
News
Nigerians in anguish over building demolition in cities
Till date, Bernard Nzerem, an engineer, is still in shock over the demolition of his over N2.2billion property at Naze, Imo State.
The property, comprising a two-storey building plaza, housing a church auditorium, another two-storey plaza, about 70 percent completed and multiple shops, was marked on June 28, 2025, and demolished on July 5, 2025, within a week notice, despite the presentation of Certificate of Occupancy and a Power of Attorney to the government agencies.
“This was not just a building. It was my entire life’s sweat,” Nzerem, an elder statesman, a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), ruling party and an indigene of Naze, cried out.
Nzerem is not facing the trauma alone, as many shop owners and businesses within the property complex have either packed up or are still struggling to raise money to pay for new shops elsewhere.
So also are owners of the 15 buildings around the Federal Polytechnic Nekede area in Owerri, demolished in July, crying over their huge losses, especially shelter. The same scenario is playing out across the country.
For instance, house demolition is not new in Lagos State, which perhaps, accounts for the highest number of house demolitions in Nigeria, followed by Abuja.

In 2023, a five-storey building at 7 Breadfruit Street, Lagos Island, was demolished, among many over the years.
The state also marked 39 buildings for demolition, amid issuance of quit notices to owners and tenants at Oral Extension Estate, Westend and Mega Mond Estate in Eti-Osa, LGA.
The above-mentioned are few of the many property demolitions in the state over the years.
However, the brazen way a community was demolished in the Oworonshoki area of the state, this September, raised alarm over the exercise, which was intended for the residents’ good.
According to Balogun Jamiu, chairman of a Community Development Association in Oworonshoki, the residents, who are now homeless, were left in shock when bulldozers moved in at night, despite efforts at meeting the requirements of the government.
“The demolition came to us as a surprise,” he said, decrying why such an exercise was carried out at night when residents were home, sleeping and vulnerable.
Afeez Ayeni, a displaced resident, lamented that the government betrayed them as there was a gentleman agreement, which the residents were complying with.
“When the government people came from Alausa, they asked us to restructure our houses and make them stronger because the Oworonshoki area is swampy, with the closeby lagoon. We have done that and we have proof.
So, why come from behind to demolish our houses, especially now that our government does not build for the poor,” Ayeni lamented.
Following the demolition, Ayeni noted that house rent, which was already high due to the area’s proximity to the island, has more than doubled.
“Landlords are now saying that their houses are government approved and using it to increase rent in Oworo. We are now ex-landlords, and cannot even pay for a room again,” he decried.
Esther Morakinyo Fabiyi, a senior nurse at a government hospital, noted that the government keeps overlooking houses under high tension, waterways and buffer zones, which are more dangerous and rather demolishing the ones that the owners are making efforts to enhance in this hard time.
“I saw fellow mothers, who were displaced, crying.
“The government is no longer building cheap houses as Jakande did and yet it is demolishing the ones the owners have invested heavily to meet their high requirements,” she said.
Also, residents of Rimin Zakara village in Ungogo Local Government Area of Kano State, particularly, landlords, were traumatised over the demolition of over 40 houses during a recent operation by the state agencies, where no fewer than four casualties were recorded.
In defence of the demolition operation, a source at the state Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning said that the land in dispute belongs to the Bayero University Kano (BUK).
But many argued that the explanation is not enough reason for the demolition of the houses belonging to the poor.
Also, while it is about two years since the demolition of a set of buildings belonging to the Bayelsa State Government on Akassa Street, Old GRA axis of Port Harcourt, by the River State government, the evictees still recall their ordeals, amid pain.
Then, many described the demolition exercise as uncalled for, but while the two governments fought, the staff members of the Bayelsa State Liaison office in Port Harcourt, felt the impact of the eviction.
Isaac Board, a staff and evictee, recalled hurriedly packing out of the building and had no place to stay for some time.
“My family slept in the corridor of a friend’s place last night,” he lamented then.
Not only him, Woseebimu Frank-Oputu, an administrator officer at the liaison office then, sought refuge for his family at a church.
“It was my pastor that came with a truck to carry my property. My family and I are putting up in the church,” he stated then.
Though the staff members have been sorted out long ago, the worry for many is why government property and staff members were treated in such a way and that also points to why most governments don’t treat citizens with human face.
But in Abuja, many houses went down when Nasir El-Rufai was the Minister of Federal Capital Territory Abuja.
That wave of house demolition has resurfaced since Nyesom Wike became the FCT Abuja minister, with the Federal Housing Authority and the Abuja Metropolitan Management Council (AMMC) of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA), leading the onslaught.
Speaking on the issue, Andrew Osarhieme, a property expert, noted that while house owners share the blame for the demolition of their properties, the government and its multiple agencies share more of the blame for not putting the right measures in place and also being selective in the enforcement of building laws and demolition exercises.
“I live in Lagos and I have seen many houses built under high tension and the owners have been there for decades,” he said.
“Where is the government when the foundation was being laid and their agents who report fresh foundations to them for sealing off the premises if the owners have no approvals?
“The government is being more reactive than proactive in the enforcement of building laws, especially in Lagos and Abuja,” he said.
He insisted that if the government clearly marks areas and their purposes, fight enthronement, provide roads long before people start building, and deal with the omo-onile issue, there would be less properties to demolish across the country.
Mathias Egem, an Owerri-based property lawyer, also thinks that the government is reactive in the enforcement of building laws, while some demolitions are just for land grabbing.
Citing an instance with the demolition of a building allegedly used as a criminal hideout within the Ama Hausa axis in Owerri, the lawyer decried that instead of flushing the criminals out or turn the property to school or hospital, the government demolished it and probably, with an intent of taking over the land and reselling to individuals.
Countering the above, the Lagos State Building Control Agency (LASBCA) noted that its demolitions, which come after several notices, are aimed at safeguarding lives and property.
Last year, the Lagos State Government, through LASBCA, directed the removal of all illegal structures erected under high-tension and power lines, giving property owners until January 31, 2025, to comply, after which enforcement actions will commence.
For Gbolahan Oki, general manager, LASBCA, the directive aligned with the Lagos State Urban and Regional Planning and Development Law, which prohibits construction within restricted zones such as power line corridors.
Those who are crying foul today, according to the LASBCA boss, are owners who failed to adhere to the directive.
“Removing illegal structures is a crucial step in preventing tragedies caused by electrical hazards,” Oki stated.
“High-tension power lines transmit electricity at extremely high voltages, and any structure within their clearance zone poses serious risks, including electrocution, power surges, fires, and infrastructural damage due to safety violations,” he added.
Also, to ensure safety of lives and property across the state, in 2024, Babajide Olusola Sanwo-Olu, governor of Lagos State, granted amnesty to property owners to regularize their documents, which was extended to December 31, 2024, after which the LASBCA commenced enforcement, starting with Ogudu GRA.
Reviewing the exercise, LASBCA has noted that the enforcement drive is restoring order to Lagos physical planning, amid preventing structural hazards, such as recurring building collapse.
The Lagos State government has also taken safety further and started demolishing unapproved buildings following the expiration of the amnesty period granted by Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu.
For the Federal Housing Authority (FHA), there is nothing wrong with demolishing buildings, especially when there is a need such as structural failure, which then requires controlled demolition.
Based on the above and for the safety of the residents, the FHA has carried many controlled house demolitions, especially in Abuja.
The most recent, according to the housing authority, was on March 24, 2025, when it demolished one of the authority’s buildings in Gwarinpa Estate, Abuja; a block consisting of six 3-bedroom flats.
Ojo, managing director and chief executive of FHA, explained that the authority considered the safety of human lives over any other thing in the demolition of the block due to structural defects.
For those accusing the government of being reactive, the FHA boss insisted that his management cannot wait until there is a disaster before acting, hence, proactive steps have been taken to salvage the situation.
The FHA also cleared the air on fear of forfeiture of properties when demolished, citing the demolition of one the 24 two-storey buildings illegally constructed on a waterway in Guzape District, Abuja.
The FHA boss owned up that the dilapidated buildings were FHA’s, but assured that the authority would complete the new building in one year and all the allottees would get back their houses at no cost.
While the above sounds interesting, considering the many cases where house owners and allottees often lose after demolition, the court is also offering respect to some owners who still have faith in the legal system and have taken legal actions against the government.
In July, an Abuja High Court declared recent demolitions of homes across the FCT illegal.
It also ordered the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA), responsible for the demolition, to pay N200?million to people whose homes were wrongly destroyed.
Though the case dated back to 2023 when the FCDA was demolishing buildings alleged to be on government land, it is justice at last for home owners, who despite having valid title documents or were in the process of securing them, lost their houses to the demolition exercise.
The ruling, according to Egem, will curb the excesses of government agencies, which often enforce laws without human face.
The property lawyer decried that most of the demolitions in the country violate homeowners’ rights to fair notice and a hearing.
“As Nigerians, part of our fundamental rights is the right to property. But our governments often act as if the citizens should not own property.
