
News
10 Key Things to Know about Justice Lifu’s Judgment Affecting ADC, Atiku, By Abdulrahman Abdulaziz
The political landscape has been thrown into fresh turbulence after the Federal High Court delivered a judgment by Justice Peter Lifu that voided the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) under Senator David Mark and nullified Atiku Abubakar’s presidential candidacy for the 2027 elections.
Here are 10 key things to know about the judgment, the events that led to it, and the underlying political battles.
1. The Core Ruling and Immediate Casualties
Justice Peter Lifu’s judgment nullified the leadership of the Senator David Mark-led National Working Committee (NWC) of the ADC. Alongside sacking the party leadership, the court invalidated the primary elections conducted under their watch, effectively stripping Atiku Abubakar of his 2027 presidential nomination and nullifying the candidacies of other party flagbearers.
*2. Triggered by the North-East Zonal Leadership Dispute*

The legal onslaught against the Mark-led leadership began with a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, filed by Nafiu Bala Gombe, the former ADC National Deputy Chairman (North-East). Gombe challenged the legitimacy of the transition process that installed the new leadership after the resignation of the former National Chairman, Chief Ralph Nwosu.
3. The “Haphazard” Takeover by the Atiku Camp
The crisis began with a sudden, intense political realignment that saw the Atiku camp sweep into the ADC. Critics and aggrieved party stalwarts described the influx as a “haphazard takeover,” arguing that political heavyweights hijacked the party’s structures overnight, brushed aside internal party mechanisms, and sidelined foundational stakeholders who had built the platform over the years.
4. The Fierce Battle for Party Control
The takeover triggered an internecine war for the soul and structure of the ADC. Factional leaders and aggrieved members — such as Nafiu Bala Gombe — argued that the installation of Senator David Mark, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola (as National Secretary), and other caretaker committee members blatantly violated the party’s constitution and provisions of the Electoral Act. This internal friction morphed into a fierce proxy war over who legitimately controlled the party apparatus.
5. Escalation of Interlocutory Issues to the Supreme Court
As the battle for control intensified, factions rushed to court, triggering a flurry of interlocutory injunctions, counter-injunctions, and appeals. These interlocutory battles moved swiftly through the court hierarchy, eventually landing on the Supreme Court docket as camps sought interim legitimacy or tried to block opponents from running party affairs.
6. The Trial Court Remand Order
At a previous stage of the protracted legal tussle, appellate reviews and procedural assessments led to orders directing parties back to the trial court. Rather than resolving the substantive issues at the appellate level immediately, higher courts returned the matter to the Federal High Court for a proper trial and determination of the core substantive claims regarding leadership rights and structural compliance.
7. Yesterday’s Judgment and Findings on Infractions
Following the procedural trajectory, Justice Lifu took up the substantive case and ruled in the plaintiff’s favour. The court held that the emergence of the Mark-led NWC violated both the ADC constitution and the Electoral Act, making all actions, congresses, and primary elections conducted under their administration legally unsustainable and void.
8. Atiku and the ADC’s Sharp Condemnation
Reacting swiftly to the judgment, Atiku Abubakar (through his campaign organisation) condemned the ruling, labelling it a panicked move by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to weaken the opposition. The ADC similarly rejected the verdict, characterising it as legally indefensible and a coordinated assault on multi-party democracy in Nigeria. The embattled politician, however, remained silent on the undemocratic role he and his colleagues played in stoking the crisis.
9. Jubilation from the Opposing Faction
Conversely, the faction loyal to Nafiu Bala Gombe hailed Justice Lifu’s verdict as a triumph of the rule of law. Proponents of this view argued that political parties cannot treat their internal constitutions with impunity and that leadership must emerge through transparent, lawful processes rather than imposition.
10. The Next Legal Frontier: Heading to the Appeal Court
The legal war is far from over. Representatives of the ADC and affected camps have announced their resolve to challenge yesterday’s judgment at the Court of Appeal. With the 2027 general elections drawing closer, the legal status of the party’s leadership and its presidential ticket hangs in a delicate balance, setting the stage for another high-stakes judicial showdown.
Ultimately, the Atiku camp stands as the true architect of the ADC’s current misfortune. By treating the party’s internal democracy with impunity and arbitrarily hijacking its leadership structures overnight, they sowed the seeds of bitter division and legal vulnerability. By ignoring due process and alienating foundational stakeholders, they have nobody else to blame but themselves for the party’s present ordeals.
Nafiu Bala Gombe had filed an ex parte application and instituted a legal suit at the Federal High Court on 2 September, 2025, challenging the legitimacy of the party’s leadership under the David Mark-led faction.
In late 2025 and early 2026, the case experienced prolonged delays in the Federal High Court under Justice Emeka Nwite, prompting grievances from the plaintiff over the slow pace of hearing the substantive matter. Some of Nafiu Bala Gombe’s supporters alleged that Justice Nwite is close to Peter Obi and that the judge dragged the case to favour him. Mr Obi was a member of the party at the time.
Following the stagnation at the lower court, Nafiu Bala Gombe approached the Court of Appeal to challenge the delays and seek intervention regarding the handling of the judicial process. The court granted status quo ante bellum, which the ADC challenged at the nation’s apex court.
The legal battle then moved to the apex court, which subsequently reviewed the procedural delays and dispute. The Supreme Court directed that the matter be remitted back to the Federal High Court, specifically instructing an expedited trial of the substantive case (which was later reassigned and handled by Justice Peter Lifu).
CHRONOLOGICAL REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN NAFIU BALA GOMBE v. ADC & ORS., FCT/ABJ/CS 1819/2025
29th July–2nd September 2025: Subject matter and commencement
The suit, filed on 2nd September 2025, arose from the emergence and recognition of national officers at the African Democratic Congress (ADC)’s 99th NEC meeting on 29th July 2025. The Plaintiff alleged that the requisite notice or a democratic election had not preceded their appointment.
The Plaintiff sought declaratory and injunctive reliefs challenging both the disputed ADC leadership and INEC’s recognition of it. He sought declarations that INEC was duty-bound to ensure the lawful constitution of the ADC’s governing bodies; that it could not validate the 99th NEC meeting; that its attendance at the meeting, report, recognition of the challenged NWC officers and validation of their assumption of leadership were unlawful and void; and that it could not deal with, monitor or enable unelected persons to function as executive officers.
He further sought orders nullifying the challenged officers’ acts from 29th July 2025, setting aside the meeting’s decisions and resolutions constituting their NWC membership, and recognising him as the only elected NWC member with a subsisting four-year tenure and entitlement to supervise ADC affairs. He also sought perpetual injunctions restraining INEC from recognising those persons and restraining the 2nd and 3rd Defendants, together with those they represented, from acting as ADC officers or members of its governing bodies.
The Plaintiff filed motions ex parte and on notice seeking interim and interlocutory injunctions. The suit was assigned to Hon. Justice Emeka Nwite for hearing.
4th September 2025–12th March 2026: Interlocutory appeal
On 4th September 2025, the trial Court declined to determine the interim application without notifying the other parties. It held: “I am of the view and I so hold that the interest of justice will be met by putting the other party on notice to show cause why the application should not be granted.”
On 18th September 2025, the 2nd Defendant, despite the plethora of cases decided by the Appellate Courts to desist from pursuing interlocutory appeals aimed at derailing or stalling the smooth flow of the main suit and indeed the course of justice, filed a notice of appeal challenging the above-quoted decision which was entirely made for his benefit.
On 27th January 2026, before the entry of the appeal before the lower Court, the Plaintiff filed a motion on notice seeking to amend his originating summons and thereby deeming the amended originating summons as having been properly filed and served.
On the 6th day of February 2026, 6 months after filing of the notice of appeal, the 2nd Defendant transmitted its record of appeal solely because the Plaintiff filed a motion to amend. The 2nd Defendant circumvented the consideration and determination of the pending motions, including the motion to amend, and indeed the suit.
On 12th March 2026, the Court of Appeal dismissed the interlocutory appeal no.: CA/ABJ/CV/145/2026. The lower Court, guided by the doctrine of necessity, made preservative orders to ensure that the main suit, which is still pending before the trial Court is not rendered nugatory and determined timeously. Thus:
“Finally, it is necessary to make preservatory orders to ensure that the subject matter of the dispute pending before the trial court is not prejudiced, as Courts have inherent powers to control and regulate proceedings to ensure justice… Accordingly, to protect the integrity of the proceedings and the eventual determination of the substantive suit pending before the Federal High Court in Suit No. FCT /ABJ/CS/1819/2025, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
-That Suit No. FCT/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, be and is hereby granted accelerated hearing in view of the Electoral Time Table released by the 4th Respondent.
– That the parties are hereby directed to maintain the status quo ante bellum and shall refrain from taking any step or doing any act capable of foisting a fait accompli on the court or otherwise rendering nugatory the proceedings before the trial court.
– Costs of N2,000,000.00 (Two Million Naira) are awarded in favour of the 1st Respondent.”
16th March–30th April 2026: Appeal to Supreme Court
On 16th March 2026, the 2nd Defendant pursued a further appeal to the Supreme Court. Persisting in its actions that prevent a meaningful resolution of the pending motions and the main suit before the trial Court.
On 30th April 2026, in SC/CV/180/2026, Senator David Mark v. Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe & 4 ors., the Supreme Court affirmed the direction to return to the trial Court thus: “…the order by the court below for parties to return to the trial Court for determination of all pending processes in the 1st Respondent’s suit before it, is hereby affirmed.”
8th May 2026 – 5th November 2026: Return to trial
On 8th May 2026, the trial Court Coram: Hon Justice Emeka Nwite reconvened and the Defendants raised concerns that the Certified True Copy of the Supreme Court had yet to be obtained, thereby applying that the matter be adjourned sine die. Upon their application, the Court adjourned sine die pending receipt of the certified judgment.
On 19th May 2026, the Honourable Chief Judge in the exercise of his administrative powers and owing to the intervening event of the recommendation of Hon. Justice Emeka Nwite by the National Judicial Council for appointment to the Court of Appeal, which could render him functus officio, reassigned the suit to Hon. Justice Peter O. Lifu for accelerated hearing.
Prior to Hon. Justice Peter O. Lifu’s first sitting, the Defendants filed a barrage of about 23 applications, including motions for recusal, stay of proceedings, joinder, interrogatories, discovery, case-stated e.t.c. The Defendants sought to simply frustrate the hearing of the main suit.
On 30 June 2026, the Court, despite attempts by the Defendants to occasion an adjournment proceeded to hear the 23 pending applications. All five defendants moved their motions, and the Plaintiff adopted his responses. Rulings were scheduled for 7th July 2026.
On 7th July 2026, rulings were delivered dismissing the applications. In connection with the 2nd Defendant’s motions of 3rd and 8th June, the Court requested submissions on interrogatories and discovery in proceedings commenced by originating summons, the application of case-stated principles to the reliefs, and any unsettled or recondite legal issues warranting those principles. Only the Plaintiff and the 2nd Defendant were directed to file addresses of no more than two pages each within 48 hours.
On 24th July 2026, rulings were delivered dismissing the motions for interrogatories, discovery and case-stated and the matter was adjourned for hearing.
On 28 September 2026, the Plaintiff was ready to proceed with the hearing, but the Defendants sought strenuously for an adjournment sine die, citing in particular a motion filed at the Court of Appeal for Stay of proceedings Application. The Plaintiff opposed an indefinite adjournment, arguing that no notice of appeal supported a valid stay and that further delay would undermine the Supreme Court’s direction for accelerated hearing. The Court scheduled 5th October 2026 for ruling on the sine-die request and/or substantive hearing.
On 5th October 2026, the Court dismissed the application for an adjournment sine die and proceeded to hear the substantive suits.
*5th November 2026: Judgment and eventual outcome*
The Court granted the reliefs sought by the Plaintiff. Particularly holding that:
– INEC must not recognise the ADC’s 99th NEC meeting for Electoral Act non-compliance;
– INEC must recognise Nafiu Bala as the ADC’s only recognised NEC member.
– Senator David Mark (2nd Defendant) and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola (3rd Defendant) have no right to continue presenting themselves as ADC members.
– The meetings, decisions and resolutions reached by the NWC under their control have been set aside.
● Abdulrahman Abdulaziz, a political analyst, is based in Abuja.
News
‘I Had Lost Hope, But Prayed To Receive My Gratuity Alive’ – Enugu Retirees Thank Mbah After Years Of Waiting
By Tony Edike
Several retired civil servants in Enugu State have expressed profound gratitude to Governor Peter Mbah following the payment of their long-awaited retirement gratuities, which had remained unpaid for years under previous administrations.
The retirees, some of whom had waited for more than two decades after leaving service, described the ongoing payment exercise as a dream come true, saying they had almost lost hope of receiving their entitlements while still alive.
They spoke during the ongoing disbursement of gratuity arrears by the Mbah administration, which inherited a huge backlog of unpaid retirement benefits from previous governments.
One of the beneficiaries, Mr. Luke Obi Ezea, who retired in 2014 after 35 years in service, said he had resigned himself to fate after waiting for years without receiving his gratuity.

Ezea said he had continued praying to God to keep him alive long enough to receive his retirement benefits, expressing joy that his prayers had finally been answered under the Mbah administration.
“I had lost hope of receiving my gratuity, hence I left everything to God. But I kept praying that I would be alive to receive it. God has answered my prayers as Governor Mbah has come to our rescue,” he said.
Describing the payment as a dream come true, Ezea praised the governor for fulfilling his promise to retirees, describing him as a man of his word and an action-oriented leader.
Another beneficiary, who also expressed appreciation to the state government, said the prolonged delay in receiving his gratuity had subjected retirees to terrible experiences and financial difficulties.

He, however, noted that the situation had changed since Mbah assumed office, particularly commending the governor for ensuring that monthly pension payments were up to date.
According to him, previous administrations often owed pensioners several months of their monthly entitlements, leaving many struggling to meet their basic needs.
“Today, I thank God that we have an amiable governor, a listening governor. Today, I am rejoicing because I have received my gratuity. Governor Mbah is also not owing monthly pension. He is up to date,” he said.
He added that the governor’s intervention had restored hope and brought smiles to retired civil servants and their families, praying for God’s protection and continued blessings upon him.
Also, Mrs. Christiana Emehelu narrated the emotional experience of her family, saying her husband, who retired in 2013, had yet to receive his gratuity and was currently in poor health.
She explained that when the family heard that the state government had commenced payment of outstanding retirement benefits, her husband immediately asked her to visit the relevant government office to confirm whether his gratuity was ready.

Mrs Emehelu
According to her, her husband had previously feared that he might not live long enough to enjoy the benefits of his years of service.
“When we heard the news that pension is being paid, he asked me to hastily go to the office to collect his pension. He said his expectation to collect his gratuity while alive had become a reality,” she said.
Emehelu said she was overwhelmed with joy when she arrived at the office and discovered that her husband’s name was among the beneficiaries.
She expressed appreciation to God and Governor Mbah for remembering her family after years of waiting, adding that only God could adequately reward the governor for the gesture.
The reactions underscore the emotional and financial implications of the prolonged non-payment of gratuities on retired civil servants, many of whom spent decades in public service but were unable to access their retirement entitlements for years after leaving office.
The Mbah administration has commenced the clearance of the inherited gratuity backlog as part of efforts to fulfil its commitment to retirees and restore confidence in the state’s pension administration.
The ongoing exercise has brought relief to beneficiaries and their families, some of whom had waited for more than 20 years for payments that represent their legitimate entitlements after years of service to Enugu State.
News
Enugu Gratuity: ‘It’s Wrong to Retire Without Gratuity for Years’ – Mbah Releases ₦10bn, Pays 1,893 Retirees in First Batches
• Outstanding Debt To Retirees Hits ₦48bn
• Mbah promises monthly payments until backlog is cleared
By Tony Edike
The Accountant-General of Enugu State, Mr Tony Okenwa, says the state government has commenced a fresh drive to clear decades of unpaid retirement benefits, with Governor Peter Mbah approving an initial ₦10 billion f or the exercise.
The Enugu State Government has disclosed that its outstanding gratuity liabilities have risen to approximately ₦48 billion, following the accumulation of unpaid retirement benefits inherited from previous administrations and obligations incurred under the present government.
The Accountant-General of the state, Mr Tony Okenwa, made this known while explaining the ongoing payment of gratuities to retired civil servants, describing the intervention by Governor Peter Mbah as unprecedented in the history of the state’s public service.
Okenwa disclosed that the Mbah administration inherited about ₦32 billion in unpaid gratuity obligations covering the period between 2010 and 2023 when it assumed office in June 2023.

He explained that the liabilities had continued to increase due to the growing number of civil servants retiring from service, bringing the total outstanding obligations to approximately ₦48 billion.
According to him, the backlog also includes related pension benefits payable to the next of kin or beneficiaries of workers who die in active service. Such beneficiaries are entitled to five years’ pension in addition to the applicable gratuity, subject to the necessary verification and documentation.
The Accountant-General said Governor Mbah had, from the beginning of his administration, demonstrated a strong commitment to addressing the plight of retired workers who spent several decades in public service without receiving their retirement benefits.
He recalled that during discussions on the backlog, the governor repeatedly questioned the situation where workers retired after many years of service but were unable to access their gratuities.
“Whenever I went to him, he would ask: ‘Do you mean that people retire and then don’t go home with their gratuity?’
“He could not understand how somebody would work for many years, retire and still not receive what he had earned,” Okenwa said.
He explained that although he initially proposed a monthly payment arrangement, the governor insisted that the government should explore ways of raising sufficient funds to clear the accumulated obligations rather than allow retirees to continue waiting indefinitely.
The Accountant-General, however, noted that the government’s financial commitments initially made it difficult to generate enough savings to address the entire backlog.
He said the administration consequently commenced payment of gratuities for workers who retired under its tenure in January 2025, with their entitlements processed and paid directly into their bank accounts.
The exercise continued until financial constraints made it difficult to sustain the payments.
Okenwa disclosed that Governor Mbah subsequently directed the establishment of a structured payment arrangement that would accommodate different categories of retirees and ensure that no group was left behind.
Following a meeting convened by the governor, a committee chaired by the Secretary to the State Government, Professor Chidiebere Onyia, was constituted to oversee the exercise.
The Commissioner for Finance serves as secretary of the committee, while the Accountant-General and the Principal Secretary to the Government, Ken Chukwuegbo, are members.
He said the governor approved an initial release of ₦10 billion to commence the payment of the outstanding obligations.
Under the arrangement, ₦8 billion was allocated to legacy gratuity debts inherited from previous administrations, while ₦1 billion each was earmarked for obligations incurred between June 2023 and January 2025 and those covering June 2025 to September 2026.
1,813 retirees receive nearly ₦3.12bn in first two batches
Giving a breakdown of the payments, Okenwa disclosed that the government initially deployed ₦5 billion, with payments released in phases to accommodate possible complaints, corrections and verification issues.
He said 1,030 retirees received a total of ₦1.9197 billion on the first day of payment, while another 783 beneficiaries received approximately ₦1.199 billion in the second batch.
The two batches therefore accounted for 1,813 retirees and approximately ₦3.12 billion.
The Accountant-General explained that the government deliberately adopted a phased payment approach because some retirees had provided dormant bank accounts or incorrect account details, while others needed to update their records before their entitlements could be released.
He said some beneficiaries had accumulated records dating back many years, making it necessary to carry out additional checks to ensure that payments reached the rightful individuals.
Okenwa also disclosed that the government had commenced payments to retirees whose entitlements fell within the June to September 2026 category.
According to him, 80 retirees whose records had been verified under the June and July 2025 period received more than ₦482 million.
He added that another batch of over 400 retirees had been prepared for payment but was undergoing final verification to ensure that all details were accurate.
He stressed that the payments represented the full entitlements of the beneficiaries and were not partial payments or deductions from the amounts owed to them.
Government removes previously paid retirees from outstanding list
On the verification process, Okenwa explained that beneficiaries under the legacy category had undergone verification exercises in previous years, and their details were already available in the government’s database.
He said the records were retrieved, updated and subjected to a filtering process to establish the actual number of retirees still awaiting payment.
According to him, the filtering became necessary because some retirees had previously received assistance from the governor after personally approaching him with urgent financial needs, including medical expenses, children’s education and other family challenges.
Such beneficiaries were removed from the outstanding payment list to avoid double payment and establish the government’s actual outstanding liability.
He further explained that beneficiaries under the related pensions category would be paid through their estates or next of kin, in line with the available records.
However, he said such beneficiaries must obtain letters of administration from the Ministry of Justice to authenticate their claims and establish their legal entitlement before payment.
This, he noted, was necessary to prevent errors, fraudulent claims and possible disputes or litigation in the future.
12,717 legacy beneficiaries yet to be fully settled
The Accountant-General disclosed that government records showed approximately 12,717 outstanding beneficiaries under the legacy gratuity category.
He said that, considering the first two batches of 1,813 retirees and the additional 80 beneficiaries paid under another category, approximately 2,000 retirees had so far been reached through the initial deployment of ₦5 billion.
He described the development as a significant intervention, expressing optimism that the next deployment of another ₦5 billion would substantially increase the number of beneficiaries paid.
Okenwa, however, noted that the exact proportion of beneficiaries settled would be established through a reconciliation of the verified records and outstanding financial obligations.
He assured retirees that the government was determined to ensure that every eligible beneficiary received what was due to them, irrespective of when they retired.
Retirees initially feared another broken promise
Speaking on the reactions from beneficiaries, Okenwa said the ongoing payments had generated enormous excitement among retirees, many of whom had almost given up hope of ever receiving their gratuities.
He disclosed that some retirees initially refused to submit their bank details when contacted by the Pension Director because they suspected the exercise could be another scam, having heard similar promises from previous administrations without receiving payment.
However, he said their attitude changed when bank alerts began confirming the actual payment of their entitlements.
According to him, some beneficiaries initially mistook the credits for their regular monthly pensions before discovering that the money was their long-awaited gratuity.
He narrated the experience of a beneficiary who visited his office to express appreciation after receiving his payment alert, bringing palm oil from his village as a personal gesture of gratitude.
Okenwa said the retiree explained that he had never met him before but decided to visit because he wanted to appreciate those responsible for making the payment possible after many years of waiting.
He described the gesture as evidence of the emotional and economic significance of the intervention.
The Accountant-General said the benefits extended beyond the individual retirees, noting that the payments would help families settle outstanding obligations, pay school fees, provide shelter and attend to other needs that had been neglected for years.
He added that even retirees who had yet to receive their payments were encouraged by seeing their colleagues receive theirs, restoring confidence that their own entitlements would eventually be paid.
Mbah promises monthly payments until backlog is cleared
On the timeline for clearing the outstanding gratuities, Okenwa said the governor had indicated that payments would continue every month until the accumulated obligations were settled, subject to the continued release of funds.
He expressed confidence that the exercise would be completed, adding that the government would conduct a final reconciliation to determine whether all eligible beneficiaries had been paid or if any outstanding cases remained.
He also revealed that the government was extending its verification and payment efforts to unresolved retirement benefits dating back to the 1990s and early 2000s, including cases that had remained unpaid since the military era.
According to him, some retirees in those years were issued cheques but failed to collect them because they were unaware that the payments were ready, while others could not cash them before the cheques became stale.
He lamented that successive administrations did not consistently sustain the payment process, leaving several legitimate retirement entitlements unresolved for decades.
Okenwa said the present administration was committed to addressing such cases and ensuring that all verified beneficiaries received their entitlements.
He described the ongoing exercise as one of the most significant policy interventions he had witnessed in his 35 years in the civil service, stressing that its impact was directly reflected in the lives of retirees and their families.
“I have never witnessed this kind of policy intervention with such a direct impact on people’s lives,” he said.
He reiterated that the government’s objective was to ensure that no eligible retiree was abandoned, regardless of how long the individual had waited for the payment of their gratuity.
News
Enugu Pensioners Rejoice as Mbah Pays Gratuities After Over 30 Years of Delay – Salaries Director
By Tony Edike
Retired workers in Enugu State have expressed excitement and renewed hope following the ongoing payment of retirement gratuities by the administration of Governor Peter Mbah, ending a backlog that had persisted for more than three decades.
The Director of Salaries and Pension in Enugu State, Dr Ejike Sylvester, described the development as a remarkable moment for pensioners, saying he had never witnessed such excitement among retired state and local government workers throughout his years of service.
Sylvester, who spoke on the ongoing payment exercise, said many pensioners who retired several years ago, including some who left service in 2000, were now receiving their long-awaited gratuities.

Enugu Director of Salaries and Pensions, Dr Ejike Sylvester

He said the joy of the pensioners was also his joy, noting that many of them had repeatedly visited his office with walking sticks to make enquiries about their outstanding retirement benefits.
According to him, the atmosphere has changed significantly since the commencement of the payment, as pensioners who previously came to the office in uncertainty now leave with smiles after confirming that their names are on the list of beneficiaries.
“The joy of these pensioners is my joy. You see the gladness all over their faces. Throughout my years in this office, I have never experienced this kind of excitement among retired Enugu workers,” he said.
The Salaries and Pension Director explained that the payment process had been made seamless through a verification exercise conducted by a government team led by Professor Egbo, after which funds were released for the payment of verified beneficiaries.
He said the responsibility of his office was largely to confirm the beneficiaries’ banking details and establish whether their names appeared on the payment list before directing them to their banks to access their money.
Sylvester disclosed that some pensioners had already received their gratuities directly through their bank accounts without being aware that the government had commenced payment.
He recounted instances where some retirees visited his office to obtain letters that would enable them to secure loans from banks, only for him to discover that their names were already on the list of beneficiaries.
“Some of them come here to collect letters to enable them to borrow money from the bank. When I ask when they retired, some do not even know that their gratuities are being paid. I check and discover that their names are among the beneficiaries, and I tell them they do not need the letter; they should go to their banks and collect their gratuities,” he said.
He, however, called on the state government to intensify public awareness through the media to ensure that all eligible pensioners are informed about the ongoing payment.
According to him, some retirees still find it difficult to believe that the long-awaited gratuity payment has become a reality, having waited for many years under successive administrations.
“Some of them still think it is a dream. Others believe it is just one of those political talks. But it is not political talk; it is a reality. Many have been paid, and the joy among pensioners in Enugu State right now is enormous,” he added.
The ongoing gratuity payment represents a major relief for retired workers who had waited for years, in some cases decades, to receive their retirement entitlements.
The Advocate reports that the Enugu State Government had approved the payment of about N32 billion in outstanding legacy gratuities owed to retirees with the first tranche of N10 billion already released.
The Secretary to the Enugu State Government (SSG), Chidiebere Onyia, who disclosed this during a news briefing in Enugu recently, said the payment was part of the commitment of the Governor Peter Mbah administration to clear the inherited gratuity liabilities before the end of his first tenure.
Mr Onyia, a professor, explained that the outstanding gratuities were liabilities inherited by the present administration.
The SSG pointed out that the state government had made provisions for the settlement of the gratuities in the 2026 budget, which had been approved by the Enugu State House of Assembly.
-
News2 days agoBREAKING: Court Nullifies Atiku’s ADC Presidential Ticket, Removes David Mark-Led Leadership
-
News2 days agoPresidency Reacts as NDC Opens Up on Peter Obi’s Health Challenge
-
News16 hours agoPSC Appoints Fidelis Ogarabe Enugu Police Commissioner, Deploys Three Others
-
News2 days ago‘19 Years of Waiting!’ Enugu Pensioner Breaks Down in Joy as Mbah Pays Long-Overdue Gratuity [VIDEO]
-
News2 days agoEnugu Air to Begin Lagos–London Flights in December – Official
-
News2 days agoTrump Blames Republican Candidates for Midterm Election Losses
-
Politics2 days ago2027: APC Flags Off Enugu Campaign in Nsukka, Vows to Deliver Mbah, Tinubu, other Candidates
-
News2 days agoEbonyi Gives Occupants 30-Day Ultimatum to Vacate Defective Building




