
News
Court Verdict: Natasha to resume at Senate on Tuesday
The suspended senator representing Kogi Central Senatorial District in the National Assembly, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has told her jubilant supporters in a video trending on social media, that she would resume her legislative activities in the red chamber on Tuesday this week.
She expressed gratitude to her supporters following a favourable court judgment that reaffirmed her position in the Senate.
She said, “I thank you for your support. I am glad we are victorious today. We shall resume in the Senate on Tuesday by the grace of God.”
A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja had on Friday nullified the six-month suspension slammed on Akpoti-Uduaghan by the Senate,
The court ordered that she should be recalled from suspension.

It also fined her the sum ofN5 million for contempt of court over a Facebook post deemed to have violated an earlier court order.
PROMAN
Erection Will Be Like At 18! Take This 15 Minutes Before Bed
LEARN MORE
The court declared that the six-month suspension slammed on her was excessive, unconstitutional, and an infringement on the rights of her constituents.
Justice Binta Nyako in a ruling that spanned multiple legal issues, held that Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Facebook post, a satirical apology directed at Senate President Godswill Akpabio, breached an interim injunction issued by the court on March 4, 2025.
That injunction had barred all parties from making public statements or social media posts relating to the ongoing suit she filed challenging her suspension.
The embattled senator was suspended for six months by the Senate in March after a rowdy plenary during which she accused Akpabio of sexual harassment.
The suspension had sparked outrage among various civil society groups and human rights organisations.
Akpoti-Uduaghan subsequently sued the Senate and its leadership, arguing that the action was a calculated attempt to silence her and disenfranchise her constituents.
In response to a satirical Facebook post dated April 27 – in which she offered what the court described as a “mock apology” to Akpabio, lawyers representing the Senate President filed a contempt application against her.
The lawyers claimed that the post was in defiance of the court’s gag order.
During proceedings, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal team contended that the post was unrelated to the suspension case, insisting it concerned her personal allegations of misconduct against the Senate President.
Justice Nyako, however, disagreed, stating that the post was clearly linked to the matter before the court and therefore constituted a deliberate breach of the court’s directive.
Delivering her ruling, Justice Nyako imposed aN5 million fine on the senator and ordered her to issue a public apology within seven days.
The apology must be published in two national dailies and reposted on her Facebook page.
News
Gunmen kill vigilante commander, three women in Rivers
Gunmen suspected to be cultists shot and killed the zonal commander of a local security outfit codenamed OSPAC in Omoku, the headquarters of Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area of Rivers State, identified as Ozomela Stephen Nwaocha, on Tuesday evening.
Also killed were three women, including the commander’s sister, who were with him during the attack.
OSPAC is the acronym for the Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area Security Planning and Advisory Committee.
The assailants reportedly attacked the vigilante commander while he was relaxing outside his compound with the women along Oba Road in Omoku.
It was gathered that the killing may have been a reprisal following a violent clash linked to a community dispute.

A source told our correspondent that a youth meeting had been disrupted earlier on Tuesday after armed security personnel and OSPAC members allegedly stormed the venue and opened fire, leaving two youths with gunshot injuries.
Videos of the aftermath of the attack circulating on social media and seen by our correspondent on Wednesday showed multiple casualties, including the three women. (Punch)
News
Deputy Speaker Kalu breaks silence on N780m Budget controversy, says Fund not meant for Churches alone
Deputy Speaker House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu has said that the N780m (seven hundred and eighty million naira) featured in the 2026 Federal budget was not solely earmarked for procurement of church musical instruments in his Bende Federal constituency, as being circulated in news.
Kalu was reacting to the social media reports which alleged that one billion naira had been set aside to purchase church musical instruments in the Deputy Speaker’s constituency in Bende.
A statement issued on Wednesday by Levinus Nwabuhiogu, the Chief Press Secretary to the Deputy Speaker, said that the actual amount involved in the budget proposal was N780 million after Vat and other tax deductions.
He said that more than 130 churches in Bende were to receive between N5m and N6m each as support for first phase youth re-orientation and social support programmes delivered evangelistically through faith-based organizations in Bende federal constituency of Abia State.
The Deputy Speaker noted that the equipment of churches was to expand existing youth engagement platforms focused on character reform, discourage narcotics use, sexual offense and violent crimes among the youths.

“The funds are intended to support the purchase of evangelical instruments and public address systems to promote campaigns against vices like the spread of narcotics, sexual offences, violent crimes while instilling discipline, values, peace, and character development among young people in the communities”, the statement said.
Kalu, who said that the N780 million fund is yet to be released because the 2026 budget had not been implemented, noted that selected churches would be credited when procurement processes are concluded.
News
PFIPC Probe: Why Tinubu’s Chief of Staff, Head of Service, Accountant-General should step aside — Opara
The Chief of Staff to the President and the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation and the Accountant-General of the Federation have been called upon to step aside over their alleged links to the fake Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC).
Making the call yesterday, Tuesday, July 21, 2026, lawyer and public affairs commentator Maxwell Opara, insisted that no public official should remain in office while under criminal investigation.
Speaking during an interview with ARISE News, Opara stated that the alleged establishment of the fake agency, the allocation of office space and the opening of bank accounts pointed to an already established criminal case that required equal treatment of all those implicated.
“There is an established crime. A fake agency was established. An office was given to the fake agency. An account was opened for the fake agency. Somebody was acting as a director in the fake agency.”
He maintained that while the alleged fake director had been arrested, other public officials mentioned in the investigation should not be treated differently.

“The Chief of Staff, the Head of Service and the Accountant-General are suspects. None of them is above the law.”
Opara criticised the decision to invite some officials for questioning while leaving them in office, arguing that such an approach could undermine public confidence in the investigation.
“If you have arrested somebody, these other suspects should be arrested like the principal suspect. Nobody is above the law.”
He further stated that public officials occupying sensitive positions should voluntarily step aside to allow an independent investigation.
“One expected all of them that are suspects in this matter to step down. If you cannot resign, step aside.”
According to him, remaining in office while under investigation creates the impression that those officials could influence the outcome of the probe.
“You cannot be a judge in your own case. People will see it as though you want to use your office to influence investigators.”
Responding to questions about evidence involving a deceased intermediary allegedly linked to financial transactions in the case, Opara said the courts would determine the weight of such evidence based on available testimony and documentary records.
“The court will decide based on the evidence presented, the testimony before it and the outcome of cross-examination.”
He also dismissed the Chief of Staff’s reported decision to pursue a defamation suit against the principal suspect, describing it as a distraction from the ongoing investigation.
“Rushing to court to sue for defamation is a distraction. The priority should be to step aside and allow the investigation to proceed.”
Opara expressed doubts about the outcome of the investigation, arguing that the seniority of those allegedly involved could affect the process.
“If they want Nigerians to believe they are fighting corruption, they should treat everybody equally. Nobody should be made a scapegoat.”
He concluded that public confidence in the investigation would depend on whether anti-corruption agencies applied the laws guiding impartially, regardless of the status or position of those implicated.
-
News3 days agoFour policemen arrested for extorting ICPC chairman of N53,000 in Abuja
-
News2 days agoGroup sues Umahi, IGP, others over Mary Habila’s death
-
News23 hours agoGunmen kill four herders from same family, raze cattle camp, slaughter cows in Anambra
-
News1 day agoPlateau gov apologises to Igbo over civil war
-
Bello Bodejo
Bello BodejoNews3 days agoAlleged $2.63m money laundering: Court grants Miyetti Allah president N2bn bail
-
News23 hours agoPFIPC Probe: Why Tinubu’s Chief of Staff, Head of Service, Accountant-General should step aside — Opara
-
News2 days agoICPC grills Gbajabiamila over PFIPC scandal
-
News23 hours agoEnugu Air Showcases Investment Vision at Farnborough International Airshow