“What they should do is to harmonise property laws and give them a human face because many pour their life savings into their buildings and also depend on them for earnings, especially at old age,” he said.
He urged for a win-win bargain, as most owners of demolished buildings do not live long after their properties are gone and land grabbing is on the rise due to many demolition exercises in the country.
Osarhieme called for harmonising of building laws, easy facilitation of necessary documents and approvals and reducing of the too many agencies In building regulations in the country, especially Lagos State.
Egem urged for stiffer laws against land grabbing and use of demolition as political weapons by government officials.
Harry Emetuma, a senior banker and house owner, urged would-be landlords to start with documentation and authorisation to avoid unnecessary harassment from the many and yet to establish government building regulatory agencies. (BusinessDay)
News
NDC: “They cannot stop me, they will fail” — Peter Obi
“…If you know what they are doing to ensure that I’m not on the ballot in 2027, you will be surprised”
Presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Mr Peter Obi has vowed that nobody will stop him from taking part in the 2027 general election.
Obi spoke in reaction to the Federal High Court judgement on Friday, which ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to deregister the party.
The NDC candidate, who disclosed that powerful forces want him out of the race, declared that he is unstoppable.
Obi was a guest speaker at a leadership programme hosted by a group, NextGen Mentorship and Leadership Initiative on Friday at Madonna University Okija, Anambra State.
He said: “If you know what they are doing to ensure that I’m not on the ballot in 2027, you will be surprised.
“The Nigerian government is doing everything to ensure that I do not contest in this election, but I’m not looking at the obstacles but at the destination.

“I’m rather focussed at the fruitfulness of the destination and that is what keeps me going.
“I’m not desperate to be Nigerian President but desperate to see Nigeria work. Go and obtain your PVC. If you don’t vote, you are hurting your future. When you have your PVC, do not vote for me because I’m an Igbo man. I’m not contesting the election because I’m an igbo man, but vote for me because I’m the most qualified.”
On the court judgment, he had this to say: “They cannot stop me. They will fail. Let me assure you it is not the end of the road. We are committed to this democracy and to those who want to kill this democracy they are trying to hurt the society.
“The reactionary elements in Nigeria, those who are bent on holding Nigeria down do not want it to work but I can assure you it would work. I have confidence that I will pull through because the will of the people must prevail.
“No where is safe in Nigeria today, yet the people who should help salvage the country are bent on hurting our democracy.
“My message to all those who mean well for Nigeria and not just my supporters is for us to remain peaceful and continue to resist this tragedy being imposed on Nigeria.”
He also challenged President Bola Tinubu to a debate, noting that “I challenge any of those contesting to a debate to say what they want to do for this country, including President Bola Tinubu. I’m not saying it to make you happy but to change Nigeria and make it work.”
Meanwhile, the NDC has also rejected the judgement , declaring that it has instructed its lawyers to file an appeal.
News
Remi Tinubu sparks debate after urging Nigerians to start akara, corn businesses
First Lady Oluremi Tinubu has come under fire on social media after encouraging Nigerians to consider small-scale ventures such as selling akara, roasted corn and kuli-kuli, saying the businesses require little capital to begin.
Tinubu made the remarks while speaking with correspondents following the second-quarter meeting of the Renewed Hope Initiative with wives of state governors at the State House in Abuja on Wednesday.
A video of her comments, shared by News Channel 247 on Friday, quickly generated widespread reactions online.
Speaking on the activities of the Renewed Hope Initiative, the First Lady said the programme had been providing grants, rather than loans, to vulnerable Nigerians to help them start businesses and improve their livelihoods.
“We’re trying to give hope, and to start Akara business doesn’t take a lot of money. To start roasting corn, or somebody even said kuli kuli doesn’t take much. We didn’t give them a loan; we gave it to them as a grant.
“So we’ve encouraged Nigerians as best as we could. What is within our hands, I have given, and I keep giving,” she said.

Tinubu also highlighted the initiative’s interventions in healthcare, education, agriculture and social investment, noting that she had personally supported several causes with substantial donations.
“I remember giving for TB. When I heard there were so many TB cases, I gave N2 billion. To breast cancer, I gave a billion. For food malnutrition, I gave half a billion.
“So those are the things we’ve been doing and making sure we can make sure that whatever this government is trying to do, it will see the light of day,” she stated.
According to the First Lady, the initiative has also provided scholarships, ICT training opportunities and support for agricultural and social investment programmes.
She urged Nigerians to remain hopeful despite the prevailing economic difficulties.
