Connect with us

News

‘Why I planned coup against Tinubu’ – Colonel Ma’aji

Published

on

Spread the love

Nigerian Army Colonel Mohammed Ma’aji, has explained the motivation behind an alleged plan to overthrow Nigeria’s democratically elected government in a coup d’état, saying the plot was driven by patriotism, concern over worsening conditions in the country and what he described as a desire to rescue Nigeria from a dangerous trajectory.

Ma’aji allegedly spearheaded the plan, which was uncovered in September 2025 before it could be executed, triggering the arrest and interrogation of serving and retired military officers as well as civilians suspected of playing various roles in the alleged conspiracy.

In 2025, after more than three decades of Nigeria’s clean break from military coups, the alleged attempt resulted in a series of arrests and interrogations involving military personnel and civilians accused of participating in the alleged plan to topple President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration.

In its first official reaction to the matter, the Defence Headquarters (DHQ) did not categorically deny that the military officers were involved in an alleged coup plot. Instead, it said the “ongoing investigation involving” the arrested officers was “a routine internal process aimed at ensuring discipline and professionalism is maintained within the ranks.”

The alleged plot, uncovered in late September 2025, unsettled the Tinubu administration and was followed, among other developments, by the cancellation of the October 1 Independence Day Parade and changes in the military hierarchy, including the removal of then Chief of Defence Staff, Christopher Musa.

Maduka College Advert

Although media reports linked the cancellation of the parade to the alleged coup plot, the DHQ explained that the event was called off to enable the President “attend a strategic bilateral meeting outside the country.”

The DHQ later acknowledged that there had indeed been an alleged plot to oust the Tinubu government and said indicted officers would face military judicial panels.

Drawing on interviews with intelligence sources, Premium Times has extensively reported on the alleged conspiracy, beginning with the initial arrest of 16 serving military officers in September.

By February, about 40 people, including senior military officers across the armed forces, a police officer and civilians allegedly involved in reconnaissance, funding and propaganda activities, had been arrested in connection with the alleged conspiracy.

For the first time, however, this newspaper is reporting authoritatively in a series of exclusive publications based on a trove of confidential documents running into about 7,424 pages.

The documents include bank statements, exchanges on encrypted messaging platforms, hotel receipts and records of items purchased, as well as statements from participants and non-participants whose financial dealings allegedly linked them to the suspected coup planners.

Ma’aji, a 50-year-old Nigerian colonel who failed his promotion examination to the rank of brigadier general twice, explained to military investigators how he conceived the alleged plot and the motivation behind it.

Ma’aji was arrested on September 29, 2025, the same day the Nigerian government cancelled the Independence Day parade.

According to statements signed by him and a military investigator at the headquarters of the Nigerian Army Corps of Military Police (NACMP) in Asokoro, Abuja, he was interrogated between October 18, 2025 and February 19, 2026.

In April, the Federal Government filed 13 charges against six individuals accused of being involved in the alleged coup plot.

They are retired Major-General Mohammed Ibrahim Gana, retired Navy Captain Erasmus Ochegobia Victor, Police Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim, electrician Zekeri Umoru, Bukar Kashim Goni and Zaria-based Islamic cleric Abdulkadir Sani.

While the former military officers and civilians are being tried in a civil court, serving military officers, including Ma’aji, are facing trial before a court-martial.

According to documents reviewed for this report, more than 30 officers and civilians were interrogated by military investigators. Their statements form part of the prosecution’s case, although their admissibility remains contested after several defendants told the court that the statements were not made voluntarily.

The dispute prompted the court to order a trial-within-trial to determine whether the statements were obtained voluntarily before ruling on whether they could be admitted as evidence in the substantive proceedings.

Discover more
History
Newspaper
Africans & Diaspora
Corporate & Financial Crime
Government
In his statement, Ma’aji, an officer from Niger State, said the alleged plot dated back to 2023, towards the end of former President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration.

He attributed the beginning of the idea to concerns over corruption, alleged nepotism, insecurity, kidnapping and banditry, particularly across northern Nigeria.

“Things particularly got out of control towards the end of Buhari’s administration when corruption and nepotism became the order of the day. Insecurity started spreading from the North (east) to the North-west and North-central parts of the country. Kidnapping and banditry engulfed the whole of northern Nigeria,” Ma’aji stated.

