Connect with us

News

Edict that established Nigeria expired 10 years ago — Northern Elders

Published

on

NEF Chairman Ango Abdullahi
Spread the love

The Northern Elders Forum has declared that the Edict that birthed Nigeria expired 10 years ago.

The chairman of the Forum, Ango Abdullahi, stated this, in an interview, on the sidelines of a “national dialogue on home grown parliamentary system” organised by a group of members of the House of Representatives under the aegis of the Parliamentary System Support Group (PSSG).

The event was to galvanize support for a bill sponsored by 83 members of the PSSG for the country to return to parliamentary system of government. The bill is awaiting second reading in the House of Representatives.

The elder statesman noted:“Nigeria was born in 1914. It was a product of an Edict by the colonial officials that were largely military, in consultation with a few of our elders, about five or six of them. The Sultan of that period. The Shehu of Borno of that period. The Alaafin of Oyo of that period. Obong of Calabar of that period and other names that I have forgotten.

“They sat down and looked at development that was taking place in colonized areas of Lagos, Southern Nigeria and the North. So by 1914, the colonial masters in Britain wanted to solidify their gains so that they could more easily exploit the colony. That was how they sat down and agreed that they would amalgamate the territories of Lagos, South and North. And the wife of the governor general at that time, was the one that gave us our name, Nigeria.

“In the Edict, if you read it, it was clear that we were being encouraged from various backgrounds to come together and build a country called Nigeria. And our leaders at that time agreed that we will try. But we were advised in the details of the Edict that we should be monitoring progress over the years.. but the life of the edict was 100 years. Which meant that the Edict expired 2014, which is 100 years from its formation..

Maduka College Advert

“The question now is that we are now in 2024, this kind of dialogue reminds us that we have a history that started In 1914, and in the conclusion of that Edict, it says if we failed to be a country that we will call our own, and are proud of our country, by the expiration of that period, the various components that were in that amalgamation discussion could go their separate ways.”

Abdullahi said the dialogue was one of the ways to chart a path forward for the country.

Earlier, the elder statesman stated that the adoption of the presidential system of government was a mistake. “This dialogue should really be as objective as passionate if possible to look at some of the things that we did wrongly. One of the things we did wrongly was to bring in a system that did not fit us. If we can, we should work on something. It must not necessarily be a typical parliamentary system from our former colonial masters, it could be something else.”

However, the former speaker of the House of Representatives, Yakubu Dogara, while speaking at the event, said the challenge with the Nigerian version of the presidential system of government is that it stifles accountability.

“The major problem with the presidential system is not because we borrowed the system, but those who copied the system did not do a wonderful job. I got to know this in my undergraduate days. The problem is that those who copied and created the 1979 constitution, it is not the American system that we copied. In the US, impeachment of the executive is real, it can happen. Even judges can be impeached.

“The provision is that it is the House that carries out impeachment, both for the executive and members of the judiciary, while it is the senate that tries them. And if they are convicted by the senate, they are removed, and it is real. But in Nigeria, section 143 does not provide anything about impeachment. It just mentioned it because at the end of the day, everything the National Assembly has done will be handed over to politicians. They call them people of impeccable character.

“I don’t know where we can find these angels. Their determination is final, it cannot even be queried by the National Assembly or any court in Nigeria. And the seven persons of impeccable character are handpicked by the CJN, who himself is an appointee of the president. So how do you make this thing real?”

Former Minister of Interior, Rauf Aregbesola, also expressed support for a return to the parliamentary system of government, stating that it was difficult for one man to effectively administer the affairs of 200 million Nigerians without checks.

“I have said it in passing that the primary responsibility of the government is the welfare and security of the people. When those two things cannot be guaranteed, forget it, there cannot be a stable society.

“There was a weakness that led to our colonialism in the first place, it was a weakness. If you are strong enough, you would not be colonized. Part of it is the chairing of these individual dictators, that we call rulers.

“If we go on believing that one man, no matter how good, has the capacity to superintend over 220 million Nigerians alone, without checks, we are joking. By that alone, I am opposed to the executive system of government. I believe collective arrangement which parliamentary system guarantee is the best for a nation like ours.”

Earlier, the guest speaker, Usman Bugaje, said Nigerians have not fared well in the last 25 years of the current democratic dispensation. Bugaje, who was national secretary of the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria (CAN), noted that apart from deepened poverty, there is also the challenge of escalating insecurity and mind boggling corruption.

He explained that a discourse of a home grown political system has to take into cognizance of three major factors.

“One we have to look at, because I see this as a process of reinventing our politics because our politics is really sick, it’s decaying and citizens are agitating because it is not given them what they are looking for. So, it is in our own interest to reinvent it to meet the aspirations of our society. We need to look at a new political philosophy when we start discussing what is the objective of politics. Is it personal aggrandizement?

“The second thing is new political parties. Our political parties, if we want to be honest with ourselves, are not different from any other. They are just the same. We need to create new political parties with very clear intellectual constituents, with very defined ideals so that when I move from one party to the other, I will be conscious of the fact that I now have a particular way of thinking to the other.

“Thirdly we have to change our political culture. (Our) Political culture is characterised by violence, merchandise politics, total disconnect between the actual challenges that are facing this country and the politics that we play. Otherwise politics change its meaning.” (Daily Sun)

News

At last, Tinubu directs ICPC to investigate ‘Fictitious Council’

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu
Spread the love

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has directed the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to conduct a thorough investigation into the activities of a “Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council” (PFIPC) and all related matters.

According to a statement signed by Bayo Onanuga,Special Adviser to the President (Information and Strategy), the President directed that the investigation be concluded and a comprehensive report submitted to him within 30 days.

The directive follows the discovery of the fictitious PFIPC, which was never established by the Federal Government of Nigeria and has no basis in any law, presidential instrument, executive approval, or other lawful act of Government.

One Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew presented himself as the Director-General of the so-called PFIPC and falsely claimed to be a presidential appointee.

Among the issues to be investigated by the ICPC are the forged appointment letters and other official government documents; the use of a false claim of presidential appointment to seek or obtain official recognition and diplomatic support, including visa facilitation; and the opening of multiple bank accounts in the names of purported government agencies using allegedly forged documents.

President Tinubu directed the ICPC to investigate not only the conduct of the principal individual and other collaborators involved but also the wider circumstances that may have enabled a fictitious body and a false claim of presidential appointment to acquire an appearance of official legitimacy.

Maduka College Advert

The investigation is to examine the provenance and use of false official documents; the processes through which official recognition or diplomatic support may have been sought or obtained; the opening and operation of any related bank accounts; the source and movement of any funds involved; and the role of any public officer, private individual, financial institution, intermediary or other person or entity that may have facilitated, enabled or participated in the alleged scheme.

The President further directed the Commission to identify any weaknesses in government and institutional procedures that may have been exploited and to recommend immediate measures to prevent the recurrence of similar abuses.

All ministries, departments and agencies of the Federal Government have been directed to provide the ICPC, upon lawful request, with all relevant information, records and assistance required for the expeditious completion of the investigation.

President Tinubu stated that the integrity of the Presidency and the institutions of the Federal Government must be protected against impersonation, forgery, abuse of official identity and the exploitation of weaknesses in the public service.

The President directed that all persons found culpable be treated strictly in accordance with applicable law.

Continue Reading

News

Xenophobia: Nigerian lawmakers reject calls to use proceeds from MTN, DStv to compensate victims

Published

on

Spread the love

The Senate on Tuesday rejected calls by some of its members to nationalise South African companies operating in Nigeria and use the proceeds from the firms to compensate Nigerians who suffered losses during xenophobic attacks in that country.

The upper chamber reached the decision after a majority of senators rejected the proposal through a voice vote during plenary while debating a motion on the continued attacks and killings of Nigerians in South Africa.

The motion was sponsored by Cross River South Senator, Asuquo Ekpenyong.

Among the South African companies operating in Nigetia are MTN, a telecom giant and DStv, a pay television service owned by MultiChoice Group.

During the debate, Lagos Central Senator, Wasiu Eshinlokun, urged the Senate to consider nationalising the companies.

Mr Eshinlokun, a member of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), lamented the continued killings of Nigerians and the destruction of their properties in South Africa.

Maduka College Advert

Edo North Senator, Adams Oshiomhole, supported the proposal, arguing that rather than merely expressing grief over the attacks, lawmakers should adopt measures that would affect South Africa’s economy.

Mr Oshiomhole, a former governor of Edo State, recalled that the Senate had earlier resolved to send a delegation to South Africa to engage with its government over the killings but said nothing had been done since the resolution was adopted.

Bauchi Central Senator, Abdul Ningi also backed the proposal, saying Nigeria should adopt stronger diplomatic measures instead of continued engagement.

However, the Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin, who presided over the session, rejected the proposal, arguing that the circumstances surrounding the attacks should first be properly investigated before Nigeria takes any action.

Mr Jibrin, an APC senator, who represents Kano North Senatorial District, acknowledged that many Nigerians had lost their lives and properties but maintained that Nigeria must act cautiously.

“Killing people in the name of protest is not something that should be accepted. It is unacceptable, we cannot allow that but then we need to be careful, particularly because we live in Africa, we set the pace. Whatever we want to do, we need to be very careful,” he said.

The deputy senate president also addressed reports that the South African government had refused to compensate victims, saying decisions should not be based on social media posts.