“The narrative has really changed, has changed to challenge the average man, whereas the average man is supposed to have hope. So I like the idea that Mr President say this is the Renewed Hope Agenda.
“We have to renew our hope, and that’s how we renew our hope, you know, and that’s what I have to tell Nigerians,” she said.
However, her comments on small-scale businesses triggered swift criticism, with many social media users accusing her of downplaying the severity of the country’s economic challenges.
An X user, @ADCVanguard_, said the video demonstrated “exactly how disconnected Nigeria’s ruling class has become from the reality of ordinary citizens.”
Another user, @ireteeh, compared the initiative’s interventions with private-sector efforts, writing: “The First Lady is empowering people with akara, corn, and kuli-kuli, while an ordinary citizen with limited resources is equipping people to build thriving careers in cybersecurity.”
A user identified as Nefertiti (@firstladyship) also criticised the remarks, saying, “Nigerians are in big trouble. There is fire on the mountain but the people are tired of running.”
Despite the backlash, some Nigerians defended the First Lady, arguing that there was nothing wrong with encouraging people to engage in small businesses.
One X user, @Akikanju1568901, described akara as “one of the most lucrative businesses in Nigeria,” noting that the trade has enabled many families to train their children in universities and acquire houses and cars.
Another user, @PemiOladapo, wrote: “There’s dignity in labour… these are our local snacks! People should start it and scale it!”
Meanwhile, another commentator, @TossynBankz_, argued that the issue was not the nature of the businesses but the broader economic context.
“Nobody is mocking akara, roasted corn, or kuli-kuli. Those are honest businesses. The problem is that Nigerians are asking for a better economy, more jobs, and lower prices. Telling people to start selling akara in this situation just feels like the government doesn’t understand what people are going through,” the user wrote.
News
BREAKING: Court nullifies NDC’s registration, overturns earlier ruling that directed INEC to register party
The Federal High Court sitting in Lokoja, Kogi State, has set aside its earlier judgment that compelled the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to register the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) as a political party.
The latest ruling effectively reverses the legal basis upon which the NDC had been listed by INEC, throwing the party’s status into uncertainty and preventing it from operating as a recognised political party for now.
Earlier this year, the NDC secured a Federal High Court judgement in Lokoja, Kogi State in Suit No. FHC/LKJ/CS/49/2025 directing INEC to register it, a development that sparked controversy among other political associations. The party’s inclusion on the electoral commission’s list was based solely on that court order.
However, the registration was challenged by rival political groups, particularly the All Democratic Alliance (ADA), which argued that the NDC failed to comply with statutory requirements for political party registration.
The challengers alleged that the party did not properly complete the application process through INEC’s designated portal and failed to submit essential documents, including its manifesto and other required materials.
Following the fresh legal challenge, the Federal High Court in Lokoja revisited the matter and vacated its previous judgment, agreeing that the earlier order compelling INEC to register the NDC should no longer stand.

The court’s decision means that the NDC is currently not an officially registered political party. As a result, the party cannot sponsor or field candidates in any election until it obtains formal recognition from INEC.
The judgment also effectively returns the party to the starting point of the registration process. To regain recognition, the NDC will either have to meet all of INEC’s registration requirements and apply afresh or challenge the latest judgment at the Court of Appeal.
For INEC, the ruling means the electoral commission is no longer under any legal obligation to register the NDC.
The court agreed with the commission’s position that there were legal issues surrounding the earlier order that compelled the registration, which may have involved procedural errors, timing, or failure to satisfy statutory conditions.
In practical terms, the court’s decision keeps the NDC off the list of officially recognised political parties unless it successfully overturns the ruling on appeal or completes the registration process in accordance with INEC’s guidelines.
The latest judgment marks a significant twist in the legal battle over the party’s registration and could have implications for its political ambitions ahead of future elections.
-
News8 hours agoBREAKING: Court nullifies NDC’s registration, overturns earlier ruling that directed INEC to register party
-
News2 days agoSenate passes state police bill, empowers govs to appoint commissioners
-
News1 day agoBREAKING: FG completes handover of Enugu Airport to Concessionaires, extols Mbah’s role
-
News2 days agoLPPC suspends Mike Ozekhome’s SAN rank
-
News2 days agoLagos Police arrests 38 foreign nationals, recovers 14 firearms in crackdown
-
News5 hours agoNDC: “They cannot stop me, they will fail” — Peter Obi
-
News2 days agoADC: Bayo Onanuga’s ‘No Hunger’ comments reflect Tinubu’s disconnection from reality
-
News8 hours agoRemi Tinubu sparks debate after urging Nigerians to start akara, corn businesses



