News
INSECURITY: Demand for bullet-proof vehicles, special security gadgets surges
• VIPs, politicians, others procure armoured SUVs, demand overwhelms dealers
As preparations for the 2023 general elections gain momentum amid a worsening security situation across the country, the demands for bullet-proof Sports Utility Vehicles have increased significantly.
Investigations by The PUNCH correspondents over the weekend indicate that Very Important Personalities,VIPs, top chieftains and candidates of political parties have been procuring customized vehicles that offer special protection in the run-up to the campaigns and elections.
About three weeks ago, there was an attempted assassination of the lawmaker representing the Anambra South Senatorial District, Senator Ifeanyi Ubah.
Four persons, including police aides, were killed by gunmen who opened fire on the senator’s convoy at the Enugwu-Ukwu junction, Njikoka Local Government Area of Anambra State while he was on his way to his country home in Nnewi.
The Young Progressives Party senator, who is seeking re-election to the Senate in the 2023 general elections, however, escaped death as he was riding in a bullet-proof SUV.
“If not for the bullet-proof SUV the senator was riding in, he would have been dead by now. We were passing the Enugwu-Ukwu junction when they hit us from all sides,” Ubah’s media assistant, Mr Kameh Ogbonna, reportedly said.
In 2017, Dino Melaye, the senator representing Kogi West, escaped death when unknown gunmen attacked him during a rally in Lokoja. His vehicle was riddled with bullets but he narrowly survived the attack.
But a former special adviser to ex-president Goodluck Jonathan on Political Matters, Ahmed Gulak, was not so lucky as he was shot dead while on his way to Owerri airport in May 2021.
Apart from ordering armoured vehicles, it was also learnt that politicians were applying for special police protection and procuring other security wares.
The use of armoured vehicles is regulated by the Office of the National Security Adviser but approval or end-user certificate is granted to private individuals who have evidence of a threat to their lives.
Checks indicate that armoured vehicles could be customised with reinforced suspension, run-flat tires, armoured battery, radiator and fuel tank protection as well as fortified doors, ballistic windows and windshield. These are meant to provide maximum protection to occupants of armoured vehicles during an attack.
Suppliers speak
Confirming the increase in orders for armoured vehicles, the President, Armor Max, Mr Mark Burton said his company had been getting orders from clients, noting that sales were very good in March.
Burton, who said his firm had been importing bullet-proof vehicles into Nigeria for the past 20 years, explained that the high demand was inspired by the political season.
Speaking in a telephone interview from the United States, he said, ‘’We are a United States-based company, we have been based in Nigeria for six years now. We have been armouring cars and sending them to Nigeria for 20 years.
“Obviously, with the political season and the unrest (insecurity), there is obviously a high demand. We have been working with government officials, diplomats, senators, and businesses. There are a lot of things that go into armouring (vehicles).
“It depends on the needs. Sometimes, it is for political purposes, other times, it is for church groups that just need transport for their pastors to and from church and their home.’’
According to the American, Armor Max has been undertaking bullet-proof windscreen replacements and other special vehicle servicing, admitting that its profits had increased due to the increased request for its services.
Asked if sales had increased in recent times, Burton said, ‘’Yes, we are making a profit, but right now, we are doing a lot of replacements. There are lots of bullet-proof vehicles in Nigeria, so we are doing lots of servicing; if someone needs a bullet-proof windshield, we do that.
“We armour vehicles and do servicing. We are making a profit in Nigeria; we get constant sales with people asking for upgrades. Right now, we are working on Jaguars; we do all the Land Cruisers and Prados. In the US, we do Rolls-Royce and Bentley but in Nigeria, we do more of Lexus LX570. In different months, there are different orders or projects.’’
When asked about the categories of his clients and his most profitable month, the businessman stated, ‘’It is hard to know who is placing the orders but our busiest month was in March. March was a crazy time because we were working with a lot of security companies.
“Since March, it’s dropped off a little bit but I see a lot of people before the end of the year wanting to get bullet-proof cars, so we are kind of ramping up (supplies) before the end of the year.’’
Approvals taking time
Burton disclosed that he obtained end-users certificates which enabled him to import the armoured vehicles into the country, adding that the official approval process takes time.
“But we still have products on the ground; it’s just on a case-by-case basis. We make sure we adhere to the local needs in Nigeria. We are trying to make sure the people who need our products get our products.’’
Asked if the insecurity in the country had indirectly benefited his firm, Burton said, ‘’Yes, but we don’t want the world to be unsafe but all we are trying to do is create solutions to different problems.’’
He added, ‘’It’s not because we want violence but because things have been happening and all we are trying to do is create solutions. We have products that can help you have peace of mind. We also get orders from the Nigerian government and private businesses in Nigeria.’’
The Sales Manager, Inkas Armoured Vehicle Manufacturing Nigeria, Mr Haresh Jethmalanito, also affirmed that the armoured vehicle market is presently booming, noting that dealers were making brisk business.
But he lamented that his company was not benefitting from the boom because of the long time it takes to procure the end-user certificate from the ONSA.
He said, “The demand is there in the market, but for us, there is no demand from politicians. They want to see the cars they want to buy. The demand is there, I can’t deny it; only we can’t materialise (fulfil) it because it takes three to four months (to import the cars). But oil and gas companies and telecommunications firms can afford to wait. Those are our main customers.’’
He noted, ‘’People are inquiring about buying but I have not seen any serious customers for now; maybe because prices are very high because of naira devaluation. So, people hear the price and keep quiet.
“The politicians who make requests and didn’t buy from us can’t wait for three or four months. They want to see the car and take it; they want instant delivery.
“The politicians don’t bother about anything, they just drop the cash, any amount. We can’t keep the vehicles on the ground because we have to apply for the end-user certificates before we import. We follow the procedures, we can’t do things like other people. We don’t want any problems in the future.
“Politicians don’t come to us, they go to where they see the car; they inquire from their sources who have cars available on the ground and they buy the available ones. So, it is very difficult for us.
“Our prices are the highest in Nigeria because we pay 100 per cent duty. We do everything legal; we don’t do it like other people. Maybe they (politicians) hear from us and buy from other people.’’
Highlighting the vehicle models preferred by his Nigerian customers, the manager said, ‘’Normally, I always sell Landcruiser and Lexus model of vehicles; the cheapest is the Landcruiser. The Lexus is very costly now. We don’t keep them, it is based on orders. We apply for an end-user certificate; the process is very tough.’’
Jethmalanito, however, said multinational firms, embassies and telecom companies placed orders regularly because ‘’they don’t trust the (open) market.’’
The chief executive of a prominent supplier of armoured vehicles, who spoke to one of our correspondents on the condition of anonymity, said demand was rising, especially from politicians but the security agencies were closely monitoring the supply of bullet-proof vehicles and other security wares.
He said, “We are being careful because of the times we are in. Yes, politicians need armoured vehicles to protect themselves. Definitely! It can provide all the safety, just as Ifeanyi Ubah could have been dead by now if not for the vehicle.”
Dealers react
A car dealer, simply identified as Mr Frank, who also markets special protection vehicles, said the business had become profitable lately.
“Politicians are getting bullet-proof cars, they are buying gradually. But when they come for transactions, we don’t ask if they are politicians. We give them what they want. I don’t import bullet-proof vehicles, I market for others,’’ he clarified.
The Proprietor of Megalio Motors, Mike Omere, said he recently sold an armoured SUV to a politician who wanted to travel to the South-South.
“A politician just bought (a vehicle) so he can travel to the South-South. The cheapest you can buy is an old Landcruiser for N18m. The 2022 model bullet-proof Landcruiser goes for N198m while the G-Wagon of the same year costs over N380m,’’ he stated.
The Managing Director, Globaton Services Limited, Mr Tonye Edwin, who leases out armoured vehicles, expressed the confidence that those who need his products would soon place orders.
“I believe that in the coming days, people will lease our vehicles for campaigns. Politicians lease our vehicles. Most of the calls we get are inquiries but we are prepared to provide services to clients,’’ he assured.
Speaking on the development, Eddy Olafeso and Rufus Aiyenigba, chieftains of the Peoples Democratic Party, and Social Democratic Party, respectively, called for caution.
In separate interviews with The PUNCH, the duo said the ordinary man on the street needed protection as much as the politicians ahead of the 2023 polls.
