Connect with us

News

Ihuezeofia’s attacks on Enuogu-Nkerefi leaders, commissioner act of mischief – Stakeholders

Published

on

Spread the love

…Accuse subversive elements of reign of terror, blackmail, anti-state activities

Community leaders and stakeholders of Enuogu Autonomous Community, Nkerefi, Nkanu East Local Government Area of Enugu State, have launched a rebuttal against what they described as a calculated campaign of blackmail, intimidation and misinformation targeted at the leadership of the community and the Enugu State Commissioner for Chieftaincy and Town Union Matters, Dr. Charles Egumgbe.

The leaders as well as other stakeholders in the community alleged that the recent publications accusing the Commissioner of bias and alleging marginalisation of Ihuezeofia Village was not only false but formed part of a long-standing pattern of subversive activities orchestrated by individuals determined to plunge the community into perpetual crisis for selfish political interests.

In a statement jointly signed by the Traditional Ruler of Enuogu Autonomous Community, Igwe Emmanuel Onukwube, the Chairman of the Caretaker Committee, Mr. Isaac Ugbor, the Committee Secretary, Barr. Abel Ani, and other prominent stakeholders, the community called on security agencies to investigate what it described as “dangerous acts of impersonation, incitement and sustained attempts to undermine constituted authority.”

The leaders urged members of the public and the Enugu State Government to disregard the publications, insisting that those behind it neither represented Ihuezeofia Village nor possessed the mandate to speak on behalf of Enuogu Autonomous Community.

According to the statement, the individuals behind the petition were “known crisis merchants and skeletal moles” whose stock-in-trade had become sponsoring petitions, false narratives and propaganda each time government interventions or development projects were attracted to the community.

Maduka College Advert

“The alarmists are invidious impostors claiming to be what they are not. They do not have the mandate of Ihuezeofia Village or Enuogu Autonomous Community. They are not recognised officers of the Town Union and therefore cannot speak for the people.

“Every time government, non-governmental organisations or public-spirited individuals attract development to Enuogu, these same elements immediately manufacture crises, circulate falsehoods and attempt to frustrate progress. Their objective is neither justice nor development, but personal relevance through instability,” the statement declared.

The stakeholders further accused the purveyors of the fake news of deliberately distorting history by alleging marginalisation of Ihuezeofia Village despite what they described as overwhelming evidence of equitable distribution of opportunities and government patronage.

They recalled that the village had produced elected and appointed office holders, including a Councillor of the electoral ward, Financial Secretary of the Town Union, Deputy President-General and other strategic officers, while also benefiting from government-backed infrastructure, including electricity transformer and other electric infrastructure, road improvements, healthcare interventions and employment opportunities.

“It is therefore astonishing that those who have benefited immensely from the collective goodwill of the community now seek to deceive the public by painting a false picture of exclusion,” the statement noted.

The stakeholders also questioned the credibility of some of the petitioners’ signatories, alleging that they deliberately adorned themselves with academic and political titles they neither possessed nor earned in order to mislead government officials and members of the public, challenging them to produce their credentials.

They added that the deliberate use of false titles amounted to impersonation capable of misleading public institutions and undermining confidence in legitimate processes.

The community leaders equally dismissed allegations that the Ministry of Chieftaincy Affairs had imposed a caretaker committee or manipulated the affairs of Enuogu, explaining that the committee was lawfully constituted by the state government in March 2026 as a temporary peace-building mechanism after intelligence reports indicated a looming breakdown of law and order from the said subversive elements.

They alleged that one Mr. Edeson Chukwudi had openly recruited armed youths and mobilised thugs with threats to unleash violence should the suspended Town Union election fail to produce him as president of the town union.

According to the statement, the armed displays and repeated threats created widespread fear within the community, forcing elders and stakeholders to petition the state government to suspend the election and intervene before lives were lost.

“The intervention of government prevented what could have degenerated into bloodshed. The caretaker committee was not created to favour anybody but to restore peace and create an atmosphere conducive for a free, fair and violence-free election.

“It is therefore both mischievous and irresponsible for those who precipitated the crisis to now turn around and accuse the Commissioner of bias simply because government refused to surrender to intimidation,” the leaders stated.

The stakeholders further alleged that the same individuals had consistently rejected constitutional processes because they realised they lacked the popularity required to emerge victorious in a transparent election.

Rather than submit themselves to democratic contest, they alleged, the petitioners had resorted to blackmail, false accusations, media propaganda and attempts to discredit respected community leaders and government officials.

The stakeholders further raised fresh security concerns, alleging that Edeson and members of his armed group had openly marked out and compiled the names of certain community leaders and prominent individuals whom they had allegedly vowed to “deal with” over the leadership dispute.

They described the alleged threats as disturbing and capable of igniting violence if left unchecked, warning that the lives of the affected leaders and members of their families were now under serious threat.

Consequently, they called on security agencies to immediately place Edeson and his associates under close surveillance and hold them accountable should any attack, harassment, disappearance, injury or other harm befall any of the named community leaders or their relatives.

According to the stakeholders, “those issuing threats should bear full responsibility for any breakdown of law and order, as well as any violence directed against innocent members of the community.”

The statement also raised concerns over what it described as anti-government tendencies among the principal actors, alleging that one of the arrowheads of the campaign was pursuing personal political ambitions through clandestine opposition activities aimed at dragging the community into needless confrontation with the Enugu State Government.

While reaffirming their confidence in Dr. Charles Egumgbe’s neutrality and commitment to due process, the stakeholders commended Governor Peter Mbah’s administration for acting swiftly to preserve peace in the community.

They maintained that the matter had gone beyond mere political disagreement, insisting that it had assumed dangerous security dimensions requiring urgent intervention by law enforcement agencies, appealing to the police, the Department of State Services (DSS) and other security agencies to investigate the alleged threats, protect vulnerable community leaders and ensure that those accused of issuing violent threats were prevented from carrying them out.

The statement stressed that any future attack on any community leader, stakeholder or member of their families should not be treated as an isolated incident but viewed within the context of the alleged threats already brought to the attention of the authorities.

The community leaders also reaffirmed that Enuogu Autonomous Community remained united, committed to constitutional democracy, fairness among its constituent villages and the pursuit of peace, warning that no amount of propaganda or intimidation would derail the community’s determination to protect law, order and sustainable development.

They appreciated the governor for his efforts in transforming Nkerefi, pointing at the massive road infrastructure, bridges, Smart Green Schools, healthcare facilities, rural electrification, human capital development and appointments of the people of the community into various sectors of his administration, pledging continuous support and loyalty.

News

NOUN bursar shot dead in Zamfara

Published

on

Nasiru Marafa
Spread the love

Nasiru Marafa, the bursar of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), is dead.

Oladipo Ajayi, NOUN registrar and secretary to council, announced Marafa’s death in a statement on Sunday, saying he was reportedly shot while returning from Gusau, Zamfara state capital.

“The Vice-Chancellor, on behalf of the Governing Council, Management, Senate, Staff and Students of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), regrets to announce the sudden and untimely passing of the University Bursar, Mallam Nasiru Gusau Marafa, which occurred today, Sunday, 6th September 2026,” the statement reads.

“According to information available to the University, Mallam Nasiru Gusau Marafa was reportedly shot while returning from Gusau.”

Marafa was appointed bursar of the university on September 17, 2022, for a five-year tenure scheduled to end in September 2027.

Maduka College Advert

Ajayi described the deceased as a dedicated and committed staff member of the university, who served the institution meritoriously and occupied various positions of responsibility during his career.

He said Marafa’s demise is a profound loss to the university community, describing him as “a distinguished colleague, dedicated administrator and valued member of the NOUN family.”

The registrar extended the university’s condolences to Marafa’s immediate family, relatives, friends, colleagues and others mourning his death.

He also said further information on the burial arrangements would be communicated once details are released by the family.

“May the Almighty Allah forgive his shortcomings, grant him Al-Jannah Firdaus, and grant his family, friends, colleagues and the entire University community the strength to bear this painful loss,” the statement added.

Continue Reading

News

Enugu CP receives Best Crime Bursting police chief award , SP Ndukwe best PRO

Published

on

CP Giwa receiving the Best Crime Bursting Police Chief in West Africa award
Spread the love

The Commissioner of Police, Enugu State Command, CP Mamman Bitrus Giwa, has received the 2025 Best Crime Busting Police Chief in West Africa award, just as the Command’s Police Public Relations Officer (PPRO), SP Daniel Ndukwe, bags the Best Police Public Relations Officer in Nigeria award.

 Both awards were presented to them weekend by the Security Watch Africa Initiative.

Presenting the awards at the State Command Headquarters, GRA, Enugu, the International Coordinator and Chief Executive Officer of the Initiative, Patrick Agbambu, said the recipients were selected following a review of their respective policing antecedents and professional contributions in Enugu State.

He urged CP Giwa to sustain his proactive approach to crime prevention and combating, while encouraging the PPRO to maintain his strategic and effective police-public relations activities.

Responding, CP Giwa expressed appreciation to the organizers for the recognition, attributing his achievements in Enugu State to Almighty God and the support of the State Government, law-abiding citizens and other stakeholders. SP Ndukwe also appreciated the organizers and dedicated the award to Almighty God, CP Giwa and the people of Enugu State for their continued support.

Maduka College Advert

The awards were presented as part of the 19th Africa Security Watch Awards, following the 19th Africa Security Watch Conference held in July 2026 at the Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara International Conference Centre, Banjul, The Gambia.

Continue Reading

News

Gumi took my Moroccan wife from me, Kaduna man alleges

Published

on

Sheikh Gumi
Spread the love

A Kaduna-based businessman, Nasir Musa Idris, has accused prominent Islamic scholar, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, of taking custody of his Moroccan wife, Khadija Diab, after he took her to the cleric’s residence for counselling.

Idris, who made the allegation in an interview with RFI Hausa, the Hausa service of Radio France Internationale, said he had been unable to take his wife back home for about 11 months after leaving her at Gumi’s residence in September 2025.

The businessman said he married Khadija, a Moroccan national, in October 2024 after travelling to Morocco to seek her hand in marriage and completing what he described as the necessary legal and immigration procedures.

He said the marriage was conducted with the consent of her parents and the involvement of relevant authorities, including the Nigerian embassy, before he brought her to Nigeria.

According to him, Khadija had never previously known anyone in Nigeria and the couple lived together in Kaduna without major problems until September 2025.

Maduka College Advert

Idris said he was subsequently informed that Gumi wanted to counsel his wife over complaints she had allegedly made concerning their marriage.

He said he trusted the cleric because of his standing as an Islamic scholar and leader and therefore took Khadija to Gumi’s residence.

“For Dr Gumi, I believe in him because of his character as a religious scholar and leader. I met him at a pharmacy on Isa Kaita Road with my family,” Idris said.

The businessman alleged that after he left his wife at the cleric’s residence, he was unable to take her back despite repeated attempts to regain access to her.

He said the situation had continued for months, prompting him to report the matter to relevant authorities and seek legal redress.

Idris also alleged that Gumi was invited by the authorities to answer questions concerning the matter but did not honour the invitation.

The dispute has also resulted in legal proceedings in Kaduna, where Idris reportedly made allegations bordering on wrongful restraint or confinement, interference in his marriage, theft, defamation and issues relating to a purported marriage document.

Court documents connected with the case reportedly named Amal Ahmad Gumi, described as Sheikh Gumi’s wife, as well as some members of the cleric’s family among the defendants.

The filings indicated that Idris initially introduced Khadija to Amal because both women were Moroccan.

The businessman also raised questions over a purported marriage certificate and alleged involvement by Gumi in proceedings before a Sharia Court in Kaduna.

However, the allegations remain contested and have not been established as facts by a court. There is also no independent confirmation that Gumi married Khadija.

Gumi: I’ll sue him

But Gumi, in his reaction to the allegations, denied Idris’ claims and threatened legal action against the businessman.

Speaking to Weekend Trust yesterday, the cleric dismissed the allegation and said he would sue Idris.

Gumi’s denial introduces a direct legal and factual contest between the two men over what happened after Khadija was taken to the cleric’s residence.

Idris, however, maintained that his marriage to Khadija was valid and that she had been brought into Nigeria only after he had completed the necessary procedures.

He said he was seeking the return of his wife and clarification of the circumstances under which she allegedly remained at Gumi’s residence.

The controversy has attracted attention because of the identities of those involved and the unusual circumstances surrounding the marital dispute.

With Gumi now threatening legal action and the matter already the subject of proceedings, the competing accounts are likely to be tested through the appropriate legal and investigative processes.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert