
News
Real reasons Akpabio withdrew defamation suits against Natasha, others – Aide
Eseme Eyiboh, Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to Senate President Godswill Akpabio, has explained that the decision by the Senate President to withdraw all defamation suits he instituted against individuals was guided by faith, leadership responsibility and a desire for national reconciliation.
Eyiboh said the move, announced on January 1, was not influenced by political pressure or expediency, but arose from deep personal reflection and conviction.
Recall that Akpabio had instructed his legal team to discontinue all pending court cases filed in his name over alleged defamatory statements.
In a statement giving insight into the decision, Eyiboh disclosed that the Senate President made the choice after attending a New Year Mass at Sacred Heart Parish in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State capital.
According to him, the parish priest, Reverend Father Donatus Udoette, during his sermon, admonished worshippers to let go of past grievances, forgive those who had wronged them and pursue peace.

Eyiboh noted that Akpabio was neither at a political gathering nor engaging supporters at the time.
“He was simply in church as a worshipper when the message of forgiveness resonated deeply with him,” Eyiboh said.
He revealed that shortly after the church service, the Senate President informed those around him of his resolve to forgive his critics and withdraw all legal actions arising from alleged defamation.
Eyiboh stated that about nine defamation suits were affected by the directive, including the much-publicised N200 billion case against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, as well as other cases involving individuals and associates.
The Senate President’s spokesman emphasised that Akpabio had consistently defended his reputation through lawful means and had never expressed regret for approaching the courts when accusations were made against him.
“For him, the law has always served as a legitimate instrument for protection and redress,” Eyiboh said.
“Choosing to step away from that option now represents a conscious pause from a position of authority he is familiar with.”
He added that Akpabio’s action should be viewed through the lens of his leadership philosophy, which blends political authority with strong religious values.
“In his understanding, power is a trust that comes with responsibility,” Eyiboh explained.
“Forgiveness, in that context, is not a sign of weakness but an expression of leadership.”
Eyiboh further noted that prolonged legal disputes often drain leaders emotionally and institutionally, while deepening divisions.
According to him, the decision to forgive allows the Senate President to redirect focus and energy towards more pressing national responsibilities.
“There is also a strategic dimension,” he said.
“Promoting reconciliation rather than confrontation helps strengthen unity within the legislature and sustains authority without creating unnecessary tension.”
Dismissing suggestions that the withdrawal of the cases amounted to surrender, Eyiboh insisted that restraint requires courage and confidence.
“Absorbing criticism without retaliation is not easy, especially in public office,” he said.
He added that Akpabio’s action was meant to set a precedent in Nigeria’s political space, where disagreements often escalate into personal attacks and legal battles.
“With the country facing insecurity, economic hardship and social mistrust, leaders must show emotional maturity,” Eyiboh said.
“Such gestures contribute to national healing in ways that policies alone cannot.”
Eyiboh concluded that the move should not be seen as a symbolic act, but as a deliberate effort to model forgiveness as both a moral obligation and a leadership principle.
“Sometimes,” he said, “the boldest political decision is choosing restraint over retaliation.”
News
UBA Commences Contempt Proceedings Against WEMPCO Directors over Alleged Disobidence of Court Order
The Federal High Court, presided over by Honourable Justice Aluko, has granted an application by United Bank for Africa (UBA) Plc for substituted service of Form 49 on directors of Wempco named as alleged contemnors in the case of UBA v. Wempco.
The application forms part of proceedings seeking to determine whether the named individuals disobeyed an order of the court and whether they should be committed to prison for contempt.
The directors named as alleged contemnors are Lewis Shui Ngor Tung, Phillip Shui Chei Tung, M.A. Ola Yusuf, Tung Lawrence Blake, Aali Aare Hadji Tokunbo, Paul Shui Po Tung, Tung Robert, C.L. Ip and Taiwo Alli.
In advancing the application, counsel to UBA argued that service of Form 49 on the alleged contemnors was necessary to enable them to appear before the court and show cause why an order of committal should not be made against them.
He also argued that the Directors of Wempco and some members of staff took illegal steps in an attempt to disobey the Order of Court.

The court’s decision to grant substituted service provides a procedural step towards bringing the notice to the attention of the individuals concerned in accordance with the court’s directions.
Form 49 is a notice requiring an alleged contemnor to show cause why an order of committal to prison should not be made against them for alleged disobedience of a court order.
The Federal High Court had earlier made an Order of Mareva Injunction and appointed a Receiver/Manager over some of the Assets of Wempco following the indebtedness of Wempco to UBA in the sum of N61,445,695,993.76 (Sixty One Billion FourHundred and Forty-Five Million Six Hundred and Ninety Five Thousand, Nine Hundred and Ninety Three Naira, Seventy Six Kobo).
News
$242m Petroleum Products Diversion Claim: UBA Secures Court Order Against Vitol, Four Others
A Lagos State High Court has granted interim preservative orders, including a Mareva injunction, in favour of United Bank for Africa (UBA) Plc in a dispute involving the alleged diversion of petroleum products valued at $242 million.
The orders, granted last Thursday by Justice K. A. Jose, followed allegations by UBA that Vitol SA, a Switzerland-based energy trading company, wrongfully released cargoes of petroleum products consigned to the bank in the bills of lading.
UBA’s lead counsel, Bode Olanipekun, SAN, urged the court to grant the interim orders to preserve assets and prevent the dissipation of funds pending the determination of the substantive dispute.
In her ruling, Justice Jose granted three of the prayers sought by the bank, including requests to restrain dealings with assets and funds up to the disputed amount.
“Prayers 1–3 are granted as prayed against the 2nd Respondent only,” the judge ruled.

The application was brought pursuant to Order 43 Rule 1 of the High Court of Lagos State (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019 and the Lagos State High Court Practice Direction No. 2 of 2019.
In the substantive proceedings, UBA is seeking to establish the liability of Vitol SA and the owners of the vessels over alleged conversion, misrepresentation and negligence arising from the non-delivery of the petroleum products.
The bank also cited 34 financial institutions and public agencies, including commercial banks, merchant banks, microfinance banks, the Nigerian Ports Authority and the Nigeria Customs Service, in connection with the application.
In an affidavit supporting the application, UBA’s Group Head of Recoveries and Remedial Management, Anthony Chilaka, stated that the bank had issued a letter of credit in favour of Vitol SA to facilitate petroleum products transactions.
According to the affidavit, the cargoes were transported to Nigeria, and the masters of the vessels issued several bills of lading.
UBA alleged that Vitol subsequently endorsed the bills of lading “to the order of” the bank and handed over the original documents to it.
The bank maintained that the endorsement entitled it to take possession of the cargoes upon completion of the voyages.
However, Chilaka stated that UBA had not received the gasoil despite the completion of the voyages.
“The applicant has not been given possession of the gasoil despite completion of the voyage,” the affidavit stated.
UBA alleged that the cargoes were instead diverted for the use of another party, arguing that the failure to deliver the products amounted to conversion and negligence.
The bank further contended that the respondents had obligations arising from the transactions and the endorsement of the shipping documents but failed to fulfil them.
UBA also alleged that cargoes linked to the transactions were diverted to other parties after the completion of their voyages rather than delivered to the bank as stipulated in the shipping documents.
The allegations are expected to be determined in the substantive proceedings.
News
Enugu CP Warns Officers Against Extortion, Degrading Treatment of Citizens
The Commissioner of Police in Enugu State, Mr Mamman Giwa, has warned police officers against degrading treatment of citizens, extortion and other forms of unprofessional conduct.
Giwa gave the warning on Wednesday during an emergency conference with senior officers at the Senior Police Officers’ Mess, Agbani Road, Enugu.

He also directed senior and supervisory officers to strengthen oversight of personnel and improve security management for political and election-related activities ahead of the 2027 General Elections.
The commissioner said the conference followed directives issued by the Inspector-General of Police, Mr Olatunji Disu, during a virtual strategic meeting with senior officers on October 20.

According to him, the I-G emphasised professionalism, compliance with the Nigeria Police Force’s social media policies, adapting policing to contemporary realities, respectful treatment of citizens, and effective management of political activities and election security.
“It is clear that officers cannot effectively discharge their policing responsibilities without treating citizens with respect and conducting their duties in accordance with extant laws and established professional standards,” Giwa said.
He charged senior officers to take responsibility for the conduct of personnel under their supervision, warning that any officer found engaging in misconduct would face the consequences.
The conference also featured a health talk on the Ebola virus, focusing on its symptoms and preventive measures.
Those in attendance included Deputy and Assistant Commissioners of Police, Area Commanders, Divisional Police Officers, heads of formations, tactical and operational units, and heads of various sections of the Enugu State Police Command.
-
Features1 day agoKogi’s Kidnapping Crisis: Why Do Forests Remain Safe Havens for Criminals Under Ododo’s Watch?
-
News2 days ago“It’s not debatable, we can’t go back,” Mbah Backs Tinubu on Fuel Subsidy Removal
-
News1 day agoKidnappers kill seven-year-old boy after ransom demand
-
News2 days agoMbah: Enugu Now Produces 120 Million Litres of Water Daily, Expands Agricultural Investment
-
Politics2 days agoMike Igini: Politicians Infiltrate Agencies Responsible for Election Personnel as Electoral Laws Go Unenforced
-
Politics9 hours ago2027: Atiku, Obi, Duke, Others in Talks on Single Opposition Candidate – Coalition
-
News8 hours agoMacron Postpones Planned Visit to Nigeria Until 2027
-
News6 hours agoEnugu CP Orders Probe into Death of Izuchukwu During Police Raid