He said the deteriorating situation became “critical and precarious,” with troops and civilians losing their lives, adding that it was at that point that “the idea of military intervention started.”

According to him, the military hierarchy was expected to act but failed to do so.

“It was expected that the higher hierarchy of the military could have acted to save the situation. Unfortunately, there was no action from the top,” he said.

Ma’aji said the movement initially involved identifying officers who shared concerns about what he considered the deteriorating condition of the country and bringing them into the scheme.

“Most of the officers involved share the same sense of patriotism, love of country and genuine desire for positive change,” he said.

Ma’aji said the alleged plan could not initially be executed because of difficulties in raising funds, logistics and manpower.

He told investigators that much of the money spent came from his personal resources, including proceeds from the sale of personal property, alongside contributions from some members of the group.

He said he sold three houses in Kaduna State and a students’ hostel at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, in an effort to support the movement.

The colonel said one officer contributed N1 million through a bank account, while another made contributions in foreign currency.

The plan was later revived after Ma’aji failed his second promotion attempt in 2024.

He said some officers became concerned that he could be prematurely retired and urged him to revive the movement.

According to Ma’aji, Lieutenant Colonel Shamsuddeen Bappah was among those who strongly pushed for the revival.

He said Bappah travelled from his unit in Ibadan to Abuja to convince him that they had no option but to revive the movement.

Ma’aji said he raised concerns about logistics and manpower because he had already exhausted significant personal resources, but Bappah insisted that the plan should continue.

The officer subsequently promised to sell personal property to support the movement but later informed Ma’aji that he had been unable to find a buyer.

Ma’aji said he subsequently asked whether other officers remained committed to the plan and was assured that they were.

He said the first meeting took place towards the end of 2024 or early 2025, while subsequent meetings were held at different locations in Abuja, with largely the same officers attending and some new members joining.

Ma’aji said his failed promotion attempts were not the primary motivation behind the alleged plot.

According to him, members of the movement believed that Nigeria’s situation had deteriorated further under President Tinubu compared with the Buhari administration.

He cited the removal of fuel subsidy, the floating of the naira, what he described as dubious and multiple taxation, electricity tariff increases, corruption and widespread insecurity as major concerns.

He also said attempts by young Nigerians to have political leaders listen to their grievances had failed, citing the #EndSARS, #EndBadGovernance and Take Back Your Country protests.

According to Ma’aji, excessive force used by security agencies against demonstrators contributed to growing frustration.

He described the average Nigerian youth as frustrated, unemployed and without a clear means of livelihood or hope for the future.

He also lamented the situation of military veterans and retired personnel, saying some had been forced to protest before receiving their pensions, gratuities and other benefits.

In a lengthy statement, Ma’aji repeatedly insisted that the alleged plan was motivated by patriotism rather than personal ambition.

He said he struggled to raise his five children on his salary and questioned how ordinary military personnel could afford quality education and other basic needs amid the country’s economic difficulties.

He also expressed concern about the welfare of wounded soldiers, pointing to the situation at the 44 Nigerian Army Reference Hospital in Kaduna.

According to him, soldiers and officers who sustained injuries in combat had been abandoned to their fate.

He said these concerns reinforced his belief that Nigeria was heading towards a dangerous point.

“The summary of all this is that this action was driven by the desire to have a prosperous nation and country that we all can be proud of,” he stated.

Ma’aji said he believed Nigeria was becoming a “banana republic” and argued that the country had functioned better under military rule.

He said officers and soldiers shared many of the concerns and that the movement was built around recruiting those who genuinely believed that Nigeria needed a change of direction.

The documents also contain Ma’aji’s account of how the group allegedly sought support from military personnel and civilians.

He identified several individuals who, according to his statement, were aware of or allegedly connected to different aspects of the plan.

However, he also specifically denied involvement by a number of officers and said some senior officers who were initially aware of the discussions subsequently withdrew.

Ma’aji said the movement never reached the stage of a fully constituted team because more meetings, resources and personnel were still required.

He also said no definitive “D-Day” had been agreed.

Some of the operational details contained in his statement concern proposed mobilisation, communications, weapons and the intended treatment of senior government and military officials.

