Connect with us

News

Kogi guber dispute: Supreme Court rejects Ajaka’s request for full panel to hear his appeal

Published

on

Kogi: Nullify Ododo’s election, declare me winner, Ajaka tells tribunal 
Ajaka and Ododo
Spread the love

The Supreme Court has rejected an application by Yakubu Muritala Ajaka, the Social Democratic Party (SDP) candidate in the last governorship election in Kogi State, asking the court to await the outcome of his request for a full panel to hear an issue raised in his appeal.

Ajaka and his party have filed an appeal marked SC/CV/654/2024, urging the Supreme Court to set aside the concurrent decisions of the Court of Appeal and the election tribunal, which upheld the victory of Ahmed Usman Ododo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the election held on November 11, 2023.

At the mention of the appeal on Monday, Pius Akubo, the lawyer for Ajaka and the SDP, informed the court that his client had written to the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) requesting the constitution of a full panel of the court to hear issues raised in Paragraphs 4.28 and 4.29 on page 16 of the appellant’s brief of argument.

Akubo argued that the appellants, in those paragraphs, were requesting the court to depart from its previous decisions in determining their appeal.

Lawyers for the respondents—Kanu Agabi (SAN) for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Joseph Daudu (SAN) for Ododo, and Emmanuel Ukala (SAN) for the APC—described the application as unnecessary and urged the court, as currently constituted, to proceed with hearing the appeal.

In his ruling, Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba, who presided over the five-member panel, noted that the issue for which the appellants sought a full panel was a fraction of the entire appeal. Justice Garba further noted that the issue was one of three raised in the appeal. He held that the court, as presently constituted, could hear and determine the appeal and instructed Akubo to proceed with the hearing.

Maduka College Advert

Akubo identified his briefs, adopted them and urged the court to allow the appeal, set aside the decision of the Court of Appeal and declare Ajaka as the duly elected governor of Kogi State.

On their part, Agabi, Daudu and Ukala adopted their briefs and prayed the court to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Justice Garba subsequently adjourned judgment till a date to be communicated to parties.

News

My name has been cleared, says Alison-Madueke after London Jury acquits her of corruption charges

Published

on

Diezani Allison-Madueke
Spread the love

Former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, has declared her complete vindication after being acquitted of all charges brought against her by a jury at Southwark Crown Court in London.

In a statement issued on Wednesday through her representative, Bolouere Opukiri, Alison-Madueke said the verdict marked the end of an eleven-year legal battle that had subjected her and her family to intense public scrutiny.

“Today, at Southwark Crown Court, I was acquitted of all charges brought against me,” she said.

Reflecting on the lengthy legal process, the former minister described the period as one of immense hardship and personal suffering.

“For eleven arduous years, this matter has weighed heavily upon me and my family. Today, a decade of unrelenting and unjust vilification, condemnation, and scrutiny has finally concluded,” she stated.

Alison-Madueke expressed gratitude to God, her legal team, family and friends for their support throughout the trial.

Maduka College Advert

“I give thanks to Almighty God for His faithfulness and for the complete vindication I have received. I am grateful to my legal counsel for their diligence, and to my family and friends for their steadfast support and encouragement throughout this period,” she said.

The former minister said the verdict had brought a sense of relief and closure after years of legal uncertainty.

“I am profoundly relieved. My name has been cleared, and this ordeal has come to an end,” she added.

Despite the acquittal, Alison-Madueke indicated that she intends to speak further about the events of the past decade and outline her future plans.

“This, however, is not the final chapter. In due course, I shall address this difficult period in greater detail and share my intentions for the future. For now, I intend to embrace the freedom that has been unjustly denied me for many years,” she said.

The statement followed her acquittal at Southwark Crown Court, bringing to a close a legal case that had attracted significant public attention over the past eleven years.

Continue Reading

News

London court acquits Alison-Madueke of all corruption charges

Published

on

Ex Petroleum minister, Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke
Spread the love

Diezani Alison-Madueke, the former Minister of Petroleum Resources, was on Wednesday acquitted by a London jury of six bribery charges, after ‌a rare corruption trial of a high-profile former energy official.

Alison-Madueke was minister between 2010 and 2015 under then-president Goodluck Jonathan.

She stood trial ​charged with five counts of accepting bribes and a ​charge of conspiracy to commit bribery, which she denied.

Prosecutors ⁠alleged Alison-Madueke, 65, was given “a life of luxury” in London ​from oil and gas industry figures seeking lucrative contracts in Nigeria, ​which has long grappled with mismanagement and corruption.

But the former minister, who was also briefly president of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, ​said she never took any bribes and had no real ​influence over awarding of lucrative government contracts.

After a trial at London’s Southwark ‌Crown ⁠Court, Alison-Madueke was acquitted by a jury of all six charges she faced after more than 46 hours of deliberation.

Maduka College Advert

The not guilty verdicts are a major blow to British authorities, which began their ​investigation into corruption ​allegations against Alison-Madueke ⁠more than a decade ago.

Alison-Madueke stood trial alongside oil industry executive Olatimbo Ayinde, 54, who was ​charged with one count of bribery relating to ​Alison-Madueke ⁠and a separate count of bribery of a foreign public official.

Alison-Madueke’s brother Doye Agama, 69, was charged with conspiracy to commit bribery ⁠with ​his sister relating to payments made to ​Agama’s church.

Both Ayinde and Agama denied the charges against them and were also ​acquitted by the jury. (Reuters)

Continue Reading

News

Court martial: 12 soldiers face trial over alleged murder, other criminal offences

Published

on

Spread the love

The Commander, 4 Special Forces Command, Nigerian Army, Doma, Maj.-Gen. Olurotimi Awolo, has inaugurated a General Court Martial (GCM) to try 12 soldiers accused of various offences, including alleged murder, assault and aiding criminality.

Speaking during the inauguration on Tuesday in Doma, the Commander, represented by the President of the General Court Martial, Col. Salihu Ibrahim, said the convening order was issued pursuant to powers conferred on him by Section 131(2)(d) of the Armed Forces Act, Cap A20, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

He said the court was constituted to hear the cases of all accused personnel and determine each matter strictly on its merit.

“The court will be guided throughout the trial by the principles of natural justice as enshrined in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

“We are also mindful of the cardinal principle of criminal justice that every accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

“Where the prosecution fails to establish any allegation beyond reasonable doubt, the court will discharge and acquit the accused person.

Maduka College Advert

“Conversely, where an accused person is found guilty, the law will take its course in accordance with the provisions governing such offences,” he said.

He assured all parties of the court’s commitment to fairness, justice and professionalism, urging prosecution and defence counsels to avoid unnecessary delays and frivolous adjournments.

The court president maintained that speedy disposal of the cases would serve the interest of justice and ensure confidence in the military justice system.

However, trial could not commence immediately after the inauguration as six of the accused persons present in court were declared medically unfit to stand trial.

The court’s Medical Orderly, Sgt. Audu Ahmadu, informed the panel that five of the six accused persons had elevated blood pressure levels.

Following the development, the prosecutor, Capt. Shamsondeen Sadiq, urged the medical orderly to ensure that the affected personnel received adequate medical attention to enable the trial to commence.

The President of the court subsequently adjourned proceedings to a later date, which would be communicated to all parties.

Speaking with newsmen after the inaugural sitting, Barr. George Illah, counsel to one of the accused persons, commended the Command for constituting the court martial.

He expressed confidence in the competence of the panel, noting that the president of the court, other members and the Judge Advocate were qualified to discharge their responsibilities.

“As a defence counsel, I will do my best to ensure that the soldiers standing trial before this honourable court martial get the justice they deserve.

“It is important for people to understand that military personnel standing trial before a court martial are entitled to all constitutional and legal rights guaranteed under the law, and we will ensure that those rights are protected,” he said.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that members of the General Court Martial include Col. A.A. Buhari, Lt.-Col. Victor Yamu, Lt.-Col. A.K. Karma and Lt.-Col. S. Abdullahi.

Others are Maj. J.M. Usendeng, Maj. A.D. Ahmed, Maj. U. Ahmed, Maj. S.L. Sagu, while Capt. U. Nna serves as Judge Advocate. (NAN)

Continue Reading

Trending

Maduka College Advert