According to Olafeso, a former South-West Deputy National Chairman of the PDP, “If politicians get bullet-proof vehicles while the common man is left unprotected, what have we achieved? It is escapist and selfish to procure bullet-proof vehicles because not every Nigerian can afford one.
“The security agencies should do their job. Yes, prayer is good but it shouldn’t take the place of the role placed on our security personnel,” he said.
On his part, the National Publicity Secretary of the SDP, Aiyenigba, said, “Who is demanding these vehicles? It can’t be the common man struggling to eat decent meals. The bullet-proof vehicles we need are food, security and welfare for every Nigerian.”
Security experts kick
Retired military personnel, Col Hassan Stan-Labo (retd.), said politicians were rushing to purchase bullet-proof vehicles because they are very vulnerable, having failed to use public resources judiciously.
He said “It is obvious that they need to rush to buy bullet-proof vehicles because they need to protect themselves. And of course, they need to protect themselves because they have not done what they were expected to have done with all the resources placed at their disposal. So, they have not only ended up making the citizens vulnerable but they themselves have become vulnerable.
A retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Ali Amodu, sees nothing wrong in politicians acquiring armoured vehicles for their personal safety if they can afford it.
He stated, “Yes, if they have the money they have to do so. This is because there is insecurity in the land. If it’s affordable, then it’s fine. Your life is important first and foremost; before you protect another person you have to first protect yourself. You are not questioning their source of income; they have to live. I want to conclude this conversation with let us pray generally for the nation, let us have a better Nigeria.”
A security expert, Mr Chidi Omeje, noted that the procurement of armoured vehicles by politicians for personal protection showed the level of insecurity in the country, and the political elite’s selfishness.
He noted, “Technically, people have the right to protect their lives. However, would the elite be able to procure armoured vehicles for their entourage and aides, or would they just be left to die when they get attacked?
Pro-democracy groups worry
Two civil rights organisations under the aegis of Yiaga Africa and Transition Monitoring Groups said it was a dangerous signal and reflection of what to expect in the campaigns.
The Executive Director of Yiaga Africa, Samson Itodo and Chairman of TMG, Auwal Musa Rafsanjani, said these in separate interviews with The PUNCH.
Itodo said, “It’s not unsurprising, given the nation’s multidimensional security crisis. However, it provides insight into the nature, temperature and dynamics we should expect this campaign season. It’s important to consider this an early warning sign and begin the process of neutralising these threats of violence.”
Speaking in the same vein, Rafsanjani said, “It is unfortunate that some politicians have created conditions for political violence in Nigeria taking advantage of the hopeless situation of young people who are forced out of university due to the government’s refusal to support proper functioning of our university system.’’
According to him, the purchase of armoured vehicles by politicians ahead of the campaigns is a clear indication that they want to promote violence to win elections.
Reacting to the development, the Director of the Centre for Democracy and Development, Idayat Hassan, expressed worries that the campaigns might not be violence-free.
She noted, “We have to acknowledge that the country is insecure and the ability to campaign in every part of the country without being attacked by either political thugs or criminal elements like bandits is becoming a challenge and that is why people are moving up to self-protection.’’
Meanwhile, the Senate on Tuesday directed the Nigeria Police Force and Department of State Services to carry out a thorough investigation towards fishing out those behind the dastardly attack on the convoy of Senator Ubah some weeks ago. (The PUNCH)
The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), the apex students governing body, has issued a four days ultimatum to South African business interests to evacuate Nigeria.
This is contained in a statement issued on Monday in Enugu by Comrade Amb. Bestman Okereafor, NANS National Executive Director, Cooperate and Private Sectors Engagement.
The statement said that after the expiration of the ultimatum, South African business interests would face full wrath of the over 43.1 million Nigerian students scattered in the nooks and crannies of the country.
“The attention of the apex students governing body, NANS, has been drawn to continuous attacks, intimidation and subsequent chase of law abiding, peaceful and hardworking Nigerians and other Africans from South Africa.
“As the biggest students body in Africa, we are giving South African business interests four days to evacuate our beloved country, Nigeria.
“The reason for this action is simple. South Africans cannot continue to oppress and chase our people from their country and expect their businesses to thrive on our soil,” it said.
The statement further noted that immediately after expiration of the ultimatum, NANS will consider picketing South Africa business interests, while further actions will follow.”
It called on the Federal Government of Nigeria and the African Union (AU) to take more decisive actions against South Africa for their inimical acts towards other Africans.
“It is on record that Nigeria played a major role in support of South Africa during the apartheid struggle and should never be paid with disloyalty, disrespect and global embarrassment,” it added.
It would be recalled that xenophobic attack by South Africans on other Africans for some months had led to Nigerians being physically assaulted, embarrassed, intimidated, injured and some gruesomely murdered.
Several Nigeria business interests and business premises, owned by law abiding Nigerians in South Africa, had been completely burnt down or destroyed by rampaging South Africans without any justification.
The alleged perpetrators of these crimes had earlier given Nigerians and other Africans an ultimatum of June 30 to leave South Africa.
The Federal Government through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had in recent weeks airlifted hundreds of Nigerians, who are willing to leave the unfriendly country and her people, free of charge back to Nigeria.
However, some of those, who returned to Nigeria recently, left South Africa barely with the cloth they put on, losing savings, valuables and businesses they set up or acquired after many years.
The Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) has condemned the manner Emeritus Professor Martin Aghaji was arrested at the weekend in Enugu by alleged security operatives.
Aghaji, an internationally acclaimed cardiothoracic surgeon, renowned academic, distinguished statesman and one of Nigeria’s foremost medical icons, was reportedly taken from his residence in the early hours of Friday, July 3.
Sources stated that Aghaji’s arrest might not be unconnected with the convicted leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. Aghaji is Kanu’s personal doctor.
Kanu’s lawyer, Aloy Ejimakor had taken to his Twitter handle at the weekend to alert about the arrest of Aghaji, alleging that it must be in connection with medical report he issued on Kanu.
The Enugu branch of the NMA had convened State Officers Council (SOC) at the weekend on receiving information about the development.
A communiqué from the meeting signed by the State Chairman, Dr Sunday Okafor and Secretary, Dr Chima Edeoga, while decrying the manner ’f the arrest, recognised the constitutional responsibilities of security agencies, but maintained however that every citizen deserved to be treated with dignity and in accordance with due process.
The doctors stated that upon receiving reports from concerned medical elders and members of the Association, the leadership of NMA Enugu State commenced extensive engagements with relevant government and security authorities to ascertain the circumstances surrounding the incident.
“These engagements included the Office of the Security Adviser to the Governor of Enugu State, the Nigeria Police Force through both the Divisional Police Officer, Independence Layout Division, and the Commissioner of Police, Enugu State Command, the Department of State Services (DSS), as well as other relevant Stakeholders”, the statement said
Explaining that “specific reasons for his arrest have not been officially communicated”, they resolved to convene an Emergency General Meeting (EGM) of all members of the Association to fully deliberate on the development and collectively determine appropriate professional and lawful actions.
They resolved to continue engaging all relevant authorities with a view to securing the immediate release of Professor Aghaji or ensuring that his constitutional rights are fully protected, including access to his family, legal representation and necessary medical care where applicable.
“To formally notify the National Officers’ Committee of the Nigerian Medical Association and request immediate clarification and coordinated advocacy in the interest of justice and the protection of members of the medical profession”, he said.
The Association said It remained committed to lawful engagement and constructive dialogue while closely monitoring developments.
“We assure all members that every legitimate effort is being deployed to protect the rights and welfare of our distinguished colleague”, the statement said, while requesting its members to remain calm, united and vigilant and await further directives from the Association.
…Presidency can’t escape accountability over Gbajabiamila claims — PDP
…SERAP asks Akpabio, Abbas to explain N1.3bn allocation to ‘fictitious’ PFIPC
Fresh documents emerged on Sunday showing that the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, OSGF, approved the disowned Director-General of the non-existent Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, PFIPC, Mr Adeniyi Adeyemi, to attend the Canada-Africa Fintech Summit, CAFS, in August 2025.
The opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) reacting to the development on Sunday, accused the Federal Government of demonstrating a “troubling pattern of institutional failure” following the controversy surrounding the alleged Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC).
On it’s part, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, also on Sunday, urged the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, and speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to disclose certified copies of all documents relating to the consideration and approval of the allocation of over N1.3 billion (N1,302,978,784) to the PFIPC in the 2026 Appropriation Act.
The presidency had alleged that Mr Adeyemi concocted letters and claims, insisting that the council never existed.
It also asked investigators from the Department of State Services, DSS, the Nigeria Police Force and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to identify and prosecute those within government institutions who allegedly assisted Adeniyi in carrying out the scheme.
Meanwhile, the controversy surrounding the alleged PFIPC intensified yesterday as a document circulating online showed that the Permanent Secretary, Political and Economic Affairs Office, Office of Secretary to the Government of the Federation, SGF, Engr. Nadungu Gagare, had approved a trip for Mr Adeyemi to attend a Fintech summit in Canada.
The latest development has further escalated the dispute involving the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, and Adeyemi.
The new document showed that the embattled PFIPC DG was given the nod by the SGF’s office to attend the Fintech summit in Canada from August3-8, 2025.
The document, signed by Engr. Gagare, on behalf of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, OSGF, showed that the embattled PFIPC DG was directed by the OSGF to register and involve other stakeholders in the programme.
The document read: “In accordance with Mr President’s Economic Strategies on the Agenda. I invite you to participate in and join the Nigerian delegation to Canada from August 3rd to 8th, 2025.
“The CAFS Summit highlights strategic roles in Digital Finance and Technology, among stakeholders worldwide.
‘’This initiative will significantly contribute to shaping our economic vision, advancing development priorities, strengthening economic ties, fostering bilateral trade relations, and attracting foreign direct investment, FDI, to benefit the Nigerian economy.
“Given the above, you are urgently requested to register and involve other stakeholders in the programme. Your experience, technical support, and presence will strengthen this delegation.
“For more information and details, don’t hesitate to get in touch with the Permanent Secretary of the Political and Economic Affairs Office at the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, OSGF, and the CAFS Organising Group. Accept the warm regards of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation.’’
Presidency can’t escape accountability over Gbajabiamila claims —PDP
Reacting to the development on Sunday, , Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, asked President Tinubu to order an independent forensic investigation into allegations surrounding the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, PFIPC, insisting the Presidency “cannot escape accountability” over claims involving the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila.
The opposition party said the controversy left the Presidency facing two equally damaging possibilities.
In a statement signed by the spokesman of its Interim National Working Committee, Mr Ini Ememobong, the PDP said allegations made by Prince Adeniyi Matthew over the PFIPC, and the Presidency’s response through presidential spokesperson, Bayo Onanuga, had raised fresh questions about accountability and the integrity of government institutions.
The PDP said Mr Matthew alleged that Gbajabiamila solicited and received financial inducements to facilitate his appointment into the PFIPC before making further financial demands during the course of his engagement.
“The Presidency cannot escape accountability by choosing between corruption and incompetence. If its version is true, it has admitted to an unprecedented collapse of institutional safeguards.
‘’If Prince Matthew’s version is true, it has exposed corruption at the heart of government. Either way, Nigerians deserve answers.
“Whichever version of events proves to be true, the implications are deeply troubling,” Ememobong said.
The party said the Presidency, rather than directly denying the allegations, described Prince Matthew as an impostor who allegedly secured office space, had government staff assigned to him, operated CBN-registered accounts and conducted official business with agencies including the EFCC and other security institutions despite having no lawful authority.
It said the Presidency’s explanation only raised more questions.
“How did an alleged impostor gain unrestricted access to the Presidency? Who authorised the allocation of office space? Who approved the deployment of staff and budgetary resources?
‘’How were official accounts established? Who permitted him to transact with federal institutions and security agencies? These are questions that cannot simply be dismissed through a press statement.
“From the reported appointment of deceased persons into public offices, to controversies surrounding the presidential pardon process, the alleged N800 billion Progressive Governors Forum scandal, and several other avoidable administrative lapses, this administration has repeatedly found itself explaining controversies that ought never to have arisen,” the party stated.
The PDP urged President Tinubu to order an independent forensic investigation into the PFIPC controversy, suspend officials connected to the matter, pending the outcome of the inquiry, review administrative processes within the Presidency and issue an unreserved apology to Nigerians.