Those allegations remain matters before the courts and are not proof that any such plan was actually executed.

Ma’aji further denied discussing the alleged plot with several senior officers whose names had circulated in connection with the investigation.

He said some officers were merely aware of general concerns within the military and were not necessarily participants in the alleged conspiracy.

Former Bayelsa State Governor Timipre Sylva, who was alleged to be a major financier of the coup plot, has vehemently denied any involvement in the conspiracy.

Sylva, a former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources under Buhari, issued the denial through his spokesperson in October 2025 following a security raid on his Abuja residence.

The statement described him as a “thoroughbred democrat” who could not have been involved in such a plot, insisting that he “has no involvement whatsoever—either in planning or in logistics—with any such plot.”

It added that Sylva and his wife were in the United Kingdom at the time for a routine medical check-up and were expected to travel to Malaysia for a professional conference.

The former governor is not known to have returned to Nigeria since then.

Meanwhile, five people associated with him are facing charges over allegations that they concealed his whereabouts, while nine properties linked to him have been placed under interim forfeiture orders.

In his statement, Ma’aji also offered recommendations which he said could prevent a recurrence of such incidents.

He called for improved remuneration for members of the Nigerian Armed Forces, arguing that their salaries were inadequate given current economic realities and inflation.

On welfare, he called for stronger packages for serving personnel and their families, better treatment of casualties, expansion of the COAS Loan Programme, a review of the Armed Forces National Health Insurance Scheme, sustainable housing programmes and the revival of previous car-loan initiatives.

He also called for a dedicated department within the Armed Forces focused on personnel welfare.

On what he described as “godfatherism”, Ma’aji criticised a system in which officers allegedly struggle to advance without influential backing, noting that some personnel spend years on operations while others rarely serve in conflict zones.

He also called for improved pensions for retired personnel, saying veterans deserved better treatment after sacrificing their working lives for the country.

On fuel subsidy removal, Ma’aji argued that the policy should have been phased rather than implemented suddenly, describing its impact as “anti-human”.

He called on the Federal Government to invest savings from subsidy removal in practical projects capable of reducing hardship and urged the revival of mass transit initiatives.

He also called for stronger action against corruption, citing high-profile corruption cases as examples of what he believed had undermined confidence in the system.

Ma’aji criticised the state of education, budget padding and what he described as the inability of many military personnel to afford housing and school fees for their children despite years of service.

He further called for an institutionalised communication channel through which military personnel could directly raise concerns with the Chief of Army Staff without fear of victimisation.

Towards the end of his statement, Ma’aji said his experience in detention and interrogation had changed his perspective.

He said that if released and the underlying problems persisted, he would consider “a different approach,” but added that his interactions with the panel had shown him that there were alternative ways of expressing grievances.

He appealed to the authorities for forgiveness and leniency, saying the alleged plot had not resulted in injury or the release of any bullet.

He said the incident had served as an eye-opener and changed his mindset.

“If God willing, the authority is kind enough to pardon us, we will never contemplate this course of action again in the future,” he said.

Ma’aji maintained that the alleged plan was not intended to destabilise Nigeria but was born out of what he described as patriotism, love of country and a desire for a prosperous nation.

He also appealed for an opportunity for those involved to interact directly with the authorities, plead for forgiveness and commit themselves not to repeat the alleged course of action.

Ma’aji and the other accused persons facing trial before the General Court Martial have denied wrongdoing.

Six other defendants, including retired military officers facing charges arising from the alleged plot before the Federal High Court in Abuja, have similarly maintained their innocence.

They have challenged the admissibility of written statements and video recordings of their interrogations, arguing that the materials were improperly obtained.

The prosecution, however, maintains that due process was followed and has urged the court to dismiss the objections.

The claims contained in Ma’aji’s written and verbal statements, as well as statements made by other people interrogated over the alleged coup, do not in themselves establish guilt.

The courts will ultimately determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants at the conclusion of the ongoing proceedings after considering the totality of evidence presented by both the prosecution and defence. (Premium Times)

News

Enugu Governor’s Aide, Lucky Chukwu is dead

Published

on

Spread the love

 

Hon. Chief Barrister Lucky Chukwu, Senior Special Assistant on Public Affairs to Enugu State Governor Peter Mbah, has died

His death was announced in October 2026 by the office of his younger brother, Senator Kelvin Chukwu, who represents Enugu East Senatorial District.

