
News
Nnamdi Kanu writes British House of Lords over continued detention
In his renewed bid to regain freedom, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has, through his Special Counsel, Aloy Ejimakor, filed a petition to the United Kingdom’s International Relations and Defence Committee of the House of Lords.
The six-page petition to the House of Lords dated January 18, 2024, not only reminded the House that Kanu is a British national and was “renditioned, tortured and imprisoned by the Federal Government of Nigeria, since June 19, 2021.”
Part of the petition read: “Mr. Kanu, a British national, is a political activist, advocating self-determination for the people of Biafra (Eastern Nigeria), with the singular aim of creation of the sovereign State of Biafra from Nigeria through a referendum.
“He is the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, which he founded in 2012, for actualisation of the creation of the State of Biafra.
“IPOB is registered as a legal entity in the United Kingdom and it has numerous offices and chapters around the world. It operates in the open as a non-violent group, including in Nigeria, before the Government of Nigeria, GON, unfairly proscribed/declared it a terrorist group in 2017.

“However, in October 2023, a High Court in Nigeria declared as unconstitutional, the executive actions of the GON in the proscription of IPOB and its declaration as a terrorist group.
“The court awarded significant damages against the GON and ordered it to apologize to Mr. Kanu.
“Over time and after 18 months in detention without trial, Mr. Kanu was released on bail, due mainly to domestic and international pressure.
“Following this, Mr. Kanu returned to his ancestral home in Umuahia, Abia State, South-East Nigeria, where he stayed and awaited his next court date scheduled for October 20, 2017.
“From September 10 to 14, 2017, Nigerian security forces led by the Army, levied lethal attacks at Mr. Kanu’s home. The security forces used live bullets and other lethal munitions and several people including Mr. Kanu, his parents (now late), his siblings, children, women, the elderly, and numerous visitors were at the said home with Mr. Kanu during the attacks.
“At the end of the attack, Mr. Kanu’s home was badly damaged, dozens of people were killed, many were wounded and maimed, and the security forces captured several people alive and took them to unknown locations to this day.
“In January 2022, a High Court in Nigeria declared the military attack at Mr. Kanu’s residence as unconstitutional and a breach of his fundamental rights and awarded him substantial monetary damages.
“In March 2018, the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights, ACHPR, issued an interim decision, holding that the military attacks on Mr. Kanu and the contemporaneous proscription of IPOB, violated the African Charter; and accordingly, the ACHPR wrote the former President of Nigeria to remedy the situation but the GON never implemented the Provisional Measures to this day.
“In October 2020, the United Nations Special Rapporteurs transmitted a Communication/Decision, No: AL NGA 5/2020, to the GON, conveying its disapproval of the executive or administrative action of the GON on the proscription of IPOB.
“In particular, the said Communication/Decision expressly stated that the action of the GON in this regard was motivated by ethnic bias and discrimination against the Igbo.”
The petition graphically narrated how Kanu was forced to flee Nigeria and go into voluntary exile, to save his life, his entry into Kenya on May 12, 2021, as a British citizen, and how several armed security agents working for GON, violently accosted and abducted, handcuffed, blindfolded and bundled him in a vehicle and sped away, to a nondescript private house, somewhere in Nairobi, Kenya and chained him to the floor.
After taking a hard look at the recent judgment of the Supreme Court, Kanu’s Special Counsel expressed happiness that the Justices “strongly condemned both the said military attacks against Mr. Kanu and his extraordinary rendition,” stressing that “Mr. Kanu remains in limbo without any clear prospects of ever being brought to trial since this saga begins almost nine years ago.”
He then pleaded: “Given the foregoing, we hereby most respectfully urge the House of Lords to urgently intervene with His Majesty’s Government, to promptly make demands on the GON to unconditionally release Mr. Kanu from detention and repatriate him to the United Kingdom, and to levy sanctions against the GON, if it fails to comply within a reasonable time.
“It is pertinent to stress the point that extraordinary rendition inherently destroys every prospect for a fair trial in the jurisdiction that levied the rendition.”