“The Nigerian people deserve more than explanations. They deserve transparency, accountability, and institutions that inspire confidence rather than suspicion. Until this administration demonstrates a genuine commitment to holding itself accountable, every unresolved scandal will further erode public trust and strengthen Nigerians’ determination to demand a government that is competent, transparent, and worthy of their confidence in 2027,” Ememobong stated.
SERAP asks Akpabio, Abbas to explain N1.3bn allocation to PFIPC
Meanwhile, SERAP has urged the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, and speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to urgently disclose certified copies of all documents relating to the consideration and approval of the allocation of over N1.3 billion (N1,302,978,784) to the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, PFIPC/Presidential Economic Advisory Council in the 2026 Appropriation Act.
SERAP, in a Freedom of Information, FoI, request by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, urged them to exercise the National Assembly’s constitutional powers under sections 88 and 89 of the Nigerian Constitution to investigate the circumstances surrounding the allocation to ‘a fictitious presidential council’ in the 2026 Appropriation Act and to identify anyone responsible for any irregularities.
SERAP also urged them to “provide certified copies of records identifying the members of the National Assembly committees that considered the allocation and the names and official designations of all public officers or representatives who appeared before those committees to defend the proposed allocation.”
SERAP further urged them to “clarify whether the allocation formed part of the executive’s original Appropriation Bill or was introduced or amended during the appropriations process and whether any lawmaker raised concerns or sought clarification regarding the legal status, establishment or operational mandate of the ‘fictitious body’; and the action taken by the National Assembly in response.”
According to reports, the PFIPC/Presidential Economic Advisory Council was allocated over N1.3 billion in the 2026 Appropriation Act. However, the Presidency has publicly stated that the body is fictitious and was never established by the federal government.
SERAP said: “These conflicting accounts raise serious concerns regarding the integrity of Nigeria’s appropriations process, legislative oversight, public financial management and accountability.
“Nobody has a more sacred obligation to obey the law than those who make the law. The National Assembly ought to keep an eye on what the executive is doing and to keep the Presidency and agencies of government in check, including before and during the appropriation process, by thoroughly scrutinising the Executive’s budget proposals before any authorisation.
“Nigerians have a right to know whether public funds were appropriated for an entity that was not lawfully established and, if so, how this occurred.
“Providing the requested information would enable Nigerians to assess whether the National Assembly discharged its constitutional responsibilities under sections 80, 81, 88 and 89 of the Constitution in scrutinising and approving the allocation.
“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest.
“Disclosure of the requested information would strengthen public confidence in the credibility of the National Assembly and the integrity of the appropriations process, promote transparency in the management of public resources, and enable citizens to meaningfully scrutinise the exercise of parliamentary oversight.
“The requested records concern matters of exceptional public importance. They relate directly to the integrity of Nigeria’s budgetary and appropriations process, the lawful establishment and funding of public institutions, the expenditure of public funds, and the effectiveness of legislative oversight.
“The National Assembly has a clear obligation to disclose the requested information, particularly where there are credible allegations of governmental impropriety and possible misuse of public resources.
“The disclosure of the requested information and documents would advance these constitutional and statutory objectives by promoting openness, strengthening legislative accountability and enhancing public confidence in the management of public resources.
“According to widely reported allegations, the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, PFIPC/Presidential Economic Advisory Council was allocated over N1.3 billion (N1,302,978,784) in the 2026 Appropriation Act.”
-
News1 day agoXenophobia : Nigerians in South Africa take up arms in self defence
-
News2 days ago
Tinubu media centre posts AI image of Remi Tinubu selling akara
-
Uncategorized3 days ago
Three brothers charged with murder after beating mother’s boyfriend to death
-
News2 days ago
PFIPC scam: Presidency asks DSS, EFCC to unravel criminal network
-
News3 days ago
PFIPC scandal: NDC seeks Gbajabiamila’s sack, independent probe
-
News1 day ago
Xenophobia: Two more Nigerians killed in South Africa
-
News9 hours ago
NNAMDI KANU: NMA condemns Prof. Aghaji’s arrest, demands justice
-
News12 hours ago
PFIPC Scandal: New details reveal SGF’s Office cleared Adeyemi for Canada Summit