Lucky Chukwu was an elder brother of the late Labour Party senatorial candidate, Oyibo Chukwu, and Senator Kelvin Chukwu, a former member of the Enugu State House of Assembly.

He was appointed Senior Special Assistant on Public Affairs to Governor Mbah in August 2026, having previously been involved in political activities in the state.

Maduka College Advert

Following his elder brother’s death, Senator Kelvin Chukwu suspended his political activities and engagements for one week to mourn the loss.

The senator’s office announced the temporary suspension in a statement issued on October 11, 2026.

The death is another loss for the Chukwu family, which had earlier lost Oyibo Chukwu, who was the Labour Party’s candidate for the Enugu East Senatorial District in the 2023 general election before he was assassinated during the campaign.

Following Oyibo Chukwu’s death, Kelvin Chukwu emerged as the Labour Party’s replacement candidate and went on to win the senatorial election.

Continue Reading

News

Why kidnappers target NYSC members —  Security experts 

Published

on

Spread the love

•About 40 abducted in one year

The abduction of 20 prospective members of the National Youth Service Corps, NYSC, in Imo State has brought into sharper focus the growing danger facing young Nigerians travelling to or from orientation camps and places of primary assignment.

The 20 graduates, who were travelling from Ibadan, Oyo State, to orientation camps in Abia and Akwa Ibom states, were abducted on October 1 along the Owerri-Onitsha Road in Imo State. They were rescued on October 7, after seven days in captivity, in a joint operation involving the police, military, Department of State Services, DSS, and other security agencies. The victims were subsequently taken for medical examination and treatment.

The Imo incident came barely weeks after another mass abduction involving NYSC members in Kogi State. On August 26, 16 corps members returning from the NYSC orientation camp in Bayelsa State to Abuja after completing their orientation were abducted along the Aloma-Egane axis in Ofu Local Government Area of Kogi State. All 16 were later rescued after a coordinated operation involving the Armed Forces, police, DSS and local vigilantes.

The two incidents have renewed concerns over the safety of corps members whose national service often requires them to undertake long journeys through unfamiliar parts of the country and, in some cases, known kidnapping corridors.

They also form part of a wider pattern recorded over the past year.

Maduka College Advert

According to findings by Sunday Vanguard, not less than 40 corps members and prospective corps members have been reported abducted in separate incidents, including the January abduction of prospective corps member, Binuyo Lateefah, in Kogi State while travelling to Taraba; the April abduction of prospective corps member, Gift David Samiya, on the Akwanga-Jos road while travelling to Maiduguri; the April abduction of LASU graduate, Ogunlana Adetola Sodiq, while travelling to an orientation camp in Osun State, and the May abduction of serving corps member, Eunice Ameh, in Abuja.

Lateefah was reportedly held for 10 days after her abduction on January 22, while her abductors demanded N30 million. Ameh, an Abuja-based lawyer and corps member, was abducted in Maitama on May 6 and released four days later after money was reportedly paid, although the amount was not disclosed.

In the Kogi case, one of the rescued corps members, David Ayodele, later recounted that the abductors beat and kicked their captives and threatened to keep them in the forest for a month and kill them.

The Imo victims also spent a week in captivity before their rescue. Police said security operatives had earlier located the kidnappers’ camp through drone surveillance but delayed moving in after intelligence indicated that the area had been mined with improvised explosive devices.

The Imo State Commissioner of Police, Audu Bosso, has since said he was not aware that ransom was paid for the release of the corps members, saying the kidnappers eventually succumbed to pressure from security forces operating in the forest.

Predictability of deployment 

For security governance expert, Prof. Al Chukwuma Okoli, the vulnerability of corps members is linked to the predictability of their deployment and movement.

He said: “The vulnerability arises from predictable posting to high-risk rural areas that are grossly under-policed. Corps members travel on hazardous highways bereft of real-time security.

“Posting corps members to volatile areas without contingency plans to secure their movements through convoy tracking and risk-map deployment poses a challenge.”

He argued that the Federal Government, NYSC and security agencies should jointly develop a system for protecting corps members from the point of departure to their destination.

 “Government and NYSC authority need to work closely with security agencies to jointly fund safe transit protocols, secure corps members’ lodges, and ensure that there is a rapid-response mechanism to rescue victims when an attack occurs.”

Okoli also linked the difficulty in rescuing victims and bringing kidnappers to justice to the absence of effective state security presence in some of the areas where the attacks occur.

“Such kidnappings occur in areas with limited coercive state presence and inadequate security, making rapid rescue response challenging”, he said adding that prosecution had also suffered from “weak inter-agency collaboration in case treatment.”

Weakness of intelligence systems

For Alfred Ononugbo, a forensic investigator and criminal intelligence specialist, the wider problem is rooted in the weakness of Nigeria’s intelligence and policing systems.

According to him, “the crime of kidnapping has lingered due to the absence of credible intelligence, national crime database and ineffective policing.”

Ononugbo said the absence of reliable crime data makes it difficult for security agencies to understand patterns of kidnapping across states and communities and deploy appropriate responses.

“No reliable data to provide peculiar crime behaviours with states and communities within the country in order to develop necessary security responses to such crime patterns”, he said noting that criminals tend to identify victims who are vulnerable and capable of generating quick ransom payments.

“The intending corp members may have been victims of opportunistic attack or informants considering that they may have given away their identities as a uniformed group on transit. The criminals often target the most vulnerable and beneficial victims to generate quick revenues and escape from the consequences of their crimes.”

He said stops made during long journeys could also provide opportunities for criminals to gather information about the passengers.

“They may have attracted attention at locations where they stop during the trip and this made it possible for the information to be passed to the kidnappers.”

He recommended a more deliberate security arrangement for corps members travelling in groups. “Considering the challenge of attacks by criminals, an armed security escorts for the young graduates should have been appropriate for such movement.

Fundamentally evidence-driven

Ononugbo also criticised the country’s capacity to investigate and prosecute kidnapping cases, saying criminal prosecution is fundamentally evidence-driven. “With science and technology, forensic evidences provides accurate evidence harvesting, handling and presentations in courts to help prosecutors and the courts.”

But he said the police face serious difficulties in conducting actionable investigations, citing inadequate training, weak exposure to modern intelligence techniques and deficiencies in evidence gathering. “Modern technology and digital solutions must be inculcated in the training of our policemen and women.”

He further identified alleged collusion and compromise as another obstacle to fighting kidnapping. “Collusion and compromise is another setback to minimising kidnapping crimes as some of the financial evidence are often tempered with by unprofessional and poorly disciplined personnel”, he alleged.

Ononugbo called for improved training, better remuneration and greater use of technology, while urging government to involve traditional institutions and town development associations in community policing.

“We must improve on training, capacity building and the use of modern technology in combating kidnapping and other forms of crimes”, he added.

National concern 

For Okechukwu Nwanguma, Executive Director of the Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre, RULAAC, the recurring abduction of corps members should concern the country because national service is compulsory.

He pointed out that the obligation placed on young graduates by the NYSC scheme creates a corresponding responsibility for the government to protect them.

 “The recurring kidnapping of National Youth Service Corps members should concern every Nigerian because these are young citizens undertaking a compulsory national assignment. If the State requires young graduates to travel across the country in the service of national integration, then there is a corresponding duty to take reasonable measures to protect them from foreseeable harm”, Nwanguma stated.

Deployment pattern

He explained that corps members face the wider security problems affecting Nigerian highways, but their deployment pattern creates additional exposure, stressing that the recent Imo incident demonstrated the problem.

 “They frequently travel long distances to unfamiliar parts of the country, sometimes using ordinary commercial transport and passing through roads with known histories of kidnapping and armed attacks.

“The problem therefore goes beyond advising corps members to ‘be security conscious.’ Government needs a systematic risk assessment of routes used by prospective and serving corps members.”

He called on NYSC to work with the police, DSS and other security agencies to identify kidnapping hotspots and establish safer travel arrangements during mobilisation and demobilisation.

“Where a route presents a demonstrably high security risk, government should consider coordinated transportation from designated departure points, security-supported movement during peak mobilisation periods, or alternative deployment arrangements.”

According to him, graduates should not be forced into a choice between obeying their NYSC call-up instructions and exposing themselves to known security threats.

“Young Nigerians should not be compelled to choose between obeying an NYSC call-up instruction and exposing themselves to a foreseeable risk of kidnapping.”

Nwanguma also called for a joint security protocol involving the Federal Government, NYSC, state governments and security agencies. Such a protocol, he said, should cover prevention, emergency response, communication with families, rescue operations and post-rescue care.

“NYSC should maintain a constantly updated security map of deployment and travel routes and communicate specific warnings to corps members before they travel.

“Reporting dates should also take account of travel distances so that prospective corps members are not pressured into unsafe travel schedules.”

The RULAAC director said security agencies needed stronger intelligence coverage and patrols along identified kidnapping corridors, while state governments should improve roads and support intelligence gathering in vulnerable communities.

The Imo incident, he said, illustrated why prevention and intelligence gathering should receive as much attention as rescue operations.  “That underscores why prevention and intelligence must receive as much attention as rescue operations after people have already been abducted.”

Nwanguma also warned that the consequences of kidnapping do not end when victims regain their freedom. “There should also be proper psychosocial and medical support for rescued victims. Kidnapping can leave serious psychological consequences even after physical freedom has been regained.”

 

 

On prosecution, he described accountability as one of the weakest parts of Nigeria’s response to kidnapping.

“Public attention understandably concentrates on securing the victims’ release, but there is often much less information afterwards about identifying, arresting and successfully prosecuting the perpetrators”, he said.

According to him, the difficulty of operating in forests and remote communities, movement across state boundaries, the use of disposable telephones and the need to prioritise hostages’ lives can complicate investigations.

But he also pointed to institutional weaknesses.

“Weak intelligence coordination, poor preservation of evidence, difficulties securing witnesses, inadequate forensic capacity and delays in investigation and prosecution can undermine accountability”, he said.

According to him, there is an important difference between rescuing a hostage and dismantling a kidnapping network.

Hos words: “Recovering a kidnapped person is an immediate humanitarian success, but dismantling the criminal network requires identifying the kidnappers, their informants, financiers, ransom collectors, arms suppliers and other collaborators, and then assembling evidence capable of sustaining prosecution.”

He urged the government to publish anonymised data showing kidnapping cases investigated, suspects arrested, prosecutions and convictions. “This would allow Nigerians to assess whether criminal networks are actually being dismantled rather than simply displaced.”

For the experts, the answer lies in moving security planning beyond the orientation camps to the roads corps members must use to reach them and return home.As Nwanguma put it, the central issue is the responsibility of the state to protect those it requires to serve.

 

 

“The objective should not merely be to rescue corps members after they have been abducted. It should be to make their abduction far less likely in the first place and to ensure that those who attack them face credible investigation, prosecution and punishment”, he stated. (Vanguard)

Continue Reading

News

2027: Enugu Accuses Opposition of Plotting to Import Armed Thugs, Bandits

Published

on

Spread the love

…Denies government involvement in NDC airport, secretariat incidents

_Says Mbah’s performance more than enough to win free, fair election

The Enugu State Government said it has uncovered alleged plans by some opposition elements to import armed thugs and bandits into the state to create panic and a false sense of insecurity ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Prof. Chidiebere Onyia, made these known on Sunday while addressing a press conference at the Government House, Enugu, on the incidents involving the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) at the Akanu Ibiam International Airport and the party’s state secretariat in Enugu on Saturday.

Enugu SSG, Prof Chidiebere Onyia briefing journalists in Enugu on Sunday

Onyia denied any involvement of the government or the Governor’s Chief Security Officer, Ifeanyi Osondu, in both incidents, describing the airport confrontation as a matter between the NDC and federal authorities, while noting that the shooting incident at the party’s secretariat was under police investigation.

According to the SSG, the government’s preliminary findings indicated that the airport incident followed the NDC’s attempt to hold what it described as a “Grand Statewide Campaign Flag-off 2026” at the facility without securing the necessary approval from the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN).

Maduka College Advert

He said the party had published notices inviting its members and supporters to the event, including on the Facebook page of its governorship candidate in the state.

Onyia explained that the police had advised the party to obtain FAAN’s approval before security personnel could be deployed to the airport for the event.

“Further findings, however, revealed that the NDC did not secure the approval of FAAN to host a grand statewide rally at its facility. Security agencies, therefore, advised the organisers of the rally to rethink it,” he said.

The SSG alleged that the party proceeded to mobilise its members to the airport and attempted to gain entry into the facility, resulting in a confrontation with airport authorities.

He said security agencies intervened to disperse the “riotous” party members and restore order around the airport, which he described as a strategic national asset.

Onyia added that the state government’s account was consistent with the statement issued by the Enugu State Police Command on Sunday.

NDC Secretariat Shooting

On the shooting incident at the NDC state secretariat in the GRA area of Enugu, the SSG said security reports had established that a violent clash occurred at the party’s office and that the police were investigating the matter.

The SSG disputed reports alleging fatalities, stating that the government’s findings indicated that no death had occurred in the incident.

He disclosed that a 43-year-old man, identified as Ifeanyi Nworie, sustained a gunshot wound and was taken to the Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Park Lane, where he was stabilised before being transferred to the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu, for further examination.

“We can, therefore, authoritatively report that there were no deaths as falsely claimed by some reports and NDC leaders,” he said.

Onyia also faulted allegations that the Governor’s Chief Security Officer was present at the party secretariat and supervised the shooting, maintaining that the official was with Governor Peter Mbah at the Teachers Grassroots Movement mega rally at Okpara Square, Enugu, at the time of the incident.

The SSG further criticised the reported holding of a minute’s silence for an individual he said was still alive, describing it as an attempt to mislead the public for political advantage.

Reaffirming the state government’s position, Onyia said Governor Mbah had sworn to protect the lives and property of all residents, irrespective of their religious beliefs or political affiliations, and condemned.

He said the administration’s ambition to grow Enugu into a $30 billion economy and make it a preferred destination for investment, business, tourism and living depended significantly on sustained peace and security.

According to him, this informed the government’s substantial investments in security infrastructure and operations over the past three years.

“Consequently, the Enugu State Government strongly condemns in its entirety any form of violence, including politically induced violence in the state. We welcome healthy debate and freedom of association and peaceful assembly,” he said.

He, however, urged political parties and their candidates to exercise restraint and embrace issue-based campaigns ahead of the 2027 elections.

The SSG said democratic rights should be exercised responsibly, arguing that political parties ought to serve as models of decorum and integrity.

He questioned the decision to announce a statewide campaign flag-off at the airport and without the approval of the relevant authorities.

“Without holding brief for FAAN, is it not sheer rascality to attempt to hold a “Grand Statewide Campaign Flag-off 2026” of the NDC at the airport as publicised by the party and its gubernatorial candidate, especially without the approval by the appropriate authorities?

“Is it not equally gross mischief and a sign of political desperation to hold a minute silence for a living person, just to mislead the public for political traction?” he queried.

Onyia accused opposition elements in the state of attempting to create the impression that Enugu was unsafe and that the government was intolerant of opposing political parties.

He alleged that some opposition groups had been attributing internal disagreements and violent clashes to the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the state.

As an example, he cited the September 12, 2026 incident at Obuofia in Nkanu West Local Government Area, claiming that investigations had identified the alleged perpetrators, who were being prosecuted by the police.

The SSG described the opposition as factionalised and alleged that some of its members were seeking to draw the state government into controversies for political relevance.

Onyia also reiterated the government’s allegation that some opposition elements were plotting to bring armed thugs and bandits into Enugu to create panic and undermine public confidence in the state’s security ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“We, however, make bold to say that the peace and security we have achieved in Enugu State in the last three years, and at huge material costs and sacrifices by our security agents, are non-negotiable and irreversible,” he said.

The SSG said the Mbah administration remained committed to protecting citizens’ democratic rights, including the freedom to campaign for and vote for candidates of their choice in the forthcoming elections.

He described the right of residents to elect their leaders through free, fair and credible polls as fundamental to the state’s democratic development.

Onyia added that the government was confident of securing a second term for Mbah based on what it described as the governor’s performance and delivery on campaign promises.

“Indeed, these inalienable rights of Ndi Enugu to elect their leaders in free, fair and credible polls are our surest hope for re-election come 2027,” he said.

He added that the administration had no reason to resort to desperate measures, maintaining that its record in office would be the basis for seeking a renewed mandate from the electorate.

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert