speak to others. It should be a collaborative project with INEC, National Orientation Agency, Ministry of Information, the EU, AU, etc, who will serve as sponsors of money, materials, logistics, monitoring and advisory.
If INEC and the Nigerian leadership want this national embarrassment to stop, it will, like a vapor. It is roundly a construct of the system and can be deconstructed forthwith. The operators of the system should urgently set the children free from this unsavory, irritating and sour electoral publicity.
LAST LINE: INEC, should include the presentation of Birth Certificate or Declaration of Age as a requirement for the registration of young people that have attained the age of 18 years or claimed to have attained. This at least, will be a hurdle and cast a moral burden on the claimants or deponents.

Opinion
Enugu State, Governor Mbah and The Road Revolution
By Samson Ezea
There is no meaningful development without infrastructure, and no infrastructure impacts the daily lives of the people more directly than roads. Roads connect communities, drive commerce, reduce travel time, improve security, attract investments, and open up rural areas for economic growth. In Enugu State today, one of the most visible signatures of Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah’s administration is the aggressive push in road construction and reconstruction across the state. From urban renewal projects to strategic rural link roads, the administration has continued to redefine the state’s infrastructural landscape.
Recently, I had cause to travel to Nsukka. I began my journey from Independence Layout through the Enugu–Port Harcourt Expressway and passed through Abakpa Junction. What immediately caught my attention was the impressive level of work on the second lane of the Enugu–Onitsha Expressway, which has already been opened for use, as well as the ongoing construction of the flyover bridge at Abakpa Junction.
On getting to Penoks Junction, I became even more excited seeing the extent of the dualisation project stretching from the junction down to the flyover bridge at T-Junction as part of the ongoing dualisation of the Penoks–Opi–Nsukka Road by Governor Mbah’s administration. Unlike in the past, when journeys to Nsukka were stressful and time-consuming, I arrived in less than 40 minutes.
Apart from the already completed sections, construction work is progressing rapidly on other parts of the road, particularly from the Opi Nsukka Junction axis towards Enugu. Just like every other road, Governor Mbah’s administration has constructed and reconstructed in the state, one remarkable feature of the project is the provision of proper drainage systems on both sides of the road to ensure easy flow of erosion and floodwater. This was largely absent on the old road and had contributed significantly to its deterioration over the years.
Beyond eliminating the usual traffic congestion and gridlock associated with the route, the economic benefits and long-term impact of the dualisation of this strategic road cannot be overemphasized. It is a major gateway linking Enugu State to northern Nigeria and other parts of the South-East.

Also, during the grand finale of the Tomorrow Is Here Movement, the vibrant support group of Governor Mbah’s administration, held at Owo Junction last month, I took time to travel through the ongoing 44.5-kilometre dual carriage road being constructed from scratch from Owo Junction through Ubahu down to Ikem. The road, when completed, will serve as another major access route connecting Enugu State to Northern Nigeria, while opening up several rural communities to development and economic opportunities.
Across Enugu State, from urban centres to rural communities, I have personally driven through several strategic roads either under construction or undergoing rehabilitation by Governor Mbah’s administration, roads I never even knew existed from my undergraduate days in Enugu till date.
Despite the huge backlog of infrastructural deficits inherited from decades of neglect by successive administrations, even before the creation of Enugu State in 1991, Governor Mbah’s administration has performed remarkably well in critical infrastructure development, particularly in roads, schools, hospitals, and related sectors. These projects are gradually transforming the developmental outlook of the state and positioning Enugu as an emerging investment destination.
From the outset, it was obvious that Governor Mbah came prepared for governance. This became even clearer on August 31, 2024, when he commissioned the Enugu State ultra-modern Mega Asphalt Plant, one of the best in the South-East region. The plant was established specifically to tackle the high cost and logistical challenges associated with road construction, especially asphalt production, which constitutes a major component of road projects.
The establishment of this important facility has significantly accelerated the pace and quality of road construction across the state.
Aside from occasional delays caused by the rainy season, most of the roads awarded by the administration are progressing steadily. Importantly, none of the projects awarded by Governor Mbah’s government has been abandoned. Construction activities are ongoing on virtually all of them, earning commendations from residents and indigenes alike.
Even as political activities ahead of the 2027 general elections intensify, with many politicians focusing more on strategies for electoral victory, Governor Mbah appears determined to allow his performance speak for him. This perhaps explains why the administration has continued to award more strategic road projects across the state.
Among the recently flagged-off projects is the 52.2-kilometre Nsukka–Leija–Aku–Akpakumeze–Eke-Ebe Road, inaugurated during the Enugu North Mega Endorsement Rally in May 2026. Other newly awarded projects include:
Beach Junction–Ovoko Afor Road, Nsukka
Enyichiru Barracks Junction Road, Nsukka – 1.2km
Mechanic Road Barracks Junction, Nsukka – 1.15km
Ugwuachara Road, Nsukka – 1.55km
Ezeagu–Umumba–Orie Engine Ebenebe Road – 10.1km
Enugu United Palm Plantation (EUPP) Access Road at Ibite Olo, Ezeagu – 14.5km
Umabi–Umuaga Link Road – 3.6km
Eke Obinagu–Obodo Nike–Umuode–Oruku–Aguikpa–Amaechi Idodo Road – 18.23km
Obodo Ukwu–Inyi Road – 5.6km
Ehuhe–Achi–Umabi Road – 13.05km
Amanpunato Achi–Amoli Road – 16.47km
Altogether, these projects cover over 151 kilometres of roads across different parts of the state.
These are not just ordinary roads; they are economic lifelines. They will boost agriculture, enhance rural commerce, improve access to healthcare and education, reduce travel time, and strengthen connectivity between rural communities and urban centres.
That is why it is amusing to read the propaganda and misinformation being circulated by some sponsored social media hirelings attempting to downplay the achievements of Governor Mbah’s administration in road construction. Their aim may be to score cheap political points ahead of the 2027 elections, but facts remain sacred.
Even to the blind, it is obvious and indisputable that Governor Mbah’s administration has done remarkably well in road construction and reconstruction across Enugu State. The administration has not abandoned any road project awarded so far and continues to initiate new projects despite growing political distractions.
The construction of the Mega Asphalt Plant at the early stage of the administration clearly demonstrated foresight, seriousness, and preparedness to tackle the long-standing challenge of deplorable roads across the state.
However, one undeniable reality remains: the infrastructural decay inherited over several decades is enormous.
Even if Governor Mbah were given another eight years focused solely on road construction, it would still be difficult to completely erase the backlog of dilapidated roads across the state. That is simply the magnitude of neglect accumulated over the years.
Nevertheless, the progress made so far deserves recognition and appreciation. Road construction is highly capital-intensive and requires careful planning, technical expertise, and time to ensure durability and quality delivery. Therefore, development should not only be assessed based on whether roads in one’s immediate community have been reconstructed. Governance must be viewed from a broader perspective.
In all fairness, Governor Peter Mbah’s administration has shown commitment, vision, and determination in addressing Enugu State’s infrastructural challenges. The ongoing road revolution across the state is not merely about laying asphalt; it is about opening up communities, stimulating economic growth, improving the quality of life of the people, and laying a solid foundation for future generations.
Indeed, the roads are speaking for the administration.
• Ezea writes from Independence Layout, Enugu State

Business
Amukpe-Escravos pipeline and the real cost of ignoring current value, By Sufuyan Ojeifo
Nigeria’s oil infrastructure has a habit of telling uncomfortable truths. Not just about barrels and flow rates, but about how a country chooses to value what it cannot afford to lose, and what it risks when it gets that calculation wrong.
Take the Amukpe-Escravos Pipeline, for example. A syndicate of lenders, led by Sterling Bank, is pushing back against efforts to revive a collapsed transaction involving a 40% stake in the asset. Their argument is not complicated. It is rooted in numbers and contractual discipline.
To be clear, a deal that fell apart in 2024 is being reconsidered using a valuation from that same year. However, since then, the asset has proved its worth. Independent assessments now place that stake closer to $600 million. The earlier benchmark sits far below that. The gap is not cosmetic. It is material. And if left unaddressed, it becomes a cost.
The original $243 million offer did not collapse by accident. It was terminated in October 2024 after Conpurex Limited failed to meet payment obligations, breached key terms, and sought to shift risk back to the seller. By the time the Technical Committee closed the process, confidence had already drained out of it. That much is settled.
Ordinarily, that should have been the end. Instead, there are moves to return to a September 2025 approval linked to that same process. The lenders describe this as an administrative carryover. Their response is simple. Start again. Set aside the old approval. Bring in an independent adviser. Return the asset to the market and let current value speak.
What is striking is not just the position itself, but how unusual it sounds in the Nigerian context. In a system where strategic assets have too often travelled through corridors of convenience, an insistence on valuation and process can sound almost rebellious. It should not be so.

Because this is not entirely about one pipeline. It is about whether a terminated deal remains terminated. Whether contracts still mean what they say. Whether performance counts for anything once the paperwork has been filed away. And, crucially, who bears the cost when value is ignored.
The numbers, as always, are blunt. A 2025 independent valuation, referenced in the March 2026 edition of Africa Oil+Gas Report, places the 40% stake at a mid-case of $372 million, a high case of $544 million, and an upside of $641 million. These are not speculative figures. They reflect an asset that has quietly done its job in a difficult environment.
With a capacity of 160,000 barrels per day and uptime consistently above 95%, the Amukpe-Escravos Pipeline has become one of the more reliable evacuation routes in a system where reliability is often in short supply. While other corridors struggle with theft and disruption, this one works.
That fact matters a great deal. Because when an asset proves itself under pressure, its value does not stand still. It moves. To price it as though nothing has changed is not just a technical choice. It is a financial one. And every financial choice has consequences.
It says performance can be ignored. It says time does not count. It says administrative continuity can outrun economic reality. To be fair, the earlier process gave enough warning signs. Lenders questioned the assumptions. Coordination was weak. When Continental Oil and Gas stepped back, Conpurex entered without a clean transition and soon began to reopen settled terms, shifting obligations and introducing new conditions that unsettled the commercial balance. The eventual termination was not dramatic. It was inevitable.
What unsettles stakeholders now is the possibility that a process that ran its course may still shape the outcome. If a concluded transaction can reappear without a clear restart, the line between closure and continuity begins to blur. Once that line blurs, contractual uncertainty follows. And when certainty weakens, serious capital takes notice.
This is where the issue widens beyond the pipeline itself. Back in March, Africa Oil+Gas Report described the Amukpe-Escravos matter as no longer just a transaction story, but a test of how Nigeria governs, values, and safeguards strategic oil infrastructure. That reading feels even more relevant now.
Because what is at stake is not simply who acquires a stake in a pipeline. It is how the country signals to those willing to invest in its most critical assets. It is about whether value is recognised only in theory, or protected in practice. It is about whether losses are acknowledged, or quietly absorbed.
The lenders’ position is often described as resistance. It is better understood as discipline. Reset the process. Revisit the approval. Bring in independent oversight. Return the asset to the market through a transparent and competitive process that reflects present realities. Ensure capable counterparties. Align all stakeholders.
These are not extravagant demands. They are the basics. Nigeria has seen too many assets drift from promise to regret. Too many structures that once worked reduced to cautionary tales. When something works, when something proves resilient in a difficult system, the least that can be done is to treat it with the seriousness it has earned.
Moments like this do not announce themselves as turning points. They arrive quietly, dressed as routine decisions.
But they reveal everything. For an economy seeking disciplined capital and trying to rebuild confidence, the signal matters. Let the process be reset. Let valuation reflect reality. Let the outcome show that when Nigeria recognises value, it also knows how to protect it, and what it stands to lose when it does not.
Until then, the lenders’ position stands as a reminder that in a system where too much has been taken for granted, some lines are too important to be crossed and must be held.
● Sufuyan Ojeifo publishes THE CONCLAVE online newspaper.

Health
How Gov Peter Mbah is rewriting Enugu’s healthcare story
By Dr. Collins Ogbu
In the life of every society, there comes a defining moment when leadership either sustains the status quo or boldly reimagines the future. For Enugu State, that moment is now. At the centre of this transformation is Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah, whose administration is not merely responding to challenges in the health sector but fundamentally rebuilding it. Recent public discourse surrounding the suspension of a health assistant trainee by a private institution has, perhaps inadvertently, created an opportunity to restate a deeper truth: the Enugu State Government remains focused, deliberate, and fully committed to repositioning healthcare delivery across the state.
For years, Enugu’s healthcare system reflected a troubling pattern familiar in many subnational contexts; underfunded primary healthcare centres, overstretched personnel, aging and inadequate infrastructure, and an overreliance on private or out-of-state medical services. Rural communities were particularly disadvantaged, often forced to travel long distances for basic care. Training institutions operated with limited capacity, while secondary and tertiary facilities struggled with outdated equipment and insufficient staffing. The system was largely reactive, constrained by years of neglect and unable to meet the growing needs of the population.
Governor Mbah’s administration has decisively broken from that past. Anchored on the principle that healthcare is a right and not a privilege, the government undertook a comprehensive audit of the sector and initiated a far-reaching reform agenda. Rather than incremental adjustments, the approach has been bold and systemic; targeting every layer of healthcare delivery, from primary care to specialised services.
Central to this transformation is the rollout of 260 Type-2 Primary Healthcare Centres across all political wards in the state. This initiative directly addresses the longstanding gap in grassroots healthcare access. Where communities once depended on poorly equipped facilities or distant hospitals, modern, well-positioned centres are now being established to provide quality care within reach. This effort is further strengthened by the recruitment of over 2,250 healthcare workers, a significant intervention aimed at resolving the manpower shortages that previously undermined service delivery.
At the secondary level, general hospitals are undergoing extensive rehabilitation to restore their capacity as reliable referral centres. Facilities such as Uwani General Hospital, which once symbolised infrastructural decline, are being transformed to meet modern standards. These upgrades are ensuring a more efficient continuum of care between primary and tertiary institutions.

The transformation is even more pronounced in tertiary healthcare. The Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Parklane, is experiencing unprecedented infrastructural expansion, including the construction of a twin six-floor Laboratory and Clinical Complex, a seven-floor Nursing Complex equipped with advanced diagnostic facilities, and a modern Accident and Emergency Department. These developments represent a significant leap from the limitations of the past, positioning the institution as a centre of excellence in both service delivery and medical training.
In the area of medical education, the administration has recorded a landmark achievement with the reaccreditation of the ESUT College of Medicine and the subsequent increase in its admission quota to 350 students – the highest among state-owned institutions in Nigeria. This milestone reflects a strategic commitment to building human capital and ensuring a steady pipeline of highly trained medical professionals for the future.
Equally significant is the completion of the State University of Medical and Applied Sciences (SUMAS) Teaching Hospital in Igbo-Eno. Unlike in previous years when a single teaching hospital struggled to meet demand, Enugu now has a second fully equipped facility, with recruitment already underway to commence full-scale operations. This expansion not only improves access to tertiary care but also strengthens the state’s capacity for medical training and research.
Crowning these efforts is the nearly completed 300-bed Enugu International Hospital, a state-of-the-art, super-specialist facility designed to elevate healthcare standards and reduce the need for outbound medical tourism. For decades, many residents sought advanced medical care outside the state or country, often at great financial and emotional cost. This facility represents a turning point, offering world-class services within Enugu and reinforcing the state’s emergence as a healthcare hub.
Amid these sweeping reforms, the government has also demonstrated a strong commitment to transparency and responsible governance. By clearly distancing itself from the internal disciplinary processes of a private institution while engaging relevant stakeholders, it underscores respect for institutional autonomy alongside responsiveness to public concerns.
What is unfolding in Enugu today is not merely policy execution but a comprehensive transformation. The contrast between the past and the present is both clear and compelling; where there were once gaps, there is now structure; where there was decline, there is now renewal. The state is moving from a system defined by limitations to one driven by vision, investment, and measurable progress.
While challenges inevitably remain, the trajectory is unmistakable.
Enugu State is no longer managing a fragile healthcare system; it is building a resilient, modern, and inclusive one. In the final analysis, Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah’s strides in the health sector are redefining not just infrastructure and policy, but the very experience of healthcare for Ndi Enugu, laying the foundation for a future where quality care is accessible, reliable, and sustainable for all.
• By Dr. Ogbu is a Senior Special Assistant, SSA to Enugu State Governor on Strategic Communications

-
News2 days agoWoman passes out after receiving 100 strokes of cane for having sex outside marriage
-
Politics2 days agoPDP suspends Enugu Guber Aspirant over alleged anti-party activities
-
News21 hours agoSupreme Court restrains FG from controlling waterfront lands in states, voids parts of NIWA Act
-
News2 days agoPolice arrest suspect over killing of Imo Nursing Student
-
News20 hours agoDISCLAIMER: NDC disowns John Paul Anih
-
News2 days agoAbductors of Oyo Schoolchildren begin negotiations, give conditions for release
-
News3 days agoPresidency denies plan to rename Nigeria, abolish Sharia law
-
Politics1 day agoImo North chooses experience: Araraume’s primary election win and what it means, By Sufuyan Ojeifo