I’m not averse to genuine restructuring of Nigeria — Kanu
In a related development, Kanu has said he is not opposed to any genuine restructuring of Nigeria along the 1963 Constitution.
The IPOB Leader insisted that unless those opposed to holistic restructuring of Nigeria repented, his demand for a referendum to determine whether the people of Biafra would like to exit or continue as part of Nigeria remained sacrosanct.
Kanu’s position was conveyed to Vanguard by his younger brother, Prince Emmanuel after meeting with him at his solitary confinement at the Abuja headquarters of the Department of State Services, DSS.
He quoted Kanu as saying: “We are not averse to the genuine restructuring of the country. We know that the country cannot grow or make progress under the current unworking unitary structure. The facts are clear for all to see.
“Our position remains the same as our submission in the presence of Prof. Ben Nwabueze, and Evangelist Elliot Ugochukwu-Uko on 30th August 2017 at the meeting with the South East Governors in Enugu. We have no reason to add or subtract from our position six years ago.
“We reiterate that we are not opposed to a consensual but wholesome restructuring of the country along the 1963 constitution.”
Kanu blamed those who disrupted an earlier attempt by the Federal Government in 2017 to reach a truce with him, for the current insecurity in the South East.
Kanu’s family cries foul over S’Court’s non-release of CTC
Meantime, the family of the detained Kanu has cried foul over the delay by the Supreme Court to release the Certified True Copy, CTC, of its judgment in the suit involving the IPOB Leader.
Kanunta Kanu who spoke for the family said the action of the apex court “is impeding further legal moves” by the family to seek justice for their son.
He regretted that over one month after the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the matter, the Justices of the apex court who abdicated in the matter were yet to append their signatures on the judgment.
Recall that the Supreme Court had on December 15, 2023, refused to affirm the ruling of the Appeal Court which had ordered the immediate release of Kanu.
The Supreme Court ruled that instead, Kanu should be tried at the appropriate court.
Kanunta expressed surprise that the Justices of the apex court allowed the normal two weeks to elapse without signing the judgment.
Suspecting foul play over the unnecessary delays, Kanunta said the action amounted to a gross violation of the principles of the rule of law.
He said: “Unlawfully withholding the CTC in the case of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has confirmed that Nigeria will not obey her treaty obligations.
“These justices, the presidency, and the Nigerian entity are officially terrorists according to the laws of Nigeria.”
Citing Section 2 (3)(f) of the Terrorism (Prevention & Prohibition) Act, 2022, Kanu said, “In this Act “act of terrorism” means an act wilfully performed to further an ideology, whether political, religious, racial, or ethnic and which violates the provisions of any international treaty or resolution to which Nigeria is a party, subject to the provisions of section 12 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999; and Cap C23, LFN 2004
Vanguard
News
Gunmen abduct 15 NYSC Corps members in Kogi
• Victims were returning to Abuja after orientation in Bayelsa Camp
Fifteen National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members have been abducted by Armed Bandits in Kogi State while returning from their orientation camp in Bayelsa State.
The corps members were said to have been travelling from the NYSC Permanent Orientation Camp in Kolokuma/Opokuma Local Government Area of Bayelsa State towards Abuja when they were intercepted along the Ofu/Itobe–Onicha-Igo axis in Ofu Local Government Area of Kogi State on Wednesday August 26, 2026.
A relative of one of the victims, who spoke on the incident on Thursday, confirmed that the corps members were taken while on their journey to the Federal Capital Territory.
The victims were said to be traveling in some vehicles including a Peace Mass Transit bus and a yellow Toyota bus marked 564.
A police officer from the Kogi State Police Command who obtained next-of-kin contacts from the passengers’ manifest contacted the victims’ families.

As of the time of reporting, details regarding the identities of the victims, possible ransom demands and ongoing rescue efforts remain unclear.
The reported incident has, however, renewed concerns over the safety of NYSC members traveling across different states of the country, particularly young Nigerians returning to their states after completing orientation camp activities.
NYSC’s Director of Information and Public Relations, Caroline Embu, was contacted but couldn’t confirm the incident, while attempts to reach the Bayelsa coordinator were also unsuccessful.
Also, the Kogi state police command has yet to speak on the development though The Advocate learnt that it has launched an operation in conjunction with vigilante groups in the area to rescue the victims.
News
Benin–Asaba Road: Umahi unhappy with concession deal, says ‘We played into Concessionaire’s hands’
The Minister of Works, David Umahi, has asked the concessionaire handling the Benin-Asaba road to immediately write to the Federal Government through the Ministry of Works to enable it to terminate their contract on account of what he observed as poor handling of the road.
The minister also ordered the concessionaire to urgently remove all the blockages on the Benin-Asaba road to allow free flow of traffic.
Umahi made the appeal and issued the directive on Wednesday in Benin at a stakeholders’ engagement in Government House, Benin.
He said, “We are therefore pleading with you to give us written approval to proceed in this manner, we believe this is the way forward.
“Therefore, our directive going forward is that you should be removed from the site of this project, within the limits of our rights. You have added no value to the project,” he said.

He stressed that the Federal Ministry of Works should write to the independent engineer to request measurements of all the works that have been carried out, excluding what we describe as negative work.
“When you remove asphalt contrary to the contract and contrary to the specifications, that is negative work.
“It will not be recognised as part of the value of work done. In fact, the cost of rectifying the damage must also be established.
“Now, we want to plead with you, as the clients acting in the interest of the public, we do not believe that you currently have the capacity to reinstate the road.
“We have not stopped you from working, but if you continue doing what you are currently doing, we are not convinced that you will be able to avert the potential for public disorder in that area,” he added.
The minister, while suggesting ways to remedy the current hardship caused by the concessionaire, directed that the affected sections should then be reconstructed under the supervision of the independent engineer.
He also directed that the concessionaire to provide a technical design for proper stormwater canalisation, adding that this is very important.
He further warned that it should restore all the asphalt, redirect any water that has been channelled onto the carriageway, and restore free flow of traffic along the carriageway.
The minister said BAECC lacked the technical capacity and competent manpower required to execute and complete the project within the stipulated timeframe and contractual specifications.
“I want the public to know that by the concession agreement, we played into the hands of the concessionaire,” Umahi said.
The minister directed that the concessionaire be removed from the project site within the limits of the government’s rights under the agreement.
“Therefore, our directive going forward is that you should be removed from the site of this project, within the limits of our rights. You have added no value to the project,” he said.
Umahi said the ministry would write to the Independent Engineer to obtain measurements of all work executed, excluding what he described as “negative work”.
He clarified that the ministry had not stopped BAECC from working, but said allowing the concessionaire to continue under the current circumstances could worsen the situation and create the potential for public disorder.
The minister said BAECC could alternatively allow the government to engage a competent contractor to complete the project, after which the concessionaire could be given the right of first refusal to re-toll the road and recoup its investment.
Also speaking, the Director of Highway Planning, Ministry of Works and Technical Lead, Project Delivery Team for the HDMI Project, Mr Ebere Izunobi, attributed some of the project’s challenges to BAECC’s failure to comply with instructions from supervising officials.
Izunobi also alleged that the concessionaire used unqualified staff and engineers and unsuitable materials in executing the project, contributing to the poor quality of work.
Sen. Allwell Onyesoh, a member of the Senate Committee on Works, said those responsible for introducing the concession arrangement to the country had not served Nigeria well.
“The concessionaires and whoever pushed for this concessionaire did not mean well for Nigeria, and this is a big lesson about concessionaires in Nigeria,” he said.
According to him, not every concessionaire possesses the capacity required to execute projects of such magnitude.
Earlier, the BAECC Chief Executive Officer, Mr Samuel Daramola, appealed to the ministry to allow the company to continue with the project.
Daramola said the company had secured funds and upgraded its equipment and technical personnel, assuring that it could complete the project as scheduled.
“We don’t want to put money in the drain. We have upgraded our technical staff and we want the ministry to allow us to continue the project,” he said.
The Head of Legal and Compliance, BAECC, Mr Peterson Fabian, urged stakeholders to allow more time for further consultations on possible solutions.
“Every stakeholder here, do allow us to have more time to engage. I believe that we will have more pathways forward to further collaborate,” Fabian said.
Gov. Monday Okpebholo described the state of the Benin-Asaba road as a waste of resources, given the period already spent on the project.
“What we are seeing now is not what I should be seeing at this point after 16 months. Nothing has been done. To me, it is a total waste of resources,” Okpebholo said.
He urged the Minister of Works to take necessary action and find lasting solutions to the condition of the highway to ease the hardship experienced by motorists and other road users.
News
VeryDarkMan invited by Police over allegation linking officers to kidnap incidents

The Nigeria Police Force has invited social media activist, Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan, to provide evidence backing his allegation that some police officers at checkpoints collude with kidnappers and bandits.
The Force, in a statement on Thursday by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, said it had taken note of comments made by Otse at the recent Nigerian Bar Association conference in Port Harcourt.
VeryDarkMan had alleged that police officers manning checkpoints along major highways identify wealthy travellers and relay information about their identities and movements to kidnappers, thereby facilitating their abduction for ransom.
Reacting, the police described the allegation as serious, unsubstantiated and unfairly damaging to the institution.
The statement said, “The Nigeria Police Force firmly rejects these allegations as unsubstantiated and unfairly damaging to an institution entrusted with the protection of millions of Nigerians. Allegations of this gravity demand a corresponding standard of evidence, and that standard has not yet been met.

“Accordingly, the Nigeria Police Force hereby invites Mr Martins Vincent Otse to produce, without delay, the evidence upon which he based these serious allegations, including any evidence that police personnel at checkpoints identify wealthy individuals and subsequently transmit information about them to kidnappers for the purpose of facilitating their abduction.”
The force said any evidence presented by the activist would be treated with urgency and thoroughly investigated.
It urged members of the public with credible evidence of police misconduct to approach the appropriate authorities rather than relying solely on public allegations.
The police maintained that officers deployed to checkpoints nationwide were assigned to prevent crime, detect criminal activities and protect citizens, rather than facilitate kidnapping.
According to the statement, police personnel routinely confront criminal elements and have suffered attacks and casualties in the course of their duties.
The police said, “Indeed, these same police officers routinely confront the very criminal elements alleged to be receiving such information. Police personnel have been ambushed, attacked and killed, while police stations, formations and operational assets have equally been targeted by terrorists, kidnappers and other violent criminals.”
The force also said that where individual officers were found to have compromised their duties, they would face internal disciplinary measures and prosecution in accordance with the law.
It, however, cautioned against blanket accusations that could demoralise its personnel and undermine public trust in the institution.
“The sacrifices of our personnel and the integrity of the institution will not be casually diminished by unverified allegations. Anyone with credible evidence of misconduct should bring it forward through the appropriate channels for investigation in accordance with the law.
“The force calls on members of the public to exercise responsibility in making and sharing allegations concerning national security institutions and to distinguish between legitimate criticism, which strengthens accountability, and unsubstantiated claims, which can endanger public trust and national security,” the police said.
-
Entertainment3 days agoDolly Parton, Queen of Country Music, dies at 80
-
News2 days agoTension mounts as bandits kill brother of Tinubu’s minister
-
News19 hours agoBREAKING: NLC General Secretary, Ugboaja, is dead
-
News3 days agoNFIU uncovers how terrorist financiers use women’s bank accounts, crowdfunding in operations
-
News3 days agoMotorists trapped in Benin-Agbor-Asaba gridlock for days, Umahi inspects road
-
News1 day agoEnugu Govt Refutes Report of Sale of Assets at ESBS, Water Corporation, Stadium, Lagos Liaison Office
-
News2 days agoGOCOP mourns former President Dotun Oladipo
-
News3 days agoPolice detain officers accused of N40,000 extortion in Abuja