“What Senator Adams Oshiomhole said, sometimes, we don’t take things that are said on social media to analyse the situation. I saw what he is talking about. What the minister was saying was that those who live in illegal settlements will not be paid anything because they illegally occupied those areas. But those who have titles, nobody will take those titles away from them, nobody will take their properties from them even if they have been displaced.

“The government (of SA) should be bold enough to say we have been threatened by some certain people who are conspiring to destabilise our nation. The president (of SA) should come out to tell the world. Maybe after the committee has done its work, maybe we will find it necessary to advise the South African government,” he said.

Mr Jibrin subsequently urged the three senators to withdraw their proposals and instead allow the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs to investigate the attacks and report back in two weeks.

This is not the first time lawmakers have debated attacks on Nigerians in South Africa. There have also been previous calls to revoke the operating licences of MTN Group, DStv and other South African companies doing business in Nigeria.

On 5 May, the Senate resolved to send a delegation to South Africa as part of diplomatic efforts to find a lasting solution to the attacks.

It agreed at the time that the delegation would comprise members of both chambers of the National Assembly and would be led by the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio.

The delegation was expected to engage with the South African government and the leadership of its parliament to seek an end to the attacks on Nigerians. However, it is not clear whether the lawmakers delegation visited South Africa because there are no public records of such visitation.

In recent weeks, violent protests have erupted in parts of South Africa, targeting African migrants, including Nigerians. Videos circulating on social media show mobs attacking foreigners, with several Nigerians reportedly killed.

There are also allegations that security officials failed to intervene in some of the attacks. Two Nigerians were reportedly killed in April by personnel of the South African National Defence Force in Port Elizabeth.

One victim, Ekpenyong Andrew, was arrested and later found dead in Pretoria, while another, Amaramiro Emmanuel, died from injuries allegedly sustained during an attack by security personnel.

The government however has repatriated several Nigerians from South Africa due to the violence.

The motion

Presenting the motion, Mr Ekpenyong condemned the attacks and urged the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to obtain written assurances from the South African government on the safety and protection of Nigerians living in the country.

He also called for the arrest and prosecution of those responsible for violence, intimidation, looting and unlawful immigration enforcement.

The senator further urged the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission and the Nigerian High Commission in South Africa to strengthen emergency consular support and establish a verified register of Nigerians who have suffered death, injury, displacement, unlawful detention, or loss of businesses and property to facilitate legal redress, restitution and compensation.

He also called on the federal government to work with other affected African countries and relevant organs of the African Union to establish an effective early warning and accountability mechanism to prevent xenophobic violence and protect African migrants.

Continue Reading

News

Enugu Police impound 195 vehicles for Registration and Number Plate violations

Published

on

Spread the love

The Enugu State Police Command has impounded no fewer than 195 vehicles across the state for violating registration and number plate regulations, warning that all offending motorists will be prosecuted in court.

The enforcement exercise, led by the Commissioner of Police, CP Mamman Bitrus Giwa, on Tuesday, July 7, 2026, formed part of the nationwide crackdown on unregistered vehicles and those operating with covered, defaced, obscured, improperly affixed, unauthorised or missing number plates.

In a statement issued on Tuesday by the Command’s Public Relations Officer, SP Daniel Ndukwe, the police said the operation targeted vehicles contravening the provisions of the National Road Traffic Regulations and other extant laws.

According to the command, the impounded vehicles include those that were not registered, those bearing covered, defaced, obscured, unauthorised or improperly affixed number plates, as well as vehicles operating with only one number plate instead of the legally required two.

“The affected vehicle owners will be charged to court and prosecuted accordingly,” the statement said.

Maduka College Advert

Commending officers who participated in the operation, CP Giwa described the exercise as professional and reminded motorists of their legal obligation to comply with vehicle registration and number plate regulations.

He warned that the enforcement would be sustained across the state, stressing that violators would continue to face prosecution.

“The Command will sustain the enforcement and ensure that all offenders are prosecuted in accordance with the law,” the Commissioner stated.

CP Giwa explained that the operation followed the recent directive of the Inspector-General of Police, IGP Olatunji Rilwan Disu, mandating all state police commands to strictly enforce the nationwide ban on unregistered vehicles and prosecute offenders.

According to him, the directive was necessitated by the growing security concerns associated with such vehicles, which are frequently used in criminal activities while also violating existing traffic regulations.

The Commissioner also issued a stern warning to police personnel participating in the exercise, cautioning that any officer found engaging in extortion, harassment or any other form of misconduct would face severe disciplinary sanctions.

He equally urged motorists operating unregistered vehicles or using covered, defaced, obscured, unauthorised or improperly affixed number plates, except where permitted by law, to immediately comply with all relevant regulations.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert